Ohio
No. 13 Ohio State 60, Iowa 59: Another Close Call
No. 13 Ohio State 60, Iowa 59: Another Close Call
Iowa’s bid for a fourth-straight Big Ten Tournament title — and what would have been a record-setting 12th consecutive Big Ten Tournament victory — came up just short on Friday night, as the Hawkeyes fell to No. 13 Ohio State, 60-59. The Hawkeyes led with under a minute to go, but couldn’t see out the victory; a pair of Cotie McMahon free throws with 6.7 seconds to go gave Ohio State its final lead of the game and the Hawkeyes weren’t able to convert a pair of scoring chances at the other end before time expired.
With the defeat, Iowa falls to 22-10 overall, while Ohio State improves to 25-5. The Hawkeyes will now have two weeks off until the 2025 NCAA Tournament gets underway.
The Deep Three breaks down the big takeaways from Iowa’s very narrow loss.
1. Almost Got ‘Em – Again
For all the strides Iowa has made in this rebuilding season without Lisa Bluder, Caitlin Clark, Kate Martin, Gabbie Marshall, and more, one thing has elude the new-look Hawkeyes under head coach Jan Jensen: close game success. Tonight’s defeat drops the Hawkeyes to 0-5 in one-possession games this year — that’s half of Iowa’s total losses for the season. Truly, one-score games have been Iowa’s kryptonite.
In several of those losses, Iowa has had potential game-winning (or game-tying) shots at the buzzer, but couldn’t convert. Addison O’Grady missed game-ending baskets at Oregon and against UCLA, while Sydney Affolter and Hannah Stuelke each got off unsuccessful potential game-winning shots tonight.
“I think when you go, you kind of think [of] your sets, sometimes you kind of go with who you think is going to hit the corner pocket,” said Jensen after the game. “Then I’ll go back and think, oh, maybe we should have thrown it inside. Maybe we shouldn’t have driven it.”
The end-of-game struggles in close games seem indicative of this Iowa team in a few ways. One, this team is good — and very, very close to being really good. It just hasn’t been able to quite get over that hump to win the tightest games. Two, this is a roster — and a coach — learning on the fly.
For the last four years, Iowa had the benefit of an all-time closer in Caitlin Clark, an offensive wizard with the ability to take — and make — any shot she wanted or draw a foul in the biggest moments. Iowa also had a head coach with a deep reserve of experience in Lisa Bluder, who could call upon those years of experience to try to find the right play in those key moments.
Don’t miss out on any of our exclusive football, basketball, and recruiting coverage. Sign up with Hawkeye Beacon here.
This Iowa team has no Clark and no Bluder; the Hawkeyes don’t have a go-to superstar to try and close out games and Jan Jensen is still feeling her way through late-game situations. She acknowledged as much after the game.
“I don’t feel like — I’m not dismayed by it. I just wish we would have did this a little better, but I think it’s just sport,” said Jensen. “Last night I felt pretty good about what I called. This one, I’m like, oh, maybe I should have gone a different way in that last 6.8 seconds.”
Close losses are always a bitter pill to swallow — lose a game by a point and it’s impossible not to think about what could have gone differently to reverse that result. A made layup here, a better pass there; a three-pointer that rattles in instead of out, a successful box-out and rebound; a whistle blown here, a foul not called there. And so on. Still: while the result stings, it doesn’t take away from what this team has accomplished over the last 6+ weeks. Iowa has gone 10-3, with two of the three defeats coming by a combined three points against teams ranked in the top-15 (and the third loss was in overtime).
2. A Defensive Identity
Iowa’s team identity during the Caitlin Clark era reflected its high-scoring superstar: an all-gas, no brakes offensive powerhouse. In the first year of the post-Clark era, the team’s identity swung back more towards the defensive side of the ball and that increased focus on defense was on full display on Friday night, as Iowa and Ohio State went toe-to-toe for 40 grinding and intense minutes.
The Buckeyes had the second-highest scoring offense in the Big Ten this year, averaging 80.0 ppg. On Friday, Iowa held them to just 60 points. The Hawkeyes limited Ohio State to 36.5% shooting from the floor, including a meager 35.5% on 2-point attempts (as well as 38.9% from beyond the arc). Those shooting numbers dipped to 27.3% from the field in the fourth quarter (though the Buckeyes did drain two of their seven three-pointers in the game in the back-and-forth final quarter).
Iowa forced 14 Ohio State turnovers and turned those giveaways into 12 points. The Hawkeyes had five steals and blocked four shots in the game, with Kylie Feuerbach leading the team in both categories, with two apiece. Feuerbach was maybe the most spectacular individual defender on the night, but Iowa’s defensive success was truly a team effort. “I thought we knew our personnel pretty well. I thought our defensive schemes, I think they were always in the moment,” said Jansen.
Switching to a zone defense led to a lot of Iowa’s success, as Ohio State head coach Kevin McGuff acknowledged. “They played zone defense the first time we played them, and we didn’t execute real well against it, and that gave us problems,” said McGuff.
“Late in the game we got better shots, but for a while there, we just kind of stood around and didn’t move ourselves, didn’t move the ball very effectively,” added McGuff. “Finally got it right at the end, but Iowa played really great defense tonight.”
Defense has been the backbone of Iowa’s mid-season turnaround and current 10-3 run — opponents eclipsed 70 points just twice in that run and one of those two games came in overtime. Locking down opponents created the platform for Iowa’s success in the Big Ten Tournament as well, as opponents averaged just 58.3 ppg in Iowa’s three tournament games. Maintaining that same defensive ferocity in the NCAA Tournament will be key to Iowa’s ability to put together any sort of run in this year’s tourney.
3. Shining Stars, Old and New
Five players scored all of Iowa’s 59 points, with four players accounting for 88% (52) of Iowa’s points in the game. This was not a spread-it-around scoring effort; instead Iowa relied on its best players to carry the load — and they more or less did.
Lucy Olsen, Hannah Stuelke, and Sydney Affolter led Iowa with 14 points apiece, though all three scored their points at different points in the game. Olsen kept Iowa afloat early in the game, when no one else could manage to get the ball to go through the basket; she had seven points in the first quarter and 12 total in the first half — nearly half of Iowa’s 28 points in the first 20 minutes. Olsen wasn’t particularly efficient — those 12 points came on 5-of-15 shooting — but Iowa just needed someone to make shots and Olsen was one of the few who could in the opening half.
In the second half, Olsen had just two points on 1-of-3 shooting, as Ohio State’s defense increased its pressure on her and focused on shutting down her scoring. Still, while she scored just two points in the second half, she was still very influential on offense, dishing five assists to get Iowa’s offense rolling.
Hannah Stuelke scored six of her 14 points in the second quarter as Iowa roared back into the game, then added six more in the third quarter as Iowa traded blows with Ohio State. Stuelke’s sharp cuts and smooth finishes around the basket helped pace Iowa’s offense in the middle of the game. She was also a force on the glass, hauling down 12 rebounds for her team-high seventh double-double of the season (and 11th of her Iowa career).
Meanwhile, Sydney Affolter scored nine of her 14 points in the second half — with six of those nine coming in the fourth quarter on back-to-back made three-pointers. Affolter’s huge made triples took Iowa from a 58-53 deficit to a 59-58 lead with just over a minute to go. For the game, Affolter was 4-of-5 from beyond the arc and made over half of Iowa’s three-pointers (7) for the entire game.
Olsen, Stuelke, and Affolter are familiar stars for Iowa, players who’ve produced at a high level several times this season (and in the past). But Friday night also saw the emergence of a newer star, as Ava Heiden followed up her breakthrough 11-point effort against Michigan State last night with a 10-point showing against the Buckeyes.
“Ava’s been coming, right? In my opinion, in my coaching career, whatever chair I sit on, the timing of when you kind of unleash can make all the difference,” said Jensen after the game. “I think Ava’s done a lot, and she’s showed she’s ready for the moments.”
She certainly has done that; 21 points over two games on 8-of-10 shooting is a head-turning performance. Heiden’s skills were on full display in both games — her deft touch around the rim, her crisp footwork in the post, her dazzling speed and finishing ability in transition. She’s made an extremely compelling case, both for more minutes in however many games Iowa still has left in this season — and especially for what she can offer in upcoming seasons as she continues to unlock her considerable abilities.
NEXT: For the first time since the 2019-20 Big Ten Tournament, Iowa won’t be playing on the weekend. Iowa had played in the last four Big Ten Tournament finals, winning the last three. Now Iowa will wait to see what seed they receive in the 2025 NCAA Tournament — and where they’ll be headed to play a first round game. The 2025 NCAA Tournament Selection Show is scheduled for Sunday, March 16 at 7 PM CT and will be televised by ESPN.
Ohio
New bill seeks to make Loveland Frogman Ohio’s state cryptid
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Step aside, Bigfoot.
A new bill introduced to the Ohio House on April 13 wants to make the Loveland Frogman Ohio’s official state cryptid.
This very real bill is being sponsored by Ohio Representative Tristan Rader, who represents district 13 in Cleveland, and Representative Jean Schmidt, who represents district 62 in Loveland.
“This bill is about showcasing our communities,” said Rader in a press release. “The Loveland Frog is uniquely Ohio. It reflects the stories we tell, the places we’re proud of and the creativity that makes our state worth celebrating.”
The bill makes note that Loveland’s beloved legend has inspired books, documentaries, local festivals, artwork, merchandise and local tourism — all contributing to the local economy.
The Loveland Frogman is, as described by House Bill 821, “a frog-like, bipedal creature standing approximately four feet fall.”
The legend also inspired a found footage horror movie released in 2023.
But what is the Loveland Frogman?
The legend of the Loveland Frogman started with the story that, on two different nights in March of 1972, two different police officers spotted the Frogman.
The creature went unseen for decades, until in 2016, when a couple playing Pokemon Go said they spotted something weird between Loveland Madeira Road and Lake Isabella.
“We saw a huge frog near the water,” Sam Jacobs wrote in an email. “Not in the game, this was an actual giant frog.”
Jacobs said he stopped playing Pokemon Go so he could document what he was seeing, snapping some photos and shooting a short video.
“Then the thing stood up and walked on its hind legs. I realize this sounds crazy, but I swear on my grandmother’s grave this is the truth,” he wrote. “The frog stood about 4 feet tall.”
When they returned to Jacobs’ girlfriend’s home, her parents told them about the legend of the Frogman.
So was it the legendary Frogman? Or just a big frog? Jacobs wasn’t sure.
Around a day after WCPO’s story about Jacobs was published, we got a phone call from a man who claimed to be one of the original police officers who first saw the cryptid.
Mark Mathews told us the creature was not a frog at all.
Mathews explained that the first officer to encounter the purported Frogman, Ray Shockey, called him one night in the March of 1972 after spotting something strange on Riverside Drive/Kemper Road near the Totes boot factory and the Little Miami River.
“Naturally, I didn’t believe him … but I could somehow tell from his demeanor that he did see something,” Mathews said.
Later that month, Mathews was driving on Kemper Road near the boot factory when he saw something run across the road. However, it wasn’t walking upright and didn’t climb over the guardrail as the urban legend of the Frogman goes. The creature crawled under the guardrail. Matthews said he “had no clue what it was.”
“I know no one would believe me, so I shot it,” he said.
Mathews recovered the creature’s body and put it in his trunk to show Shockey. He said Shockey said it was the creature he had seen, too.
It was a large iguana about 3 or 3.5 feet long, Mathews said. The animal was missing its tail, which is why he didn’t immediately recognize it.
Mathews said he figured the iguana had been someone’s pet and then either got loose or was released when it grew too large. He also theorized that the cold-blooded animal had been living near the pipes that released water that was used for cooling the ovens in the boot factory as a way to stay warm in the cold March weather.
“It’s a big hoax,” he said. “There’s a logical explanation for everything.”
Replay: WCPO 9 News at Noon
Ohio
Ohio Secretary of State Democratic primary pits outsider vs. insider – Signal Ohio
Ohio Democrats had a tough time recruiting candidates for the 2026 midterms after years of election losses.
But they’ve still ended up with a primary contest for Ohio Secretary of State that bears the hallmarks of a competitive race, pitting a first-time candidate against one of the state’s more accomplished Democrats.
After launching his campaign early, Cincinnati cancer doctor Hambley has gained traction with state party insiders. He’s done so through a mix of active campaigning and strong fundraising – visiting 78 counties and, according to him, raising nearly $1 million, a figure that includes a nearly $200,000 personal loan. Former Gov. Ted Celeste endorsed Hambley last week, becoming the latest current or former elected Democrat to do so, and the state party opted last month to remain neutral in the race.
“Everyone here knows that we need a change,” Hambley said at a voter forum packed with liberal activists in Columbus earlier this month.
State Rep. Allison Russo, an Upper Arlington Democrat who previously led the Ohio House Democrats, meanwhile, says she’s made up for lost time after entering the race eight months after Hambley.
She’s racked up organized labor endorsements and is touting her experience fighting with Republicans in Columbus.
“We are not at a moment in time for an office of this significance in the statewide ticket where we can afford to have someone who’s on a learning curve,” Russo said in an interview.
The contest has become a test of competing arguments within the party: whether Democrats are better served by a political outsider or an experienced officeholder. Voters will decide in the May 5 primary.
A similar insider-outsider dynamic also exists in the Republican primary between state Treasurer Robert Sprague and Marcell Strbich, a retired U.S. Army intelligence officer, although the Ohio Republican Party has backed Sprague in that race, greatly increasing his chances of winning.
The Ohio Secretary of State is a key battleground for both parties, since it serves as the state’s chief elections officer. The role has become more politicized in recent years as President Donald Trump has sought to impose new restrictions on mail voting, which he claims is susceptible to fraud, even though documented cases of voter fraud are exceedingly rare.
The office’s duties include overseeing election administration, issuing guidance to county boards and writing ballot language for statewide issues, an increasingly important political battleground in Ohio, and serving on the Ohio Redistricting Commission.
The office also manages the state’s campaign finance system and business filings.
Hambley builds grassroots campaign
Hambley launched his campaign in January 2025, just months after Democrats were left decimated and demoralized by the November presidential election. A cancer doctor who works for the University of Cincinnati health system, he attracted little attention outside of Cincinnati. In his campaign launch statement, he cited in part the redistricting reform amendment that voters rejected in the November 2024 election as inspiring him to run.
Hambley was involved with that political fight, running a network of Southwest Ohio health workers who promoted the amendment. He got his first introduction to politics a decade before that, organizing opposition in Cleveland to Trump’s “Muslim ban” ahead of the city’s hosting of the 2016 Republican National Convention.
🗳️Have a question about Ohio’s elections?
Ask us — we may dig up the answer through our reporting.
As other Democrats deliberated over whether to run, Hambley developed his campaign by working off the list of hundreds of thousands of voters who signed the petitions for the 2024 amendment. He’s also amassed support by holding hundreds of small events around the state – 360, by his count. Hambley’s message includes emphasizing his background growing up on a small farm and the trusted role doctors play in society. He’s campaigned around the state in a Jeep, like another Democratic physician seeking statewide office, Dr. Amy Acton, the party’s presumptive nominee for governor.
“I absolutely believe, with a caregiver background running on care and empathy, especially this year, especially against these opponents, is the right way,” Hambley said during an April 11 voter forum in Columbus.
Russo makes a case for experience
Russo, who also works as a health care researcher, launched her campaign in August after being privately linked to a possible run for lieutenant governor.
She won her current seat in November 2018 in her first run for elected office, and was one of several women candidates to flip previously Republican-held suburban seats. Since then, she’s built relationships with Democrats around the state, in part through an unsuccessful special election campaign in 2021. At a November 2024 election night event that otherwise was extraordinarily bleak for state Democrats, she touted how Democrats flipped two additional Republican-held seats in Franklin County, ending Republicans’ ability to pass referendum-proof legislation.
From the beginning, Russo has emphasized her experience dealing with Republicans in Columbus.
“Having been in the arena, having been in some of the toughest fights in terms of attacks on direct democracy, attacks on voting, attacks on our redistricting process and navigating through a very broken redistricting process, that experience I think is critical,” Russo said in an interview.
Russo’s experience should give her an advantage in fundraising, given the opportunity she’s had to network as a Democratic legislative leader and a former candidate in a 2021 congressional race.
But in a state disclosure filed in January, Hambley said he had $546,000 in cash on hand, more than double what Russo reported at the time. He’s started putting his campaign cash to work – launching TV ads that subtly criticize Russo for accepting corporate political action committee money as a Democratic legislative leader.
“We’re going to be ramping up in the next couple weeks,” he said in an interview.
Russo declined to share her fundraising numbers, saying she’ll do so when she files her disclosure later this month. Even though Hambley got an eight-month head start on the race, Russo said she’s visited 76 counties, just under Hambley’s 78.
She said her advertising plan involves leaning on social media, and likened buying TV ads during a primary election to “lighting money on fire.” She dismissed the idea that the race is competitive, saying her internal polling shows her with a significant lead. She said it also shows there are many undecided voters, but she thinks they’ll gravitate toward the more experienced candidate.
“I think all of this leads me right into the general election. And that is where my eye is focused. It is winning this general election in November,” Russo said.
Few policy differences
The two candidates don’t have much difference on policy. Both say they want to expand voting rights while opposing Donald Trump’s attempts to restrict mail voting. Their main points of difference largely come down to their professional backgrounds.
But Hambley has leaned into two lines of attack, which both reflect Russo’s practical experience in politics.
First, Hambley has attacked Russo over her 2023 vote with Republicans to approve the current state legislative maps. The vote, which followed a lengthy court battle that Republicans ultimately won, locked in maps for the rest of the decade that will favor the GOP to win between three-fifths and two-thirds of Ohio’s House seats, to the disappointment of activists who view the maps as gerrymandered in favor of Republicans.
“Voting for gerrymandered maps is disqualified if you want to be Secretary of State,” Hambley said at the Columbus voter forum.
Second, Hambley has attacked Russo for accepting money from corporate PACs during her tenure as state House minority leader. He also attacked her for getting endorsed by the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, which Hambley called a “MAGA group” in a social media video.
In response, Russo said she supports campaign-finance reform. But, she said her job as a Democratic legislative leader was to help elect Democrats.
“I want real solutions. Not a bumper-sticker slogan that makes us all feel good,” Russo said.
In an interview, Russo also said some of Hambley’s stances could hurt him in a general election.
Hambley has pledged to campaign in 2027 for a new redistricting reform amendment – which would continue the politicization of the office by current Secretary of State Frank LaRose. In 2024, he endorsed and campaigned for President Donald Trump, after previously arguing that secretaries of state should avoid political campaigning to prevent a perception of bias.
“My primary opponent misunderstands what the job actually is and misunderstands what the role of [secretary of state] should be,” Russo said.
For his part, Hambley has argued Democrats need to confront difficult truths.
“People don’t like us. People don’t like the average Democrat in Ohio,” Hambley said during a March 5 candidate forum in Erie County. “It is a huge problem for us.
Ohio
Ranked choice voting ban silences Ohio voters | Opinion
By banning ranked choice voting and penalizing communities that consider it, Ohio leaders have limited local control and signaled a lack of trust in voters to shape their own elections.
When Gov. Mike DeWine signed Senate Bill 63 into law, he didn’t just ban ranked choice voting in Ohio. He sent a clear message: Ohio voters cannot be trusted to make decisions about our own elections.
That should concern everyone, regardless of where you stand on ranked choice voting.
This is not really about a specific voting system. It is about whether communities have the right to explore new ideas, debate them openly, and decide for themselves what works. Senate Bill 63 shuts that door completely. It tells cities and counties across Ohio that even considering a different approach is off-limits.
Worse, it punishes them for trying.
When policy becomes coercion
The law threatens to withhold Local Government Fund dollars from any community that adopts ranked choice voting. That is not guidance. It is coercion. It forces local leaders to choose between representing their voters and protecting their budgets.
In a state that has long valued local control, that should raise serious red flags.
Here in Greater Cincinnati, we pride ourselves on collaboration, innovation, and civic pride. We bring people together across industries, neighborhoods, and perspectives to solve problems and build something stronger. That spirit does not come from the top down. It comes from people who are trusted to show up and participate.
Senate Bill 63 undermines that spirit.
Ranked choice voting is already used in cities and states across the country. Some have embraced it. Others have rejected it. That is exactly how democracy is supposed to work. You try something. You evaluate it. You adjust.
Ohio does not even get that chance.
Who gets to decide our elections?
Instead of trusting voters to decide, state leaders decided for them. Instead of allowing debate, they ended it. Instead of encouraging participation, they shut it down.
If we believe in democracy, we have to believe in the people who make it work.
We have to trust Ohioans to think critically, to weigh options, and to choose how our elections should function. Taking that choice away does not protect democracy. It weakens it.
Gov. DeWine had an opportunity to stand up for that principle. He chose not to.
Now it is up to Ohio voters to decide what kind of voice we want to have moving forward and whether we are willing to accept it being taken away.
Tyler Minton is a Cincinnati resident and Ohio native who works in the meetings and events industry.
-
News16 minutes agoSouthern Poverty Law Center indicted on federal fraud charges
-
New York2 hours agoN.Y.P.D. Narcotics Unit Under Review After a Beating Is Caught on Tape
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoMI Healthy Climate Conference in Detroit focuses on green funding and strong future
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoCalifornia’s New Hotel Edit: The Best Places to Stay Across the Golden State in 2026
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoThe Brandon Aubrey Deal | DZTV
-
Miami, FL3 hours agoRanking the Miami Heat’s Top Trade Targets
-
Boston, MA3 hours agoFormer Massachusetts doctor faces 81 new sexual assault charges
-
Denver, CO3 hours agoHouston County murder suspect returns to face charges after her arrest in Denver