Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World Film Review: Controlled Chaos

Published

on

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World Film Review: Controlled Chaos

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World is Edgar Wright’s most chaotic film, but that does not mean it’s all style and no substance.


Director: Edgar Wright
Genre: Action, Comedy, Fantasy, Teen, Rom-Com
Run Time: 112′
U.S. Release: August 13, 2010
U.K. Release:August 25, 2010
Where to Watch: on digital and on demand

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World (2010) is a film I once described as being “on absolute crack.” With the movie’s fast-paced dialogue, quick-cut editing, and overall vibrant energy, I could be forgiven for simply thinking Edgar Wright’s film was a fun, frantic, mess. Upon repeat viewings, however, I have come to appreciate Wright’s controlled chaos, using a committed cast and a distinct style to comment on growing up, relationships in the 21st century, and learning to accept the lots of life.

In the film, Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera) is in his early twenties, trying to navigate his budding music career and his revolving-door of relationships. The movie begins with Scott dating a high schooler, Knives (Ellen Wong) but quickly meeting and falling in love with Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). Scott quickly realizes that, in order to win Ramona’s affection, he must battle and defeat her “seven evil exes.” The resulting adventure is a mishmash of mid-2000s cultural touchstones (comic books, fighter-style video games, and punk music) that is unlike any other film released during that time, and something we are unlikely to ever see again.

Before diving into what makes this film truly insane, it is important to note how much the cast is on board with Wright’s vision. Cera bounces between calm awkwardness and goofy heroism, while Winstead provides some stability in an otherwise tumultuous roller coaster. Kieran Culkin, Brie Larson, Chris Evans, Aubrey Plaza, Anna Kendrick, and Jason Schwartzman round out the cast, all dialing it up to 11. Each brings a unique sense of humor to the characters. Wright then uses these individual personalities to inhabit an incredibly zestful world.

Advertisement

That zestful world features the “booms!” and “pows!” reminiscent of the 1960s Batman show, hilarious title cards, and a visual flare that is pulled straight out of a comic book or an arcade-style fighting game (Mortal Kombat quickly comes to mind). Each ex Scott faces feels like the next big boss battle, each one increasingly zany and difficult to defeat. These fights are choreographed, colorful, and completely stylized. When the film feels teetering on the edge of becoming slightly redundant, the next battle begins, looking and feeling different than what came before. Wright keeps his audience on their toes at every turn.

Scott Pilgrim and Ramona Flowers sit on a bus in a still from Scott Pilgrim vs. The World
Scott Pilgrim and Ramona Flowers in a still from Scott Pilgrim vs. The World (Universal Pictures)

With everything that is happening in the filmmaking itself, critics of Scott Pilgrim could easily say the movie is all style and no substance. Even worse, Wright could be accused of mocking his own characters, reducing the serious struggles young adults go through as nothing more than a game we all must play. I don’t think this is the case however. Rather, Wright is drawing on the culture that he knows to empathize with his characters. There are genuine moments of heart on display, especially towards the end, when Scott begins to realize the ways he’s hurt those closest to him. The film seems seriously concerned with questions about how we can escape our past, how we learn from mistakes, and how human relationships can persevere despite the personal challenges each individual has. 

Towards the end of the film, Scott receives two “level-ups” as he faces down his final opponent. The first is “love.” Wright centers love as the driving force of human relationships, something that can overcome any obstacle. The second is “self-respect,” a challenge for the audience to accept their own individuality. To say that Wright simply utilizes these visual moments as gags would be to undersell the very real issues the film grapples with. The chaos may seem out of control, but Wright seems to suggest that, much like the real world, chaos can be controlled by the power of our own emotions. One can easily watch the movie and simply be entertained, but for some — especially ones in a certain generation — the film brilliantly blends its wild mise en scéne with themes that will certainly resonate throughout time.


Get it on Apple TVGet it on Apple TV

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World is now available to watch on digital and on demand. Read our review of Netflix series Scott Pilgrim Takes Off!

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World Trailer (Universal Pictures)
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Published

on

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’

Advertisement

The action is relentless in the complex thriller In Cold Light, a tense combination of crime and fugitive tale and family drama. It is the third feature and first English language film by Maxime Giroux, best known for a very different kind of film, the critically acclaimed 2014 drama Felix & Meira.

The tension and high energy of In Cold Light almost overwhelm the film, but are relieved, barely, by moments of character development and introspection that keep the audience pulling for the restrained and outwardly cold main character. 

Speaking at the film’s Canadian premiere, director Giroux admitted he found creating an action film a challenge. Part of his approach was using very minimal dialogue, especially for the central character, letting the action speak for itself, and allowing silence to intensify suspense. Giroux has said he likes the lack of dialogue and speaks highly of the importance of silence in cinema; he prefers using “physical aspects of communication” in his films. 

Young Ava Bly (Maika Monroe) is a competent and businesslike drug dealer, working in partnership with her brother Tom (Jesse Irving) and a small team. As the film begins, Ava has just been released from a brief prison sentence. She is hoping to return to her former position, but her brother’s associates consider her a risk due to her recent incarceration. While she works to re-establish herself, a shocking encounter with a corrupt police officer sends Ava’s life into chaos and forces her to go on the run.

Ava’s fugitive experience introduces a new character, to whom Ava turns for help: her father, Will Bly, played by Troy Kotsur, known for his excellent performance in CODA. Their first interaction is handled in a fascinating way, as Will is deaf and the two communicate through sign language. This, of course, provides another form of the silent interaction the director prefers; he explained that much of the father-daughter interaction was rewritten with the actor in mind. Their conflict is nicely expressed through a scene in which their initial conversation is intermittently cut off by a faulty light which goes out periodically, making communication through sign momentarily impossible, nicely expressing the rift between father and daughter. 

Advertisement

As Ava continues to evade danger, her escape becomes complicated by new information, placing her in a painful dilemma. We gradually learn more about Ava, her background, and her character through occasional flashbacks and glimpses of her dreams. The plot becomes more complex and more poignant, and gains features of a mystery as well as an action tale, as she is pressed to choose from among equally unacceptable alternatives.

The climax of her efforts to protect both herself and those close to her comes to a head as she meets with the director of a rival drug gang. Veteran actress Helen Hunt is perfect in the minor but significant role of Claire, the rival drug lord, who plays odd mind games with Ava in an intriguing psychological fencing match. It’s an unusual scene, in which Ava’s personality is made clearer, and Claire’s understated dominance and casual speech do not quite conceal the threat she represents. 

The frantic pace and emotional turmoil are enhanced by the camera work, which tends to focus tightly on Ava, and by a harsh, minimal musical score that sets the tone without distracting from the action. Giroux chose to shoot the film in Super 60; he describes digital as “too perfect” for the look he was going for, and since “Ava is rough,” the film portrays her better. The director describes the entire movie as “rough,” in fact, and deliberately chose a dark, washed-out look for much of the footage, occasionally using light and colour, in the form of fireworks, lightning, or a colourful carnival, to both relieve and emphasise the darkness. 

The dynamic, intense story holds the attention in spite of the lengthy, sometimes repetitive chase scenes and subdued dialogue. Ava’s predicament, and the difficult decisions she is forced to make, are made surprisingly relatable, from the initial disaster that starts the action to the surprising flash-forward that concludes the film, on as high a note as the situation could allow. Fans of action movies will definitely enjoy this one.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Jeremy Schuetze’s ‘ANACORETA’ (2022) – Movie Review – PopHorror

Published

on

Jeremy Schuetze’s ‘ANACORETA’ (2022) – Movie Review – PopHorror

PopHorror had the chance to check out Anacoreta (2022) ahead of its streaming release! Does this meta-horror flick provide interesting story telling or is it a confusing mess.

 

Let’s have a look…

Synopsis

A group of friends heads to a secluded woodland cabin for a weekend getaway, planning to film an experimental horror movie. As the shoot progresses, the project begins to fall apart—until a real and terrifying presence emerges from the darkness.

Anacoreta is directed by Jeremy Schuetze. It was written by Jeremy Schuetze and Matt Visser. The film stars Antonia Thomas (Bagman 2024), Jesse Stanley (Raf 2019), Jeremy Schuetze (Jennifer’s Body 2009), and Matt Visser (A Lot Like Christmas 2021)

Advertisement

 

My Thoughts

Antonia Thomas delivered an outstanding performance as the female lead in Anacoreta. It was remarkable to watch her convey such a wide range of emotions with authenticity and depth. I was continually impressed by her ability to switch seamlessly between different dialects. I absolutely loved her delivery of the dialogue of telling The Scorpion and the Frog fable.

Anacoreta employs a distinctive, meta-horror style of storytelling. The narrative follows a group of friends creating a “scripted reality” horror film, and as the plot unfolds, the boundary between their staged production and their actual lives becomes increasingly blurred. This was interesting, but at the same time frustrating as a viewer.

Check out Anacoreta on Prime Video and let us know your thoughts!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years

“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway. 

It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.

Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.

We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.

Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.

Advertisement

That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.

Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.

The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.

And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged. 

“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.

Advertisement

HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending