Connect with us

Ohio

Jaloni Cambridge returns in No. 10 Ohio State women’s road victory vs Rutgers

Published

on

Jaloni Cambridge returns in No. 10 Ohio State women’s road victory vs Rutgers


play

No. 10 Ohio State returned from their Christmas break to a regular-season schedule that only has Big Ten opponents remaining, which included Rutgers, who the Buckeyes defeated 77-63 on the road.

For the first time in three games, the Buckeyes had point guard Jaloni Cambridge in the starting lineup. The freshman injured her right shoulder against Ball State on Dec. 10 and her status was day-to-day up until the Rutgers game.

Advertisement

Having Cambridge back on the court set up a matchup between two of the top freshman in the conference, as Rutgers’ freshman starter Kiyomi McMiller averages 20.9 points, the second highest in the Big Ten. Cambridge has averaged 13.9 across nine games.

On Sunday, Cambridge recorded 2 points and McMiller had 14, with half her points scored in the fourth quarter.

“We did a decent job of making her earn everything that she got,” Ohio State coach Kevin McGuff said. “That was the goal. You know you’re not going to shut her out, but you want to make sure that you have taking contested shots and I think we did that collectively as a team pretty well.”

The more prevalent battle during the game was between Ohio State forward Ajae Petty and Rutgers forward Destiny Adams. Both had double-doubles, Petty with 16 points and 10 rebounds while Adams scored 31 and grabbed 17 rebounds.

Advertisement

Adams, one of three Big Ten players averaging over 10 rebounds per game, led Rutgers to win the rebound battle 45-41.

“She was tough, quick post player, physical,” Petty said. “It was good being able to play against somebody who can play like that.”

Petty was tied with junior Cotie McMahon for a team-high points against Rutgers.

The Buckeyes started with sloppy ball movement during their first two possessions, while the Scarlet Knights were strong in their half-court defense. Rutgers got hands on three Ohio State passes before fouling Petty on a layup and sending her to the free throw line, where she went 1-for-2 for the first points of the game at the 8:51 mark.

With both teams preferring to run fast-tempo offenses, it was Ohio State who had a quicker start.

Advertisement

Going on a 13-4 run throughout the first 2:45 minutes of the opening quarter, the stretch began when Cambridge recorded one of her two steals of the game and found junior teammate Chance Gray for a layup while making a 2-on-0 fastbreak.

“That’s just another thing that coach McGuff talks to us about, just being able to handle the lead the correct way,” Petty said. “We came out a little lackadaisical, but we all want to win, so we just made adjustments.”

Rutgers came out of a timeout following the Buckeyes’ run and over the course of 5 minutes, cutdown the deficit to as little as 4 points. Ohio State built back its distance between the Scarlet Knights by the end of the quarter with a 23-16 advantage.

Advertisement

Ohio State’s lead grew to 21 points in the second quarter behind the efforts of Taylor Thierry. The senior record 8 points, just one less than the whole Rutgers lineup in the quarter, and the Buckeyes finished ahead 46-25.

Coming out of halftime, the Scarlet Knights had the hot hand. Led by Adams and senior Jojo Lacey, Rutgers went on a 9-0 run in the first 2:30 of the third.

“They didn’t quit playing, they kept playing hard,” McGuff said. “And this has been a little bit of a trend unfortunately when we have a lead, we don’t do the things that allowed us to get the lead.”

Similarly to the run Rutgers had in the first half, the Scarlet Knights were unable to keep the momentum and Ohio State never allowed Rutgers to come within 9 points in the half, despite outscoring the Buckeyes 38-31.

Advertisement

The Scarlet Knights were forced to play more conservatively in the fourth quarter with Adams and McMiller on the court with four fouls each. Neither fouled out, but Ohio State took advantage of the situation by attacking both players in one-on-one matchups.

Ohio State, now 13-0, is back at Value City Arena on Jan. 5 and will face Northwestern at 1 p.m.

bmackay@dispatch.com

@brimackay15





Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Lorain woman killed, three children injured in Ohio Turnpike crash in Elyria (UPDATED)

Published

on

Lorain woman killed, three children injured in Ohio Turnpike crash in Elyria (UPDATED)


Advertisement

`
const PAYWALL_HTML2 = `

Subscribe For Unlimited Access

Advertisement

You have exceeded the number of free articles available each month.

Thank you for supporting quality local journalism

Our award-winning coverage would not be possible without you.

Sign in here

Advertisement


if you are already a subscriber for unlimited access to breaking news, sports, photos, videos and our e-edition on your phone, tablet or desktop.

Click here
 for our new subscriber specials.

`.trim();
const PAYWALL_HTML3 = `

Advertisement
To continue reading SUBSCRIBE.
Already a subscriber? LOG IN.

`
const PAYWALL_HTML4 = “
function ensureCss() {
if (!document.head) return;

const existing = document.querySelector(‘link[data-paywall-css=”1″]’);
if (existing) return;

const link = document.createElement(‘link’);
link.rel=”stylesheet”;
link.type=”text/css”;
link.href = CSS_HREF;
link.setAttribute(‘data-paywall-css’, ‘1’);
document.head.appendChild(link);
}

function hasSubInfo(el) {
// Only replace once the widget already contains .subInfo
return !!(el && el.querySelector(‘.subInfo’));
}

function applyTo(el) {
if (!el || el.dataset.paywallReplaced === ‘1’) return;
if (!hasSubInfo(el)) return; //



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit $865,000

Published

on

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit 5,000



Real estate transfers in Licking County, Ohio, range from $85,000 to $865,000

The following are property transfers recorded in Licking County from June 1-5, 2026.

Advertisement

First name indicates the seller; second name represents the buyer

Buckeye Lake

  • 502 Providence Lane; Cohagen, Christopher C and Lori A; Adams, Jeffrey L and Boyce-Adams, Jo Anna; 6/1/2026; $511,000
  • 131 Cranberry Lane; Smart, Amy and Kidwell, Kevin K; Sew and Minor, Christian; 6/1/2026; $262,000

Etna Township

  • 116 Cameron Drive SW; Ray, Erica L; Darjee, Sanjay and Laxmi and Dil; 6/2/2026; $412,000  
  • 119 Kraner St. SW; Adkins, Zane and Amy; Culbertson, Brenton Howard; 6/1/2026; $368,500
  • 160 Dusky Willow Drive; Willow Reserve LLC; Martin, Alaina K; 6/2/2026; $290,940

Granville

  • 119 Derwyn Del Way; Lifer, David C and Julia H; Martin, Michael and Lisa; 6/1/2026; $865,000
  • 39 Victoria Drive; Acton, Wendy S and Paul J; Cannon, Matthew Evan and Zywica, Natalie Nicole; 6/2/2026; $835,000

Granville Township

  • 49 Alberry Drive; Halliday, Lucas and Breayne; Howe, Jason and Kathryn; 6/2/2026; $570,000

Harrison Township

  • 102 Whirlaway Loop; Rice, Dawn (Trustee); Bope, Maria and Shane; 6/2/2026; $420,000

Heath

  • 1306 Kacey Court; Fischer Homes Columbus II LLC; Owens, Blake Andrew and Taylor Marie; 6/2/2026; $437,779
  • 805 Fieldson Drive; Flowers, Ingrit; Harder, Noah C; 6/2/2026; $250,000

Hebron

  • 802 Cumberland Meadows Circle; Lines, Marlene S; Gerhart, Jamie A and Ralph W Jr; 6/2/2026; $232,000

Johnstown

  • 101 Bigelow Drive; McGovern, Matthew S and Jennifer L; Sanford, Jessica; 6/2/2026; $442,500

Liberty Township

  • 5844 Nichols Lane Road NW; La Jeunesse, Garth E and Debra; Nesselroad, William Heath and Annie; 6/1/2026; $629,000
  • 7211 Northridge Road NW; Devault, Robert E Jr and Joann; Esbenshade, Travis M and Lowe, Shelby M; 6/1/2026; $495,000

Newark

  • 2110 Overlook Way; D.R. Horton-Indiana LLC; Tarsha, Michele A; 6/1/2026; $433,335
  • 1162 Taylor Ave.; Heath Fluid LLC; Anglada, Gabriel P and Salina T; 6/1/2026; $200,000
  • 32 Postal Ave. W.; Palmisano, Phil; Moore, Dominic Michael and Miksich, Paige Elizabeth; 6/1/2026; $198,900
  • 75 Gay St.; Velez, Marcos A; Camell, Campbell; 6/1/2026; $155,000
  • 655 Evans St.; TNL; McRada Properties LLC; 6/1/2026; $145,000
  • 63 Wallace St.; FDA Peachtree LLC; Burns, Amber L; 6/2/2026; $86,500
  • 404 10th St.; Synergy Group Properties LLC; Busy Boys Restoration LLC; 6/2/2026; $85,000

Reynoldsburg

  • 8447 Rodebaugh Road; Collins, Carol J; Thorpe, Kimberley Lynn and Henry, Steven; 6/2/2026; $340,000



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored

Published

on

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored


COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s law requiring children under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps must be restored, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The decision comes as a blow to NetChoice, which has won court victories against identical digital identification laws in other states, including Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia. The trade group representing TikTok, Snapchat, Meta and other major tech companies said the Ohio decision went against “clear national consensus” and that it intended to keep fighting.

“An unconstitutional law protects no one, and we remain focused on ensuring the First Amendment rights of Ohioans are protected,” said Paul Taske, director of the NetChoice Litigation Center.

Netchoice brought suit against Ohio’s law in 2024, arguing that it was overly broad, vague and represented an unconstitutional impediment to free speech.

Advertisement

The Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit’s panel disagreed. In a 2-1 decision, it found that the law was not unconstitutional and sent it back to a lower court to have a block on the law’s enforcement vacated.

“At bottom, the Act imposes a parental consent requirement,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the lead opinion. “That requirement constitutes a marginal burden that precisely targets the multi-faceted problem that Ohio has identified: Children’s unsupervised assent to terms and conditions for use of platforms that take advantage of and harm them.”

Judge Alice Batchelder concurred, writing that “a statute is not vague just because it has a wide berth.”

Known as the Social Media Parental Notification Act, the Ohio law was part of an $86.1 billion state budget bill that Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law in July 2023.

The administration pushed the measure as a way to protect children’s mental health, with then-Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, now a U.S. senator, saying at the time that social media was “intentionally addictive” and harmful to kids.

Advertisement

The law requires companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.

Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Advertisement

Republican Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson called Thursday’s ruling “a win for Ohio families.”

“The court agreed that parents –- not social media companies –- should get a say in what kids see online,” he said in a statement. “We have an obligation to keep our children safe, and today, the most dangerous place for our kids is the internet. This decision gives parents the tools to be involved and provide oversight.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending