Connect with us

Wisconsin

PBS News Hour | Judy Woodruff reflects on Crossroads town hall in Wisconsin | Season 2024 | Montana PBS

Published

on

PBS News Hour | Judy Woodruff reflects on Crossroads town hall in Wisconsin | Season 2024 | Montana PBS


FOR THE PAST YEAR AND A HALF, JUDY WOODRUFF HAS BEEN EXPLORING THE WAYS OUR COUNTRY’S POLITICAL DIVISIONS HAVE AFFECTED OUR PERSONAL LIVES, CREATING RIFTS BETWEEN FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND COMMUNITIES.

AS PART OF THAT SERIES, CALLED “AMERICA AT A CROSSROADS,” IN MILWAUKEE THIS PAST WEEK, JUDY MET WITH MORE THAN 50 WISCONSIN RESIDENTS FROM ACROSS THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM FOR A FRANK DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CHALLENGES WE FACE AS A COUNTRY.

HERE’S A BIT OF THAT DISCUSSION.

>> I HAVE FAMILY MEMBERS THAT WANT TO THROW THE RACIST CARD AT ME AND I WANT TO LET PEOPLE KNOW AS A TRUMP SUPPORTER, I AM NOT RACIST AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT TRUMP IS, EITHER.

Advertisement

>> AS A BLACK MAN THE ONLY THING , THAT HE TRIES TO IDENTIFY WITH IS MY STRUGGLE.

NOT ME BEING A PARENT, NOT ME BEING A PERSON TRYING TO WORK AND PAY BILLS AND BUY A HOME AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

JOHN: THAT IS PART OF A PBS SPECIAL THAT AIRS TOMORROW NIGHT CALLED “CROSSROADS: A CONVERSATION WITH AMERICA.”

AND JUDY JOINS ME NOW.

PEOPLE FEELING THAT DIVISION PERSONALLY, HOW COMMON WAS IT?

Advertisement

>> WE HEARD SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO ARE TRUMP SUPPORTERS SAY THEY HAVE FAMILY MEMBERS WHO WILL NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THEM, THAT WOMEN JUST SAID IT HAS REALLY HURT HER WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND HER FAMILY, ANOTHER WOMAN TOLD US SHE LOST CUSTOMERS, A WOMAN WHO OWNED A SHOOTING RANGE AND A BEAUTY SALON AND WHEN HER CUSTOMERS LEARNED SHE WAS SUPPORTING TRUMP AND AFFECTED THEM AND THEY STOPPED PATRONIZING HER BUSINESS.

ON THE OTHER HAND WE HEARD PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY MUCH DEMOCRATS SUPPORTING BIDEN AND HARRIS, SAYING IT CAUSED DEEP SPLITS IN THEIR FAMILY AS WELL SO WE KNOW NOW AND WE HAVE HEARD THIS ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOR THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF.

JOHN: DID ANYTHING IN THE DISCUSSION SURPRISE YOU?

>> A LOT OF THINGS.

FOR EXAMPLE, WE ASKED PEOPLE ABOUT SPECIFIC ISSUES THAT WERE THE REASONS THEY MAINLY SUPPORT EITHER TRUMP OR HARRIS.

Advertisement

WE HAD A TRUMP SUPPORTER TALK ABOUT HER FAMILY, SHE SAID WE ARE A FAMILY OF IMMIGRANTS BUT WE BELIEVE IN COMING ACROSS THE BORDER AND DOING IT BY THE BOOKS, BEING LEGAL AND WE DO NOT BELIEVE IN ALLOWING PEOPLE TO COME INTO THE COUNTRY AND TAKES JOBS AND FRANKLY TAKE THE PLACE OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE PAID THEIR DUES.

I THINK IF YOU ARE ASKING ME WHAT SURPRISED ME, AFTER THE CONVERSATIONS, AND WE TALKED TO ANOTHER GENTLEMAN BY THE WAY WHO IS A DACA RECIPIENT, HE CAME UNDOCUMENTED WITH HIS PARENTS AND NOW HE IS A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS PERSON AND STILL CANNOT VOTE AND DOES NOT HAVE CITIZENSHIP STATUS.

SO AFTER THE SESSION WE SAW HIM TALKING WITH THE WOMAN WHO HAD SAID I DO NOT LIKE PEOPLE COMING ACROSS THE BORDER AND TAKING UP SPACE IN OUR COUNTRY.

WE SAW THE SAME THING AROUND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, PEOPLE WHO HAD DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW TALKING WITH ONE ANOTHER.

SO THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF COMMON GROUND, IT IS JUST THAT YOU DO NOT HEAR ABOUT IT IN THE PUBLIC SPACE.

Advertisement

JOHN: DID YOU COME AWAY FROM THIS MORE OR LESS HOPEFUL ABOUT POLITICAL DISCOURSE?

>> YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS ANSWER, BUT IT IS BOTH.

YOU CANNOT HELP BUT BE DISCOURAGED WHEN SOME PEOPLE EXPRESS VERY STRONG FEELINGS ON ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER AND MOST PEOPLE IN THAT ROOM TOLD US THAT THEY BELIEVE COMPROMISE IS A GOOD IDEA AND WE SHOULD BE SEEKING COMMON GROUND BUT THEY ALSO SAID THERE ARE THINGS I DO NOT WANT TO COMPROMISE ON.

I THINK MANY OF THE PEOPLE WERE ON GOOD BEHAVIOR, FRANKLY.

THEY KNEW WE WERE FILMING THIS AND WE PROBABLY GOT THE BEST ANSWERS THEY WERE GOING TO GIVE.

Advertisement

WE HAD A POLITICAL SCIENCE PROFESSOR FROM UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHO SAID PEOPLE MIGHT BE MORE CANDID BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, TRAVELING AROUND THE COUNTRY AND IN MILWAUKEE MONDAY NIGHT, YOU GOT THE SENSE PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF THE DIVISION.

YES THEY HAVE STRONG FEELINGS, YES THEY HAVE STRONG PRINCIPLES, BUT THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO FUNCTION AS A SOCIETY, AS A PEOPLE, AND TO ME THERE WAS THIS SENSE THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE US FIGURE OUT A WAY THROUGH THIS.

JOHN: IT SOUNDS LIKE A FASCINATING CONVERSATION.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

“CROSSROADS: A CONVERSATION WITH AMERICA” AIRS TOMORROW NIGHT ON PBS AT 9:00 P.M. EASTERN, 8:00 CENTRAL.

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association, wildlife advocates react to delisting of the gray wolf

Published

on

Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association, wildlife advocates react to delisting of the gray wolf


GREEN BAY, Wis. (WBAY) – The Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association is speaking out about the U.S. House passing the “Pet and Livestock Protection Act”.

“I’ll be honest, our cattlemen are pretty fed up. I mean, they have been dealing with this issue for a long time, so. I mean just really felt like we are finally making progress here. And that’s really exciting that we can help our producers deal with this issue,” says Brady Zuck, a cow-calf producer and the past president of the Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association.

Brady Zuck, one of many livestock producers in Wisconsin, is responding to the U.S. House passing a bill to delist the gray wolf from the “Endangered Species Act”.

The population of gray wolves is increasing, and according to the Wisconsin DNR, from April 2024 to April 2025, there were 70 verified wolf conflicts with livestock.

Advertisement

“That’s what’s been the most frustrating, is that we have producers locally here in northwest Wisconsin or your area by Green Bay that are dealing with this issue, and it’s all controlled in Washington, and we have people in our state that could make those management decisions, but their hands are tied,” says Zuck.

Supporters of the bill say non-lethal methods used to keep gray wolves away, such as strobe lights and music, are only short-term solutions.

“We’re asking, saying hey, if we’re having problems with wolves on farms, we need ways to effectively deal with that, that work,” says Zuck.

The Great Lakes Wildlife Alliance shared a statement from Thursday about the delisting, saying: “We are disgusted by this reckless abandonment of science-based wildlife management. However, our advocates showed up in extraordinary numbers against overwhelming odds, and their voices were heard. This organization and our supporters are not defeated.”

“As cattlemen, we never said we want to eliminate all wolves, we don’t want any wolves, we never said that. But we just need to make sure we have the tools in place that we can, you know, if we have wolves killing calves, we need a way to deal with it, right?” Zuck says.

Advertisement

The bill still has to pass the Senate and reach the president’s desk before changes are made.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Watch Live: Demolition of bridge between Iowa, Wisconsin

Published

on

Watch Live: Demolition of bridge between Iowa, Wisconsin


LANSING, Iowa (KCRG) – The Black Hawk Bridge, connecting Iowa and Wisconsin over the Mississippi River will come down Friday morning.

The Iowa DOT and Wisconsin DOT are partnering on the demolition, which is set for 9:30 am on Friday. You can watch the demolition live in this article when it happens.

The bridge has been closed since October with plans to construct a new bridge, planned to open in 2027.

Advertisement

The Iowa DOT laid out safety plans for the demolition:

  • A zone around the bridge will be blocked off to protect people from debris.
  • The Lansing Ferry service will not run from 6:00 p.m. on December 18 to the morning of December 22.
  • Highway 26 will be closed from around 8:45 a.m. on December 19 and reopen around 30 minutes after the implosion. Detour signs will be posted.
  • The demolition zone will be closed to recreational boat traffic on December 18 and expected to reopen during the night of December 19.
  • No trains will run through Lansing for four hours on the morning of December 19.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics

Published

on

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics




AP
 — 

A jury found a Wisconsin judge – accused of helping an undocumented immigrant dodge federal authorities – guilty of obstruction Thursday, marking a victory for President Donald Trump as he continues his sweeping immigration crackdown across the country.

Federal prosecutors charged Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan with obstruction, a felony, and concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, in April. The jury acquitted her on the concealment count, but she still faces up to five years in prison on the obstruction count.

The jury returned the verdicts after deliberating for six hours. Dugan faces up to five years in prison when she’s sentenced, but no date had been set as of late Thursday evening.

Advertisement

Dugan and her attorneys left the courtroom Thursday, ducked into a side conference room and closed the door without speaking to reporters. Steve Biskupic, her lead attorney, later told reporters that he was disappointed with the ruling and didn’t understand how the jury could have reached a split verdict since the elements of both charges were virtually the same.

US Attorney Brad Schimel denied the case was political and urged people to accept the verdict peacefully. He said courthouse arrests are safer because people are screened for weapons and it isn’t unfair for law enforcement to arrest wanted people in courthouses.

“Some have sought to make this about a larger political battle,” Schimel said. “While this case is serious for all involved, it is ultimately about a single day, a single bad day, in a public courthouse. The defendant is certainly not evil. Nor is she a martyr for some greater cause.”

According to court filings that include an FBI affidavit and a federal grand jury indictment, immigration authorities traveled to the Milwaukee County courthouse on April 18 after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Dugan learned that agents were in the corridor outside her courtroom waiting for Flores-Ruiz. She left the courtroom to confront them, falsely telling that their administrative warrant for Flores-Ruiz wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest him and directing them to go to the chief judge’s office.

Advertisement

While the agents were gone, she addressed Flores-Ruiz’s case off the record, told his attorney that he could attend his next hearing via Zoom and led Flores-Ruiz and the attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. The US Department of Homeland Security announced in November he had been deported.

The case inflamed tensions over Trump’s immigration crackdown, with his administration branding Dugan an activist judge and Democrats countering that the administration was trying to make an example of Dugan to blunt judicial opposition to the operation.

Prosecutors worked during Dugan’s trial to show that she directed agents to the chief judge’s office to create an opening for Flores-Ruiz to escape.

Prosecutors also played audio recordings from her courtroom in which she can be heard telling her court reporter that she’d take “the heat” for leading Flores-Ruiz out the back.

Her attorneys countered that she was trying to follow courthouse protocols that called for court employees to report any immigration agents to their supervisors and she didn’t intentionally try to obstruct the arrest team.

Advertisement

This story has been updated with additional details.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending