Connect with us

Washington

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard


Democratic state lawmakers are again pushing a proposal to restrict rent hikes across Washington.

Despite the rent cap bill’s dramatic failure last session, backers say its prospects this year are better given new lawmakers, revamped legislative committees and growing public support. The road to final passage, however, could still be tough.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, D-Seattle, prefiled a “rent stabilization” bill in the House on Thursday. It is similar to where the plan left off last year

The bill includes a 7% cap on yearly rent increases for existing tenants, with some exceptions, including buildings operated by nonprofits and residential construction that is 10 years old or less. It also requires landlords to give 180 days notice before an increase of 3% or more and limits some move-in and deposit fees.

Advertisement

“People are suffering, and I don’t know how anyone comes back to the legislative session and doesn’t want to support relief,” said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau, D-Tacoma, who will sponsor the legislation in the Senate.

Supporters say the proposal would help tenants and alleviate homelessness, but opponents say a rent cap could only worsen Washington’s housing shortage by disincentivizing new development.

Democratic leaders said Thursday that the proposal will likely be heard quickly in the House after the session kicks off next week but could move slowly in the Senate where it died last year. 

Trudeau said the new makeup of the chamber and the membership of key committees could be in the bill’s favor. Last year,  supporters blamed moderate Democrats on committees like Ways and Means and Housing for killing the bill. Two of those moderates — Sens. Mark Mullet and Kevin Van De Wege — did not run for reelection last year and will no longer be in the Senate. 

Trudeau also said that because the policy is being named early as a priority for their caucus, it will give lawmakers more time to consider it. 

Advertisement

“We’re still going to have conflict, just hopefully not as dramatic as last year,” she said. 

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, told reporters Thursday that he believes his caucus is ready to support the bill, but that it would take passing other legislation to increase housing supply and improve affordability. 

In the House, the outlook is more certain. “We passed it off the floor in the House last year, and we will pass it off the floor this year,” House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, said.

The bill is sure to cause some heavy debate.

Last year, it had support from affordable housing advocates, tenants and labor unions. 

Advertisement

Michele Thomas, at the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, said stabilizing rents is essential to help prevent evictions and homelessness. 

“I think lawmakers understand how much rising rents are contributing to housing instability, to homelessness, and to our state’s eviction crisis,” Thomas said.

Among those against the proposal are business groups, landlords and developers. 

Sean Flynn, board president and executive director at the Rental Housing Association of Washington, an industry group, criticized the idea, saying it would drive developers out of the state and lead to less home construction. 

“The fundamental problem that we have in our housing market is a lack of supply,” Flynn said. “This chokes off supply.”

Advertisement

Instead of a cap on all rents, Flynn said the Legislature should try to target tenants who need assistance most and specific landlords who use predatory rent increases without cause. 

One idea that has support from Republicans is creating a tenant assistance program that would give rental assistance vouchers to low-income tenants who may need help paying rent during a given month. Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, is sponsoring that bill. 

House Minority Leader Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, told reporters Thursday his caucus is working on similar proposals with a more targeted approach to helping tenants. 

Stokesbary and Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said their members likely will not support a rent cap policy this session. Stokesbary said he understands the short-term relief of the proposal but that the state ultimately needs more housing.

“In the long-run, this is a much worse deal for renters,” he said.  

Advertisement

Braun said lawmakers should find ways to make permitting easier and increase available land for home construction. He said there is “no quick solution” to the state’s housing and homelessness crisis.

But supporters of the rent cap bill push back on the idea that solely building more housing will solve the state’s problems.

Thomas said lawmakers have put a lot of emphasis in recent years on increasing the supply of homes and alleviating homelessness, but they have not passed legislation to help tenants struggling to keep their homes. Failing to do so will only result in higher levels of eviction and homelessness, Thomas said. 

“Rent stabilization stands alone,” she said. “Each of these issues are important, and the Legislature needs to address the entire housing ecosystem.”

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

1 dead, 2 injured in head-on collision near Sequim

Published

on

1 dead, 2 injured in head-on collision near Sequim


A man is dead, and two others were injured after two vehicles collided near Sequim late Sunday night, according to the Washington State Patrol (WSP).

An SUV with two people was heading west on SR 101 at around 7:15 p.m. when a pickup truck in the opposite direction crossed the center line and crashed head-on.

The SUV passenger, a 39-year-old Lynnwood man, was declared dead by authorities at the scene. A 34-year-old woman driving the vehicle was airlifted to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, and her condition is unknown.

WSP said drugs or alcohol played a part in the collision. The Colorado man is facing charges of vehicular homicide and vehicular assault.

Advertisement

The Colorado man was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash and was lifeflighted to Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett. WSP has not released his condition.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

How Washington’s crossing of the Delaware presaged a changing world

Published

on

How Washington’s crossing of the Delaware presaged a changing world


Spend some time staring at the famous painting “Washington Crossing the Delaware,” and you can’t miss the ice. It’s everywhere. Cold weather became part of Washington’s military strategy, says Alex Robb, an educator at Washington Crossing Historic Park outside Philadelphia. “It does a lot to impede the crossing and endanger the whole operation,” he said, “but it actually becomes our shield.”

“Washington Crossing the Delaware” by Emanuel Leutze, 1851. Oil on canvas. From the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. 

GraphicaArtis/Getty Images

Advertisement


At the end of 1776, after a string of losses, Washington’s army was on the verge of collapse. But Robb says that on Christmas, with ice forming in the Delaware River, the enemy assumed it was too dangerous for the Americans to cross.

They were wrong … and the cold weather handed Washington the element of surprise. His victory at Trenton was a sign that the war could still be won.

Robb said, “Looking back, had the weather proven more mild, they most definitely would’ve encountered resistance outside Trenton.”  Just a few degrees made the difference between winning and losing a battle.

revolutionary-war-re-enactors.jpg

Every year, Revolutionary War re-enactors gather to mark the anniversary of Gen. Washington’s crossing of the Delaware on Christmas 1776. 

CBS News

Advertisement


At that time, Americans were used to colder winters. We know that from Thomas Jefferson’s meticulous, handwritten weather records. But since then, winter has gotten warmer. “Ever since Washington was here, there has been a steady increase,” said Jen Brady, a data analyst at the science non-profit Climate Central. Their research shows that average winter temperatures in the Philadelphia area have gone up and down over the years. But overall, they are now 5.5 degrees warmer than they were in 1970.

As for the current weather conditions around Washington Crossing, Pa., Brady said, “It will continue to snow. There will continue to be cold in cold places. But there will be less of it.”

“It’s a time machine”

The best evidence of our changing climate comes from ice cores – long tubes of ice extracted out of glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica. And inside the ice core are perfectly-preserved air bubbles. The deeper you drill, the older the bubbles. “It’s this sort of magical way of going back in time,” said Eric Steig, a glaciologist at the University of Washington in Seattle. “It’s a time machine.”

eric-steig-ice-core.jpg

Glaciologist Eric Steig slices an ice core, showing trapped air bubbles dating back to the birth of the United States.  

CBS News

Advertisement


Steig showed us one ice core that dates from 1776, containing tiny pockets of air from that time. “So, like, you’re breathing a little bit of the air that George Washington breathed,” Steig said.

Those bubbles contain carbon dioxide, a gas that helps regulate Earth’s temperature. And for 800,000 years the carbon levels found in ice cores have gone up and down, but never above 300 parts per million – not until around 1800, when they started to take off.

What changed at that point to make that spike? “We began burning fossil fuels, and we’re doing it really fast,” Steig said.

carbon-levels-over-millennia.jpg

CBS News

Advertisement


Since the Industrial Revolution, which began around the time of the American Revolution, our cars, factories, and power plants have been burning oil and gas and emitting massive amounts of carbon dioxide. That has led to warmer temperatures, which can intensify extreme floods, droughts and fires.

Steig said, “It would seem to me it’s good for people to understand things have changed, and will continue to change, and have an understanding of what to expect going forward.”

So, it turns out, around the time Washington looked out on the icy Delaware, there were two important pictures coming into focus: One, the story of America; the other, the beginnings of climate change.

And both continue to shape our world.

What would Washington say if he showed up in 2026? Steig replied, “You pluck somebody from that time period, they would see things having changed quite dramatically.”

Advertisement

     
For more info:

  • Alex Robb, Washington Crossing Historic Park, Washington Crossing, Pa.
  • Jennifer Brady, senior data analyst and research manager, Climate Central
  • Eric Steig, glaciologist, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle
  • Thanks to Martin Froger Silva, University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership, and the U.S. Ice Drilling Program

      
Story produced by Robert Marston. Editor: Chad Cardin. 

    
See more: 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington panel set to consider Trump’s ballroom project in March

Published

on

Washington panel set to consider Trump’s ballroom project in March


Washington – President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project may get a blessing from Washington planning authorities as soon as next month.

Trump razed the White House’s East Wing in October to make way for a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot (8,400-square-meter) addition that he says will be privately financed. The administration planned the neoclassical building’s ribbon-cutting for summer 2028 as part of the most extensive remaking of the U.S. capital’s landscape in decades.

Advertisement

The National Capital Planning Commission said it would consider “approval of preliminary and final site and building plans” on March 5, according to a tentative meeting agenda posted online.

The commission is one of two federal bodies, along with the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, assigned a role in overseeing key D.C.-area building projects.

Neither group is expected to block or delay Trump’s plans. Trump picked several members of both groups, and his former personal lawyer Will Scharf chairs the National Capital Planning Commission.

But federal courts are scrutinizing the project. A judge last month expressed skepticism about whether the administration had authority to proceed with construction after a demolition that Congress didn’t approve.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued in December, arguing that the project lacked the required approvals and environmental review.

Advertisement

In documents supporting its proposal and posted online by the commission, the Trump administration said it concluded that demolition of the East Wing was “the most effective solution to many longstanding issues affecting the White House” in light of the 120-year-old structure’s limitations, poor energy efficiency and limited accessibility for people with disabilities.

The White House’s disclosures were the most extensive description of the project to date, including illustrations by architect Shalom Baranes.

In those disclosures, the White House said the administration planned to incorporate some preserved items from the East Wing, such as its cornerstone and a pergola designed by the Chinese-American architect I.M. Pei.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending