Finance
Major Move: TPG RE Finance Secures Massive $1.1B Real Estate Financing Deal
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX) has announced the pricing of TRTX 2025-FL6, a $1.1 billion managed Commercial Real Estate Collateralized Loan Obligation (CRE CLO). The company expects to place approximately $962.5 million of investment grade securities with institutional investors, providing non-mark-to-market, non-recourse term financing.
Key features of TRTX 2025-FL6 include:
- 30-month reinvestment period
- 87.5% advance rate
- Weighted average interest rate at issuance: Term SOFR plus 1.83%
TRTX will redeem TRTX 2019-FL3 on March 17, 2025, which currently has $114.6 million outstanding. The new issuance and redemption are expected to generate net cash proceeds of approximately $211.1 million for investment and corporate purposes. The transaction is expected to close around March 28, 2025.
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX) ha annunciato la determinazione del prezzo di TRTX 2025-FL6, un prestito obbligazionario collateralizzato (CRE CLO) gestito da 1,1 miliardi di dollari. L’azienda prevede di collocare circa 962,5 milioni di dollari di titoli di investimento di grado presso investitori istituzionali, fornendo finanziamenti a termine non garantiti e non soggetti a valutazione di mercato.
Le caratteristiche principali di TRTX 2025-FL6 includono:
- Periodo di reinvestimento di 30 mesi
- Aliquota di anticipo del 87,5%
- Aliquota d’interesse media ponderata al momento dell’emissione: Term SOFR più 1,83%
TRTX rimborserà TRTX 2019-FL3 il 17 marzo 2025, che attualmente ha 114,6 milioni di dollari in circolazione. La nuova emissione e il rimborso dovrebbero generare proventi netti in contante di circa 211,1 milioni di dollari per scopi di investimento e aziendali. Si prevede che la transazione si chiuda intorno al 28 marzo 2025.
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX) ha anunciado el precio de TRTX 2025-FL6, un obligación de préstamo garantizado comercial (CRE CLO) gestionado de 1.1 mil millones de dólares. La empresa espera colocar aproximadamente 962.5 millones de dólares en valores de grado de inversión con inversores institucionales, proporcionando financiamiento a plazo no garantizado y sin evaluación de mercado.
Las características clave de TRTX 2025-FL6 incluyen:
- Período de reinversión de 30 meses
- Tasa de adelanto del 87.5%
- Tasa de interés promedio ponderada al momento de la emisión: Term SOFR más 1.83%
TRTX redimirá TRTX 2019-FL3 el 17 de marzo de 2025, que actualmente tiene 114.6 millones de dólares pendientes. La nueva emisión y redención se espera que generen ingresos netos en efectivo de aproximadamente 211.1 millones de dólares para fines de inversión y corporativos. Se espera que la transacción se cierre alrededor del 28 de marzo de 2025.
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX)는 TRTX 2025-FL6의 가격을 발표했습니다. 이는 11억 달러 규모의 관리형 상업용 부동산 담보 대출 의무(CRE CLO)입니다. 이 회사는 기관 투자자와 함께 약 9억6250만 달러의 투자 등급 증권을 배치할 것으로 예상하고 있으며, 이는 시장 평가 없이, 무담보로 제공되는 장기 금융을 제공합니다.
TRTX 2025-FL6의 주요 특징은 다음과 같습니다:
- 30개월 재투자 기간
- 87.5%의 선급 비율
- 발행 시 가중 평균 이자율: Term SOFR 플러스 1.83%
TRTX는 2025년 3월 17일에 TRTX 2019-FL3을 상환할 예정이며, 현재 1억1460만 달러가 남아 있습니다. 새로운 발행과 상환은 약 2억1110만 달러의 순 현금 수익을 생성할 것으로 예상되며, 이는 투자 및 기업 목적을 위해 사용될 것입니다. 거래는 2025년 3월 28일경에 완료될 것으로 예상됩니다.
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX) a annoncé le prix de TRTX 2025-FL6, un prêt obligataire commercial géré de 1,1 milliard de dollars (CRE CLO). La société prévoit de placer environ 962,5 millions de dollars de titres de qualité d’investissement auprès d’investisseurs institutionnels, offrant un financement à terme sans évaluation de marché et sans recours.
Les caractéristiques clés de TRTX 2025-FL6 incluent:
- Période de réinvestissement de 30 mois
- Taux d’avance de 87,5%
- Taux d’intérêt moyen pondéré au moment de l’émission : Term SOFR plus 1,83%
TRTX remboursera TRTX 2019-FL3 le 17 mars 2025, qui a actuellement 114,6 millions de dollars en circulation. La nouvelle émission et le remboursement devraient générer environ 211,1 millions de dollars de produits nets en espèces pour des fins d’investissement et d’entreprise. La transaction devrait se clôturer aux alentours du 28 mars 2025.
TPG RE Finance Trust (NYSE: TRTX) hat die Preisgestaltung von TRTX 2025-FL6 bekannt gegeben, einer 1,1 Milliarden US-Dollar großen verwalteten gewerblichen Immobilien besicherten Schuldverschreibung (CRE CLO). Das Unternehmen erwartet, etwa 962,5 Millionen US-Dollar an Anleihen mit Investment-Grade bei institutionellen Investoren zu platzieren, die nicht marktbewertet und ohne Rückgriff auf Terminfinanzierung bereitgestellt werden.
Die wichtigsten Merkmale von TRTX 2025-FL6 umfassen:
- 30-monatige Reinvestitionsperiode
- 87,5% Vorschussquote
- Gewichteter durchschnittlicher Zinssatz zum Zeitpunkt der Emission: Term SOFR plus 1,83%
TRTX wird TRTX 2019-FL3 am 17. März 2025 zurückzahlen, das derzeit 114,6 Millionen US-Dollar ausstehend hat. Die neue Emission und Rückzahlung werden voraussichtlich netto etwa 211,1 Millionen US-Dollar an Barerlösen für Investitions- und Unternehmenszwecke generieren. Die Transaktion wird voraussichtlich um den 28. März 2025 abgeschlossen sein.
Positive
- Secured $1.1 billion in CRE CLO financing
- Generated $211.1 million in net cash proceeds for investments
- Obtained favorable 87.5% advance rate
- Secured non-mark-to-market, non-recourse financing terms
Negative
- Higher interest rate exposure with Term SOFR plus 1.83% financing cost
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (NYSE: TRTX) (“TRTX” or the “Company”) today announced the pricing of TRTX 2025-FL6, a
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC is acting as sole structuring agent, co-lead manager and joint bookrunner for TRTX 2025-FL6. BofA Securities, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC are acting as co-lead managers and joint bookrunners, and Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., HSBC Securities (
This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities or any other securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
ABOUT TRTX
TRTX is a commercial real estate finance company that originates, acquires, and manages primarily first mortgage loans secured by institutional properties located in primary and select secondary markets in
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains “forward‐looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward‐looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties relating to: the performance of the Company’s investments; global economic trends and economic conditions, including heightened inflation, slower growth or recession, changes to fiscal and monetary policy, higher interest rates, stress to the commercial banking systems of the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250312981804/en/
INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
+1 (212) 405-8500
IR@tpgrefinance.com
MEDIA CONTACT
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
Courtney Power
+1 (415) 743-1550
media@tpg.com
Source: TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
FAQ
What is the size and purpose of TRTX’s 2025-FL6 CLO offering?
TRTX’s 2025-FL6 is a $1.1 billion Commercial Real Estate CLO offering that will provide non-mark-to-market, non-recourse term financing through $962.5 million in investment grade securities placement.
When will TRTX redeem the 2019-FL3 CLO and what are the net proceeds?
TRTX will redeem TRTX 2019-FL3 on March 17, 2025, and combined with the new FL6 issuance, will generate net cash proceeds of approximately $211.1 million.
What are the key terms of TRTX’s 2025-FL6 CLO?
TRTX 2025-FL6 features a 30-month reinvestment period, 87.5% advance rate, and weighted average interest rate of Term SOFR plus 1.83% at issuance.
When is the expected closing date for TRTX’s 2025-FL6 CLO?
TRTX 2025-FL6 is expected to close on or around March 28, 2025, subject to customary closing conditions.
Finance
When making travel plans, timing and financing are major considerations
For the true travel fan, there’s often a built-in conflict on how best to plan for your next adventure.
On the one hand, the world awaits. Spin the globe, cover your eyes and point. Or, throw a dart at the map! Then it’s time to dig in and research your next dream destination.
On the other hand, getting the best bargain can be a last-minute proposition. There may be a fare sale today, but not tomorrow. How does that mash up with your bicycle tour in Italy? Or your friend’s wedding in Hawaii?
Spreading out all the options on the table can be daunting. It’s a bit like taking a sip from the fire hose. And we all have varying degrees of tolerance for changing prices, tiny seats and geopolitical uncertainty.
So let’s take a snapshot of what’s happening now, knowing you won’t likely drink from the same river, or fire hose, twice.
Since most of today’s snapshots are on the phone, there are some handy settings: You can zoom in for a closer look at that fruit and cheese platter, frame it up nicely for a good shot of your seatmate, or look out the window and get a nice view from 30,000 feet.
Fares we love. There are just a few fares to zoom in on right now.
Anchorage-Chicago. Three airlines will offer nonstop flights this summer: Alaska, United and American. Alaska and United fly the route year-round. There are just a couple of months where travelers have to stop in Denver or Seattle on the way. Right now, the Basic price is $349 round-trip. United has the least-expensive Main price of $429 round-trip. Alaska charges more: $449-$469 round-trip.
The rate to Chicago is steady throughout the summer, as long as you’re open to flying on other airlines, including Delta and now Southwest, starting May 15.
Anchorage-Dallas. Choose from four airlines with competitive prices. United and Delta offer great rates starting on March 30, for travel all summer and into the fall for $331 round-trip in basic economy. Remember: Basic economy means you’ll be sitting in the middle seat back by the potty. There are few, if any, advance seat assignments permitted and you’re the last to board. Don’t expect to accrue many frequent flyer points. Alaska will give you 30%. Delta and American offer none. United is axing MileagePlus points for basic travelers soon.
Delta and United offer the chance to pay $100 more for pre-reserved seats and mileage credit. Of course, they may charge you more for a nicer seat on the plane. But that’s another story.
American Airlines charges a little bit more, about $20 more for a round-trip, to fly nonstop. It’s a nice flight.
Anchorage-Albuquerque. Delta is targeting this route with a nice rate: $281 round-trip in Basic or $381 in Main. But it’s just between May 23 and June 29. Why? Well, it lines up nicely with Southwest’s launch on May 15. Who knows why airlines cut their fares during a traditionally busy season? It’s just a hunch.
Looking at airfares more broadly, there are a few more bargain rates out there, but most only go through May 20. Airlines are hoping for a robust summer — so prices go up after that.
For example, between March 29 and May 20, Alaska Air offers a nonstop from Anchorage to Los Angeles for $257 round-trip in basic. For pre-assigned seats and full mileage credit, the main price is $337 round-trip. Prices go up to $437 round-trip in the summer.
The view from 30,000 feet is pretty clear, although past performance is no guarantee of future results. Several carriers, including American, Delta, United, Southwest and Alaska are adding flights for the summer. There will be robust competition, which means lower fares. Just last week, Alaska Air dropped the price from Anchorage to Seattle to $210 round-trip. That rate is gone, but others will come along.
Charge it. Banks own the airlines by virtue of their popular credit cards. Do they own you, too?
Sifting through the various credit card offers and bonus points emails, it’s easy to forget that banks, not travelers, are the airlines’ biggest customers. At a Bank of America conference last year, Alaska Airlines reported it receives about 15% of its total revenue from its loyalty plan. That adds up to more than 1.7 billion in 2024. Delta has a similar deal with American Express, which paid the airline about $8.2 billion last year.
Think about that the next time the flight attendants are handing out credit card applications in the aisle.
Zooming in, if you’re going to play the Atmos loyalty game on Alaska Airlines, you have to have an Alaska Airlines credit card from Bank of America.
I carry the plain-old Alaska Air card. I used to have two of them, primarily for the $99 companion fare. That’s still a compelling offer. But to get that benefit, you have to charge it on an Alaska Airlines Visa card.
So the question is: Is it worth it to pay $395 per year for the new Summit Visa card from Bank of America?
If you use your credit card for your business or if you regularly charge thousands of dollars every month, the Summit card may be the card for you.
One of the foundational benefits is for every $2 you charge, you earn one status point toward your next elite tier, such as titanium. It’s possible to charge your way to the top tier of the frequent flyer ladder without ever stepping on a plane. If that’s your level of charge-card use, then the Summit is for you. For the lesser Ascent card like mine, you earn one status point for every $3 spent.
For a little wider view, consider that your other travel costs, including accommodations, can hit your budget a lot harder than an airline ticket. It’s one reason I carry a flexible spend credit card in addition to my Alaska Airlines card. Here’s a snapshot of some popular options:
1. Bilt Rewards. I finally signed up for a Bilt account, although I haven’t yet received my card. There are two big benefits with Bilt: You can charge your rent and transfer points to Alaska Airlines. There also is a scheme to charge your mortgage, but it’s more convoluted. But the charge-your-rent option is a stand-alone gold star for the Bilt program, even if you don’t fly Alaska Airlines.
In addition to the link with Alaska Airlines, Bilt points transfer to other oneworld carriers like British, Japan Airlines and Qatar Air. Hotel partners include Hyatt, my favorite, and Hilton. A big bonus comes with the “Obsidian” card, $95 per year: three points for every dollar spent on groceries.
But there’s also a Bilt card with no annual fee. And there are no extra fees incurred when you charge your rent.
2. American Express. If you fly on Delta, the American Express card is a natural choice.
The two companies really are joined at the hip. The last American Express card I had was a Delta “Gold” card, which included a 70,000-point signup bonus. Cardholders get a free checked bag, although Delta offers two free checked bags for SkyMiles members who live in Alaska, and 15% off award tickets.
The Delta card is free for the first year, then $150 per year thereafter.
There is a dizzying array of American Express cards available, including some with no annual fee. But with Delta there is a narrowed-down selection, including one that’s more than $800 per year. That includes lounge access and some other benefits, including a companion pass.
American Express cardholders also can transfer their points to Hilton and Bonvoy as well as to 15 other airlines.
Capital One offers the Venture X card, which offers cardholders 75,000 points plus a $300 travel credit at their in-house travel service. The cost is $395 per year. Get the slimmed-down Venture card for just $95 per year. You still can earn the 75,000 bonus points after spending $4,000 in the first three months. Plus, there’s a $250 credit with Capital One Travel.
Airline partners include EMirates, Singapore Air, Japan Air and EVA Air, from Taiwan. Hotel partners include Hilton and Marriott.
I’ve carried several Chase cards for years. Right now I have the Chase Sapphire Preferred card, for which I received 80,000 bonus points. But that was several years ago. More recently, I got the Chase-affiliated Ink Business Cash card to harvest a 90,000 point bonus. Previously, I carried the Chase Sapphire Reserve. I got a 100,000 point bonus for that. But I dropped that card when the fee went up to $795 per year.
Stacking the cards like that — getting more than one — has helped me to get more bonus points, both for American Express and for Chase.
The best value for Chase points that I’ve found is for Hyatt Hotels. Right now, it’s the best redemption ration, but that can change. Chase also allows for transfers to Emirates, United, Singapore Air and Southwest, among others. The Chase travel portal is managed by Expedia, so you can redeem points for other hotels at a lower redemption rate.
The long view: All airline mileage plans are now credit card loyalty plans. Terms and conditions change, along with signup bonuses and other features of the cards. Last year, Chase dropped its airport restaurant feature, which offered $29 per person at select restaurants in Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland. A couple of years ago, the Priority Pass affiliated with Chase dropped the Alaska Airlines lounges as a partner.
It takes some time and effort to keep up with the programs and get the best value. But airline credit card plans are here to stay, even if the frequent-flyer programs are watered down year after year.
Finance
Lawmakers target ‘free money’ home equity finance model
Key points:
- Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering a bill that would classify home equity investments (HEIs) and shared equity contracts as residential mortgages.
- Industry leaders have mobilized through a newly formed trade group to influence how HEIs are regulated.
- The outcome could reshape underwriting standards, return structures and capital markets strategy for HEI providers.
A fast-growing home equity financing model that promises homeowners cash without monthly payments is facing mounting scrutiny from state lawmakers — and the industry behind it is mobilizing to shape the outcome.
In Pennsylvania, House Bill 2120 would classify shared equity contracts — often marketed as home equity investments (HEIs), shared appreciation agreements or home equity agreements — as residential mortgages under state law.
While the proposal is still in committee, the debate unfolding in Harrisburg reflects a broader national effort to determine whether these products are truly a new category of equity-based investment — or if they function as mortgages and belong under existing consumer lending laws.
A classification fight over home equity capture
HB 2120 would amend Pennsylvania’s Loan Interest and Protection Law by explicitly including shared appreciation agreements in the residential mortgage definition. If passed, shared equity contracts would be subject to the same interest caps, licensing standards and consumer protections that apply to traditional mortgage lending.
The legislation was introduced by Rep. Arvind Venkat after constituent Wendy Gilch — a fellow with the consumer watchdog Consumer Policy Center — brought concerns to his office. Gilch has since worked with Venkat as a partner in shaping the proposal.
Gilch initially began examining the products after seeing advertisements describe them as offering cash with “no debt,” “no interest” and “no monthly payments.”
“It sounds like free money,” she said. “But in many cases, you’re giving up a growing share of your home’s equity over time.”
Breaking down the debate
Shared equity providers (SEPs) argue that their products are not loans. Instead of charging interest or requiring monthly payments, companies provide homeowners with a lump sum in exchange for a share of the home’s future appreciation, which is typically repaid when the home is sold or refinanced.
The Coalition for Home Equity Partnership (CHEP) — an industry-led group founded in 2025 by Hometap, Point and Unlock — emphasizes that shared equity products have zero monthly payments or interest, no minimum income requirements and no personal liability if a home’s value declines.
Venkat, however, argues that the mechanics look familiar and argues that “transactions secured by homes should include transparency and consumer protections” — especially since, for many many Americans, their home is their most valuable asset.
“These agreements involve appraisals, liens, closing costs and defined repayment triggers,” he said. “If it looks like a mortgage and functions like a mortgage, it should be treated like one.”
The bill sits within Pennsylvania’s anti-usury framework, which caps returns on home-secured lending in the mid-single digits. Venkat said he’s been told by industry representatives that they require returns approaching 18-20% to make the model viable — particularly if contracts are later resold to outside investors. According to CHEP, its members provide scenario-based disclosures showing potential outcomes under varying assumptions, with the final cost depending on future home values and term length.
In a statement shared with Real Estate News, CHEP President Cliff Andrews said the group supports comprehensive regulation of shared equity products but argues that automatically classifying them as mortgages applies a framework “that was never designed for, and cannot meaningfully be applied to, equity-based financing instruments.”
As currently drafted, HB 2120 would function as a “de facto ban” on shared equity products in Pennsylvania, Andrews added.
Real Estate News also reached out to Unison, a major vendor in the space, for comment on HB 2120. Hometap and Unlock deferred to CHEP when reached for comment.
A growing regulatory patchwork
Pennsylvania is not alone in seeking to legislate regulations around HEIs. Maryland, Illinois and Connecticut have also taken steps to clarify that certain home equity option agreements fall under mortgage lending statutes and licensing requirements.
In Washington state, litigation over whether a shared equity contract qualified as a reverse mortgage reached the Ninth Circuit before the case was settled and the opinion vacated. Maine and Oregon have considered similar proposals, while Massachusetts has pursued enforcement action against at least one provider in connection with home equity investment practices.
Taken together, these developments suggest a state-by-state regulatory patchwork could emerge in the absence of a uniform federal framework.
The push for homeowner protections
The debate over HEIs arrives amid elevated interest rates and reduced refinancing activity — conditions that have increased demand for alternative equity-access products.
But regulators appear increasingly focused on classification — specifically whether the absence of monthly payments and traditional interest charges changes the legal character of a contract secured by a lien on a home.
Gilch argues that classification is central to consumer clarity. “If it’s secured by your home and you have to settle up when you sell or refinance, homeowners should have the same protections they expect with any other home-based transaction,” she said.
Lessons from prior home equity controversies
For industry leaders, the regulatory scrutiny may feel familiar. In recent years, unconventional home equity models have drawn enforcement actions and litigation once questions surfaced around contract structure, title encumbrances or consumer understanding.
MV Realty, which offered upfront payments in exchange for long-term listing agreements, faced regulatory action in multiple states over how those agreements were recorded and disclosed. EasyKnock, which structured sale-leaseback transactions aimed at unlocking home equity, abruptly shuttered operations in late 2024 following litigation and mounting regulatory pressure.
Shared equity investment contracts differ structurally from both models, but those episodes underscore a broader pattern: novel housing finance products can scale quickly in tight credit cycles. Just as quickly, these home equity models encounter regulatory intervention once policymakers begin examining how they fit within existing law — and the formation of CHEP signals that SEPs recognize the stakes.
For real estate executives and housing finance leaders, the outcome of the classification fight may prove consequential. If shared equity contracts are treated as mortgages in more states, underwriting standards, return structures and secondary market economics could shift.
If lawmakers instead carve out a distinct regulatory category, the model may retain more flexibility — but face ongoing state-by-state negotiation.
Finance
Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson
Cornell University administrator Warren Petrofsky will serve as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ new dean of administration and finance, charged with spearheading efforts to shore up the school’s finances as it faces a hefty budget deficit.
Petrofsky’s appointment, announced in a Friday email from FAS Dean Hopi E. Hoekstra to FAS affiliates, will begin April 20 — nearly a year after former FAS dean of administration and finance Scott A. Jordan stepped down. Petrofsky will replace interim dean Mary Ann Bradley, who helped shape the early stages of FAS cost-cutting initiatives.
Petrofsky currently serves as associate dean of administration at Cornell University’s College of Arts and Sciences.
As dean, he oversaw a budget cut of nearly $11 million to the institution’s College of Arts and Sciences after the federal government slashed at least $250 million in stop-work orders and frozen grants, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.
He also serves on a work group established in November 2025 to streamline the school’s administrative systems.
Earlier, at the University of Pennsylvania, Petrofsky managed capital initiatives and organizational redesigns in a number of administrative roles.
Petrofsky is poised to lead similar efforts at the FAS, which relaunched its Resources Committee in spring 2025 and created a committee to consolidate staff positions amid massive federal funding cuts.
As part of its planning process, the committee has quietly brought on external help. Over several months, consultants from McKinsey & Company have been interviewing dozens of administrators and staff across the FAS.
Petrofsky will also likely have a hand in other cost-cutting measures across the FAS, which is facing a $365 million budget deficit. The school has already announced it will keep spending flat for the 2026 fiscal year, and it has dramatically reduced Ph.D. admissions.
In her email, Hoekstra praised Petrofsky’s performance across his career.
“Warren has emphasized transparency, clarity in communication, and investment in staff development,” she wrote. “He approaches change with steadiness and purpose, and with deep respect for the mission that unites our faculty, researchers, staff, and students. I am confident that he will be a strong partner to me and to our community.”
—Staff writer Amann S. Mahajan can be reached at [email protected] and on Signal at amannsm.38. Follow her on X @amannmahajan.
-
World3 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Louisiana6 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO3 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT