Connect with us

Entertainment

'What We Do in the Shadows' finale: All good things must end

Published

on

'What We Do in the Shadows' finale: All good things must end

This article contains spoilers for the series finale of “What We Do in the Shadows.”

Can vampires be funny? After six seasons of “What We Do in the Shadows,” the answer is a resounding yes.

Like the 2014 film by Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement that it is based on, the series is a mockumentary that follows a group of vampire roommates, Laszlo Cravensworth (Matt Berry), Nadja of Antipaxos (Natasia Demetriou), Nandor the Relentless (Kayvan Novak) and Colin Robinson (Mark Proksch), and their familiar Guillermo de la Cruz (Harvey Guillén). The vampires here are much like the ones you’ve seen in movies and read about in books: they’re immortal, blood-sucking creatures who kill mercilessly. But the series, like the film, shows that vampires are also multidimensional — vulnerable, emotional, funny, absurd — and completely out of place in the modern world. “Shadows” was often at its best when we saw the characters trying to blend in and act like everyday citizens of Staten Island, N.Y.

But what differentiated the FX series from its source material was how it expanded the vampire universe and our understanding of it. Case in point: the creation of energy vampires like Colin Robinson, who feed on emotional energy instead of blood. It was the perfect analogy to our tech-driven, capitalist, corporate society where meetings, office small-talk and bureaucracy often feel like they can drain us of our life force.

Now, the show is coming to a close, and not just in our world. In the “Shadows” universe, Guillermo and the vampires are saying goodbye to the documentary camera crew that have followed them for the past six years. For the vampires, it’s just another day as immortal beings; we learn they’ve been through this before, having shot a documentary in the 1950s. But for Guillermo, it’s bittersweet; he’s trying to come to terms with the news, what it means and what’s next for him.

Advertisement

The other question it raises: How do you come up with a perfect ending for a show? Guillermo ponders this and the finale plays with it. We see the boom mics, cameras and operators emerge from behind the scenes and a clapperboard close the documentary, but a twist at the end of the episode opens the possibility for more — will Guillermo start a new life as a vigilante with Nandor or leave the vampires behind? We don’t know for certain, but for now, Times staff writer Tracy Brown and television editor Maira Garcia discuss the finale of the series, favorite moments and what made the comedy so special.

Will familiar and vampire become vigilante and sidekick? Nandor (Kayvan Novak) and Guillermo (Harvey Guillén) in their superhero outfits.

(FX)

Maira Garcia: All good things must come to an end, to quote Nadja of Antipaxos, or was it Nelly Furtado who said that originally? In any case, we’ve come to the end of the road for “What We Do in the Shadows,” one of my favorite comedies of the past decade. Tracy, you’ve heard me wax on about this show and my love for Jackie Daytona and Matt Berry probably more than you ever wanted to hear, but its quirkiness, ongoing jokes and macabre humor were always my kind of humor.

Advertisement

Now that the finale has aired, I’m curious to hear what you thought of the episode and how it ties things up? We’ve seen the characters occasionally break the fourth wall by addressing the camera directly or acknowledging the documentary crew, but this was a wrecking ball.

Tracy Brown: I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I thought the episode was a very wild and fitting “Shadows” way to wrap things up. One of the things I’d asked showrunner Paul Simms before the season started was whether the finale was a period or more like a semicolon so I knew we were getting an episode more like the latter. Still, I wasn’t sure what to expect because series finales are tough — just look at all the best/worst lists that have been published. It was fun to see the show just skewer the whole idea of endings and closure and sticking the landing. Of course Guillermo got caught up in his feelings about the “documentary” coming to the end because it’s a very human thing to reflect on the crossing of milestones and to want the passage of time to mean something. And he experienced a lot of growth and change over the course of the show. But for the vampires, it’s just any other day. One of my favorite gags in the episode was the vampires revealing that this documentary (a.k.a. the show) wasn’t even the first time they’d let a film crew into their lives. The unreleased Maysles brothers film was great both thematically and as a way to revisit some favorite moments from the past.

How about you, Maira? What did you think of the episode? More importantly, how excited were you for Jackie Daytona’s return?

A black and white photo of a man standing at the head of a room as four people sitting in armchairs look up at him.

The vampires in a documentary — in 1958. (Russ Martin/FX)

A black and white photo of a man wearing a hat with toothpick in his mouth.

Jackie Daytona from Tucson, Arizonia, has been around awhile. (Russ Martin/FX)

Advertisement

Garcia: I was thrilled. Jackie’s been around town for awhile, as we learn. I think the nod to “The Usual Suspects” was another moment that had me in stitches (and don’t laugh, but it took me a minute to realize what I was watching — the movie came out in 1995! I can barely remember what I had for lunch.) I was curious how they would tie everything together, considering so much of this season has been about Guillermo — played by Harvey Guillén, a brilliant actor who I hope we see more of soon — beginning to let go of the roommates/coven that he’s been with for so long. First, he decides he no longer wants to be a vampire, and he gets a corporate job in finance, but that ends up not working out either, as we see in the penultimate episode. In some ways, he still seems to be finding his way, but it’s true, he’s grown so much. He went from a meek, subservient familiar to realizing he has Van Helsing blood, and has the ability to lay waste to vampires (which he does, to Laszlo, Nadja, Colin and Nandor’s benefit), to the infinitely more confident person he is now. His arc, including when he came out to his family in Season 4, was handled with care and it showed that you can be sensitive and kind, but also a no-holds-barred vampire killer when you need to be.

A man sits up in a fur-lined coffin as a man stands next to it.

Nandor (Kayvan Novak) and Guillermo (Harvey Guillén) in one of the final scenes from the finale of “What We Do in the Shadows.”

(Russ Martin/FX)

Advertisement

Brown: Guillermo really was the beating heart of the show — literally! And I laughed when the Guide (Kristen Schaal) suggested turning Guillermo into a vampire for their perfect ending because it was a perfect nod to how most people probably expected the show to end before Season 5 happened. But I think for me that arc in particular really highlights what was special about this show. Guillermo standing up for himself to finally make his dreams come true on his own terms since his (toxic) boss had strung him along for years, only to realize the big life change wasn’t for him and that being OK. It was something very relatable wrapped up in the unabashedly silly vampire trappings of the show. “Shadows” was proudly a comedy through and through but it handled its deeper themes with care. Like the time in Season 3 when Nadja’s ghost felt so neglected that it jumped from her doll to possess various other things including a giant inflatable rat. A hilarious lesson on the importance of self care. But that levity and absurdity was really the show’s superpower at a time when a lot of the other buzzy comedy shows are making us cringe or cry.

Garcia: Absolutely. Sometimes I just need to laugh, and this show consistently delivered without being too heavy-handed. And each character was more than the face they put on; for example, Laszlo was a self-described lothario, but he was also the guy who became a father figure for Colin Robinson when he rebirthed himself, and he created the Monster, who he cares for like a son. Plus, we got a cameo this season from Steve Coogan, as Laszlo’s father Lord Roderick, which showed the complicated relationship between them, and again, showcases the depth of our vamps. Similarly with Nandor, who was once a great Ottoman warrior, we see that he is really just a big softie looking for love, romantic and platonic.

Tracy, you spent some time with the cast this year in the lead up to the final season. They seem like a group with a lot of chemistry from what we’ve seen on screen, and each has comedic chops that work well together. What did they say about the show coming to a close?

Brown: I got to talk to them right around the time that they would usually be heading to Toronto to film the next season, so they were all feeling a little nostalgic and mentioned how it was weird that they weren’t getting ready for more “Shadows.” The cast is really close so they shared how they had just been texting each other “I miss you” or even messages joking about their flight being delayed or making plans in Toronto as if they were about to go shoot another season. I’ll let you guess who was sending what. But the overall sentiment was love — for the show, for each other and for the fans. I think Natasia Demetriou said it best: “There wasn’t one season where I didn’t think at least 10 times a day, ‘I cannot believe this is my job. I cannot believe I get to do this.’ … I’m going to miss the show so much.” I’m going to miss it, too.

Garcia: That is genuinely heartwarming. I love it when a cast becomes real-life friends. But I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the many guest stars on this series, a who’s who of comedy appeared over the six seasons. We even saw OG “Shadows” vampires Jemaine Clement, Taika Waititi and Jonny Brugh on the show. But it was the ongoing appearances of Haley Joel Osment as Topher and Benedict Wong as Wallace the necromancer that were among my favorites. Who were some of yours?

Advertisement
A man in a pink furry coat and hat drives an old car covered in string lights.

Matt Berry in the Season 5 episode “Pride Parade.” (Russ Martin/FX)

A woman in a white shirt and plaid beige cardigan looks a man in a beige sweater who is seen from behind.

Vanessa Bayer and Mark Proksch in Season 5’s “The Campaign.” (Russ Martin/FX)

Brown: It’s tough to keep it to a short list but I’ll go with Vanessa Bayer as emotional vampire Evie Russell and, of course, Mark Hamill as Jim the Vampire. And Doug Jones as the Baron was my favorite recurring guest star. If we’re talking cameos, my absolute favorite moment was when Sofia Coppola, Phoenix’s Thomas Mars and Jim Jarmusch showed up as themselves in Nadja’s vampire nightclub. The vampire councils were great but I laugh at that scene every time. And since we’re reminiscing, I have to give a shout to Season 5’s “Pride Parade,” about the vampires helping Laszlo’s human buddy Sean appeal to the “LGBTQLMNOP community” to help his campaign, and Season 2’s “Ghosts,” which introduces Nadja’s human ghost that possesses her doll, as a couple of my favorite episodes. What about you?

Advertisement

Garcia: The Nadja nightclub storyline was so good, from start to finish. It’s so hard to pick. But since you mention Vanessa Bayer, that episode from Season 5 with the energy vampire council is a recent favorite. Evie and Colin’s meeting with them is the equivalent to the most painful Zoom meeting you’ve ever been on at work, where someone doesn’t know how to mute or notification pings keep interrupting the conversation or someone is trying to fix a tech problem as everyone else waits. It is breathtaking in its similarities and that feeling you get, like you just died inside a little. I’ve never seen anything capture that feeling so closely.

I think another favorite for me is the finale of Season 3, after Colin Robinson dies and it seems like everyone is going their separate ways, only for there to be a twist: Colin is alive. There’s also an earlier episode from Season 3, where Nandor joins a wellness cult, that’s great. From this final season, the ninth episode is a standout, where Guillermo’s cousin Miguel, played by Frankie Quiñones, arrives to help him battle other vampires, including barista vampires — ahem, I mean artists and writers. It demonstrates how intricate the vampiric world is on this show. Oh, and it’s hilarious.

As much as I wish this show would go on, ending on a high note is good, though I’ll miss hearing “You’re Dead” any time I started up a new episode.

Brown: At least Season 6 gave us the Matt Berry cover.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Song Sung Blue’ movie review: Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson sing their hearts out in a lovely musical biopic

Published

on

‘Song Sung Blue’ movie review: Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson sing their hearts out in a lovely musical biopic

A still from ‘Song Sung Blue’.
| Photo Credit: Focus Features/YouTube

There is something unputdownable about Mike Sardina (Hugh Jackman) from the first moment one sees him at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting celebrating his 20th sober birthday. He encourages the group to sing the famous Neil Diamond number, ‘Song Sung Blue,’ with him, and we are carried along on a wave of his enthusiasm.

Song Sung Blue (English)

Director: Craig Brewer

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Kate Hudson, Michael Imperioli, Ella Anderson, Mustafa Shakir, Fisher Stevens, Jim Belushi

Runtime: 132 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: Mike and Claire find and rescue each other from the slings and arrows of mediocrity when they form a Neil Diamond tribute band

We learn that Mike is a music impersonator who refuses to come on stage as anyone but himself, Lightning, at the Wisconsin State Fair. At the fair, he meets Claire (Kate Hudson), who is performing as Patsy Cline. Sparks fly between the two, and Claire suggests Mike perform a Neil Diamond tribute.

Claire and Mike start a relationship and a Neil Diamond tribute band, called Lightning and Thunder. They marry and after some initial hesitation, Claire’s children from her first marriage, Rachel (Ella Anderson) and Dayna (Hudson Hensley), and Mike’s daughter from an earlier marriage, Angelina (King Princess), become friends. 

Members from Mike’s old band join the group, including Mark Shurilla (Michael Imperioli), a Buddy Holly impersonator and Sex Machine (Mustafa Shakir), who sings as James Brown. His dentist/manager, Dave Watson (Fisher Stevens), believes in him, even fixing his tooth with a little lightning bolt!

The tribute band meets with success, including opening for Pearl Jam, with the front man for the grunge band, Eddie Vedder (John Beckwith), joining Lightning and Thunder for a rendition of ‘Forever in Blue Jeans’ at the 1995 Pearl Jam concert in Milwaukee.

There is heartbreak, anger, addiction, and the rise again before the final tragedy. Song Sung Blue, based on Greg Kohs’ eponymous documentary, is a gentle look into a musician’s life. When Mike says, “I’m not a songwriter. I’m not a sex symbol. But I am an entertainer,” he shows that dreams do not have to die. Mike and Claire reveal that even if you do not conquer the world like a rock god, you can achieve success doing what makes you happy.

Advertisement

ALSO READ: ‘Run Away’ series review: Perfect pulp to kick off the New Year

Song Sung Blue is a validation for all the regular folk with modest dreams, but dreams nevertheless. As the poet said, “there’s no success like failure, and failure’s no success at all.” Hudson and Jackman power through the songs and tears like champs, leaving us laughing, tapping our feet, and wiping away the errant tears all at once.

The period detail is spot on (never mind the distracting wigs). The chance to hear a generous catalogue of Diamond’s music in arena-quality sound is not to be missed, in a movie that offers a satisfying catharsis. Music is most definitely the food of love, so may we all please have a second and third helping?

Song Sung Blue is currently running in theatres 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Stephen A. Smith doubles down on calling ICE shooting in Minneapolis ‘completely justified’

Published

on

Stephen A. Smith doubles down on calling ICE shooting in Minneapolis ‘completely justified’

Stephen A. Smith is arguably the most-well known sports commentator in the country. But the outspoken ESPN commentator’s perspective outside the sports arena has landed him in a firestorm.

The furor is due to his pointed comments defending an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot a Minneapolis woman driving away from him.

Just hours after the shooting on Wednesday, Smith said on his SiriusXM “Straight Shooter” talk show that although the killing of Renee Nicole Good was “completely unnecessary,” he added that the agent “from a lawful perspective” was “completely justified” in firing his gun at her.

He also noted, “From a humanitarian perspective, however, why did he have to do that?”

Smith’s comments about the agent being in harm’s way echoed the views of Deputy of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who said Good engaged in an “act of domestic terrorism” by attacking officers and attempting to run them over with her vehicle.

Advertisement

However, videos showing the incident from different angles indicate that the agent was not standing directly in front of Good’s vehicle when he opened fire on her. Local officials contend that Good posed no danger to ICE officers. A video posted by partisan media outlet Alpha News showed Good talking to agents before the shooting, saying, “I’m not mad at you.”

The shooting has sparked major protests and accusations from local officials that the presence of ICE has been disruptive and escalated violence. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frye condemned ICE, telling agents to “get the f— out of our city.”

The incident, in turn, has put a harsher spotlight on Smith, raising questions on whether he was reckless or irresponsible in offering his views on Good’s shooting when he had no direct knowledge of what had transpired.

An angered Smith appeared on his “Straight Shooter” show on YouTube on Friday, saying the full context of his comments had not been conveyed in media reports, specifically calling out the New York Post and media personality Keith Olbermann, while saying that people were trying to get him fired.

He also doubled down on his contention that Good provoked the situation that led to her death, saying the ICE agent was in front of Good’s car and would have been run over had he not stepped out of the way.

Advertisement

“In the moment when you are dealing with law enforcement officials, you obey their orders so you can get home safely,” he said. “Renee Good did not do that.”

When reached for comment about his statements, a representative for Smith said his response was in Friday’s show.

It’s not the first time Smith, who has suggested he’s interesting in going into politics, has sparked outside the sports universe. He and journalist Joy Reid publicly quarreled following her exit last year from MSNBC.

He also faced backlash from Black media personalities and others when he accused Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas of using “street verbiage” in her frequent criticisms of President Trump.

“The way that Jasmine Crockett chooses to express herself … Aren’t you there to try and get stuff done instead of just being an impediment? ‘I’m just going to go off about Trump, cuss him out every chance I get, say the most derogatory things imaginable, and that’s my day’s work?’ That ain’t work! Work is, this is the man in power. I know what his agenda is. Maybe I try to work with this man. I might get something out of it for my constituents.’ ”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dead Man’s Wire review: Gus Van Sant tackles true-crime intrigue

Published

on

Dead Man’s Wire review: Gus Van Sant tackles true-crime intrigue

In 1977, a man named Tony Kiritsis fell behind on mortgage payments for an Indianapolis, Indiana, property that he hoped to develop into an affordable shopping center for independent merchants. He asked his mortgage broker for more time, but was denied. This enraged him because he suspected that the broker and his father, who owned the company, were conspiring to defraud him by letting the property go into foreclosure and acquire it for much less than market value. He showed up at the offices of the mortgage company, Meridian, for a scheduled appointment regarding the debt in the broker’s office, where he took the broker, Richard O. Hall, hostage, and demanded $130,000 to settle the debt, plus a public apology from the company. He carried a long cardboard box containing a shotgun with a so-called dead man’s wire, which he affixed to Hall as a precaution against police interference: if either of them were shot, tackled, or even caused to stumble, the wire would pull the trigger, blowing Hall’s head off.

That’s only the beginning of an astonishing story that has inspired many retellings, including a memoir by Hall, a 2018 documentary (whose producers were consultants on this movie) and a podcast drama starring Jon Hamm as Tony Kiritsis. And now it’s the best current movie you likely haven’t heard about—a drama from director Gus Van Sant (“Good Will Hunting”), starring Bill Skarsgård as Tony Kiritsis and Dacre Montgomery as Richard Hall. It’s unabashedly inspired by the best crime dramas from the 1970s, including “Dog Day Afternoon,” “The Sugarland Express,” “Network,” and “Badlands,” and can stand proudly alongside them.

From the opening sequence, which scores the high-strung Tony’s pre-crime prep with Deodato’s immortally groovy disco version of “Thus Spake Zarathustra” played on the radio by one of Tony’s local heroes, the philosophical DJ Fred Temple (Colman Domingo); through the expansive middle section, which establishes Tony as part of a thriving community that will see him as their representative in the one-sided struggle between labor and capital; through the ending and postscript, which leave you unsure how to feel about what you’ve seen but eager to discuss it with others, “Dead Man’s Wire” is a nostalgia trip of the best kind. Rather than superficially imitate the style of a specific type of ’70s drama, Van Sant and his collaborators connect with the essence of what made them powerful and memorable: their connection to issues that weighed on viewers’ minds fifty years ago and that have grown heavier since.

Tony is far from a criminal genius or a potential folk hero, but thinks he’s both. The shotgun box with a weird bulge, barely held together with packing tape, is a correlative of the mentality of the man who carries it. His home is filled with counterculture-adjacent books, but he’s a slob who loudly gripes during a brief car ride that his “shorts have been ridin’ up since Market Street,” and has a vanity license plate that reads “TOPLESS.” His eloquence runs the gamut from Everyman acuity to self-canceling nonsense slathered in profanity . He accurately sums up the mortgage company’s practices as “a private equity trap” (a phrase that looks ahead to the 2008 financial collapse, which was sparked by predatory lending on subprime mortgages) and hopes that his extreme actions will generate some “some goddamn catharsis” for himself and his fellow citizens, and “some genuine guilt” among Indianapolis’ lending class.

He’s also intoxicated by his sudden local fame. The hostage situation migrates from the mortgage company to Tony’s shabby apartment complex, which is quickly surrounded by beat cops, tactical officers, and reporters (including Myha’La as Linda Page, a twenty-something, Black local TV correspondent looking to move up. Tony also forces his way into the life of his idol Temple, who tapes a phone conversation with him, previews it for police, and grudgingly accepts their or-else request to continue the dialog and plays their regular talks on his morning show.

Advertisement

Despite these inroads, Tony is unable to prevent his inner petty schmuck from emerging and undermining his message, such as it is. He vacillates between treating Hall as a useless representative of the financial elite (when the elder Hall finally agrees to speak with Tony via phone from a tropical vacation, Tony sneers to Hall the younger, “Your daddy’s on the line—he wants to know when you’ll be home for supper!”) and connecting with him on a human level. When he’s not bombastic, he’s needy and fawning. “I like you!” he keeps telling people he just met, but Fred most of all—as if a Black man who’d built a comfortable life for himself and his wife in 1977 Indiana could say no when an overwhelmingly white police force asked him to become Tony’s fake-confidant; and as if it matters whether a hostage-taking gunman feels warmly towards him.

Ultimately, though, making perfect sense and effecting lasting change are no higher on Tony’s agenda than they were for the protagonists of “Dog Day Afternoon” and “Network.” Like them, these are unhinged audience surrogates whose media stardom turned them into human megaphones for anger at the miserable state of things, and the indifference of institutions that caused or worsened it. These include local law enforcement, which—to paraphrase hapless bank robber Sonny Wirtzik taunting cops in “Dog Day Afternoon”—wanna kill Tony so bad that they can taste it. The discussions between Indianapolis police and the FBI (represented by Neil Mulac’s Agent Patrick Mullaney, a straight-outta-Quantico robot) are all about how to set up and take the kill shot.

The aforementioned phone call leads to a gut-wrenching moment that echoes the then-recent kidnapping of John Paul Getty III, when hostage-takers called their victim’s wealthy grandfather to arrange ransom payment, and got nickel-and-dimed as if they were trying to sell him a used car. The elder Hall is played by “Dog Day Afternoon” star Al Pacino, inspired casting that not only officially connects Tony with Wirtzik but proves that, at 85, Pacino can still bring the heat. The character’s presence creeps into the rest of the story like a toxic fog, even when he’s not the subject of conversation.

With his frizzy grey toupee, self-satisfied Midwest twang, and punchable smirk, Pacino is skin-crawlingly perfect as an old man who built a fortune on being good at one thing, but thinks that makes him a fountain of wisdom on all things, including the conduct of Real Men in a land of women and sissies. After watching TV coverage of Tony getting emotional while keeping his shotgun on Richard, Jr., he beams with pride that Tony shed tears but his own son didn’t. (Kelly Lynch, who costarred in another classic Van Sant film about American losers, “Drugstore Cowboy,” plays Richard, Sr.’s trophy wife, who is appalled at being confronted with irrefutable evidence of her husband’s monstrousness, but still won’t say a word against him.)

Van Sant was 25 during the real-life incidents that inspired this movie. That may partly account for the physical realism of the production, which doesn’t feel created but merely observed, in the manner of ’70s movies whose authenticity was strengthened by letting the main characters’ dialogue overlap and compete with ambient sounds; shooting in existing locations when possible, and dressing the actors in clothes that looked as if they’d been hanging in regular folks’ closets for years. Peggy Schnitzer did the costumes, Stefan Dechant the production design, and Arnaud Poiter the cinematography, all of which figuratively wear bell-bottom pants and platform shoes; the soundscape was overseen by Leslie Schatz, who keeps the environments believably dense and filled with incidental sounds while making sure the important stuff can be understood. It should also be mentioned that the film’s blueprint is an original script by a first-timer, Adam Kolodny, with a bona-fide working class worldview; he wrote it while working as a custodian at the Los Angeles Zoo.

Advertisement

More impressive than the film’s behind-the-scenes pedigree is its vision of another time that unexpectedly comes to seem not too different from this one. It is both a lovingly constructed time machine highlighting details that now seem as antiquated as lithography and buckboard wagons (the film deserves a special Oscar just for its phones) and a wide-ranging consideration of indestructible realities of life in the United States, which are highlighted in such a way that you notice them without feeling as if the movie pointed at them.

For instance, consider Tony’s infatuation with Fred Temple, which peaks when Tony honors his hero by demonstrating his “soul dancing” for his hostage, is a pre-Internet version of what we would now call a “parasocial relationship.” An awareness of racial dynamics is baked into this, and into the film as a whole. Domingo’s performance as Temple captures the tightrope walk that Black celebrities have to pull off, reassuring their most excitable white fans that they understand and care about them without cosigning condescension or behavior that could escalate into harassment. Consider, too, the matter-of-fact presentation of how easy it is for violence-prone people to buddy up to law enforcement officers, especially when they inhabit the same spaces. When Indianapolis police detective Will Grable (Cary Elwes) approaches Tony on a public street soon after the kidnapping, Tony’s face brightens as he exclaims, “Hi Mike! Nice to see you!”

And then, of course, there’s the economic and political framework, which is built with a firm yet delicate hand, and compassion for the vibrant messiness of life. “Dead Man’s Wire” depicts an analog era in which crises like this one were treated as important local matters that involved local people, businesses, and government agents, rather than fuel for a global agitprop industry posing as a news media, and a parasitic army of self-proclaimed influencers reycling the work of other influencers for clout. Van Sant’s movie continually insists on the uniqueness and value of every life shown onscreen, however briefly glimpsed, from the many unnamed citizens who are shown silently watching news coverage of the crisis while working their day jobs, to Fred’s right hand at the radio station, an Asian-American stoner dude (Vinh Nguyen) with a closet-sized office who talent-scouts unknown bands while exhaling cumulus clouds of pot smoke.

All this is drawn together by Van Sant and editor Saar Klein in pop music-driven montages that show how every member of the community depicted in this story is connected, even if they don’t know it or refuse to admit it. As John Donne put it, “No man is an island/Entire of itself/Each is a piece of the continent/A part of the main.” The struggle of the individual is summed up in one of Fred’s hypnotic radio monologues: “Let’s remember to become the ocean, not disappear into it.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending