Connect with us

Midwest

Morning Glory: Vote 'No' on Ohio’s Issue 1

Published

on

Morning Glory: Vote 'No' on Ohio’s Issue 1

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Ohio has gone “deep red” over the past two decades and, as a consequence, the Buckeye State is the target of an attempt by the hard left to use its dark money machine to gerrymander to permanently favor the blue jerseys. They are doing it via Ohio state ballot Issue 1.  

Advertisement

Every serious person I have discussed this with in my home state hates the prospect of unelected bureaucrats with unlimited budgets gerrymandering the entire state to reach an amorphous goal of “proportionality” in representation. Citizens who genuinely believe in representative government will be voting “No” on Issue 1, even as they turn out to vote for Trump/Vance and for Bernie Moreno for the United States Senate and even if they are Harris/Walz/Sherrod Brown supporters.  

Even the most partisan Democrat should recoil from this blatant power grab by the hard left and its dark money machine.  

LAST-MINUTE HEARING COULD DETERMINE WHETHER VULNERABLE HOUSE DEM CAN VOTE FOR HERSELF IN KEY RACE

If Issue 1 passes in Ohio on November 5, the hard left’s agenda will advance in the near term and the long. The terms “hard left” and “dark money machine” repeat often in this column because what ought to be a scandal is simply not covered in this most consequential of presidential elections. Pardon the repetition, but it is the “hard left” at work, and the money at its disposal is staggering in its totals and its origins are deeply cloaked behind many happy talk labels.  

Hard left, dark money groups are trying to gerrymander the state. FILE: The Ohio Statehouse on December 18, 2023 (Maddie McGarvey/For The Washington Post)

Advertisement

In the near term, if Issue 1 passes, it almost guarantees Democrats will gain eight or nine of Ohio’s 15 congressional seats. Republicans currently hold 10 of those 15 seats, after a bipartisan commission took almost two years to arrive at lines acceptable to Ohio’s Supreme Court.  

The left didn’t like that result even though Ohio’s map of congressional districts is among the most reasonable to behold in the country. The left’s first run at tweaking the state constitution failed to thwart the people’s will, so it has produced and put before the voters a 26-page Jackson Pollock painting of a ballot measure that would install gerrymandering within gerrymandering, all bundled up as “citizens not politicians.” The money pouring into Ohio to impose this Rube Goldberg machine on Buckeyes is stunning.  

The dark money behind this Trojan Horse of a ballot measure now tops $24 million. That’s right: $24 million to weld a bizarre, convoluted scheme on to Ohio’s state constitution, almost all of it from out-of-state leftists.  

Less than 1% of the massive spend on this power grab comes from individual Buckeyes. Tens of millions come from the left’s dark money machine.  

The “Sixteen Thirty Fund,” founded by Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, has poured $6 million into the effort to impose permanent left-wing gerrymandering on my home state. “Several D.C. based leftist organizations contributed $1 million or more,” the Ohio State Senate Republicans reported earlier this year. “Article IV gave $2 million, Our American Future Foundation gave $1.5 million, The Tides Foundation from San Francisco contributed $2 million,” the report continued. “The Open Policy Center and Unite and Renew Fund both from D.C. gave $500,000 each.  And the far left ACLU Union Foundation out of New York contributed $1 million.” 

Advertisement

Ohio already has a “redistricting commission,” created by a statewide vote in 2015, and it is a part of the state constitution. Its makeup and mandate are clear and easy to understand — its seven members include the governor, the secretary of State and the state auditor and one appointee of both the majority and the minority in both houses of the state legislature. And the commission must abide by clear instructions on keeping cities, counties and townships together in a congressional district where possible.  

The commission produced congressional maps that tried to draw the district lines so that the state’s majority party, the GOP, would dominate, as Democrats did in Massachusetts and California. Democrats succeeded in stopping the Republican effort. But it wasn’t enough. Now, the short-term objective of Issue 1 is to push the House toward a permanent Democratic majority. 

The long term “win,” however, would not be for traditional Democrats though. It would for the hard left that we see in “the Squad,” via the successful imposition on a ruby red state of a deep blue congressional delegation and, crucially, the “proof of concept” it would provide.   

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, right, greets Ohio state senator and Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Matt Dolan during a campaign event in Columbus, Ohio, Monday, March 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Vernon) (AP Photo/Paul Vernon)

When a political play works anywhere in the United States, it then spreads like kudzu. Thus, has the legalization of marijuana spread across the country after it first blossomed in Colorado. Ditto for the push for decriminalization of crime and the election of non-prosecutors in major urban jurisdictions. The chaos driven by the hard left is designed very much to lock out the people and lock in the left’s elites.  

Advertisement

Every statewide elected official in Ohio, starting with its center-right and very popular Governor Mike DeWine, has come out urging Buckeyes to vote “No on 1.”  

Those officials are all Republicans because, just as California has all Democrats in statewide office, the self-sorting of state electorates into “red” and “blue” is as far advanced in Ohio as it is from Massachusetts to California.   

The party of wealthy coastal elites is blue and anchored in Massachusetts, New York and California. “Fly-over” country is mostly red, and the GOP depends upon Texas and Florida as its electoral strongholds. The House and Senate are slowly moving toward representing this reality.  

The hard left wants to stop that. It was never on the agenda of the hard left that “the center” and “the right” would be represented in any legislature except as tokens. The hard left hates the purposefully designed United States Senate with its two members per state and six-year terms, just as it despises the Electoral College.  Both are bulwarks of constitutional government, of a “Republican form of government” which was guaranteed to every state by our framers.  

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Advertisement

The electorate instinctively knows that a 26-page initiative cannot be a push for “good government” or even for merely “normal congressional districts” as opposed to those deeply partisan salamander-like districts which followed the founding of the republic as “factions” instantly arose and manipulated district lines.   

That’s been a feature, not a bug, of our elegant and enduring constitutional structure. We are not a parliamentary system. Ours is a much more stable and enduring republic built on a federalist design of dual sovereignty between the federal government of limited and enumerated powers and the 50 state governments.  

Every statewide elected official in Ohio, starting with its center-right and very popular Governor Mike DeWine, has come out urging Buckeyes to vote “No on 1.”  

The Constitution which binds us all together provides in Article IV, Section 4 that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government….”  That guarantee has been largely left alone by the United States Supreme Court over the centuries, as the states are by design intended to tweak their own governing systems.  

Advertisement

But this provision surely means there is some limit to what the hard left’s dark money machine can impose via machinations like Ohio’s Issue 1. But a constitutional challenge after 1 passes would be a long shot that would take a long time even if that result came eventually from the “originalist majority” on the current court.  

Far better for Buckeyes of all sorts to come together to reject this deeply disingenuous ploy. Tell all the Ohio voters you know to vote “No” on Issue 1. Send them this column. Call them up and explain what the ploy is here. The stakes are national, and the good news is that Ohio’s electorate, like most of the Midwest, is mostly center-right, reasonable and measured. When the smoke clears in a fortnight, pray that Ohio’s electorate spent enough time studying their down ballot as well as voting in the big two races, and thus soundly defeated Issue 1.  

Hugh Hewitt is host of “The Hugh Hewitt Show,” heard weekday mornings 6am to 9am ET on the Salem Radio Network, and simulcast on Salem News Channel. Hugh wakes up America on over 400 affiliates nationwide, and on all the streaming platforms where SNC can be seen. He is a frequent guest on the Fox News Channel’s news roundtable hosted by Bret Baier weekdays at 6pm ET. A son of Ohio and a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, Hewitt has been a Professor of Law at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law since 1996 where he teaches Constitutional Law. Hewitt launched his eponymous radio show from Los Angeles in 1990.  Hewitt has frequently appeared on every major national news television network, hosted television shows for PBS and MSNBC, written for every major American paper, has authored a dozen books and moderated a score of Republican candidate debates, most recently the November 2023 Republican presidential debate in Miami and four Republican presidential debates in the 2015-16 cycle. Hewitt focuses his radio show and his column on the Constitution, national security, American politics and the Cleveland Browns and Guardians. Hewitt has interviewed tens of thousands of guests from Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump over his 40 years in broadcast, and this column previews the lead story that will drive his radio/ TV show today.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM HUGH HEWITT

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Midwest

Noem says Minneapolis suspect committed ‘domestic terrorism,’ accuses Walz, Frey of inciting violence

Published

on

Noem says Minneapolis suspect committed ‘domestic terrorism,’ accuses Walz, Frey of inciting violence

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem on Saturday labeled the alleged actions of the suspect killed in a Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis as “domestic terrorism,” accusing Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey of inciting violence against federal officers while stressing that President Donald Trump is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act if deemed necessary.

“When you perpetuate violence against a government because of ideological reasons and for reasons to resist and perpetuate violence, that is the definition of domestic terrorism,” Noem said during a news conference at FEMA headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“This individual who came with weapons and ammunition to stop a law enforcement operation of federal law enforcement officers committed an act of domestic terrorism,” Noem added. “That’s the facts.”

Noem described the incident beginning while DHS officers carried out “targeted operations” in Minneapolis against an illegal alien whose criminal history included domestic assault, disorderly conduct, and driving without a valid license.

Advertisement

TODD BLANCHE WARNS AMERICANS ‘SHOULD BE WORRIED’ ABOUT MINNESOTA PROTESTS AFTER CHURCH DISRUPTION

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem speaks during a news conference at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) headquarters, Saturday, in Washington, D.C.  (Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“An individual approached U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9-millimeter semi-automatic handgun,” and agents attempted to disarm him. “The officers attempted to disarm this individual, but the armed suspect reacted violently,” Noem said. “Fearing for his life and for the lives of his fellow officers around him, an agent fired defensive shots.”

Medics attempted to render aid, Noem said, but the man, later identified as 37-year-old Alex Pretti, “was pronounced dead at the scene.” 

She also claimed that Pretti had “two magazines with ammunition in them that held dozens of rounds” and no identification.

Advertisement

“This looks like a situation where an individual arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement,” Noem said.

TRUMP CITES ARMED SUSPECT, LACK OF POLICE SUPPORT FOLLOWING FATAL BORDER PATROL SHOOTING IN MINNEAPOLIS

Anti-ICE agitators stand behind a barricade of trash bins as they gather near the site a man was shot and killed by a federal agent, Saturday, in Minneapolis.  (Roberto Schmidt / AFP via Getty Images)

The shooting was followed by unrest in the area, Noem said. 

“Hundreds of protesters then showed up at the scene,” she said. “They began to obstruct and to assault law enforcement officers,” she added. “We saw objects being thrown at them, including ice and other objects, and a rampant assault began.

Advertisement

“A [Homeland Security Investigation] HSI agent’s finger was bitten off.” 

She said crowd-control measures were deployed “to bring safety to the public and to law enforcement at the scene.”

Noem said the situation “did not have to happen,” placing blame on Minnesota’s political leadership. 

“The Minnesota governor and the Minneapolis mayor need to take a long, hard look in the mirror,” she said. “They need to evaluate their rhetoric, their conversations, and their encouragement of such violence against our citizens and our law enforcement officers.”

NOEM SAYS ‘ARRESTS COMING’ AFTER ANTI-ICE MOB TARGETED MINNESOTA CHURCH

Advertisement

Noem claimed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has “encouraged residents and citizens and violent rioters to resist.” (Reuters/Tim Evans)

She also accused Walz of undermining federal officers. “I’ll remind you that Governor Walz, today in his press conference, said that our officers were not even law enforcement, which is a lie,” Noem said. “He’s called them the Gestapo.”

Noem further claimed Walz “encouraged residents and citizens and violent rioters to resist,” and alleged that state leaders had doxxed federal officers, “putting themselves and their families’ lives in jeopardy.”

During the briefing, Noem was asked whether Trump was closer to invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the unrest. She did not rule it out.

“The president will use every tool that he needs to follow through on his promises to the American people,” Noem said.

Advertisement

She added that the Trump administration would continue operating in Minneapolis despite objections from state and local leaders.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We’re going to treat Minneapolis exactly the way that we have treated every other city across this country,” Noem said, referring to immigration enforcement operations like Operation Metro Surge underway nationwide.

Noem said DHS is investigating the shooting “just like we do all other officer-involved shootings,” and that additional details would be released as the investigation continues.

The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment in response to Noem’s remarks.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

Matthew Stafford Should Not Be Remembered as Detroit Lion

Published

on

Matthew Stafford Should Not Be Remembered as Detroit Lion


As the snow piles up all around the Metro Detroit community, naturally it was time to fire up the television to watch pre-game coverage of the AFC and NFC championship games.

Advertisement

Mix in a little sports radio, a football podcast while eating a hearty breakfast and some google searches, and it dawned on me.

Advertisement

This week will be the five-year anniversary of the Lions blockbuster trade that sent veteran quarterback Matthew Stafford to the Los Angeles Rams to the Detroit Lions for draft picks and Jared Goff.

As Stafford is preparing for his Rams squad to face the top-seeded Seattle Seahawks, it is time for those rooting for the 37-year-old to let it go.

He is a member of the Rams and not the Lions.

His resume with the Lions is just like the snowflakes falling on your windshield. Eventually, they will evaporate when the weather finally warms up, never to be remembered.

Advertisement

When he eventually retires, he should not have his Lions jersey retired, no entry into the Pride of the Lions and no speeches at Ford Field during primetime games.

Advertisement

This week, Stafford was asked about the evolution of his game to where he’s been able to perform so well in the months of December, January and February since joining the Rams.

Would have been nice in Detroit, right?

“I appreciate that and I understand that. I think quarterback wins is an interesting stat. It takes everybody. There are certain games where I don’t play up to par but we win the game or certain games where I feel like I played really well and we don’t win the game. It doesn’t always correlate with the quarterback,” said Stafford. “Obviously, I want to play as good as I possibly can, but I would equate that to our head coach leading the way and our team playing good football at the right time.

“Surely, I’m doing my best part to try and play at a high level or lead the guys in the right way and find a way to win the football game.,” Stafford added. “There’s no question about that, but I didn’t win those games by myself and I didn’t lose any of them by myself. We play as a team. We win as a team and we lose as a team. That’s what I’d say about that.”

Advertisement

Some will say the Lions failed Stafford. Others blame Stafford.

Advertisement

Many believe it was a true combination of both. But the years-long debate regarding who was more at fault does not really matter.

In the end, Stafford had his career success outside of Detroit, and should be simply revered as a Rams quarterback who failed in Detroit.

Advertisement

More from Detroit Lions OnSI



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Was It Wrong For The Milwaukee Brewers To Trade Freddy Peralta?

Published

on

Was It Wrong For The Milwaukee Brewers To Trade Freddy Peralta?


The question everyone asks when a trade like this happens is pretty simple: Was this the right move for the team?

Some deals cut a little deeper, and this one definitely feels like one of those.

But this is how the Milwaukee Brewers operate, regardless of whether you agree with the strategy. On Wednesday, the Crew traded ace right-hander Freddy Peralta. They sent him and an expendable piece, right-hander Tobias Myers, to the New York Mets for two of their top-five prospects: infielder-outfielder Jett Williams and right-handed starter Brandon Sproat.

One of the first negative reactions I saw on social media was something from a national baseball writer to the effect of “The Brewers, not the Dodgers, are ruining baseball because they can’t afford $8 million.”

Advertisement

That is certainly a take. Very wrong, but certainly a take.

The Brewers were more than willing to pay Peralta $8 million for 2026. The reason behind the trade is what comes after 2026. No, I’m not talking about whatever happens related to a lockout or strike or anything related to the collective bargaining agreement.

Instead, it has to do with Peralta’s future. He will be a free agent following the 2026 World Series. Peralta enters his age-30 season in a prime position to cash in. After a team-friendly five-year, $15.5 million contract extension that then became a seven-year, $31.6 million deal with two club options that bought out two free-agent years, Peralta is due a payday. He has earned it. Remember that Peralta came to the Brewers as one of three wild cards as they dealt first baseman Adam Lind to the Seattle Mariners following the 2015 season. Peralta hadn’t played any higher than the complex league in Arizona at that point and was 19 years old when he joined the Crew.

In the 10 years since, Peralta has been a self-made pitcher. Sure, the Brewers gave him all the tools they could, but it was Peralta who put in the work and rose from obscurity to MLB All-Star and Cy Young Award contender. And the Brewers reaped the benefits of that and took advantage of the salary-suppression system MLB employs to get more value out of their investment in Peralta. No longer is he Fastball Freddy, the youngster who could only throw a variety of fastballs. Now he features three offspeed pitches in a changeup, slider, and curveball to go along with a four-seam fastball.

Since his stunning 13-strikeout MLB debut on that Mother’s Day in Colorado in 2018, Peralta has been an integral part of the Brewers’ success. Since joining the rotation full-time at the beginning of the 2021 season, Peralta has been a rock in the rotation, even if he wasn’t spectacular for most of that. He started 139 of 141 games with a FIP of 3.65, an ERA of 3.30, and an ERA+ of 126. That ERA+ means Peralta was 26% above the average MLB pitcher. That number was certainly boosted by his 2025 performance, where he posted a 154 ERA+ and finished fifth in NL Cy Young Award voting.

Advertisement

The Brewers’ philosophy of baseball business is not to overpay. They don’t want to hand out exorbitant salaries that could weigh down their roster at the back end. The Brewers are approaching that situation with Christian Yelich, who has three more years at about $24 million each before a mutual option at $20 million for 2029 (those are usually declined). Peralta will certainly clear what Yelich, technically the Crew’s highest-paid player*, is making, perhaps even approach $30 million a year. It is his market value at this moment. The Brewers would have given Peralta a qualifying offer (probably around $23 million for 2027), which he would have declined and netted the Brewers one single draft pick.

That was the situation Brandon Woodruff was in this offseason. Woodruff accepted the qualifying offer and returned on a $22.025 million contract for 2026. That is on top of the $10 million mutual option buyout the Crew paid Woodruff instead of a $20 million contract. So Woodruff is really making $32.025 million this season* (thus the mythical highest-paid Brewers player).

Could the Brewers afford Peralta’s $8 million for 2026? Of course. That was never in question. But the Brewers, like they did with closer Josh Hader, starter Corbin Burnes, and closer Devin Williams, sold high on the player in question. Burnes netted shortstop Joey Ortiz, left-hander DL Hall, and a draft pick that resulted in first baseman Blake Burke from the Baltimore Orioles. Williams brought back third baseman Caleb Durbin and left-handed starter Nestor Cortes.

Hall hasn’t panned out yet, and Cortes flamed out due to injury. Ortiz and Durbin are the starting left side of the infield. Time will tell on Jett Williams and Sproat, but their pedigree is higher than that of the others acquired in those other two deals. This is how the Brewers churn their talent. This is part of the secret sauce they have used to win three straight NL Central titles.

I am on record as saying Peralta was the perfect player for the Brewers to invest in. He epitomizes what they do, taking a ball of clay and molding it into something useful.

Advertisement

But I also understand the Brewers’ philosophy and agree with it to a certain extent. Players should get paid what they are worth, and teams also have the right not to make a bad investment. Hader cashed in. Devin Williams got his payday. So did Burnes, who then got hurt. Peralta, barring the unforeseen, will get his next offseason.

Just not from the Brewers, who sold Peralta at his peak and now instead have two good prospects, bolstering an already-burgeoning farm system.

Was this the right move for the team?

Yes, it was.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending