Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

Bizarre lawsuit accuses billionaire Milwaukee Brewers owner of using EXTREME methods to maintain the coastline by his Malibu home

Published

on

Bizarre lawsuit accuses billionaire Milwaukee Brewers owner of using EXTREME methods to maintain the coastline by his Malibu home


Malibu billionaires are at each other’s throats in a scramble to stop their multi-million dollar homes tumbling into the sea, with one accused of stealing the sand that is holding them all up.

Financier James Kohlberg is suing neighbor Mark Attanasio after the Milwaukee Brewers owner allegedly sent his diggers onto the beach to grab ballast for his own personal sea wall.

Attanasio, who seized control of England’s Norwich City soccer club on Monday, is accused of snatching the fast-disappearing sands of Broad Beach where celebrities including Dustin Hoffman, Pierce Brosnan and Robert DeNiro dip their toes.

[perform-sport]

Advertisement

In its place he has left gasoline residue in the water, and prevented his well-heeled neighbors from accessing the beach, it is alleged.

‘This case is about a private property owner using a public beach as their own personal sandbox, and the disturbing conversion of a public natural resource (ie sand from Broad Beach) for a nearby homeowner’s personal, private use,’ the lawsuit claims.

Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio is being sued for ‘using a public beach as their own personal sandbox’ by his well-heeled neighbors in Malibu, California

The billionaire financier allegedly sent his diggers onto Broad Beach to steal the sand

The billionaire financier allegedly sent his diggers onto Broad Beach to steal the sand  

Attanasio, 66, is the co-founder of the Los Angeles-based Crescent Capital Group which had more than $43 billion under management earlier this year.

He bought his beachfront home for $23 million in 2007 and snapped up the empty lot next door for $6.6 million ten years later.

Kohlberg, his immediate neighbor is the chairman of the eponymous private equity firm which he co-founded with his father, the Wall Street financier Jerry Kohlberg in 1987.

Advertisement

He has dabbled in film-making and writing fiction, and bought his beachfront house for $14.2 million in 2021.

But the powerful ocean currents of the Malibu coast have been scooping 35,000 cubic yards of sand from the beach each year for the last five years leaving the foundations of the homes perilously exposed.

A consortium of neighbors including Hoffman, Brosnan, and comedian Ray Romano came together in 2015 to fund a $31 million project to protect the beach’s sand, but the rate of erosion is expected to reach 60,000 cubic yards per year.

The Bronx-born Attanasio who bought his Wisconsin baseball team in September 2004 secured permits to repair a damaged section of the seawall outside his home in March this year, the lawsuit states.

Neighbor James Kohlberg described the move as 'indecent and offensive to the senses'

Neighbor James Kohlberg described the move as ‘indecent and offensive to the senses’

Kohberg bought his beachfront house at 31444 (left) for $14.2 million in 2021, moving in next door to Attanasio who bought his at 31430 (right) for $23 million in 2007

Kohberg bought his beachfront house at 31444 (left) for $14.2 million in 2021, moving in next door to Attanasio who bought his at 31430 (right) for $23 million in 2007

The Kohlberg & Company founder whipped out his phone when he saw the diggers plowing up the beach outside his home

He claims the diggers have polluted the environment and blocked access to the beach

The Kohlberg & Company founder whipped out his phone when he saw the diggers plowing up the beach outside his home 

Two months later his excavators were on the beach, dragging the sand back to his now $34 million property.

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims that the work is imperiling local sea life and demand he be fined for the alleged damaged, ordered to stop work, and forced to replace the sand he is accused of stealing.

‘His intended and unlawful actions are potentially harmful to health, are indecent and offensive to the senses, obstruct the free use of public property and interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of Broad Beach and the surrounding properties.’

The Malibu sand grab is just the latest in a series of legal spats involving Californian billionaire beach boys accused of eroding the rights of other users.

Venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has been fighting for more than a decade to keep a secluded beach to himself next to his 89-acre, $32.5 million property in Half-Moon Bay, 35 miles south of San Francisco.

In May a California state judge threw out his bid to stop a lawsuit by the California State Lands Commission and Coastal Commission which would allow the public to return.

Advertisement

The state Constitution guarantees public access to all beaches below the high tide line.

But private landowners are not always required to allow access to the coastline across their properties.

Khosla’s legal team has slammed what is describes an attempt to ‘seize our client´s private property without compensation’.

Attanasio, pictured with the Brewers' Ryan Braun and wife Debbie, bought his baseball team in 2004 and seized control of England¿s Norwich City soccer club on Monday

Attanasio, pictured with the Brewers’ Ryan Braun and wife Debbie, bought his baseball team in 2004 and seized control of England’s Norwich City soccer club on Monday 

‘While such tactics are commonplace in communist systems, they have never been tolerated in the American system where the US Constitution precludes the government from simply taking private property and giving it to the public,’ said lawyer Dori Yob Kilmer.

Lawyers for Attanasio, who sold another house up the beach for $24 million in August last year insist he and his company, 2XMD Partners LLC, have done nothing wrong.

Advertisement

‘2XMD is in the midst of a fully-permitted emergency repair of the property to protect it from ocean forces,’ lawyer Kenneth Ehrlich told the LA Times.

‘It has secured all permits necessary for the repairs from the City of Malibu and LA County as well as thoroughly vetted all contractors and sub-contractors involved in the project.’



Source link

Milwaukee, WI

Arizona Diamondbacks 0/2, Chicago White Sox/Milwaukee Brewers 6/6

Published

on

Arizona Diamondbacks 0/2, Chicago White Sox/Milwaukee Brewers 6/6


Record 7-7. Change on 2025: +0.5. 5-inning record: 4-9-1.

The D-backs found themselves swept on both sides of today’s split squad double-bill, with fairly weak line-ups in both games. Starting off at Salt River Fields, a pair of three-run homers did all the damage as the White Sox blanked the D-backs 6-0. They were allowed by Landon Sims and Joe Ross; the latter came in to relieve Daniel Eagan with two outs and two on in the second, and didn’t. The best of the relievers for Arizona was likely Andrew Hoffman who struck out three batters in a scoreless seventh. The Diamondbacks were held to four hits and two walks: Angel Ortiz had the only extra-base hit, a double, as the team went 0-for-5 with runners in scoring position.

Over in Maryvale, the team did at least pick up a five-inning win, leading 2-1 at that point. But the Brewers scored five unanswered runs to beat the D-backs 6-2. Mitch Bratt started, and walked four over 2.2 innings, but gave up just one run on one hit, with two strikeouts. Bryce Jarvis tossed two scoreless, but Juan Burgos, John Curtiss and Taylor Rashi allowed five runs on six hits and two walks, over their three frames. Gavin Conticello and Demetrio Crisantes each went 2-for-3, while DH Manuel Pena had a homer and drew a walk. LuJames Groover drove in Arizona’s other run with a groundout.

Tomorrow, it’s back to one game: that comes at Salt River Fields against the Giants, with a 1:10 pm first pitch, and Kohl Drake starting for the Diamondbacks.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee oversight body asks for more police pursuit policy changes

Published

on

Milwaukee oversight body asks for more police pursuit policy changes


play

  • The Fire and Police Commission is mulling a recommendation the Milwaukee Police Department amend its police chase policy and restrict chases for reckless driving.
  • The current recommendation draft calls for a ban on chases for reckless driving after an attempted traffic stop. That will now move to a committee for further changes.
  • The draft recommendation comes after department modified the policy to remove speeding as a sole justification for chases. Prior, speeding was allowed to be considered when evaluating reckless driving

A Milwaukee oversight body is pushing for further restrictions on how the city’s police decide to chase vehicles, but isn’t ready to move those forward yet.

At its March 5 meeting, the city’s Fire and Police Commission mulled a recommendation the Milwaukee Police Department no longer chase drivers for reckless driving after an attempted traffic stop and stop other chases for reckless driving if it raises danger to the public. The department’s pursuit policy has been a point of contention for years and has come under intense scrutiny after nine people died from police chase crashes in 2025.

Advertisement

But that recommendation was tabled and sent to commission committee for further discussion, after concerns it needed to be further tweaked and receive more police department input.

“I’m trying to find incremental changes we can make to reduce chases,” said Commissioner Bree Spencer, who sponsored the recommendation.

Spencer said she was hesitant to push for policy changes that were too sweeping or too permissive. She said that had happened in years past, when pursuits were heavily restricted in 2010 and then later opened up in 2017 in response to reckless driving, following a then-Fire and Police Commission order.

As has become the norm at the commission’s meetings, a lengthy public comment period was held where some were critical of the proposed changes. Some called for dashcam footage of pursuit-related deaths to be released, as policy requires in officer shootings, and for the city’s costs of police chase-related lawsuits to be publicized.

Advertisement

“Police chases do not keep our community safe,” Angela Lang, the co-executive director of Black Leaders Organizing Change, said during public comment.

The Fire and Police Commission’s proposed recommendation comes after the department voluntarily removed speeding as a permissible reason to chase someone who is recklessly driving. However, that move was met coldly by members of the public and the commission, which is the oversight body for the department, who said it didn’t go far enough.

Generally, department policy considers pursuits “justified” under six circumstances, among those being when an occupant is involved in a violent felony.

Milwaukee Assistant Chief Craig Sarnow said the department was content with its previous change, when commissioners asked him for feedback on the proposed recommendation.

Both the Fire and Police Commission’s drafted recommendation and police department’s change focus on reckless driving chases. Those make up an overwhelming amount of all chases that officers in Milwaukee make – with officers citing reckless driving as the initiating reason in 742 of the 970 chases in 2025, according to police data.

Advertisement

The Fire and Police Commission’s recommendation is also the first time the body has exercised that power since state legislation, 2023 Wisconsin Act 12, was passed. Before that legislation was passed, the commission held the ability to outright change police department policy, but the law shifted that to the city’s Common Council.

Some have called for the Fire and Police Commission to more aggressively issue recommendations like these.

The recommendation will now move to the commission’s Oversight and Accountability Committee. The decision was made after commissioners said they sought more time to tweak the language and for police to provide input.

License plate reading camera use scrutinized

The department’s use of license plate reading cameras, a system known as Flock, came under scrutiny from many attendees at the meeting as well, who called for the city to ban it. Many noted the recent criminal charges brought against Josue Ayala, an officer who prosecutors say improperly used the system to track a former partner and another person.

Ayala resigned and is facing a misdemeanor charge of attempted misconduct in public office. Ayala had previously faced claims of lying and excessive force but was not placed on a Milwaukee County District Attorney’s list of officers with a history of dishonesty, bias or integrity concerns until recently.

Advertisement

That was despite, in 2022, a federal public defender issuing a complaint against Ayala, saying he exaggerated so much in his testimony and reports that it almost seemed “like a compulsion.”

Milwaukee police officials like Heather Hough, the department’s chief of staff, said they were never made aware of that previous concern against Ayala.

“Had we received the information from defense counsel about these concerns they would have been investigated,” she said in an email to the Journal Sentinel.

But that goes against the role of the defense bar, outside experts and defense attorneys locally told the Journal Sentinel. Prosecutors have the ethical duty to share potential Brady material and serve the public, whereas defense attorneys’ obligation is to their client.

Milwaukee police began using Flock cameras in 2022. MPD has a $182,900 contract with Flock for the use of the technology. That contract is active through January 2027 and passed without requiring approval from member of the city’s Common Council, a point criticized by attendees.

Advertisement

The scrutiny against Flock came despite it not being on the meeting’s agenda. Attendees held signs that said things like “GET THE FLOCK OUTTA HERE” and called for the city to be “de-Flocked.”

David Clarey is a public safety reporter at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He can be reached at dclarey@gannett.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Illegal dumping plagues closed Milwaukee Pick ‘n Save

Published

on

Illegal dumping plagues closed Milwaukee Pick ‘n Save


Neighbors say since the Milwaukee Pick ‘n Save at 35th and North closed in 2025, the parking lot has been filling up, but not with cars or people. It has been attracting illegal dumpers. 

Trash piling up

Advertisement

What we know:

There are old mattresses and furniture in the parking lot. There are piles of garbage at the entrance of the old grocery store. Behind the building, there are tires, more mattresses and more trash. 

Illegal dumping at former grocery store near 35th and North, Milwaukee

Advertisement

The Pick ‘n Save stores closed in July 2025. Since then, the building has sat empty. 

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

FOX6 News was contacted by a man who manages senior and family housing in the area. He said in the last couple of months, he has noticed the stile turn into a place for illegal dumping. The man said he was so fed up, he called the office of Milwaukee Alderman Russell Stamper about the problem. The man said the whole site is an eyesore, and something needs to change. 

Illegal dumping at former grocery store near 35th and North, Milwaukee

Change sought

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“As the snow melts, it’s full of garbage. People are dumping furniture on it, tires,” said Jeffrey Sessions, who manages nearby property. “If you drive around it, it’s garbage everywhere. It’s unsightly for the neighborhood, and it’s probably going to create rats and mice problems.”

FOX6 News reached out to the Department of Neighborhood Services. Officials said the dumping has not been reported. They said the department’s commercial team will now be made aware of the issue. 

Advertisement

Illegal dumping at former grocery store near 35th and North, Milwaukee

“It makes the whole neighborhood look like garbage, like nobody’s taking care of anything around here,” Sessions said. “It’s a detriment, it’s unsightly, and it needs to be addressed.”

Advertisement

Illegal dumpers could face fines

Dig deeper:

If the dumpers are caught on camera, they could face fines. 

Advertisement

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

The owner of the property may also be ordered to clean it up.  

Illegal dumping at former grocery store near 35th and North, Milwaukee

Advertisement

The Source: Information in this post was provided by a person who owns property near the former grocery store, as well as Milwaukee Department of Neighborhood Services.

Crime and Public SafetyMilwaukeeNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending