Connect with us

West

California nudist ranch neighbor charged with murder in couple's disappearances

Published

on

California nudist ranch neighbor charged with murder in couple's disappearances

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A resident at a California nudist resort where two of his neighbors disappeared last month has been charged with murder after he was taken into custody during a dramatic standoff with police where he attempted to harm himself with a rifle.

Michael Royce Sparks, 62, was charged with two felony counts of murder in connection to the deaths of Daniel Menard, 79, and Stephanie Menard, 73, who were last seen on Aug. 25, the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office said at a Tuesday press briefing. 

Advertisement

Sparks was arrested at his home at the Olive Dell Ranch in Colton on Thursday, the same day that the remains of two people were found underneath his property, which is adjacent to the Menards’ home. The resort is located in the 26000 block of Keissel Road, off Reche Canyon Road, about 13 miles southeast of Downtown San Bernardino.

CALIFORNIA NUDIST RESORT NEIGHBOR CHARGED WITH MURDER AFTER COUPLE DISAPPEARS

Michael Sparks, 62, has been charged with the murder of Daniel Menard, 79, and Stephanie Menard, 73. (Redlands Police Deparment)

Police say the remains are being examined by the local coroner’s office and are believed to be Dan and Stephanie Menard. Redlands Chief of Police Rachel Tolber said at the press conference that there is no reason to believe the bodies belong to anyone else. 

A cause of death has not been revealed. Police say they also removed bags of evidence from the scene in a search which was completed Monday.

Advertisement

The couple’s dog, named Cuddles, is also missing. 

Sparks’ arrest was dramatic and followed numerous attempts to contact him.

Redlands police obtained a search warrant to enter Sparks’ property aided by a drone while SWAT teams tore down the front of his home, which led to significant damage and forced operations to pause at one stage as the space showed signs of potential collapse, police say. 

Eventually, search teams found Sparks armed with a rifle hiding in a subterranean basement of his home and he attempted to harm himself. However, the weapon misfired and eventually he was taken into custody that evening, Tolber said. 

MOUNTAIN LION ATTACKS 5-YEAR-OLD PICNICKING WITH FAMILY AT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PARK

Advertisement

The entrance to the Olive Dell Ranch in Colton where the couple vanished. (Google Maps)

Sparks became a suspect after a family member reportedly told police that he confessed to being involved in the couple’s disappearance and also killing the couple, Tolber said. The family member also reported Sparks was threatening suicide.

Sparks was also charged with two counts of allegations of special circumstances of more than one murder in the first or second degree.

“We know they’re dead and we know there’s two victims and so the special allegation that we filed is multiple victims in a murder case,” District Attorney Jason Anderson said.

“You don’t get a free murder. We believe in this case we can go forward and prove that Mr. Sparks is responsible for both.” 

Advertisement

The Menards were last seen on Saturday, Aug. 24, police say.  (Redlands Police Department)

 

Neighbors told Fox 11 that on multiple occasions, Sparks said he “hated” the couple who had lived at the property for decades.

One neighbor said there was bad blood between Sparks and the couple after parts of their tree grew onto Sparks’ property. 

The Redlands Police Department says the Menards’ dog, Cuddles, has not been found. (Redlands Police Department)

Advertisement

Sparks’ arraignment is scheduled for Wednesday.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Montana Lottery Mega Millions, Big Sky Bonus results for July 10, 2026

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at July 10, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Mega Millions numbers from July 10 drawing

02-39-44-46-56, Mega Ball: 23

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from July 10 drawing

10-13-23-30, Bonus: 02

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from July 10 drawing

14-42-46-47-57, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Planetary parade this weekend — when to see it in Northern Nevada

Published

on

Planetary parade this weekend — when to see it in Northern Nevada


play

Skywatchers across the U.S. are about to be treated to a dazzling weekend filled with not only two active meteor showers, but a celestial alignment starring the moon.

For two nights, Earth’s only natural satellite will host a cosmic party with three planets — Mars, Saturn and Uranus.

Advertisement

The phenomenon, often called a planet parade, presents spectators with a rare opportunity to see not only multiple planets, but also the moon, appear close together in the night sky — at least, from Earth’s vantage.

The best part of the show? Most of the striking spectacle — with the exception of Uranus — will be visible to the naked eye.

Here’s everything to know about the rare sight, as well as when, how and where you can see it across the United States.

Moon to appear in sky with Mars, Saturn, Uranus

The moon will appear in the night sky before sunrise on Saturday, July 11 and Sunday, July 12, NASA said in a monthly skywatching guide.

Advertisement

What is a planet parade?

While the term “planet parade” is not an official astronomy term, it is an unofficial way for astronomers and stargazers to refer to certain celestial events.

The planets in our solar system orbit the sun essentially along a line across the sky in a flat disc-shaped plane called the ecliptic.

Another term for a certain kind of planetary alignment, planet parades are what happens when planets line up along the ecliptic in a straight line and appear to us on Earth to be marching across the night sky, according to NASA. So, while planetary alignments themselves aren’t special, it is notable to have an opportunity to observe multiple planets at once.

How full will the moon be? What to know about lunar phase

During the celestial alignment, the moon will be entering a waning crescent phase before we have a new moon, according to the Old Farmer’s Almanac. That means Earth’s only natural satellite is getting less and less full and bright each night as its crescent gets thinner and thinner, NASA explains.

Advertisement

That’s good news for stargazers, as the moon will still be visible without outshining the planets nearby.

Where to see the planet parade in Nevada

Look toward the eastern sky to catch the cosmic lineup in the early morning.

While the moon will of course be the easiest to locate, Mars will look like a small reddish point of light, while Saturn is also bright and easy to spot, NASA explained in a video.

For the clearest views, there are several places that are an easy drive from Reno where you can get a clear view of the stars, including:

  • Lake Tahoe: Multiple locations around the lake are excellent for stargazing that are less than an hour from Reno.
  • Fort Churchill State Park The park on Alt. 95 south of Silver Springs provides a dark night sky ideal for evening astronomical events among the ruins of Fort Churchill. Park entrance costs $5 for Nevada residents and $10 for non-residents.
  • Pyramid Lake: A popular spot for Renoites seeking a night of stargazing, the lake is less than an hour from The Biggest Little City. It offers beautiful natural wonders and dark skies that give a clear view of lunar eclipses, meteor showers and full moons.

Northwestern Nevada weather forecast for planetary parade

Cloudy conditions may bring relief from the recent heat wave, but they could spoil the early-morning view of the planetary parade in much of northwestern Nevada.

Reno, Carson City and Minden

  • Friday: Clear and breezy overnight; lows 56-66.
  • Saturday: Partly cloudy, then mostly cloudy overnight; lows 60-70.
  • Sunday: Mostly cloudy overnight; lows 61-71.

Lake Tahoe and the central Sierra

  • Friday: Clear and breezy overnight; lows 45-55.
  • Saturday: Partly cloudy, then mostly cloudy overnight; lows 48-58.
  • Sunday: Mostly cloudy overnight; lows 49-59.

Do you need a telescope to see celestial alignment?

Mars and Saturn are among the five planets in our solar system visible without optical aid — along with Mercury, Venus and Jupiter. Telescopes certainly will enhance the view but spectators don’t need any equipment to spot those planets joining the moon in the pre-dawn sky.

As for Uranus, the planet is typically not as bright — despite being the third largest in our solar system — and will require a telescope to see, NASA said.

Advertisement

Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@usatodayco.com. The Reno Gazette Journal’s Carly Sauvageau and Brett McGinness contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

NM Delegation Demands Answers On Reports Of DEA Declining To Seize Massive Fentanyl Shipments, Calls For Immediate Reforms

Published

on

NM Delegation Demands Answers On Reports Of DEA Declining To Seize Massive Fentanyl Shipments, Calls For Immediate Reforms


U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) sent a letter demanding answers from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole on why the DEA allowed large quantities of fentanyl to circulate unseized in New Mexico communities.

Trafficking of fentanyl and other opioids poses one of the most severe — and often deadly — public health threats facing New Mexico and the nation. Illicit fentanyl, a Schedule I controlled substance, is an exceptionally potent synthetic opioid that can be fatal even in extremely small quantities. Illicitly manufactured fentanyl has been the primary driver of the overdose epidemic in the U.S.

Whistleblower complaints allege that Albuquerque-based DEA agents declined to interdict at least 1.8 million fentanyl pills between 2023 and 2025 in hopes of taking down a larger supply chain.

“We unequivocally assert that allowing fentanyl to go unseized creates an unconscionable risk to New Mexicans,” the lawmakers wrote to DEA Administrator Cole.

Advertisement

In 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and DEA established “Fentanyl Protocols” directing agents to “seize or otherwise prevent the distribution” of fentanyl “as soon as practicable” to protect public safety. In 2024, the DOJ revised those protocols to provide law enforcement with greater discretion, allowing agents to weigh public safety risks against “the benefits to be achieved through preserving the investigation.” A 2024 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigative summary further states that the U.S. Attorney’s Office acted reasonably in allowing certain drugs to remain unseized and concluded that doing so posed no “specific danger to public health and safety.”

“We adamantly disagree with this internal assessment, and we urge your agency to immediately revert fentanyl protocols to the 2017 standard of seize or otherwise prevent the distribution of fentanyl as soon as practicable,” the lawmakers underscored. “We will be taking all necessary actions in Congress to better ensure the safety of New Mexicans and expect that you will stand with us in those efforts.”

The lawmakers concluded their letter by demanding responses to a request for written documentation on all instances where the DEA declined to interdict fentanyl, and the following questions on the DEA’s fentanyl interdiction policies, investigative protocols, and enforcement practices:

  1. Provide comprehensive written documentation of all individual instances, occurring in New Mexico since January 2017, including dates, locations and amount of suspected contraband, during which DEA has declined to interdict fentanyl in the course of a Title III or electronic surveillance investigation. Please also indicate the extent to which fentanyl involved in these investigations was ultimately recovered.
  1. What are DEA’s current internal directives and guidelines dictating how federal agents manage active drug-trafficking investigations involving fentanyl? Specifically, what protocols instruct agents on whether to seize a shipment of fentanyl immediately or allow it to pass temporarily under surveillance?
  1. What internal DOJ or DEA documentation determines, or may supersede, official fentanyl interdiction and operational protocols both as a matter of agency-wide policy and also with regards to individual drug-trafficking investigations? How are these changes to operational protocols communicated to agents in the field? Please provide all such documentation since January 2017.
  1. Under what circumstances are DEA agents permitted to exercise discretion, abandoning any presumption of interdiction, allowing a fentanyl transaction to proceed without immediate seizure? What safeguards are in place to protect communities when fentanyl shipments are allowed to continue as part of an ongoing investigation?
  1. Must agents possess a guaranteed, continuous ability to seize the substance immediately if the operational environment changes? How is the likelihood of losing operational surveillance, and the potential number of lives impacted if the substance enters the illicit supply chain, measured against the benefits of a successful investigation?
  1. What circumstances mandate when fentanyl must be safely interdicted, or swapped for a controlled delivery with a substituted substance, before it is allowed to advance within the supply chain? What levels of approval within your command structure are required to bypass immediate interdiction?
  1. What other tactics such as controlled deliveries, enhanced surveillance, contraband substitution are available to your agency to facilitate long-term, high-level investigations without an unacceptable risk to public safety? What resources can we provide to make these tactics of more common use to your agency?
  1. What is the reassignment status of DEA personnel based in New Mexico to out-of-state enforcement efforts since January 2025? During the same period, have DEA agents in New Mexico maintained their primary focus on drug-trafficking investigations or have any participated in joint immigration enforcement operations not limited to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations?

For more information on the N.M. Delegation’s work to tackle the opioid crisis, click here.

The full text of the letter is here and below:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending