Wisconsin
Sandhill crane study committee scheduled to vote on draft bills, including crane hunting
Committee to meet Tuesday in Madison
Sandhill cranes along the Wisconsin River
The sights and sounds of cranes congregating along the Wisconsin River.
Provided by Aldo Leopold Foundation
The Legislative Study Committee on Sandhill Cranes is scheduled to vote Tuesday on three draft bills, including two that would allow crane hunting in Wisconsin, as the body wraps up its work on management of the species.
The committee may also make a special appeal to federal wildlife officials to allow the utilization of cranes killed on depredation permits.
The action items are the result of four previous meetings. The committee is charged with examining sandhill population trends and to “determine whether any changes to state law would effectively address the incidence and consequences of crop damage caused by sandhill cranes in this state,” according to its description.
As part of its “comprehensive review of policy options, the committee may consider whether the Department of Natural Resources should seek federal approval to establish a hunting season for sandhill cranes.”
After being threatened through the mid-1900s, sandhills have recovered in Wisconsin and the Great Lakes region. Wisconsin hosted an average of 51,000 cranes from 2018-22, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The large, native birds are welcome sights to most but have a negative effect on many farms. Agricultural producers in Wisconsin sustained an estimated $1.97 million in crane-caused crop damage in 2023, according to the U.S Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services. Slightly more than half was to corn in spring, the balance to potatoes and other crops later in the year.
No program exists to compensate Wisconsin farmers for crane-caused crop losses.
One of the draft bills (LRB-0604/P3) would establish a cost-share program to provide funding for a seed treatment to corn farmers. The treatment, commonly known by the product name Avipel, has been shown to be effective at preventing cranes from eating corn seedlings in spring. The non-toxic chemical is distasteful to cranes, according to the manufacturer.
The bill draft appropriates $1.875 million of general purpose revenue in fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27. This amount, combined with a 50% cost share, would reimburse producers for seed treatment covering 300,000 acres of corn, according to a Wisconsin Legislative Council estimate.
The seed treatment bill, however, would only address crop damage to corn in spring. Nearly half of the crop losses occur to potatoes and other crops later in the year.
The two proposals that would allow crane hunting include a stand-alone draft bill (LRB-0815/P1) and one (LRB-0591/P4) that would bundle the seed treatment bill with a sandhill crane hunting bill.
The population of sandhill cranes is large enough in Wisconsin to sustain a limited crane hunting season, according to testimony at the committee’s Aug. 1 meeting by retired DNR waterfowl ecologist Kent Van Horn. It would also provide a new hunting opportunity for the state’s hunters, some of whom now travel to western or southern states to pursue the species.
However a potential crane hunt in Wisconsin would likely be structured to have minimal to no impact on the sandhill population, Van Horn said.
Furthermore no study exists that shows sandhill crane hunting has resulted in reduced crop damage anywhere in North America.
As such, crane hunting in Wisconsin would not likely achieve the committee’s objective of reducing the incidence of crane-caused crop damage.
A sandhill hunt in Wisconsin would produce one change, however: it would allow farmers to receive compensation for crane damage through the state’s wildlife damage abatement fund.
That has its own issues since the number of crane licenses would be too low to generate anywhere near the revenue needed to cover the estimated $1.9 million in annual agricultural damage claims from crane-caused crop damage, according to a DNR assessment.
In recognition of this, the two crane hunting bills (LRB-0815/P1 and LRB-0591/P4) would apply an increase of at least $1 in the wildlife damage surcharge on all hunting licenses sold in the state. Most of the licenses are resident deer hunting licenses; they would see the fee increased to $3 from $2.
The increase on all Wisconsin hunting licenses would raise about $1 million more per year for the wildlife damage abatement fund.
Even the infusion of new revenue from the fee increase is associated with risks if a sandhill hunt is approved, according to the Wisconsin Legislative Council.
In its assessment of the draft crane hunting bills, council staff said “if new spending on sandhill crane-related damage exceeds new revenue generated under the bill draft, the program balance may be depleted. This would impact (wildlife damage claim) assistance for other species.”
In other action, the committee will consider submitting a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seeking permission to allow the utilization of cranes killed on depredation permits in Wisconsin. Rules now require the bodies of cranes killed under the permits to be left in the field or buried. As such they can’t be used by the farmers or others as food.
The Legislature has twice failed to advance bills on sandhill crane hunting, in 2011 and 2021. The Legislative Study Committee on Sandhill Cranes is chaired by Rep. Paul Tittl (R-Manitowoc), author of the 2021 crane hunting bill.
The committee will meet at 10 a.m. Tuesday in Room 417 North (GAR Hall) at the State Capitol.
Wisconsin
Couple asks Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear Brewers 50-50 raffle prize dispute
(WLUK) – A couple challenging the decision not to award them a 50-50 raffle prize at a Milwaukee Brewers game asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case, calling it one of “statewide importance.”
Matthew and Annette Flynn purchased ten raffle tickets at the July 7, 2023, game, and held the winning number which was originally selected for $13,000. According to court records, the raffle rules in effect at the time required the winning ticket holder to claim the prize at a designated 50-50 table by the end of the top of the seventh inning. Flynn said she did not see the winning number displayed or hear it announced and was directed by stadium personnel to another location before making her way to the claim table. Officials determined she did not arrive before the deadline and selected a new winning ticket.
The Flynns sued, but the circuit and appeals courts ruled the raffle’s rules gave the foundation sole discretion to determine the official winner and that the rules clearly stated a participant who failed to claim the prize within the specified time would be disqualified.
In a petition to the Wisconsin Supreme Court filed Wednesday, the Flynn’s asked the high court to take the case, saying the decision “affects not only the parties to this action but potentially every Wisconsin resident who participates in charitable raffles and similar gaming activities.”
“This case presents significant questions concerning contractual discretion, discovery, judicial review of charitable gaming decisions, and the treatment of digital evidence within Wisconsin’s appellate system. For these reasons, Petitioners respectfully request that this Court grant review of the decision of the Court of Appeals,” the petition states.
The high court does not have to take the case. At some point, it will vote on if to take it. If it does, a months-long process to review the issues will begin. If it does not, the appeals court ruling would stand.
According to the rules posted on the Milwaukee Brewers’ website, the deadline to claim the prize is no longer during the game the tickets were purchased.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
“The Participant in possession of the Raffle ticket with the potential winning number may claim the Prize at the 50/50 Table located on the Loge (2nd) level concourse behind Sections 216/217 until such time as the Ballpark officially closes to fans after the end of the game. If the Participant in possession of the Raffle ticket with the potential winning number does not claim the Prize by the time the Ballpark closes to fans after the end of the game, that Participant may still claim the Prize within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the Raffle Period for the respective baseball game by contacting the Raffle hotline (414-902-4334). A Prize that is not claimed within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the Raffle Period will be awarded in compliance with applicable regulations,” the site states.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin DOJ probes fatal shooting by Oneida County officer
ONEIDA COUNTY, Wis. (WFRV) — The Wisconsin DOJ is investigating an officer-involved death that occurred on the morning of June 17 in the town of Lake Tomahawk.
According to a press release, around 10:30 a.m., two Oneida officers arrived at Lumen Lake Drive to arrest a subject in a felony investigation.
Upon contact with the officers, the subject brandished and shot a firearm. One officer shot the subject in return.
EMS pronounced the subject dead on the scene. No members of law enforcement or the public were injured.
Both officers will be placed on administrative assignment, per the agency’s policy.
WFRV will update this story as needed.
Wisconsin
Body cam shows Wisconsin officer shooting at stray dogs 16 times. What to know
Body camera shows Wisconsin officer shooting, killing dog in Mequon
Body camera footage from April 23, 2026 shows a Thiensville officer firing at two dogs running at him. He continues to fire as they run away, killing one.
A Thiensville officer fired 16 shots at two stray dogs, killing one, and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has been tracking the fallout.
The officer, Richard C. McCormick, resigned during an internal investigation. The shooting is now under review by the Ozaukee County District Attorney’s Office.
Here’s what to know about the case and what to do if you encounter a stray or lost dog:
What brought the Thiensville officer to the Mequon intersection?
On April 23, 2026, Mequon police responded to a call shortly after 1 a.m. for two loose dogs at Highland and Cedarburg Roads. The Mequon officers decided to return in the morning, when they could seek help from the humane society.
About two hours later, McCormick saw the dogs at the same intersection, outside his jurisdiction. McCormick stopped and tried to capture them. He was not responding to a new 911 call or other request for help. He was aware of the earlier call about the dogs.
What happened during the shooting?
Body camera footage obtained by the Journal Sentinel showed the dogs bounding toward McCormick after he opened a rear door of his squad.
The officer fired at least two shots near the ground, in what he later said was an attempt to scare the dogs. Video showed the dogs running away and McCormick continuing to fire across the road, even after one of the dogs collapsed on the ground and howled.
Six minutes later, McCormick fired a final shot from close range to euthanize the dog on the ground. The other dog escaped into the woods.
A national expert on police-dog encounters told the Journal Sentinel there were “valid concerns” about the shooting, noting that McCormick continued firing even as the dogs ran away from him.
What happened to the second dog?
The shooting came to light after three women tracked and safely trapped the second dog that had been wounded.
The dog, whom they named Ranger, had a bullet in his hip.
Ranger underwent surgery and was still receiving care at the Wisconsin Humane Society Ozaukee Campus as of June 17.
The rescue volunteers – Danielle Dietz, Alicia Hegedus and Karen Bohlmann – pieced together what happened to Ranger and the other dog, whom they nicknamed BD, using public records requests.
They learned that Ranger had been out for 17 days since he had been shot.
What should you do if you encounter a lost or stray dog?
Angela Speed, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Humane Society, offered the following suggestions:
- Be cautious. Fearful, injured or ill animals can be reactive when confronted.
- Watch the dog’s body language carefully.
- If the dog is obviously friendly and approachable, check for a collar with information. If an owner cannot be located, take the dog to a local animal shelter.
- If you have safety concerns, call a local non-emergency police or sheriff’s office line.
The volunteers who rescued Ranger have years of experience tracking and safely capturing stray or missing dogs, on their own and with local rescue groups. They offered additional suggestions:
- Note the location where you saw the dog and take a photo, if possible.
- Share that information in local neighborhood groups online, which can include Facebook, NextDoor or Ring.
- Look up nearby lost dog and recovery organizations online and contact those groups for help.
- Never chase a dog.
-
Crypto4 minutes agoCrypto’s Courtside Takeover: Digital Assets in Pro Tennis
-
Finance7 minutes agoConsumer confidence plunges among younger adults
-
Fitness12 minutes agoKylie Minogue, 58, shares how she stays fit without a strict exercise routine – ‘I don’t really work out’
-
Movie Reviews22 minutes agoMovie Review: ‘Leviticus’ makes a demon out of desire in an auspicious debut for Adrian Chiarella – Sentinel Colorado
-
World34 minutes agoVideo: A Small Election Could Change British Politics
-
News37 minutes agoInside Trump’s Touring Exhibition of American Heroes
-
Politics42 minutes agoVideo: Erika Kirk’s Message for Women at Turning Point USA
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoThe second life of a classic: ‘Amores Perros’ is remastered and back in theaters