Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Fans React To Shocking Coach Firing

Published

1 year ago

on

Wisconsin Fans React To Shocking Coach Firing


Published|Updated

Wisconsin fans appear to be very happy about Phil Longo being fired.

Badgers head coach Luke Fickell released a statement Sunday announcing that Longo had been fired as the team’s offensive coordinator following a 16-13 loss to Oregon.

Advertisement

“This morning, I informed Phil Longo that he will no longer serve as our offensive coordinator. After continuing to evaluate the program, I decided we are not where we need to be and believe this decision is in the best interest of the team. I appreciate Phil’s commitment to helping us build our program over the past two seasons and wish him well moving forward. This team still has a lot in front of us and I am committed to doing everything we can to close out this season with success,” Fickell said in a statement announcing his decision.

While a change at OC by itself might not have been Earth-shattering, the fact it was done before the season ended is a clear sign that Fickell is feeling pressure.

Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell fired offensive coordinator Phil Longo following a loss to Oregon. (Photo by John Fisher/Getty Images)

Wisconsin fans react to Phil Longo being fired.

How are fans taking the news? You’d think the team just won the national title. People are fired up and very happy with Fickell making a change.

Check out some of the reactions floating around Reddit and social media below, and let me know your thoughts at David.Hookstead@outkick.com:

Advertisement
  • Wouldn’t have been surprised if this happened at the end of the year but I am shocked they did this midseason I wonder if they think they need to get to it sooner in order to try and remain stable for recruiting purposes and whatnot
  • They gotta keep the donors happy too. The reality is the defense played well enough to win last night, but the offense was so inept it really never felt like the Badgers could actually pull it off. Lanning’s fake field goal call showed just how little Oregon respected the Badger offense’s ability to get back into field goal range. He wanted to go for the jugular right there and end it with a first down.
  • Rip Dairy Raid: 2023-2024
  • Clearly wasn’t working and likely wasn’t going to work. Best to rip the bandaid off and move on.
  • I’m going to miss the 4th and 1 runs from the shotgun
  • Now do Locke
  • One of the 3 things I was hoping for the rest of the year… Now lets beat Nebraska and Minnesota
  • Thank God
  • Overdue
  • Phil is no Longo with the program. … I’ll see myself out
  • Once Barry started complaining about their identify (or lack there of) on the radio… that was nail in coffin
  • This is overdue, but it’s not going to fix anything if they keep trotting Locke out there who can’t do even some of the most basic stuff a college starting quarterback should be able to do.
  • This is the big shake up we need. I don’t think any big improvements happen with Locke taking the snaps, but the defense is pulling its weight and the offense isn’t. Last night restored some confidence in Fick that I lost after the Iowa game and I think this is the right move
  • Wow. Thought it was eventually coming but it would be more of an end of season move. A change that everyone agrees is 100% necessary
  • THANK F**K. Please let the door hit you on the way out. Take Locke with you while you’re at it.
  • Good, dump the air raid and focus on an attainable identity. Put a focus on building the OL back to being a consistently dominant unit. It doesn’t have to be old school under center, I formation stuff but the run game needs to be the priority. They’re not getting a superstar QB and the skill positions will never out-athlete the top competition.
  • Alright, a step in the right direction!
  • Hate to see a guy lose his job. However, I think it was needed.
  • LFG
  • Good move
  • Good. Better figure something out. I’m not tipping my hat because you lost even to the best team in the nation.
  • Thank goodness!

Do we think Wisconsin fans are happy or do we think Wisconsin fans are happy? The answer is a clear and obvious yes.

Was Longo responsible for all of Wisconsin’s struggles? No, but there’s simply no excuse for the kind of offense fans have had to endure this season.

None at all. The defense did its job and more than enough to beat number one Oregon. The offense did nothing, collapsed in the second half and the QB play was atrocious.

Braedyn Locke has five interceptions and two passing touchdowns over the past three games. The Badgers have a 0-3 record during that span. It’s completely unacceptable.

Wisconsin’s offense is terrible. In response, head coach Luke Fickell fired OC Phil Longo. (Photo by John Fisher/Getty Images)

The Badgers now just have two games left against Nebraska and Minnesota. It will be interesting to see what the offense looks like with Longo gone, but one thing is absolutely clear. Something needs to change. Firing Longo is a step in the right direction, but there’s still a long way to go in order for Wisconsin to get where it needs to be. Let me know what you think at David.Hookstead@outkick.com.

Advertisement





Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy

Published

9 hours ago

on

January 7, 2026

By

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy


A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.

The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.

Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.

Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.

Advertisement

The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.

More: Arrowhead students must have parental permission to use different names and pronouns at school, new policy says

But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.

Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.

Advertisement

“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.

Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.

“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.

More: Muskego-Norway School Board requires legal guardian’s permission before district can address students by preferred name and pronouns

Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.

Advertisement

“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.

Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.

Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.

“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”

Advertisement

Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.

“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

3 takeaways as Wisconsin Badgers ‘showed some fight’ in win over UCLA

Published

21 hours ago

on

January 7, 2026

By

3 takeaways as Wisconsin Badgers ‘showed some fight’ in win over UCLA


play

  • The Wisconsin Badgers defeated UCLA 80-72, with a balanced scoring attack. Nick Boyd led the team with 20 points.
  • Wisconsin showed improvement with its 3-point shooting and halfcourt defense against the Bruins.
  • The game concluded with a flagrant foul on Wisconsin’s Nolan Winter and offsetting technical fouls.

MADISON – Wisconsin men’s basketball got the palette-cleanser it needed.

After losing to its last three high-major opponents by double-digit margins, the Badgers enjoyed a double-digit lead for almost the entire game en route to an 80-72 win over UCLA on Jan. 6 at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

“The thing I like about tonight is we showed some fight and some togetherness and some heart,” Wisconsin coach Greg Gard said after the game. “And it wasn’t perfect, but when you have heart and you have fight, you always have a chance. … We were physically and emotionally engaged and after it.”

BOX SCORE: Wisconsin 80, UCLA 72

Wisconsin boasted a balanced scoring attack. Nick Boyd had a team-high 20 points, followed closely by Nolan Winter with 18 and John Blackwell with 17. Andrew Rohde also had 12 points on 4-of-6 shooting.

UCLA, meanwhile, relied on 18 points from Eric Dailey Jr. and 16 points from Tyler Bilodeau while the Bruins were playing without standout guard Skyy Clark.

Here are three takeaways from the win:

Advertisement

Badgers benefit from far superior 3-point shooting

One of the many what-ifs from Wisconsin’s 16-point loss to then-No. 6 Purdue was its 3-point shooting. UW went a mere 4 of 25 against the Boilermakers, marking its second consecutive game with sub-20% perimeter shooting.

The Badgers’ Jan. 6 win over UCLA was a much different story, as they made more 3-pointers in the first nine minutes against the Bruins than they did in all 40 minutes against Purdue.

UW finished the game with 33% shooting, going 10 of 30. But the perimeter shooting was more of a difference-maker than one might surmise from glancing through the final box score.

Advertisement

The early 3-pointers helped the Badgers claim 16-4, 28-9 and 38-19 leads throughout the first half – a sizeable enough cushion to withstand UCLA’s 14-4 run in the second half without the outcome ever seeming in serious jeopardy.

“When you see your teammates shoot with confidence and you see see them go in a few times, then it’s contagious,” Blackwell said. “It rubs off on others to make other shots and just be aggressive.”

Gard similarly said the improved 3-point shooting “creates energy.”

“As much as you try to say, ‘Don’t get emotionally attached to your shot going in or not,’ I thought we got good looks,” Gard said. “We knocked them down. We took the right ones. And that energizes both ends of the floor.”

Meanwhile, UCLA – ranking 16th in the NCAA in 3-point shooting at 38.6% ahead of the Jan. 6 game – had uncharacteristically lackluster shooting from deep, missing its first 14 3-point attempts and ultimately going 1 of 17. The Bruins’ lack of Clark – a 49.3% 3-point shooter – surely played a factor in that.

Advertisement

Wisconsin shows improvements, imperfections in halfcourt defense

As much as Wisconsin’s improved 3-point shooting captured the spotlight, the Badgers’ improved halfcourt defense also was instrumental in the Badgers enjoying a double-digit lead for much of the game.

“We were connected,” Gard said. “We were energetic. We were physical. We were covering for each other. We had each other’s back.”

UCLA averaged .969 points per possession in the first half, and the Bruins did not score outside of fastbreak opportunities until the 13:23 mark in the half.

UCLA was better in the second half, but even then, its 1.029 points per possession over the course of the entire game was the fewest allowed by UW to a high-major since holding Marquette to exactly one point per possession on Dec. 6.

Advertisement

“Our communication was really high-level,” Winter said. “These last two days of practice probably have been some of our best practices all year from a communication standpoint and a defensive standpoint.”

That’s not to say Wisconsin’s defense was perfect against the Bruins, however. UCLA made six straight shots at one point in the second half, and Gard picked out a few other issues with UW’s halfcourt defense.

“We had a couple ball-screen mistakes – one we hedged way too far, one we didn’t hedge at all,” Gard said. “Other than that, I thought we were pretty solid, and a lot of good things to build upon. We’ll have to continue to get better on that end of the floor.”

What happened with Nolan Winter’s flagrant foul, Nick Boyd’s technical foul

The Wisconsin-UCLA game ended with some drama as the officiating crew handed out a Flagrant 1 and offsetting technical fouls.

Winter received the flagrant foul after a somewhat of a hard foul on Eric Dailey Jr. as the UCLA forward attempted a layup.

Advertisement

“Yeah, it was a hard foul,” Winter said of his flagrant. “I didn’t really mean to get a flagrant, obviously, but I didn’t want to give him any free points, especially at the end of the game. … We played to the whistle.”

Gard pointed out that UCLA was “pressing us until the very end,” too.

After Winter’s foul, Dailey appeared to give Winter a light shove. Boyd and others ran to Winter’s defense, and Boyd made contact with Dailey. Boyd and Dailey received offsetting deadball technical fouls after replay review.

Boyd saw Dailey “push my guy,” he said after the game.

“Over these last couple weeks, man, we’ve just been getting pushed around too much,” Boyd said. “So I just had to have his back. That’s the mentality we’re carrying with us the rest of the year. We get pushed. We’re stepping right back up.”

Advertisement

UCLA coach Mick Cronin, unlike many of his peers this season, did not hold a postgame press conference at the Kohl Center. So Gard was the only coach in a position to share his thoughts on what transpired.

Gard’s thoughts were shaped by other officiating decisions that he did not want to specifically identify.

“I’m not going to get into refereeing, and those guys got a really hard job,” Gard said. “But there was some actions on the other end that if they get them under control, then that never happens because the play would have been whistled dead. … I’ll deal with that with the league in terms of we should have never gotten to that based on some other stuff.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Blake Cherry commits to Wisconsin, reunites with OL coach Eric Mateos

Published

1 day ago

on

January 6, 2026

By

Blake Cherry commits to Wisconsin, reunites with OL coach Eric Mateos


play

MADISON – When it comes to grabbing offensive linemen in the transfer portal, Wisconsin is going with what it knows.

Blake Cherry is the latest example.

Advertisement

The rising sophomore guard, who announced his commitment to the Badgers on Tuesday, Jan. 6,  played for new UW offensive line coach Eric Mateos at Arkansas.

Cherry announced his commitment on X. He joins former Oklahoma State center Austin Kawecki, who was recruited by Mateos when Mateos was at Baylor, as the first two offensive line pickups for Wisconsin during this portal cycle.

Cherry, who was listed as 6-foot-5 and 316 pounds, played in 11 games at Arkansas in 2025 with the bulk of the work coming on special teams. He was the top backup to second team all-SEC selection Fernando Carmona.

Cherry was a three-star prospect coming out of Owasso High School in Oklahoma. He joins an offensive line room that underperformed in 2025 but featured some promising young players like tackle Emerson Mandell and guard Colin Cubberly, who will be a redshirt sophomore next season.

UW football transfer portal tracker: Two cornerbacks commit on Day 4

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending