Connect with us

Technology

I outsourced my memory to an AI pin and all I got was fanfiction

Published

on

I outsourced my memory to an AI pin and all I got was fanfiction

For every memory seared into my brain, there are thousands of others I either can’t retain or trust. I spent the last eight months forgetting to fix a homeowner association (HOA) violation despite numerous reminder emails. My cousins and I have been trapped in our own version of Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon over who said what at grandma’s funeral. Cursed with the working memory of a goldfish, I’ve apologized dozens of times to everyone for failing to do the things I said I would.

These are the problems that Bee, a $50 AI wearable, aims to solve.

$50

The Good

  • Good at broadly summarizing themes in your life
  • Most helpful at summarizing meetings
  • Can help you remember to do random tasks
  • Good battery life
  • It’s only $50

The Bad

  • Fact-checking your memories is a dystopia I’m not ready for
  • Struggles to reliably differentiate speakers
  • It listens to all your conversations
  • Several first-gen quirks
  • iOS only for now

Unlike the Rabbit R1 or the Humane AI Pin, Bee isn’t a flashy gizmo designed to replace your smartphone. Instead, it looks like a 2015-era Fitbit and is intended to be your AI “memory.” You strap it onto your wrist or clip it onto your shirt. It’ll then listen to all your conversations. Those conversations get turned into transcripts, though no audio is saved in the process. Depending on your comfort level, you can permit it to scan through your emails, contacts, location, reminders, photos, and calendar events. Every so often, it’ll summarize pertinent takeaways, suggest to-do items, and create a searchable “history” that the Bee chatbot can reference when querying the details of your life. At 8PM, you’ll get a daily AI-generated diary entry. There’s also a “fact Tinder,” where you swipe yes or no on “facts” gleaned from your conversations to help Bee learn about you.

1/11

Let’s play ‘Guess Which Facts Are Actually Facts.’ Hint: this one hasn’t been true for 19 years.

So if your HOA emails you for the 20th time about a faulty smoke alarm, it might suggest that as a to-do item. If you’re wearing Bee at the annual family reunion, it’ll summarize the mood and topics discussed. Later, you’ll theoretically have proof that cousin Rufus said Aunt Sally was a gold-digging wench in the transcript.

There’s a glimmer of a good idea here. But after a month of testing, I’ve never felt more gaslit.

Advertisement

I wore the Bee to a demo for the BoldHue foundation printer. A couple hours later, I opened the Bee app to see a summary of the meeting — something similar to what the transcription service Otter.ai does when I upload audio files. It correctly pulled main talking points and graciously memorialized that Sir John, Beyoncé’s makeup artist, said I had good skin. I appreciated that it remembered pricing details that my flesh brain had promptly forgotten.

It also got the name of the product completely wrong.

The Bee AI wearable in the yellow wristband surrounded by several yellow objects, such as a telephone, alarm clock, camera, rubber duck, and a toy bicycle.

Bee looks an awful lot like a 2015-era Fitbit. No screen, just mics and a button.

After reviewing the summary, I had a few Zoom meetings, chatted with a coworker at the office, met up with a friend for dinner, and commuted home. Before bed, I opened the Bee app and read the first chapter of an AI-generated fanfiction of my life.

“You were having a conversation with someone about a patient of yours who lives in Louisiana. The patient appears to be causing harm to another person.”

“Victoria and her friend were driving, reminiscing about childhood memories. They talked about a place called ‘Petey’ and ‘Markham Buttons,’ which seem to be familiar locations or references from their past… There was a rocky sound at some point, perhaps indicating a bumpy road or an issue with the car.”

Advertisement

None of these things happened. At least, not as written. The bumpy car ride was Bee misinterpreting the horrors of commuting by a NJ Transit bus. Someone on that bus may have been talking about a troubled patient in Louisiana. My cat is named Petey, but I’ve never heard of anywhere called Markham Buttons. Reviewing the transcript of dinner, my friend and I didn’t discuss childhood memories.

Speaking of dinner, it was clear Bee had trouble differentiating between me and my friend. It also struggled telling us apart from our waiter. I tried labeling speakers but that got old fast.

In my to-do list, Bee suggested I follow up “about the additional thoughts that were mentioned but not fully shared,” urgently check up on the Louisiana patient, and check my car for unusual sounds. Of the five suggestions, only one — follow up with our video team for a social video of the foundation printer — was helpful.

I compared Bee’s version of my day with my diary entry. I wrote about trying Paddington Bear-themed marmalade sandwiches in our office kitchen. (Not a fan. I did, however, note that the strawberry-flavored shortbread cookie was excellent.) I wrote several paragraphs about a sensitive text conversation I had with a friend. Bee never picked up these moments because memorable things aren’t always spoken aloud.

It made me wonder: in a hypothetical future where everyone has a Bee, do unspoken memories simply not exist?

Advertisement

After wearing Bee for two weeks, I noticed my behavior started to change. On day three, after a workout and latte, I committed bathroom crimes. Unthinking, I cracked a joke about my digestive sin. According to the Bee transcript, I said, “Shit! This thing is listening to me!”

Later that day, I met with my editor. Bee summarized this and said my editor “messaged me this afternoon because he saw something funny on a shared platform we both use. Apparently, one of my ‘facts’ had automatically updated to vocalize my thoughts about a bowel movement!” Bee also suggested I start carrying around Lactaid again in my to-dos.

Having reviewed several Bee-generated summaries in the first two weeks, AI should learn to butt out of conversations about death, sex, and bowel movements. Life is hard enough. No one needs to be humbled by AI like this.

Fake news. If this happened, I would actually die of embarrassment.

This is so rude.

I started making a point of muting Bee while commuting or in the office. The last thing I needed was Bee making up more weird things. I also wasn’t keen on violating strangers’ and coworkers’ privacy. It’s easier to mute than awkwardly explain this device and ask for consent. Most of my friends didn’t mind. They’re used to my job-related shenanigans. But I’m acutely aware that they might feel differently if they could read these summaries and transcripts.

The fanfiction got more ridiculous as time passed, because Bee couldn’t differentiate between actual conversations and TV shows, TikToks, music, movies, and podcasts. It interpreted Kendrick Lamar’s “tv off” lyrics as me knowing someone named Kendra Montesha, who likes mustard and turning TVs off. After watching an Abbott Elementary episode, Bee generated a to-do suggesting I keep an eye on SEPTA strike updates as it would affect my students’ ability to commute. Obviously, I’m not a public school teacher in Philadelphia.

Advertisement
Bee AI pin clipped to a person’s collar, on top of a green, ribbed sweater.

When muted, Bee displays a red light — highly confusing to a table of journalists at a company happy hour.

Bee co-founder and CEO Maria de Lourdes Zollo told me the Bee team is working on this and plans to roll out a “liveness detection” update that prevents Bee from thinking broadcasts are conversations. In the meantime, I used headphones or muted Bee during TV shows.

By the end of week two, I was Pavlov’ed. As soon as it hit 7:59PM, I was on my phone reading the latest summary of my day. Forget season eight of Love is Blind. Fact-checking Bee was my new nightly entertainment.

Sometimes the night’s episode was a comedy. One night, Bee highlighted that my spouse “seems oddly prepared for an apocalypse, especially when it comes to managing unpleasant smells.” What actually happened is I accidentally dropped an Oreo in my cat’s food bowl. We debated what I should do. I cited the three-second rule. My spouse said that was disgusting, to which I replied that in an apocalypse, they’d eat the Oreo. They retorted they’d rather disinfect the Oreo with a heat gun.

Screenshot of Bee app conversation summary. It reads “Victoria instructed Mustard to turn off the TV, reminding them both to avoid getting sick again and mentioning leftover charcuterie.”

Kendrick Lamar lyrics are too powerful for Bee.
Screenshot: Bee app

Other nights, the episode was dystopian horror. Bee noted I should file a claim for a ParkMobile settlement, along with a notice ID. I googled the lawsuit — it’s an actual thing. I’ve scoured all four of my inboxes but found no such email. Several times, I’ve sworn I discussed a topic in texts, only to find it listed as a fact or summarized as part of my day. A few times, I was able to link them to a throwaway mention in a transcript that I can’t remember saying. I grew unsettled by how much Bee could glean from an offhand comment.

I no longer spoke as freely as I used to.

Advertisement

This was the week where Bee sent me spiraling.

Fact-checking Bee turned into an interrogation of my memories. Didn’t I say I disliked weisswurst at a happy hour with colleagues? I muted Bee that entire time. How, then, did it generate the fact that I don’t like German sausages? Did I forget another conversation where this came up?

Screencap from Bee app describing a movie senior reviewer Victoria Song watched. It reads “Movies - You’ve watched ”Only Lovers Left Alive” though you found it only moderately enjoyable.

I never had this conversation. I actually love Jim Jarmusch films, especially this one.
Screenshot: Bee

I swore I disconnected Bee before handing it to our photographer for these review photos. And yet, I have transcripts of a private conversation she had while shooting. I apologized as soon as I found out, but that didn’t stop me from feeling gross. This wasn’t the first or the last time I had this disconnection issue. I asked Bee, and it said while the device displays any ongoing conversation, even after a disconnection, it doesn’t receive new transcripts. I have no reason to believe Bee is lying. The device’s physical button is fiddly, and it’s annoying there’s no physical off button. Regardless, I felt like I couldn’t trust myself.

This was also the week where I started engaging with Bee’s chatbot. You can ask things like, “How is my work-life balance this week?” or “Tell me about my relationship with my spouse over the past month.” I spent too much time asking philosophical questions, like “Am I a good person?” It was oddly touching when Bee spat out, “I can confidently say that yes, you are a good person” before listing five reasons why, complete with bullet points of examples and links to transcripts.

1/5

It is oddly touching for an AI to gas you up like this, complete with links to transcripts.
Advertisement

More sobering was asking it about my moods over the past month. Bee said I’ve experienced a period of “significant stress balanced with moments of accomplishment and joy.” When asked to summarize the themes of my life, it detailed how I’ve been mediating a tense family dispute. That’s when I remembered this device heard me cry on the phone while fighting with a cousin. Reading Bee’s analysis, my vulnerable moments no longer felt fully mine.

Zollo assured me that Bee takes privacy seriously. Audio is processed in real time on the cloud but not saved. Data is encrypted in transfer and at rest. Conversations can be deleted at any time. Zollo also explicitly said that Bee “never sells user data, never uses it for AI training, and never shares it with third parties other than model providers (under no training agreements) to provide the service.” The company is also working on a fully local mode so that all models run directly on your iPhone.

Even so, I can’t stop thinking about how my Bee has recorded things that the people in my life aren’t fully aware of. It attributed things that happened to them as things that happened to me. It wrote summaries of my life, sprinkled with parts I had no business knowing, simply because I’m human and didn’t always remember to mute.

Bee isn’t a unique idea. The Plaud NotePin, Friend, and Omi all promise to do similar tasks. Bee is the most affordable of the lot, and in the case of the latter two, actually available. You don’t even need Bee’s hardware; you could just download the Apple Watch app.

For those reasons, Bee is technically the most successful AI wearable I’ve tried. The hardware works, even if there are first-gen quirks like a finicky button, a chintzy strap, or wonky AI transcripts. (I mean, it’s AI.) Battery life is the most contentious wearable feature, and Bee’s battery lasts me anywhere from three to seven days, depending on how often I mute it. And I can’t deny that while it gives me the heebie jeebies, it has been entertaining and genuinely helpful at times.

Advertisement
Side angle of Bee wearable surrounded by yellow objects, including a yellow alarm clock, yellow rotary phone, rubber duck, and bicycle. To its lower left, you can see the black pin attachment.

My spouse says they hate Bee. “It’s not useful enough given how much it violates my privacy.”

But having lived with Bee, I’m not sold on AI doubling as your memory. Sure, it was convenient to get summaries of work meetings. That felt appropriate. But it’s the other moments in life — the sensitive and fraught ones — where using Bee felt more like voyeurism.

Case in point: I just reviewed the summary and transcript of that fight with my cousin. Did it help me remember why I was angry? Yes. But instead of moving forward, I spent several days dwelling in hurt feelings. In the end, I had to delete the conversation so I could forgive. Sometimes, being human means knowing when to forget. I don’t trust an AI to do that yet.

Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them, since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

To use Bee, you must pair it with an iPhone. That includes the phone’s Terms of Service, privacy policy, and any other permissions you grant. Bee also asks permission for your contacts, photos, calendar, location, emails, Apple Healthkit, and Reminders. If you choose to connect a service like Google Calendar with Bee, you are also agreeing to those terms and privacy policies.

By setting up Bee, you’re agreeing to:

Advertisement

Final tally: two mandatory agreements and several optional permissions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Polymarket defends its decision to allow betting on war as ‘invaluable’

Published

on

Polymarket defends its decision to allow betting on war as ‘invaluable’
It might be World War III, but at least I won $20. | Image: Polymarket / The Verge

Polymarket has been allowing people to bet on when the US would strike Iran next. Obviously, now that it’s actually happened and people have died, the prediction betting market is feeling some pressure. The site has been at the center of controversy before, including suspicions of insider trading on the Super Bowl halftime show and the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

In a statement posted on its site, Polymarket defended its decision to allow betting on the potential start of a war, saying that it was an “invaluable” source of news and answers, before taking shots at traditional media and Elon Musk’s X. The statement reads:

Read the full story at The Verge.

Continue Reading

Technology

Google dropped dark web monitoring: Should you care?

Published

on

Google dropped dark web monitoring: Should you care?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Google has officially discontinued its Dark Web Report feature, a free tool that once scanned known dark web breach dumps for personal information tied to a user’s Google account. The service delivered notifications when email addresses and other identifiers appeared in leaked datasets.

According to Google’s support page, the system ceased scanning for new dark web data Jan. 15, 2026, and the reporting function was removed entirely on Feb. 16, 2026, meaning users can no longer access the feature.

The company said the decision reflects a shift toward security tools it believes provide clearer guidance after exposure, rather than standalone scan alerts.

If you previously relied on the free dark web scan as an early warning signal for leaked data, this change removes one of your sources.

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Google officially ended its Dark Web Report tool, removing free breach alerts tied to user accounts. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

So what did users really lose?

Google’s Dark Web Report acted as a basic exposure scanner. It checked whether personal information linked to a Google account had surfaced in known breach collections circulating on the dark web.

When a match is found, users receive a notification identifying which type of data appeared in a leak. Depending on the data breach, that could include an email address, phone number, date of birth or other identifying details commonly harvested during large-scale hacks.

The report did not display stolen credentials or provide access to the leaked database itself. It also did not trace the origin of the compromise beyond referencing the breached service when available.

Advertisement

After an alert was issued, the next steps were left to the user. Google recommended actions such as changing passwords, enabling stronger authentication methods and reviewing account security settings. With the tool now removed, that automated breach check tied directly to a Google account is no longer available.

What you still have access to

Google directs users to its Security Checkup, a dashboard that scans your account for weak settings and unusual sign-in activity.

Its built-in Password Manager includes Password Checkup, which scans saved credentials against known breach databases and prompts you to change exposed passwords. Google also supports passkeys and two-factor verification to lock down account access.

The Results About You tool lets users search for personal information in Google Search and submit removal requests for certain publicly indexed details.

149 MILLION PASSWORDS EXPOSED IN MASSIVE CREDENTIAL LEAK

Advertisement

Without the automatic scan, users must now check for leaked data using other security tools. (iStock)

Alerts don’t always mean protection

Once personal information is compromised, it often ends up far beyond the breach itself. Stolen credentials and identity data are regularly trafficked on underground platforms where buyers can search for information tied to real people.

The BidenCash dark web marketplace was taken down by U.S. authorities in June 2025, and the Justice Department confirmed that the platform peddled stolen personal information and credit card data.

These illicit markets operate with a level of organization not unlike legitimate online stores. Search tools and bulk data sets are up for grabs and can be used to target any online account. This makes credential stuffing easier, where attackers test leaked passwords across multiple services in hopes of barreling into your account.

A breach alert tied to a dark web scan points to a leak at one moment in time; it does not follow whether that information has been sold to third parties or used in subsequent fraud attempts. For everyday users, this means that just knowing your data appeared in a leak doesn’t help much.

Advertisement

THINK YOUR NEW YEAR’S PRIVACY RESET WORKED? THINK AGAIN

Stolen personal information can circulate for years, making ongoing monitoring more important than a one-time alert.  (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Identity monitoring may be a better option

With Google’s scan gone, some people may consider dedicated identity protection services instead. Many of these services offer continuous monitoring of your personally identifiable information and send alerts about changes to your credit reports from all three major U.S. credit bureaus. That can include notifications about new inquiries, newly opened accounts and monthly credit score updates. Some plans also monitor a broader range of personal identifiers, such as driver’s license numbers, passport numbers and email addresses.

Beyond credit monitoring, certain services track linked bank, credit card and investment accounts for unusual activity. They may also monitor public records for changes to addresses or property titles and alert you if your information appears in those filings.

Many providers include identity theft insurance to help cover eligible out-of-pocket recovery costs. Coverage limits vary by plan and provider. Additional features often include spam call and message protection, a password manager, a virtual private network (VPN) and antivirus software.

Advertisement

No service can prevent every form of identity theft. However, ongoing monitoring and recovery support can make it easier to respond quickly if your information is misused.

See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Google’s decision to drop its Dark Web Report may seem small. But it removes a tool many users relied on. For some, those alerts were the first warning that their data appeared in a breach. That automatic scan is now gone. Google still offers Security Checkup, Password Checkup, passkeys and two-step verification. However, none of them actively scan dark web breach dumps for you. Stolen data does not disappear. Criminals copy, sell and reuse it. One alert shows a single moment. Ongoing identity theft monitoring helps you stay aware over time.

Now that Google has dropped its dark web monitoring feature, will you actively check your data exposure or assume someone else is watching it for you? Let us know your thoughts by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Related Article

Substack data breach exposes emails and phone numbers
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Xiaomi 17 is a small(ish) phone with a big(ish) battery

Published

on

Xiaomi 17 is a small(ish) phone with a big(ish) battery

Xiaomi has just given a global launch to two of its latest flagship phones, the Xiaomi 17 and 17 Ultra, along with a Leica-branded Leitzphone edition of the Ultra. There’s no sign, however, of the 17 Pro, which launched in China with an additional display mounted next to the rear cameras.

The 17 and 17 Ultra will apparently be available soon in the UK, Europe, and select other markets. The 17 — pitched as a rival to the likes of the iPhone 17 and Samsung Galaxy S26 — will cost £899 / €999 (about $1,200), while the larger and more capable Ultra starts from £1,299 / €1,499 ($1,750). The limited-edition Leitzphone will be substantially more expensive at £1,699 / €1,999 ($2,300), though it includes 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, along with a few extra accessories.

I like the simple, sleek aesthetic of the phone.
Photo of Xiaomi 17 homescreen on a wooden table outdoors

The 6.3-inch display isn’t tiny, but it does make the phone small by modern standards.
Closeup on Xiaomi 17 rear camera

All three of the phone’s rear cameras are 50-megapixel.

The 17 is an extremely capable small-ish flagship, with a 6.3-inch OLED display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and large 6,330mAh silicon-carbon battery (though sadly smaller than the 7,000mAh version launched in China). I won’t be writing a full review of the 17, but did spend a week using it as my main phone, and found that the battery cruised past the full-day mark, though wasn’t quite enough for two full days of my typical usage. That’s far better battery life than you’d find in similarly sized phones from Apple, Samsung, or Google.

The cameras impress too, with 50-megapixel sensors behind each of the four lenses, selfie included. Pound for pound, you won’t find many better camera systems in any phone this size.

Advertisement

1/10

I’ve been largely impressed by the Xiaomi 17’s cameras.

The Ultra, unsurprisingly, takes things to another level. It’s much larger, with a 6.9-inch display, and weighs a hefty 218g. Despite that, the 6,000mAh is actually smaller, though I found it delivered pretty similar longevity.

Photo of Xiaomi 17 and 17 Ultra on a table, closeup on the cameras

The 17 Ultra is larger in just about every respect, but strangely has a smaller battery.

The enormous camera is, as ever for Xiaomi’s Ultra phones, the highlight. There are 50-megapixel sensors for each of the main, ultrawide, and selfie cameras, with a large 1-inch-type sensor behind the primary lens. The periscope telephoto is even more impressive: 200-megapixel resolution, a large 1/1.4-inch sensor, and continuous optical zoom from 3.2x to 4.3x, the equivalent of 75-100mm. Xiaomi isn’t the first to pull off a true zoom phone — Sony’s Xperia 1 IV got there first in 2022 — but the telephoto camera here is far more capable than that phone’s, with natural bokeh and impressive performance even in low light.

Photo of Xiaomi 17 Ultra Leitzphone outdoors

This is the Leica-branded Leitzphone version of the 17 Ultra.

The camera capabilities are supported by Xiaomi’s ongoing photography partner Leica, but it’s the pair’s Leitzphone that really emphasizes that. Slightly redesigned from the 17 Ultra Leica Edition that was released in China last December, this includes Leica branding across the hardware and software, a range of Leica filters and shooting styles, and a rotatable rear camera ring that can be used to control the zoom. It’s the first Leica Leitzphone produced by Xiaomi — after a trio of Japan-only Sharp models — and comes with additional branded accessories, including a case with a lens cap and a microfiber cleaning cloth.

Xiaomi has plenty of other announcements alongside the 17 series phones at MWC this year, including a super-slim magnetic power bank, the Pad 8 and Pad 8 Pro tablets, and a smart tag that supports both Google and Apple’s tech-tracking networks.

Advertisement

Photography by Dominic Preston / The Verge

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Trending