Virgil Dixon was born in New Mexico but had been away for two decades moving around the country, following his son and grandchild to remain close to them.
Dixon, 71, made it a priority to register to vote and was able to cast ballots everywhere he lived: in Iowa, Oregon and Minnesota.
Those states, like New Mexico, allow people like Dixon – who was once convicted of a felony – to vote.
But after he returned to his home state in 2022, he tried to register to vote the following year and was denied his right, because he was convicted of possessing cocaine more than two decades earlier.
Advertisement
Virgil Dixon shown when he returned to New Mexico in 2022, outside that year’s Gathering of Nations Pow Wow in Albuquerque. (Courtesy photo)
People with felony convictions can vote in New Mexico. The state has for many years allowed people who are out of prison — and who are no longer on probation or parole — to re-register to vote.
When Dixon tried to register to vote in 2023, Bernalillo County Clerk Linda Stover sent him an outdated registration form asking him whether he served his full time in prison.
The thing is, Dixon has never been in prison. A judge sentenced him to one year of unsupervised probation, and he completed it in 2001.
However, on July 27, 2023, Stover wrote a letter to Dixon telling him he was not eligible to vote because he had been convicted of a felony.
Whenever someone is convicted of a felony in New Mexico, the state’s voter registration system attaches a “felony flag” to their name, making them ineligible to vote.
Advertisement
Until a 2023 change in the law, the only way to get the flag removed was for the Corrections Department or the voter themselves to have it removed.
This resulted in felony flags being attached not just to people in prison but also to everyone who had ever been convicted of a felony, including those still on probation or parole, and those who had long completed their sentences.
Dixon said he felt like tearing up the letter. He tried to register a second time in September 2024, and was rejected again for the same reason.
“My spirit just got shot down,” he said in an interview.
Dixon said the denials triggered his post-traumatic stress disorder. He was a U.S. Army combat engineer in the Vietnam War from 1972 to 1973.
Advertisement
“I blew my top,” Dixon said. “I was ready to say, ‘To heck with it all,’ you know?” Virgil Dixon, 71, is a grandfather, a retired Army combat engineer and a citizen of Navajo Nation. He is shown in his apartment in Albuquerque on Oct. 28, 2024, days after he voted in the 2024 General Election. (Photo by Bright Quashie for Source New Mexico)
‘Emotional disenfranchisement’
On July 1, 2023, a new state law went into effect, restoring voting rights to people with felony convictions as soon as they get out of prison, including those who are still on probation or parole.
It restored the franchise to an estimated 11,000 New Mexicans, according to the Sentencing Project, which advocates for lowering the number of people behind bars.
But over the following 15 months, Dixon and about 900 other New Mexicans’ voter registrations were wrongfully denied because New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver used an incorrect list showing they were still in prison, said Daniel Yohalem, a civil rights attorney representing Dixon and the other plaintiffs in the case.
The new law requires the New Mexico Corrections Department to give Toulouse Oliver a list of people in prison and therefore ineligible to vote, so she can register everyone who’s eligible, including those on probation and parole.
However, the Corrections Department failed to give her the list, leaving her to rely on outdated and inaccurate information to populate the statewide voter registration system.
Advertisement
When the county clerks ran those registrations against the Secretary of State’s bad list, that caused those people to be rejected, Yohalem said in an interview.
After repeated unsuccessful attempts over the past year to convince Toulouse Oliver to implement the new law, court documents show, Yohalem and the Washington D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center filed the lawsuit.
Less than two weeks later, on Oct. 8, a judge ordered Toulouse Oliver and the Corrections Department to make the changes needed to implement the new law.
Following the judge’s order, Toulouse Oliver directed all 33 county clerks to stop using the old voter registration form, and to use only the new corrected ones, Yohalem said.
The old forms were unlawful because they incorrectly stated that, unless the governor had personally pardoned them, people with felony convictions cannot vote until they had served their whole sentence and completed all conditions of parole probation, according to the lawsuit.
Advertisement
Toulouse Oliver also changed some incorrect references to the old forms on her official website, Yohalem said.
Toulouse Oliver compiled a list of the people who were improperly denied after the new law went into effect, sent it to the clerks and directed them to reprocess those people, and unless they’ve gone back into prison for a new crime, they’re supposed to be registered, he said.
The Corrections Department sent an updated list of people in prison as of Oct. 1 to Toulouse Oliver, and set up a hotline for clerks to call to determine whether someone is incarcerated.
But people impacted by the criminal legal system aren’t going to return to a government building asking to vote, said Selinda Guerrero, a core organizer with Millions for Prisoners New Mexico, a plaintiff in the suit. She calls this “emotional disenfranchisement.”
“There’s so many restrictions if you’ve been convicted of a felony that you essentially are under Jim Crow law,” she said. “You’re a second-class citizen.”
Advertisement
When she tried to reach back out to people who had been wrongly rejected, some had completely lost hope, she said.
“We’re having to re-energize people and try to convince them that this also belongs to them all over again,” Guerrero said. Virgil Dixon stands before the Sandia Mountains reflecting the sunset outside Albuquerque. (Photo by Bright Quashie for Source New Mexico)
‘This is home’
As part of the lawsuit, Dixon explained to the court why voting is important to him as a citizen of the Navajo Nation.
“I want to be able to vote in my home state of New Mexico, where my Diné homelands are,” he said in a sworn affidavit.
During World War II, Dixon’s grandfather Richard Thomas, of Shiprock, was a Navajo Code Talker, a group that used their tribal language to secretly transmit messages during battles against Japan. The state of New Mexico did not provide Native Americans the right to vote until a U.S. Marine and Pueblo of Isleta citizen used the courts to force the issue in 1948, well after that war ended.
Dixon’s case is an example of the barriers to Native voting access that remain to this day, including sparse mail pickup in rural and tribal regions, racist gerrymandering in local elections, and polling places located on the other side of poorly maintained or non-existent roads.
Advertisement
In fact, the same state law being fought over in this case also enacted the first-in-the-nation Native American Voting Rights Act, which mandates state and local election officials consult and cooperate with tribal governments on where to locate polling locations, among other reforms.
While there’s no national data for felony disenfranchisement’s impact on Native people, their representation in New Mexico’s population and criminal legal system indicates they’re heavily impacted by felony disenfranchisement laws and policies, according to Human Rights Watch.
Native American representation in New Mexico’s prisons — in other words their share of past felony convictions that land someone in prison — in 2023 surpassed the national rate, with just over 10% compared to 2% nationally, according to the New Mexico Sentencing Commission.
Dixon is a success story in this case. Stover reprocessed his and the other three named plaintiffs’ voter registrations after the judge’s order came down, Yohalem said. Dixon said he mailed in his 2024 ballot on Oct. 15.
“Now I know my voice is heard,” he said.
Advertisement
The day after he mailed in his ballot, Dixon said was sitting in his apartment in Albuquerque, looking at the Sandia Mountains through his bedroom window.
“Oh man, it’s good to be back home,” Dixon recalls telling himself – physically in the same place, but still a world away from the lost feeling he felt when he couldn’t vote.
He wants to hang around on this planet a little longer to see his grandchildren grow.
“I really feel like I’m settled in New Mexico, you know? This is home.”
Expect the offenses to shine when SDSU visits New Mexico in The Pit today, per our college basketball betting picks.
Feb 28, 2026 • 10:23 ET
• 4 min read
Advertisement
Photo By – Reuters Connect. San Diego State Aztecs guard Reese Dixon-Waters.
The San Diego State Aztecs pulled into a tie for first place in the Mountain West Conference with a win over top-seeded Utah State. Now, they try to stay there when they visit a team just below them in the standings in the New Mexico Lobos.
Advertisement
My San Diego State vs. New Mexico predictions and college basketball picks believe the high stakes will translate to a high-scoring affair on Saturday, February 28.
San Diego State vs New Mexico prediction
San Diego State vs New Mexico best bet: Over 148.5 (-116)
The New Mexico Lobos had a three-game win streak snapped with a 67-60 loss at Nevada, their second-lowest point total of the season.
They return home, where they are averaging 92.2 points per game in the last 10.
The San Diego State Aztecs have the fourth-ranked offense in the conference. They hung 89 on Utah State in a 17-point blowout win.
Advertisement
They’ve won seven of 11, including an 89-73 triumph over UNM.
The Lobos have combined with their opponents to score better than 151 points in six straight at home.
Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account
San Diego State vs New Mexico same-game parlay
The Aztecs are coming off their biggest win of the season, and if they can pick up this W at New Mexico, they will be in the drivers’ seat for the Mountain West regular season crown.
SDSU has held its own on the road this year, going 5-3 this season.
San Diego State vs New Mexico SGP
Over 148.5
San Diego State moneyline
San Diego State vs New Mexico odds
Spread: San Diego State +2.5 | New Mexico -2.5
Moneyline: San Diego State +125 | New Mexico -150
Over/Under: Over 149.5 | Under 149.5
San Diego State vs New Mexico betting trend to know
San Diego State has hit the 1H Moneyline in 18 of its last 25 games (+12.40 Units / 9% ROI). Find more college basketball betting trends for San Diego State vs. New Mexico.
How to watch San Diego State vs New Mexico
Location
The Pit, Albuquerque, NM
Date
Saturday, February 28, 2026
Tip-off
2:00 p.m. ET
TV
CBS
San Diego State vs New Mexico key injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
Advertisement
Pages related to this topic
Eric has been involved in sports media in many different capacities since graduating from journalism school in 1999, back when getting your own column in a newspaper was still considered a thing. He doubled down and graduated from broadcast journalism school five years later, which led to a move to Toronto and a career with The Sports Network (TSN). From behind-the-scenes production work, he moved into the digital realm, where he had his own hoops column (At the Buzzer), while regularly live streaming and chatting with fans during broadcasts as the character known as LeBlog James. He was also a key contributor to TSN and CTV’s Olympic programming during the 2012 London Games.
Eric eventually found his way into the sports betting field in 2016 and has been a mainstay ever since. He was tagged on Twitter as a Top 10 NBA sharp during the 2021 season and has been interviewed about basketball and his handicapping process on shows from Vancouver to India. Eric is now a jack-of-all-sports at Covers, where his predictions span the alphabet soup: NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, F1, WNBA, Euro, and Copa.
When making picks, he focuses on finding value first and foremost, and ensuring readers have all the information they need to make an informed choice.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M., Feb. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — The Board of Directors of Public Service Company of New Mexico, a subsidiary of TXNM Energy (NYSE: TXNM), declared the regular quarterly dividend of $1.145 per share on the 4.58 percent series of cumulative preferred stock. The preferred stock dividend is payable April 15, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business March 31, 2026.
Background: TXNM Energy (NYSE: TXNM), an energy holding company based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, delivers energy to more than 800,000 homes and businesses across Texas and New Mexico through its regulated utilities, TNMP and PNM. For more information, visit the company’s website at www.TXNMEnergy.com.
Santa Fe police received a report in September about a man’s visit to a massage business on Rosina Street, where workers offered more than he had bargained for.
He gave officers a list of sexual acts he alleged he had been offered for a price at Korea Spa, police wrote in a report.
The man told police “he has nothing against prostitution but believes it shouldn’t be near a school,” officers wrote, noting the business sits across the street from Salazar Elementary School, just a block from the busy intersection of Cerrillos Road and St. Michael’s Drive.
Advertisement
Police did not launch an investigation into Korea Spa because the man declined to press charges, but the business shut down earlier this month after the City Council Finance Committee issued a cease-and-desist order. The business is one of four massage parlors the city has shut down since July through such an order, due to failure to comply with business regulations. Some of the businesses were operating without a current license, or didn’t pass an inspection by city staff.
City and state officials say cracking down on illicit activity at massage businesses is more effective at the administrative level than tackling the problem through the criminal justice system.
It’s the “Al Capone approach,” Santa Fe Planning and Land Use Director Heather Lamboy said in an interview last year, referring to the famous mobster’s eventual conviction on income tax evasion charges.
Staff at the land use department believe 15 to 20 businesses in Santa Fe are currently operating as illicit massage parlors, she said this week. Her agency is preparing a proposed ordinance for the City Council to consider later this year to give more teeth to the administrative process aimed at shutting them down.
New Mexico lawmakers considered a measure during their 30-day session that was also intended to provide more stringent oversight of massage businesses, with a goal of weeding out those operating illegally or offering illicit services. But Senate Bill 246 failed to make it across the finish line.
Advertisement
It passed the Senate and the House Health and Human Services Committee with just one day to get a vote on the House floor. That never happened.
Good Luck Body Massage, at 360 E. Palace Ave., is one of several massage businesses the city has shut down amid concerns about suspected illicit activities.
Advertisement
Jim Weber/The New Mexican
‘Whack-a-mole’ situation
Lamboy previously worked for the city of Aurora, Colo., and said the proposed Santa Fe ordinance is modeled on legislation spearheaded by Aurora’s licensing department, which has proven successful.
The upcoming measure, which Lamboy said will be one of the first updates in the second phase of the city’s ongoing land use code rewrite, would require massage businesses to provide additional information to the city about their state licensing and to abide by specific standards, such as keeping their doors unlocked during business hours.
Advertisement
Locked doors during advertised business hours — with people inside — caught the attention of land use staff during inspections at several of the massage businesses that later faced cease-and-desist orders from the Finance Committee. Inspectors also cited violations such as expired business licenses and employees on-site who did not have a valid license as a massage therapist.
The Finance Committee has the sole power at the city to revoke business licenses, according to city code — a power Lamboy said it has exercised very rarely before it began targeting out-of-compliance massage parlors: “I don’t know the last time it’s been used,” she said.
Yang Yang Massage/Pony Massage at 1225 S. St. Francis Drive, Unit E shut down after the Santa Fe City Council Finance Committee approved a cease-and-desist order.
Advertisement
Jim Weber/The New Mexican
To date the city has issued cease-and-desist orders to the following businesses:
Good Luck Body Massage, 360 E. Palace Ave., July 28.
Chinese Massage LLC, 4985 Airport Road, Unit B, Oct. 27.
Yang Yang Massage/Pony Massage, 1225 S. St. Francis Drive, Unit E, Dec. 8.
Korea Spa, 2008 Rosina St., Unit B, Feb. 9.
The owner of Korea Spa is the only business owner who has come to a Finance Committee hearing to protest a decision. Lamboy said owners of other massage businesses appear to have closed their doors as soon as they were notified the city was preparing to issue a cease-and-desist order.
“It’s sort of like a whack-a-mole type of situation,” Lamboy acknowledged. “They’ll move on to other places, but, at least within our local jurisdiction, they won’t be permitted.”
Advertisement
Reports to police rare
Santa Fe police Sgt. Dianna Conklin said building a criminal case against massage parlor operators based on suspicions of human trafficking is “really difficult,” partly because potential victims — frequently immigrant women — are uncooperative with an investigation.
Massage parlor workers often rely on the business for housing and money, Conklin noted.
Reports to police about suspected trafficking or illegal services could yield petty misdemeanor charges against women offering such services, but turning those cases into investigations against their supervisors — the people who run the parlors — is trickier.
“We can go in there, we can do a sting and we have, basically, the offender, who is probably a victim of human trafficking — and then what?” Conklin said. “Then, what we do from there — we’re going to wind up charging her and trying to leverage her to flip on somebody, and … they’re not going to.”
Advertisement
Conklin has worked in the Santa Fe Police Department’s Special Victims Unit for several years, and in that time she has seen just two reports alleging prostitution at massage parlors. In both cases, a man alleged a masseuse had offered to perform sex acts during a massage.
One man told officers in June 2025 he had visited Pony Massage on St. Francis Drive, and the masseuse had offered oral sex and intercourse while she was massaging him, a police report states.
The man declined, he told police, but the woman continued to touch his genitals. When he told her he was planning to call police about the incident, the woman threatened to tell officers he had forced her to touch him inappropriately, he said, according to the report.
The man said he didn’t wish to press charges, but the incident made him feel “very uncomfortable,” and he wanted police to know what was going on at the parlor, police wrote.
The second report, made against Korea Spa on Rosina Street, came three months later.
Advertisement
Conklin’s unit has a handful of officers, and several are planning to attend a conference this year to learn more about investigating massage parlors, she said, adding some other law enforcement agencies have had more success approaching suspected human trafficking organizations through racketeering or organized crime cases — focusing on tax evasion or other types of offenses that can lead to a business shutdown.
“We want to stop human trafficking at the top,” Conklin said. “We don’t want to go after the people who are having to prostitute themselves to survive; we want to actually get the people who are facilitating the services, and get the victims into a safe place where they can feel like they actually have a chance to live the American dream, instead of just being trafficked indefinitely.”
The failed state effort
New Mexico officials have aimed for years to try a regulatory approach to scrutinize massage businesses that could be offering illicit services.
The latest effort came through SB 246, which would have expanded the state’s authority to regulate massage businesses by creating a new license category for the business operations — not just the individual therapists who work in them.
Advertisement
It also would have allowed state investigators to conduct in-person visits, a power they currently lack.
Melissa Salazar, director of the Boards and Commissions Division of the state Regulation and Licensing Department, said the bill would have put New Mexico alongside Florida, Texas, Delaware and Nebraska by having state authorities regulating both licensure and inspections of massage establishments.
The department, with Salazar helping to craft the bill, had introduced a nearly identical bill during the prior year’s regular legislative session, which died after only one committee hearing.
“The number one priority is to ensure that health, safety and ethical risks are being assessed,” she said.
A secondary goal, she added, was sharing information with law enforcement when inspectors suspect wrongdoing.
Advertisement
“But … it would not be the RLD’s responsibility to go in and do something about that. They would work in conjunction with law enforcement if they noticed something that was odd or different,” she said.
She noted roadblocks for police when it comes to investigating such businesses: Police typically need search warrants and probable cause to enter an establishment and often rely on rare reports; most people who encounter illicit activity at a massage parlor never report their concerns to police, she said.
SB 246 would have granted the state Massage Therapy Board, a five-seat commission of governor appointees, expanded authority to vet massage establishments and set rules governing licensure and inspections. The board would have had the power to deny or revoke a license based on unprofessional or unethical conduct or prior convictions.
Sen. Pat Woods, a Broadview Republican who co-sponsored the bill, said his support for the measure came after a media report of allegations against a Clovis massage parlor in his district.
“I know good and dang well there’s places advertised out there,” Woods said. “Local police, they do their best to train people to watch. I’m sure that it’s a constant job for them to watch out for that kind of thing.”
Advertisement
Woods said SB 246 was also intended to protect legitimate massage businesses and their clients.
“There’s legitimate people trying to make a legitimate living,” he said. “ The state should help them do that — so the people that need that treatment aren’t afraid they’re gonna walk into something more than what they think they’re walking into.”
The bill ran into opposition over language allowing inspections of massage establishments “at any time,” including outside business hours.
Because the proposal did not distinguish home-based businesses, critics argued it would have allowed inspectors to enter a residence at any hour.
Woods said it was too late in the session to amend the language. He may bring back another version in a future session.
Advertisement
“It’s not that we’re gonna stop all prostitution by any means,” Woods said. “But, you know, we have a way to regulate this, so that’s what we should do.”