Connect with us

News

UK government seeks to quell turmoil in bond markets as borrowing costs soar

Published

on

UK government seeks to quell turmoil in bond markets as borrowing costs soar

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The British government sought to quell tumult in UK bond markets on Thursday by vowing to stick to its fiscal rules even as borrowing costs hit their highest level since the financial crisis.

Darren Jones, number two at the UK Treasury, appeared in parliament to answer urgent questions on the markets turmoil after the 10-year gilt yield rose to 4.93 per cent, its highest since 2008, and the pound dropped as much as 1 per cent against the dollar to its lowest for more than a year.

“UK gilt markets continue to function in an orderly way,” Jones told MPs. “There should be no doubt of the government’s commitment to economic stability and sound public finances. This is why meeting the fiscal rules is non-negotiable.”

Advertisement

Jones’ appearance came after Sir Lindsay Hoyle, Speaker of the House of Commons, accepted an urgent question from the Conservative opposition about the “growing pressure of borrowing costs on the public finances”.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who is about to leave for a long-scheduled trip to China, dispatched Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, to answer.

UK borrowing costs have risen sharply as investors worry about the government’s heavy borrowing needs and the growing threat of stagflation, which combines lacklustre growth with persistent price pressures.

“The sell-off in [the pound] and gilts reflects a deterioration in the UK’s fiscal prospects,” said analysts at Brown Brothers Harriman.

On Thursday, the 10-year gilt yield rose as much as 0.12 percentage points before easing back to 4.83 per cent. Sterling was swept up in the sell-off, dropping to $1.224, its weakest since November 2023, before staging a partial recovery.

Advertisement

Jones argued it was normal for gilt prices to vary and that there was still strong underlying demand for UK government bonds.

“The latest auction held yesterday received three times as many bids as the amount on offer,” he said.

The minister said the Treasury was still working on a multiyear spending review due this summer on the basis of assumptions set out in the October Budget.

However, he acknowledged that the Office for Budget Responsibility, the independent Budget watchdog, would come up with fresh forecasts on March 26, which could then have an impact on discussions with ministers.

The recent bond market strains also raise the spectre of tax rises or spending cuts. The Treasury has signalled that, if necessary, it would reduce expenditure rather than increase taxes.

Advertisement

Shadow chancellor Mel Stride, who had posed the urgent question, said Reeves should have attended parliament herself. 

“Where is the chancellor?” he asked. “It is a bitter regret that at this difficult time, with these serious issues, she herself is nowhere to be seen.” 

He later called on Reeves to cancel her China trip “and focus on this country instead”, as he attacked Labour’s “panicked attempt to reassure the markets on the economic mess of their own making”.

Reeves left herself a slender £9.9bn of headroom against her revised fiscal rules in last year’s autumn Budget even after announcing a £40bn tax-raising package that aimed to “wipe the slate clean” on public finances.

The chancellor’s key fiscal rule is a promise to fund all day-to-day public spending with tax receipts by 2029-30.

Advertisement

Increases in government debt yields have since put that budgetary wriggle room under threat. The level of bond yields is an important determinant of the budget headroom, given its implications for the government’s interest bill, which exceeds £100bn a year.

“Investors are looking for some sort of guidance from somebody but the government has just said there is no problem,” said Tomasz Wieladek, chief European economist at T Rowe Price. “The Bank of England will stick this out as long as possible,” he added, saying the moves were not big enough to merit anything beyond a verbal response from policymakers.

The gilts market could suffer another bout of selling on Friday, analysts said, if closely watched jobs data in the US was to push yields higher on US Treasuries, dragging gilts with them.

“It can turn extremely grim for gilts if we see a strong payroll,” said Pooja Kumra, a UK rates strategist at TD Securities.

Analysts have said the simultaneous sell-off of gilts and the pound carried echoes of the reaction triggered by Liz Truss’s “mini” Budget in 2022.

Advertisement

But many investors think the situation is short of the 2022 gilts crisis.

“I do anticipate things to start bottoming out . . . On gilts the washout already happened last year,” said Geoffrey Yu, a senior strategist at BNY. “I’m not denying there are issues in the UK, but to suddenly draw comparisons to 2022, I think that is pushing things.”

News

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

Published

on

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

A Waymo robotaxi drives in San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood this week.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Police in San Mateo, Calif., posted Monday on social media that they had apprehended a pair of teenagers from a Waymo driverless robotaxi after the company alerted authorities to suspected criminal activity. It’s the latest incident involving video surveillance of passengers and others by autonomous vehicles — raising questions about the limits of privacy in such vehicles.

The Facebook post by the San Mateo County Police said: “Parents do you know where your teens are? @waymo does!”

The 15-year-olds were allegedly drinking alcohol and shooting toy guns from the car, according to the police. They said Waymo’s systems detected behavior that then triggered a safety response, after which the company disabled the vehicle and contacted police.

Advertisement

Waymo’s cars, equipped with an array of cameras, microphones and other sensors to monitor passengers and other nearby vehicles, are becoming more common in cities across the United States. Experts say the detention of the two teens in San Mateo highlights a potential — but not inevitable — trade-off between privacy and convenience. It also questions the extent to which companies similar to Waymo are required to hand over private data, including audio and video of passengers, in situations where a crime is suspected.

NPR reached out to Waymo, which is owned by Alphabet, the parent company of Google, for comment on the details of the San Mateo incident and how the company responded, but did not hear back. But on its website, the company says that as many as 29 cameras in its autonomous cars provide an all-around view and “are designed with high dynamic range and thermal stability, to see in both daylight and low-light conditions, and tackle more complex environments.”

“There already exist laws that govern duty to report or even duty to protect” for carriers such as Waymo, according to Alessandro Acquisti, a professor of information technology at the MIT Sloan School of Management. “The privacy problems arise when and if driverless carrier companies used such laws or ethical obligations as a pretext for blanket, indiscriminate accumulation of identifiable data for unspecified future purposes.”

That includes not just monitoring people inside the cars, but outside too. Take, for example, a hit-and-run investigation last year in Los Angeles. Media reported that the police inquiry was aided by video captured by a Waymo taxi that had a clear view of the crime. Critics suggested at the time that authorities were using the company’s vehicles as a mobile surveillance platform. And during 2025 protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns, demonstrators vandalized Waymos, apparently angry that video recorded by the vehicles could be used by police, although there is no evidence that happened.

Continue Reading

News

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Published

on

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Donald Trump has terminated the remaining members of the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide just a few months before the midterm elections, multiple outlets reported Thursday.

The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission ⁠were forced out on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other ⁠two, Democratic appointees were notified of their terminations via email from ​the White House presidential personnel office.

“On ‌behalf of President ‌Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position ‌as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email, seen by Reuters, said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Election Assistance Commission serves as a “national clearinghouse of information on election ‌administration”, accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, and maintains the national mail-voter registration form developed by the National ​Voter Registration Act of 1993, according to the commission’s website. The terminations follow Trump and top administration officials’ advocacy to change vote-by-mail requirements and investigations into the 2020 election outcome, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Advertisement

“It is ⁠irresponsible and dangerous that this Administration remains dead set on ​causing chaos for ​our election officials across this ​country,” Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes said in a ​Thursday statement. “This ‌move undermines the integrity ​of nonpartisan ​election administration.”

The 2002 law that established the commission, the Help America Vote Act, states the president can appoint replacements to the commission.

It is unclear how Trump will move ahead with the commission.

Reuters contributed reporting

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending