Washington
Washington Health Dept. COVID report promotes racism, exclusion
The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) released a report sharing what its left-wing community partners learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is an aggressively unserious document that includes a virulently racist claim about the evils of white people.
“Don’t forget sometimes white people disengaged on safety when they learned people of color needed help,” the report absurdly claims.
The report paints an entire race with a broad, divisive brush. Or it’s meant to guilt white DOH staffers into giving organizations more money.
It demands WADOH “use COVID as an opportunity to invest in… youth of color… (and) incarcerated youth” by “celebrating their gifts” in ways that “don’t stigmatize or typify them when society fails them.”
The report even suggests that WADOH “get creative” in promoting health crisis materials by using flash mobs or collaborating with “BIPOC artists, trans/queer artists of color, women of color of all gender expressions, incarcerated youth and adult artists.”
More from Jason Rantz: Seattle may close 20 elementary schools due to avoidable problems
What is in this racist Washington Department of Health COVID-19 report?
“A Chorus of COVID – Voices from the Frontlines,” was highlighted in an Aug. 31 DOH post on X. It aims to “help us all reflect on lessons learned” during the pandemic.
DOH says it will use the lessons to help create better plans for supporting future efforts, with an aim towards better serving marginalized communities. It’s part of the department’s efforts to reach “health equity.”
“Poor health is often how communities that dominant society marginalizes know and feel what exclusion really is,” the report claims. “COVID showed several intersecting crises in public health — from the home front to the workforce and practically everywhere else you could imagine.”
Community partnerships were fundamental to the COVID-19 response. Our partners compiled their insights in two documents that help us reflect and remember equity lessons learned. Learn more at https://t.co/vCit7tYjex pic.twitter.com/ioQeuXr8tS
— Washington State Department of Health (@WADeptHealth) September 1, 2024
Dear White Progressive: Give us more money
The report predictably focuses on funneling resources specifically into “marginalized communities,” with the organizations behind it making clear that they prefer to have direct control over those funds.
They urge the state to “keep lowering the barriers to accessing funds,” but notably fail to provide any details on accountability or oversight—because why would they? This seems to be more about securing power and influence than protecting any community.
When it comes to decision making in how to best help during a pandemic (or other health crises), the reports asks DOH to give marginalized communities “decision-making power and influence.” It does not elaborate.
“Design trainings by and for communities that experience inequities such as mass incarceration, housing and food insecurity, substance use, mental illness, racism, ableism, ageism, xenophobia, sexism, transphobia and other forms of exclusion,” the report continues.
More from Jason Rantz: Seattle deputy mayor says downtown activation plan a ‘roaring success.’ Biz owner says no, it’s not
There’s a lot of demand for “centering” in the report
The report demands that DOH “center” prison inmates and illegal immigrants for agency engagement. It explains that any DOH-produced guides should include photos of people “with dark to fair skin tones, all body types, ages, gender expressions, hair textures, facial features, [and] economic backgrounds.”
But the focus should be around visually representing ” Black, Indigenous, Pacific Islander, Hispanic/Latinx, (and) BIPOC faces.”
The report is also drenched in far-left coded language that means absolutely nothing. Take, for example, the demand to “make human-centered frameworks that avoid pathologizing communities that experience disparities due to social exclusion and oppression and ask for better civic and community investment.” This is a jumble of meaningless jargon.
What’s the point of this Washington Department of Health COVID-19 report?
The DOH report is an exercise in fluffery and pandering. It’s the embodiment of a virtue signal: presenting the groups responsible for the report as noble frontliners fighting against imaginary systemic injustices. Based on ideas in the report, the emphasis on these community organizations shows their perspectives are neither more valuable nor more valid than actual professionals who handle health emergencies.
If this were merely a way to engage community organizations so that they won’t protest you in the future, it would be one thing. DOH doesn’t want to deal with a progressive mob when dealing with any health crisis.
But DOH and other government agencies have aggressively pushed left-wing dogma over their actual missions since 2020. During the pandemic, the DOH let providers deny vaccines to white people in the name of inclusion. This document raises concerns that it could serve as a blueprint for further wokify DOH.
The wrong direction
The insistence on “centering” narratives and experiences primarily on the basis of race is what actually ends up marginalizing people. More problematic, it also reinforces a victimhood mentality, suggesting that these communities are perpetually oppressed and incapable of thriving without special recognition or financial assistance.
The Washington State Department of Health report, if its ideas are implemented, would prioritize racial and social narratives over practical solutions, ultimately marginalizing the very people it claims to uplift.
Washingtonians should be deeply worried that DOH might actually follow through on this laundry list of woke demands, putting ideological posturing over effective public health strategies and initiatives. That won’t serve anyone.
Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here. Follow Jason on X, Instagram and Facebook.
Washington
Washington Watch: CCAMPIS grant competition announced – Community College Daily
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), “on behalf of the Department of Education (ED),” on Monday released a Notice Inviting Grant Applications for the Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) program. Applications are due by May 29.
Last November, ED announced that it had entered into an interagency agreement with HHS to administer the CCAMPIS program. This is the first CCAMPIS competition conducted under this arrangement.
Approximately $73.5 million will go to institutions of higher education that awarded at least $250,000 in Pell grants to enrolled students in FY 2025. HHS will award about 148 grants, ranging from $150,000 to $1 million.
The terms of the grant competition are not significantly different than prior competitions. As before, there are two absolute grant priorities that every application must address – leveraging non-federal resources and utilizing a sliding-fee scale for low-income parents.
This year’s competition includes only one invitational priority that reflects the Trump administration’s general educational policy. The new priority, entitled “Expanding Education Choice in Early Learning Settings,” encourages applications that “expand access to education choice … including by empowering parents in choosing the early learning setting that best meets their family’s needs.” Flexible childcare programs that include drop-in care and care during nontraditional hours are also encouraged.
One other notable difference from prior competitions is an expanded “Terms and Conditions” section that not only requires compliance with applicable civil rights laws, but also refers to Trump administration Executive Orders and guidance on racial discrimination that clarify “the application of federal antidiscrimination laws to programs or initiatives that may involve discriminatory practices, including those labeled as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”) programs.” This includes any “discriminatory equity ideology [as defined in Executive Order 14190] in violation of a federal antidiscrimination law.”
The exact scope of these terms is unclear because courts have not found many of the practices described in these Executive Orders and guidance documents to be violations of federal law.
Washington
A look at the roots (and routes) of immigration to Washington
The Newsfeed
This week, the team brings you stories about how communities including Filipino immigrants, Sephardic Jews and Somalis arrived in the Pacific Northwest
Each week on The Newsfeed, host Paris Jackson and a team of veteran journalists dive deep into one topic and provide impactful reporting, interviews and community insights from sources you can trust. Each day this week, this post will be updated with a new story from the team.
Group hopes to boost recognition for Seattle’s Filipinotown
By Venice Buhain
The group Filipinotown Seattle hopes to make sure that the legacy of Filipino Americans in Seattle’s Chinatown-International District isn’t forgotten.
One of the group’s current projects is pushing for a Filipinotown placemarking sign in the CID.
“Filipino Americans have had a presence here for over 100 years in Seattle,” said Filipinotown Seattle Executive Director Devin Israel Cabanilla.
He said that the signage is important to remind people that “the International District is not just Chinatown. Japantown. Filipinotown is here as well.”
The group held a poll on what signage might look like and where it might be located. It would be similar to the Chinatown sign on South Jackson Street and Fifth Avenue South, or the Wing Luke Museum
In the early 20th century, the area now known as the CID was a hub full of businesses, entertainment, social groups and housing that served Seattle’s growing immigrant population from Asia and elsewhere. The communities all intermingled throughout the CID.
“This area was a central place for Asian Pacific immigrants simply because of segregation,” Cabanilla said.
Because the Philippines was a U.S. territory from 1898 to 1946, Filipino immigrants were unaffected by laws in the 1920s that restricted immigration from Japan or China. Many Filipinos came to study at the University of Washington or to work in burgeoning industries, like lumber, farming, canneries and factories.
While the physical Filipino presence in terms of buildings and storefronts in the CID dwindled in the later 20th century with redevelopment, Seattle Filipinos and Filipino Americans continued to make impacts locally, regionally and nationally.
“It may not have been in terms of storefronts, but our presence has always existed in terms of politics, culture as well,” Cabanilla said.
The Seattle Department of Transportation said it is aware that the group is working on its signage request, but the Department of Neighborhoods has not yet received a formal request. They are also working to develop a clearer process for this and other similar neighborhood signage proposals.
Filipinotown Seattle said it hopes that the sign helps remind Seattle of the CID’s unique designation as a neighborhood shaped by many immigrants and migrants to Seattle.
“Is it Chinatown? Is it Japantown? Is it Little Saigon? It’s all those things. And I think re cultivating that this is a multicultural district, Filipinotown is helping establish: Yes, it’s more than one thing,” Cabanilla said.

Venice Buhain is a multimedia journalist at Cascade PBS. She previously was the Cascade PBS’s associate news editor and education reporter. Venice has also worked for KING 5, The Seattle Globalist and TVW News.
Venice Buhain is a multimedia journalist at Cascade PBS. She previously was the Cascade PBS’s associate news editor and education reporter. Venice has also worked for KING 5, The Seattle Globalist and TVW News.
Washington
The Church of Jesus Christ has announced its 384th temple
The state of Washington is getting a seventh temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The Marysville Washington Temple was announced Sunday night during a devotional in the Marysville Washington Stake by Elder Hugo E. Martinez, a General Authority Seventy in the church’s United States West Area Presidency.
“We are pleased to announce the construction of a temple in Marysville, Washington,” the First Presidency said in a statement. “The specific location and timing of the construction will be announced later. This is a reason for all of us to rejoice and express gratitude for such a significant blessing — one that will allow more frequent access to the ordinances, covenants and power that can only be found in the house of the Lord.”
The other temples in Washington are the Columbia River, Moses Lake, Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma and Vancouver temples.
The church has 214 temples in operation. Plans for another 170 temples have been announced; many of those temples are in various stages of planning and construction.
Sunday’s temple announcement follows the new practice of the church’s First Presidency, which determines where temples will be built — and when and how they will be announced.
The First Presidency directed a General Authority Seventy to announce the first temple in Maine at a fireside there in December.
In January, church President Dallin H. Oaks said the Maine announcement set the pattern for future temple announcements.
“The best place to announce a temple is in that temple district,” he told the Deseret News.
The First Presidency will continue to decide where future temples will be built. It then will “assign someone else to make the announcement in the place where the temple will be built,” he said.
This pattern came to him as a strong impression after he assumed leadership of the church in October, following the death of his friend, President Russell M. Nelson.
This came as a strong impression to him shortly after he assumed the leadership of the church, President Oaks said.
The church remains in the midst of an aggressive temple-building era. President Nelson announced 200 new temples from 2018 to 2025. All but one were announced at general conference.
Five dozen temples are now under construction.
President Oaks now has overseen the announcement of two temples, neither at a general conference.
At the October conference he said that “with the large number of temples now in the very earliest phases of planning and construction, it is appropriate that we slow down the announcement of new temples.”
Ten new temples are scheduled to be dedicated in the next six months.
- May 3: Davao Philippines Temple.
- May 3: Lindon Utah Temple.
- May 31: Bacolod Philippines Temple.
- June 7: Yorba Linda California Temple.
- June 7: Willamette Valley Oregon Temple.
- Aug. 16: Belo Horizonte Brazil Temple.
- Aug. 16: Cleveland Ohio Temple.
- Aug. 30: Phnom Penh Cambodia Temple.
- Oct. 11: Miraflores Guatemala City Guatemala Temple.
- Oct. 18: Managua Nicaragua Temple.
Two-thirds of the 170 temples still to be built are outside the United States.
Temples are distinct from the meetinghouses where Latter-day Saints worship Jesus Christ each Sunday. Temples are closed on Sundays, but they open during the week as sanctuaries where church members go to find peace, make covenants with God and perform proxy ordinances for deceased relatives.
-
Culture48 seconds agoBook Review: ‘Permanence,’ by Sophie Mackintosh
-
Lifestyle7 minutes agoHow ‘The Devil Wears Prada 2’ Red Carpet Looks Came Together
-
Technology19 minutes agoThe Vergecast Vergecast, 2026 edition
-
World25 minutes agoMexico pyramid shooter who took hostages and killed 1 is identified
-
Politics31 minutes agoByron Donalds cracks down on persistent border blind spot leaving US vulnerable to overstays
-
Health37 minutes agoHealthy diets spark lung cancer risk in non-smokers as pesticides loom
-
Sports43 minutes agoPGA Tour signals new era with axing of Hawaii events from schedule
-
Technology49 minutes agoAlexa+ lets you order food like a real conversation