Connect with us

North Carolina

How Kamala Knocks Out Trump

Published

on

How Kamala Knocks Out Trump


Kamala Harris speaks at a campaign rally at the Bojangles Coliseum in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12.
Photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

When CNN reported last week that Mark Robinson, North Carolina’s Republican lieutenant governor, had once called himself a “black NAZI” on a porn site, the political world came to one quick consensus: He was totally cooked in his race for governor. (Most of his staff promptly quit.) What was less obvious was how the news would budge the deadlocked presidential race there. At Kamala Harris campaign headquarters in Delaware, and on the ground in Raleigh, Democratic operatives saw a clear opportunity to gain an edge in a state only one Democrat has won at the presidential level since Jimmy Carter. When Priorities USA, an influential Democratic super-PAC, finished running its latest private North Carolina forecast on Sunday, just days after the CNN report, it had Harris at 50.3 percent and Trump at 49.7.

Advertisement

No one in Wilmington or Washington, let alone Charlotte, expects Harris to open up much of a lead in a state that often looks more burgundy than purple, but Harris’s team began making aggressive moves to flood North Carolinians with reminders of Robinson’s extremism, and his latest scandal, within hours of the news — and to tie him to Donald Trump.

Along with Georgia, North Carolina represents the second-biggest electoral-vote haul of all the battlegrounds. Joe Biden, who’d lost it by just over a point in 2020, set out to win it when he launched his 2024 campaign. His troops invested in an ambitious field and advertising operation there, recognizing it as the most obvious opportunity to flip a state Trump won four years ago. As Biden struggled, though, North Carolina slipped further from his grasp than any other core battleground; by the time he dropped out this summer, Trump held a seven-point lead there in the FiveThirtyEight polling average.

It’s been a different story entirely since Harris took over the ticket. Since then, the same polling average has never shown a gap of more than one point between her and Trump. For over a year, the vice-president had been visiting the state regularly, occasionally at the invitation of Governor Roy Cooper, a Democrat with whom she has been friends since they were both attorneys general. The national vibe shift in her favor was perhaps the most pronounced in North Carolina, where nearly 25,000 new volunteers have signed up since she became the nominee and voter registration has spiked, especially among women, and women of color in particular. (People who have spoken with Jen O’Malley Dillon, the campaign’s chair, say she appears especially eager to win the state back after losing it narrowly as Barack Obama’s deputy campaign manager in 2012. He’d won it in 2008, when she was his battleground-states director.)

While Harris’s political brain trust put North Carolina back on the front burner the week she took over for Biden, in their eyes Robinson’s implosion has only made the opportunity more ripe. It’s hardly one they can afford to pass up. The most important state this year is Pennsylvania, but her campaign does not believe it can count on winning it since it’s so close and both campaigns are pursuing it so aggressively. If she can’t win Pennsylvania, she’ll very likely need either Georgia or North Carolina’s 16 electoral votes to reach 270, and Georgia is looking like a tougher climb even though Biden won it in 2020. (A New York Times–Siena College poll this week had Trump up four in Georgia but just two in North Carolina.) Meanwhile, Trump’s path back to the presidency is exceedingly difficult without North Carolina.

The two candidates and their running mates visited the state eight times in the first three weeks of September alone. And though Democrats have more ad money booked in North Carolina than Republicans in the home stretch of the race, it’s the only battleground where the Trump campaign itself has outspent Harris’s since she got in the race, according to the ad-tracking firm AdImpact.

Advertisement

For months, the Harris team had been “expecting a close race, and trying to win a close race,” in the words of Dan Kanninen, the campaign’s director of battleground states, building a campaign to fight for marginal votes. Much of the campaign’s messaging already tied Robinson — who was infamous for being a Holocaust denier and arguing that abortion is “about killing the child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down” — to Trump.

“We knew this a year ago, we knew this a month ago: We recognize that Mark Robinson was the example of what Donald Trump’s politics have done to the Republican Party and to America,” Kanninen told me. Since last week’s revelations, less engaged voters have tuned in. “It doesn’t represent to me a shift in the imperatives or the strategy, but it does mean there is a hotter spotlight on that extremism,” he said.

The Harris campaign didn’t announce a new infusion of cash to North Carolina, but its immediate shift in attention and energy has been obvious to voters, activists, and operatives in the state. Pro-Harris forces wasted no time last week in trying to make sure hardcore Democrats, wavering independents, and conservatives associate Robinson with Trump and vice versa. The Democratic National Committee, for one, paid for billboards around the state showing the pair of Republicans together, highlighting Trump’s extensive praise for Robinson (whom he’s called “Martin Luther King on steroids”). Harris’s campaign, too, started circulating an ad explicitly tying the pair together, showing footage of them side by side. Yet the ad’s focus isn’t on Robinson’s newly revealed comments, rather on his harsh right-wing views on abortion. On the ground, the Harris operation immediately started planning press events aimed at getting more coverage of Robinson’s extreme views and, especially, his ties to Trump.

Since last week, Harris staffers have argued that Robinson’s continued outrages help their cause with both Black voters and moderate white ones in the suburbs. For months, the campaign had been working on its appeal to the latter group by focusing largely on abortion, and by specifically reaching out to the nearly one-quarter of voters in the GOP primary in March who chose Nikki Haley over Trump. This group has been bombarded with reminders of Trump’s and Robinson’s far-right views, but also those of congressman Dan Bishop, the former sponsor of the state’s infamous HB2 anti-trans “bathroom bill” who’s running for lieutenant governor, and Michele Morrow, the superintendent candidate who was at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 and called for Barack Obama’s execution. Now the Harris camp is turning up the volume on this messaging, previewing in a campaign memo that it would be specifically outlining how Trump and Robinson share a backing of abortion bans, their wish to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and their joint hope to gut the Department of Education.

As the campaign enters its final stretch, Wilmington is looking for even more ways to make sure its many staffers on the ground in North Carolina can disseminate the Robinson news — and reminders of his Trump association — to every last voter who may be undecided. “This is when people start paying attention, and all of a sudden there’s this conversation in real life, in stride, about the election. And that’s where the presence we’ve had on the ground matters,” Kanninen said.

Advertisement

Democrats’ imagined path to victory in North Carolina is straightforward but relies on maximum turnout from a few different groups and likely some Republican discouragement. Over the last decade, many liberal hopes for the state have rested on demographic change, especially on the influx of highly educated left-leaners moving in, particularly to big cities like Charlotte and Raleigh. Now Harris is hoping for higher margins of victory — and blockbuster voting rates — in those metropolitan areas. Yet she is also expected to rely largely on nearly two years of organizing work led by Anderson Clayton, the state party’s 26-year-old chair, who has been adamant about building and maintaining a presence in rural and traditionally deep-red parts of North Carolina, too. The idea is not to win there, but to cut into Trump’s margin of victory in places such as Statesville, the county seat of Iredell County, which Trump won by a two-to-one margin in 2020.

Still, most of their hope is pinned on gains in the fast-growing suburbs, where Democrats have been making particular inroads in recent years by focusing on the fall of Roe and MAGA extremism. The playbook worked to great effect in 2022, and even more in elections since then. Democratic operatives in the state point often to unexpected off-year party gains in local offices — like flipping the mayor’s office in Huntersville and a state house seat in Cabarrus County, both outside of Charlotte — as reason for optimism.

While many local Democrats insist they see no evidence of a serious Trump organizing plan, Harris has been running ads in Black-focused and Spanish-language media for months, and has established 26 field offices across the state. Among these are outposts in highly valuable suburbs like those in Cabarrus and Mecklenburg counties, and others in far more conservative areas like Gaston County, which Trump won by 28 points four years ago. (Catawba College professor Michael Bitzer told my colleague Benjamin Hart this week that the infrastructure is “the most ambitious ground-game operation I’ve seen since Obama’s ’08 campaign.”) And Harris’s operation is stacked with North Carolina experience: Kanninen, for one, helped run Hillary Clinton’s operation there in 2016, and has made sure this operation is more robustly organized across the state than Clinton’s had been. On the ground, Harris’s team is led largely by veterans of Cooper’s campaigns and governor’s office, including senior advisers Scott Falmlen and L.T. McCrimmon, and Dory MacMillan, the campaign’s state communications director.

Yet the irony is that Cooper’s repeated success in the state is one reason there’s no clear consensus about how much Robinson’s collapse will actually help Harris. The state’s voters have a decades-long history of electing Democratic governors along with Republican presidents — Cooper, who was elected in 2016 and re-elected in 2020 while the state twice went for Trump, is only the latest example.

Local operatives agree on how continued revelations about Robinson’s past could theoretically help Harris: by convincing some undecided suburbanites of GOP madness, but mostly by discouraging conservatives from voting at all. Yet many are skeptical that this would necessarily translate up the ballot, especially if it seems like Attorney General Josh Stein, Robinson’s opponent, will win easily and Robinson poses little threat. Plus, while many Democratic operatives close to Harris have firsthand experience in campaigns defeating Trump-inspired extremists, most are quick to acknowledge those candidates’ unpopularity seldom dents Trump’s own appeal to his voters. “In normal times, the Robinson thing would be a killer up and down the Republican ticket,” said Bruce Thompson, a prominent Democratic lawyer in Raleigh. But since the CNN report, “It’s hard to feel a tide shift, because it’s going to be decided on the margins. Trump supporters have proven it does not matter what he does, or who he’s associated with.” Still, Thompson said, there’s always a good chance that some groups of Republicans “get frustrated and don’t show up.”

Advertisement

Republicans have mostly scoffed at the idea that Robinson could bring Trump down. But the former president himself isn’t taking any chances.

Just two days after Robinson was revealed to have called himself a Nazi and advocated for reinstating slavery, Trump touched down in Wilmington. Robinson had been at Trump’s side in his appearances in the state for months, and spoke at Trump’s convention in Milwaukee. This time, though, Robinson wasn’t invited and Trump never mentioned his name.



Source link

North Carolina

‘Bonsai in the Blue Ridge’ exhibit brings dozens of displays to North Carolina Arboretum

Published

on

‘Bonsai in the Blue Ridge’ exhibit brings dozens of displays to North Carolina Arboretum


The North Carolina Arboretum will host a bonanza of bonsai this week with “Bonsai in the Blue Ridge,” a limited-time exhibition of more than 50 living sculptures as part of the American Bonsai Society’s Learning Seminar 2026.

Between June 4-7, arboretum visitors can explore the exhibits for a $5 admission fee, along with the arboretum’s regular parking fee. A press release from the arboretum said there will also be opportunities to register for seminars, workshops and tours led by bonsai artists for an additional cost.

GROWING YOUR GARDEN? PLENTY OF PLANTS FOR PURCHASE AT THE ARBORETUM’S SPRING SALE

“The American Bonsai Society brings together people who share a passion for bonsai. Through world-class publications and events such as the Learning Seminars, ABS promotes and educates, sharing techniques that showcase North American artistic expression and encouraging the use of plant species that grow well in the United States, Canada, and Mexico,” ABS Convention Chair Scott Barboza said in a written statement.

Advertisement

FILE IMAGE of a bonsai plant that is part of the North Carolina Arboretum’s Bonsai Exhibition Garden. (Photo: North Carolina Arboretum)

Bonsai is the ancient art of shaping trees over time to create miniature living sculptures. The North Carolina Arboretum is no stranger to the art, having established the Bonsai Exhibition Garden in 2005, which showcases up to 50 specimens of traditional Asian bonsai subjects, tropical plants, American species and plants native to the Blue Ridge region.

IKEBANA INTERNATIONAL ASHEVILLE STAGES FLORAL DESIGN EXHIBITION AT NC ARBORETUM

“Bonsai in the Blue Ridge” takes place 5 to 7 p.m. Thursday, June 4, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday and Saturday, June 5 and 6, and 9 a.m. to noon Sunday, June 7.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

See a full schedule of events for this week’s seminar at americanbonsaisociety.org.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Greenville Police Department Join Effort Promoting Safe Firearm Storage

Published

on

Greenville Police Department Join Effort Promoting Safe Firearm Storage


The Greenville Police Department joined community leaders in Pitt County this week to promote safe firearm storage as part of North Carolina’s annual NC S.A.F.E. Week of Action, the Greenville Police Department said.

In a statement, the Greenville Police Department thanked NC S.A.F.E. and the North Carolina Department of Public Safety for the opportunity to help educate residents about responsible firearm storage practices.

We want to thank NC S.A.F.E. and the North Carolina Department of Public Safety for allowing us to help relay to the community the importance of safely securing firearms so that we can avoid tragedies in the future!

The local event follows Gov. Josh Stein’s proclamation recognizing June 1-7 as NC S.A.F.E. Week of Action.

According to Gov. Stein’s office, the campaign aims to encourage gun owners to securely store firearms and make safety resources more widely available across North Carolina.

Advertisement

An unlocked gun is a tragedy waiting to happen, and too often, it does,” said Governor Josh Stein. “NC S.A.F.E Week is a reminder to all of us about the measures we can all take to keep ourselves and the people we love safe.

Safe firearm storage is one of the simplest steps we can take to prevent tragedies before they happen,” said North Carolina Department of Public Safety Deputy Secretary William Lassiter Lassiter. “NC S.A.F.E. is increasing awareness around secure firearm storage and making safety resources more accessible to help reduce preventable injuries and build safer communities throughout our state.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

The Real Reason North Carolina’s GOP Is Proposing the Most Radical Anti-Abortion Bill Yet

Published

on

The Real Reason North Carolina’s GOP Is Proposing the Most Radical Anti-Abortion Bill Yet


Another anti-abortion abolitionist proposal has been in the news. This time, conservative lawmakers in North Carolina have asked voters to approve a state constitutional amendment recognizing the personhood of embryos and establishing that anyone who ends an embryonic life is guilty of first-degree murder. Those penalties might also apply to people pursuing in vitro fertilization or using some contraceptives, given that abortion foes sometimes view either as requiring the taking of unborn life. And that’s the most ordinary part of the proposal: The bill also provides that private individuals have a right to use deadly force to prevent “the willful destruction of life.” House Bill 1232 isn’t clear about exactly who could exercise this constitutional right to vigilante violence. Would it just be available to those seeking to kill abortion providers and patients? Or might it apply even more broadly to those seen to aid them?

The bill has been greeted with bafflement and disbelief. One of its co-sponsors was embarrassed enough to remove his name from the proposal. But the idea of licensing private violence did not come out of thin air. There have been decades of debate about the use of force within the anti-abortion movement. And as conservatives embrace an increasingly punitive agenda, old justifications for violence have reemerged.

Since the 1960s, abortion foes have rallied around the idea that constitutional rights begin the moment an egg is fertilized. That meant that liberal abortion laws would violate the federal Constitution. Because that claim didn’t gain traction in the federal courts, abortion opponents didn’t have to settle what it would mean in practice to enforce this idea of personhood. Did it require that abortion be punished as murder, or that women be punished? Might it instead require more support for women during pregnancy?

By the 1980s, as the anti-abortion movement aligned with the Republican Party, the movement’s leaders increasingly retooled their ideas of justice for the unborn to fit the GOP’s tough-on-crime agenda. They endorsed fetal homicide laws and backed prosecutions based on conduct during pregnancy. But these moves didn’t lead to the reversal of Roe, much less a decline in the abortion rate.

Advertisement

Frustration led to a wave of lawbreaking. Operation Rescue, a clinic blockade group, invited supporters to use civil disobedience and break the law if necessary to stop people from entering abortion clinics. Operation Rescue disrupted the Democratic National Convention in 1992 and recorded thousands of arrests. Blockaders even developed a legal argument to justify their actions, drawing on the common law defense of necessity, which allows someone to break a law to achieve a greater moral good.

Some advocates went further. If abortion really were the murder of an equal person, they asked, why wasn’t it justified to use deadly force to protect that equal person?

Prominent figures in the late 1980s and early 1990s elaborated on that argument in books and talk-show appearances. The claim justified kidnappings, firebombings, and a series of murders of doctors, clinic staff, and security. Powerful anti-abortion groups denounced the violence, but the question of deadly force struck others as surprisingly complex. If a fertilized egg was an equal person, and if the way to protect that person involved violence, why was deadly force off limits?

While violence against abortion clinics and providers never went away, it receded from the peak of the 1980s and early 1990s. The federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which heightened penalties for threats, violence, and obstruction of people entering facilities, radically undercut the clinic blockade movement when Congress passed it in 1994. So did the conviction of high-profile murder defendants like Michael Griffin and Paul Hill. The clinic blockade movement was consumed by internal divides, with multiple organizations even claiming the name Operation Rescue. Anti-abortion leaders mostly focused on change through the courts and politics.

Now that Roe is gone, the movement is at an inflection point. Personhood has become the movement’s new North Star. And while success in the federal courts isn’t imminent, there is now no reason a state couldn’t enforce any vision of personhood. That means that conservatives have to decide what they mean by enforcing the rights of the unborn. This bill is a sign that even punishing women doesn’t strike some as harsh enough.

Advertisement

This bill won’t pass. For starters, North Carolina is not the most likely state to pass any abortion abolitionist bill; at the moment, it doesn’t even ban abortion from the moment of fertilization. And no state has yet passed any kind of abolitionist proposal, much less one allowing people to gun one another down in the name of protecting life.

But this bill has a different resonance now that Donald Trump has pledged not to enforce the FACE Act in the abortion context except in the most extreme circumstances. It is also a reminder of how the Overton window on personhood is shifting. Abolitionists who call for the punishment of women are gaining influence in state legislatures and movement debates. They have developed their own incremental approach: In South Carolina, for example, Richard Cash, a powerful lawmaker, tried this session to advance a bill punishing women for abortion, but only for a misdemeanor, rather than a felony. The bill became the second abolitionist proposal to pass through a committee this spring before time ran out to pass it this session.

Leading anti-abortion groups still speak out against abolitionists, but their strategy is clear: normalizing the idea of punishing women. The more extreme proposals conservatives advance, the more previously unthinkable ideas become politically realistic.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending