MISSOULA — Former University of Montana running back Joey Counts, best known by Griz fans for his dramatic winning touchdown in a stunning home triumph over North Dakota State nine years ago, has died.
An announcement was made online Friday by his employer, the Gilbert (Arizona) Fire Department.
“It is with profound sorrow that we announce the passing of our beloved Joey Counts, a dedicated officer with the Gilbert Fire Department, who tragically passed away in Chandler, Arizona. Joey’s untimely death leaves an irreplaceable void in the lives of his family, friends, colleagues, and the entire community he served so selflessly. While we mourn his loss, we also celebrate his life, his contributions to the community, and the unwavering dedication he demonstrated throughout his career.”
No cause of death was given.
Advertisement
People are also reading…
Longtime fans of Griz football will likely never forget Counts’ short TD burst with two seconds left in a late August 2015 game against then-four-time defending FCS champion NDSU. Montana upset the top-ranked, Carson-Wentz-led Bison, 38-35, under smoky skies in a game that aired on ESPN.
Advertisement
It was the moment of a lifetime for Counts, who missed all of 2014 with a foot injury and was held of out of much of 2015 fall camp, too.
“I can’t believe it,” said Counts, a locker room favorite for his boisterous attitude, after the game. “There’s a lot of heart and perseverance on this team and it was calm; everybody knew what they had to do.
“We all figured they were gonna pinch down pretty hard. I just saw some light and I took it.”
Counts was on the Montana roster from 2012 to 2016. His employer conveyed Friday what he meant to colleagues and his community in his professional life.
“Joey’s career as a firefighter and officer with the Gilbert Fire Department was defined by his commitment to serving the people of his community. He was not just a firefighter; he was a true hero. Joey ran toward danger when others were running away, and his bravery in the face of adversity was an inspiration to all who knew him. Whether responding to fires, medical emergencies, or other crises, Joey remained calm, focused, and compassionate in his work.”
Advertisement
To read a tribute to Counts by his employer, log on to: memorialeditorial.cfd/death-joey-counts-obituary-chandler-az-gilbert-fire-department-officer-is-dead/
Bill Speltz is Missoulian sports editor. Contact him at bill.speltz@406mtsports.com or on Twitter @billspeltz
The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at March 2, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from March 2 drawing
02-17-18-38-62, Powerball: 20, Power Play: 2
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Advertisement
Winning Lotto America numbers from March 2 drawing
03-08-17-24-34, Star Ball: 06, ASB: 02
Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from March 2 drawing
06-12-19-29, Bonus: 11
Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from March 2 drawing
21-28-58-65-67, Powerball: 25
Advertisement
Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from March 2 drawing
28-41-42-50-55, Bonus: 02
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?
Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.
Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Everyone makes mistakes, even experienced professionals; a good reminder for the rest of us to learn from those mistakes. The motion in State v. Stroup starts off well in its initial pages (no case law hallucinations), but is then followed by several pages of two other motions, which I don’t think the lawyer was planning to file, and which appear to have been AI-generated: It begins with the “Below is concise motion language you can drop into …” language quoted above.
Griffen Smith (Missoulian) reported on the story, and included the prosecutor’s motion to strike that filing, on the grounds that it violates a local rule (3(G)) requiring disclosure of the use of generative AI:
The document does not include a generative artificial intelligence disclosure as required. However, page 7 begins as follows: “Below is concise motion language you can drop into a ‘Motion to Admit Mental-Disease Evidence and for Related Instructions’ keyed to 45-6-204, 45-6-201, and 4614-102. Adjust headings/captions to your local practice.” Page 10 states “Below is a full motion you can paste into your pleading, then adjust names, dates, and styles to fit local practice.” These pages also include several apparent hyperlinks to “ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws,” “ppl-ai-fileupload.s3.amazonaws+1,” and others. The document includes what appears to be an attempt at a second case caption on page 12. It is not plausible on its face that any source other than generative AI would have created such language for a filed version of a brief….
There’s more in that filing, but here’s one passage:
While generative AI can be a useful tool for some purposes and may have greater application in the future, when used improperly, and without meaningful review, it can ultimately damage both the perception and the reality of the profession. One assumes that Mr. Stroup has had, or will at some point have, an opportunity to review the filing made on his behalf. What impression could a review of pgs. 12-19 leave upon a defendant who struggles with paranoia and delusional thinking? While AI could theoretically one day become a replacement for portions of staff of experienced attorneys, it is readily apparent that this day has not yet arrived.
The Missoulan article includes this response:
Advertisement
In a Wednesday interview, Office of Public Defender Division Administrator Brian Smith told the Missoulian the AI-generated language was inadvertently included in an unrelated filing. And he criticized the county attorney’s office for filing a “four-page diatribe about the dangers of AI” instead of working with the defense to correct her mistake.
“That’s not helping the client or the case,” Smith said, “and all you are doing is trying to throw a professional colleague under the bus.”
As I mentioned, the lawyer involved seems quite experienced, and ran for the Montana Public Service Commission in 2020 (getting nearly 48% of the vote) and for the House of Representatives in Montana’s first district in 2022 (getting over 46% of the vote) and in 2024 (getting over 44%). “Его пример другим наука,” Pushkin wrote in Eugene Onegin—”Mayhisexampleprofitothers,” in the Falen translation.
