Connect with us

News

Standard Chartered to double investment in wealth management as profits rise

Published

on

Standard Chartered to double investment in wealth management as profits rise

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Standard Chartered has said it will double investment in its wealth management business and shift its focus towards affluent individuals and global institutions after pre-tax profits rose in the third quarter.

The UK-based bank on Wednesday reported underlying profits before tax of $1.8bn, up from $1.3bn a year earlier and above analysts’ estimates of $1.6bn. A 32 per cent rise in revenue from the wealth business, which had a record quarter, boosted results.

The earnings came as the bank announced a shift in its operations to focus less on smaller domestic businesses and regular retail clients, and more on affluent individuals and larger international companies.

Advertisement

The changes would “further simplify our business and help us to generate higher-quality growth”, said chief executive Bill Winters in a statement.

StanChart raised its revenue guidance and targets for return on tangible equity, a key measure of profitability, as well as distributions to shareholders. It said it now aimed to return $8bn to shareholders between 2024 and 2026, up from a previous goal of at least $5bn.

The bank said it would reshape its retail banking business to focus on “building a strong pipeline” of affluent and international clients, and would focus on bigger international clients within its corporate and investment bank.

“We will reduce the number of clients whose needs do not play directly to our strengths,” it said, adding that it was considering the sale of “a small number of” businesses that are not core to its aims.

The emerging markets-focused bank said it would invest about $1.5bn over five years in its wealth business, including hiring more relationship managers and investment advisers to work for affluent clients — twice what it had previously planned to invest in the business.

Advertisement

“The first thing is that we are winning” in wealth management, chief financial officer Diego De Giorgi said on a call with reporters. “It’s very clear that we are gaining market share . . . we are gaining new clients and our existing clients are putting more money with us.”

Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai “clearly will receive a lot of attention” in the investment push, he said, though there would be investment “across the network”.

The lender is under pressure to grow in areas less dependent on interest income, as rates start to fall after a series of rises boosted profitability in recent years.

Its reported pre-tax profits were $1.7bn, up from $633mn a year ago when the figure accounted for a near-$700mn impairment charge on its stake in China Bohai Bank.

StanChart said its underlying revenues of $4.9bn were its best of any third quarter since 2015, the year Winters took the helm.

Advertisement

Income in the bank’s markets unit rose 16 per cent, partly because of higher foreign exchange and credit trading. 

Net interest income rose 9 per cent, which the bank said was partly due to hedging. Its closely watched net interest margin, the difference between the interest received on loans and the rate paid for deposits, rose to 2 per cent, up from 1.6 per cent a year ago.

The bank’s return on tangible equity was 10.8 per cent in the quarter, more than the 7 per cent a year earlier and beating analysts’ expectations of 10.3 per cent.

But the bank took a $16mn impairment charge in its ventures unit, which invests in start-ups, mostly because of its digital bank Mox, though it said delinquency rates at the start-up had improved.

It also reported a $34mn provision related to the risk of clients’ exposure to Hong Kong commercial real estate, where it said an oversupply of office space was an “area of concern”.

Advertisement

The bank has more exposure to commercial property lending in Hong Kong than in any other market. Its rival HSBC has been hit by a sixfold surge in defaulted commercial property loans in the territory.

StanChart shares are now just below the level when Winters took charge in June 2015, having risen 36 per cent since the start of this year. Its Hong Kong-listed shares rose as much as 3 per cent on Wednesday.

The bank has been under pressure to boost its stock since it trades at a discount to book value. In February, Winters lamented the bank’s “crap” share price, saying it did not reflect its true value.

De Georgi said “no one should ever be satisfied about a stock price” but that he was pleased about the rise in 2024.

StanChart this year said it planned to save about $1.5bn over the next three years by simplifying systems under a plan called “Fit for Growth”.

Advertisement

De Georgi said 80 per cent of the programmes under that plan — which include standardising the use of technology platforms and making use of large language models — would each lead to savings of $10mn or less.

“It derisks the programme because no single part of it can create trouble to the delivery of the programme and the achievement of our objectives,” he said.  

Costs rose 3 per cent year on year in the third quarter, which the bank said was due to inflation and business growth.

News

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

Published

on

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

new video loaded: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

transcript

transcript

Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

“One louder.” “Why don’t you just make 10 louder and make 10 be the top number and make that a little louder?”

Advertisement
The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

By Axel Boada

December 15, 2025

Continue Reading

News

BBC Verify: Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

Published

on

BBC Verify:  Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

How has the UK government performed against its key pledges?published at 11:18 GMT

Ben Chu
BBC Verify policy and analysis correspondent

Around a year ago Prime Minister Keir Starmer launched his “Plan for Change” setting out targets he said would be met by the end of this Parliament in 2029.

Advertisement

So ahead of Starmer being questioned by senior MPs on the House of Commons Liaison Committee this afternoon, I’ve taken a look at how the government has been performing on three key goals.

House building

The government said it would deliver 1.5 million net additional homes in England over the parliament.

That would imply around 300,000 a year on average, but we’re currently running at just over 200,000 a year.

Ministers say they are going to ramp up to the 1.5 million target in the later years of the parliament – however, the delivery rate so far is down on the final years of the last Conservative government.

Advertisement

Health

The government has promised that 92% of patients in England will be seen within 18 weeks.

At the moment around 62% are – but there are signs of a slight pick up over the past year.

Living standards

The government pledged to grow real household disposable income per person – roughly what’s left after taxes, benefits and inflation.

Advertisement

There has been some movement on this measure with the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasting 0.5% growth in living standards on average a year.

However that would still make it the second weakest Parliament since the 1970s. The worst was under the previous Conservative government between 2019 and 2024 when living standards declined.

Continue Reading

News

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

Published

on

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
Hon. James Comer
Hon. Robert Garcia November 3, 2025 Page 2

compel Attorney General Bondi to release what you have stated is a large trove of unseen files, which the public to date is still waiting to see released.

Your October 22 letter does not provide a persuasive rationale for why deposing the Clintons is required to fulfill the mandate of your investigation, particularly when what little information they have may be efficiently obtained in writing.

You state that your investigation into the “mismanagement” of the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and prosecutions requires the depositions of three individuals: former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Clinton, and former Attorney General William Barr – who was serving in the first Trump Administration when Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in federal custody. Compounding this inexplicable choice of deponents, you also have chosen not to depose the dozens of individuals whose links to Mr. Epstein have been publicly documented.

My clients have been private citizens for the last 24 and 12 years, respectively. President Clinton’s term ended six (6) years before allegations surfaced against Mr. Epstein. Former Secretary of State Clinton’s position was in no way related to law enforcement and is completely afield of any aspect of the Epstein matter. While neither of my clients have anything to offer for the stated purposes of the Committee’s investigation, subpoenaing former Secretary Clinton is on its face both purposeless and harassing. I set forth in my October 6 letter the facts that she did not know Epstein, did not travel with him, and had no dealings with him. Indeed, when I met with your staff to learn your basis for including former Secretary Clinton, none was given beyond wanting to ask if she had ever spoken with her husband about this matter. Setting aside the plainly relevant consideration of marital privilege, this is an entirely pretextual basis for compelling former Secretary Clinton to appear personally in this matter.

It is incumbent on the Committee to address the most basic questions regarding the basis for singling out the Clintons, particularly when there is no obvious or apparent rationale for it, given the mandate of the Committee’s investigation. Your October 22 letter does not provide such a justification. And your previous statements, belied by the facts, that President Clinton is a “prime suspect” (for something) because of visits to Epstein’s island betokens bias, not fairness. You said, on August 11:

“Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island, and we’ve all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he’s a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee.”

“1

Regrettably, such statements are not the words of an impartial and dispassionate factfinder. In fact, President Clinton has never visited Epstein’s island. He has repeatedly stated that, the Secret Service has corroborated that denial, Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent testimony to Deputy Attorney General Blanche reconfirmed this, as did the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre in her

Fields, “Comer: Bill Clinton ‘Prime Suspect’ in Epstein Investigation,” The Hill (Aug. 12, 2025).

Continue Reading

Trending