Connect with us

Finance

Career changers reflect on the many paths into financial planning — and offer advice on making the switch

Published

on

Career changers reflect on the many paths into financial planning — and offer advice on making the switch

They were military members, teachers, civil engineers, broadcasters, human resources directors and every profession in between.

And now they’re financial advisors.

While these career changers may not have much in common on the surface, one attribute they share is the desire to find a profession that truly fulfills them — and the determination to take the often arduous path of reinvention.

Several financial advisors who pivoted into the industry reflected on their journeys for Financial Planning and offered hard-won words of advice to those thinking of walking in their footsteps.

A slow turning

Carla Adams, founder and financial advisor at Ametrine Wealth in Lake Orion, Michigan, was a little over a year into her work in the chemistry doctoral program at Northwestern University when she “realized how miserable” she was.

Advertisement

READ MORE: Career-changing immigrant financial advisor finds her path

“I loved chemistry, and I still do, but I was working long hours in the lab, six to seven days a week,” she said. “That’s very different from four to eight hours a week in the lab in college. It’s fairly isolating and not very social, and I’m an extroverted person.”

After writing a master’s thesis, Adams went job hunting, but to no avail.

“There didn’t seem to be many job openings at the time, and my mother suggested I also apply to jobs in finance, as companies might be interested in my strong analytical background,” she said. “I honestly ended up taking the first job offer I got, which just so happened to be in wealth management at an RIA. It was serendipitous.”

Adams soon fell in love with the job, both working with clients and at the computer running analyses.

Advertisement

“More than 16 years later, I’m running my own firm and couldn’t be happier with where my career has taken me,” she said. “While chemistry of course has pretty much nothing to do with personal finance, I feel that studying chemistry at the graduate level developed my analytical thinking and problem-solving skills.”

Ross Dugas, founder and financial advisor at Scientific Financial in Pearland, Texas, holds a doctorate in chemical engineering from the University of Texas and worked in research for Dow Chemical for 12 years. He said he enjoyed helping “colleagues invest tax-efficiently and make the most of their company benefits.” 

But COVID-19 and the resulting on-site staff limitations completely disrupted his plans to better integrate himself within Dow’s production units.

READ MORE: Many students still haven’t heard of financial planning careers — what needs to change

“I started to consider new possibilities and realized I would enjoy running a solo, advice-only financial planning business,” he said.

Advertisement

Family ties lead to new career paths

Family situations often served as a catalyst behind many career changes into  financial planning.

Ann M. Covington, a CFP with CovingtonAlsina in Annapolis, Maryland, spent 17 years in the auto industry and was working as a consultant when she became engaged.

“I insisted we have a financial plan done,” she said. “When we met with our advisor, he kept saying, ‘You know a lot about this. Why aren’t you doing this?’ After several years of working with him as a client, I was going to be a stay-at-home mom, and he finally recruited me.”

Ross J. Natoli, a CFP with Joel Isaacson and Co. in New York, served as a legislative advisor in the U.S. Senate and later worked in brand management, most recently in financial technology. He said that growing up, his family’s finances were a constant stressor.

“Budgeting and stretching our dollars were ingrained in me from a young age,” he said. “As I grew up and started making my own money, I became fascinated with financial wellness, my 401(k) and investing. It became a passion and an obsession, so much so that I decided in my mid-30s to leave my marketing career behind and pursue financial advice full-time.”

Advertisement

Marianne M. Nolte, a financial planner with Imagine Financial Services in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, previously owned and operated a sports video production company that served the international equestrian show-jumping community for over 30 years. When she was 25 years old, her parents’ health began to decline and they reached out to her, their only child, for help. Together they met with their CPA, estate attorney, insurance agent and financial advisor to ensure all was in order. While working with her parents and their professional circle, Nolte “learned quite a bit about financial planning.”

“I’m blessed that my parents led me to financial planning,” she said. “I became hooked, and I knew this was the profession of my future.”

Not long after her parents died, Nolte started her journey to becoming a CFP and opening her own firm — decisions she said she doesn’t regret.

“If you have the guts, and sufficient funding to get you through the first couple of lean years, step off the ledge,” she said. “There is no need to look back.”

A military edge can help a planning career

Long before he founded Ironclad Financial in 2022 in Radnor, Pennsylvania, Nick Rygiel was a surface warfare officer in the U.S. Navy, serving four years onboard the U.S.S. Porter.

Advertisement

He later worked for Deloitte Consulting in Arlington, Virginia. Rygiel said his previous careers taught him the importance of strategic planning and resilience.

READ MORE: 5 professional development skills for advisors in a changing workforce

“I wanted to apply those skills in a way that helped people achieve their financial goals,” he said. “I chose to become a financial advisor because it allows me to blend my analytical skills, strategic thinking and desire to help others into a fulfilling career. Financial advising offers a dynamic environment where I can continuously learn and grow while making a tangible difference in clients’ lives.”

A previous career in the military can prove to be pivotal in a future career in financial planning.

Jeff H. Farrar, co-founder of Procyon Partners in Lenoir City, was an officer in the U.S. Coast Guard before becoming a financial advisor in 1999. He said he was always interested in personal finance, but a year working on the trading floor of UBS proved “too transactional.”

Advertisement

What attracted him to his current career was “the finance, puzzle solving, helping people, building long-term relationships, the control of your work-life balance and the constant stimulation of an ever-changing investment, tax and regulatory landscape.”

“Grit, determination, planning, intelligence and curiosity all made me successful,” he said.

John R. Power, a CFP with Power Plans in Walpole, Massachusetts, was a U.S. Army officer who was ready to retire as a colonel in the early 1980s. He took a course in personal computing and built a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet evaluating mutual funds, which helped spark his interest.

“The military plans everything, so I understood the value of analysis and planning better than most,” he said.

Communication and technical skills transfer well

Those with communication skills have also often found a home in financial planning.

Advertisement

Brad Wright, managing partner at Launch Financial Planning in Andover, was a radio and television host based mostly in Los Angeles. He decided to make the switch because “broadcast media had changed and was less fulfilling than it once was.”

“It had become much less creative,” he said.

After studying in the personal financial planning program at UCLA while still working in media, he began the slow transition.

“My former boss still talks about the time he found me in a production studio studying for the CFP exam,” he said.

Wright said his communication skills and hands-on nature were assets in his new career.

Advertisement

“While building my own firm I’ve discovered that, much like in radio, ‘live and local’ works,” he said. “Getting out and becoming involved in helping your community helps growth.”

A technical background has also proved useful to some.

Andy Cole, a financial advisor with Fiduciary Financial Advisors in Dallas, was a civil engineer who designed water and wastewater infrastructure for local municipalities. He said this experience fed directly into his current career.

“Some of my favorite projects as an engineer involved building water models for water distribution systems,” he said. “The design of financial planning models are very similar. The pump inflows, customer demand, reservoir storage and pipe frictions of a water model are like the cash inflows, spending, savings and taxes of a financial planning model.”

Karen Ogden, a partner at Envest Asset Management in Ridgefield, Connecticut, said her previous roles at the Chicago Board of Trade, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and as head of human resources for a small broker-dealer were invaluable experience in her current profession.

Advertisement

“I believe I am a well-rounded and capable advisor because I had prior career experience,” she said. “This role now draws on all of it and having the confidence to address the myriad situations that arise is key to allowing me to help clients navigate an important aspect of their lives.”

From the classroom to the planning industry

Susan Plisch, founder of Resilient Divorce Solutions in Urbana, Illinois, taught high school and college math for nearly a decade. She first learned about financial planning when she was helping her widowed mother find an advisor.

“I thought …, ‘There is a profession where I can use my superpower, mathematics, to help people without compromising my values,’” she said. “The ability to see where someone is at and explain something in a way that connects and brings about that lightbulb moment is a skill I learned while teaching that transfers to financial planning.”

David W. Demming, founder and president of Demming Financial Services in Aurora, Ohio, said he wanted to be a college professor as an economic, or Marxist, historian.

“Ergo money dictates what people and politics do,” he said.

Advertisement

Because he “needed a paycheck as well as an exemption,” he started teaching high school social studies. Meanwhile, his doctorate program was transferred to Kent State University. While he was a student there, the 1970 shootings occurred. After eight years, he quit the program in frustration with only a master’s degree. It was from there he turned to financial planning in 1978.

“I wanted to help people and as a historian had the perspective,” he said.

Dugas said he brings “an engineer’s skeptical perspective to the financial industry.”

“Working as a researcher requires that one always challenge the status quo and look for better, more efficient ways to solve problems,” he said. “That same mindset of maximizing efficiency translates perfectly to financial planning,”

Advice to others thinking of making the leap

Rygiel said the hardest part of making the transition to becoming an advisor was learning a new skill set and knowledge base. He advised others looking to make a change to seek a mentor.

Advertisement

“If I could do it over again, I would have sought out an ex-military, veteran, mentor in the financial industry earlier in my transition,” he said. “Having guidance from someone with experience in financial advising and an understanding of the military transition would have accelerated my learning curve and provided valuable insights.”

Stephen Maggard, a financial advisor with Abacus Planning Group in Columbia, South Carolina, was an Army officer who transitioned to financial planning in 2019 after taking some CFP classes. He said networking as much as possible was key to success for those new to the profession.

“There are so many advisors doing great things in this industry, and doing it in their own unique way,” he said. “Learning who those people are and why they do what they do will only clarify in your mind the path you want to take.”

Finances are also a concern for those about to enter a new field. Fortunately, Dugas said he managed his finances adequately to have the opportunity to make a dramatic career change and forgo a substantial salary.

“I’m blessed that I can now completely control my schedule and lead a slower-paced life with my wife and three young kids,” he said.

Advertisement

Neil Krishnaswamy, president of Krishna Wealth Planning in McKinney, Texas, worked as an electronics engineer before transitioning into financial planning in 2011. He said the most significant hurdle he had to face when moving careers was “giving up a highly lucrative position with a good salary and benefits, and essentially starting over.”

“I would advise anyone making a similar transition to ensure they have full support from their spouse, if married, and enough liquid cash or investments to cover their expenses for at least one to two years,” he said. “If you are new to financial planning, consider working with an established firm first before venturing out on your own.”

Li Tian, a CFP with LPL Financial in San Marcos, California, said having a spouse who brought in a stable income, health insurance and savings helped to bridge the gap into a new career from her previous work in biotech.

“For those aspiring career changers who might not want to start from zero, perhaps joining an established firm is a great way to make the switch,” she said.

Cole said those looking to make the change should check in with themselves to ensure they are “running to something and not just running from something.”

Advertisement

“If you are just switching careers because you don’t like your current career, it’s very possible you won’t like being a financial advisor either,” he said. “You will just be swapping a job for a job. If you are going to go through all the effort to make the change, I would encourage you to make sure you are swapping a job for a passion.”

Edward Hadad, a financial planner with Financial Asset Management in Chappaqua, New York, was previously an auditor and later accountant for Wall Street firms before becoming a fundraiser for nonprofits. He said while career changers may not necessarily have to pass the CFP exam before transitioning, he would encourage them to take courses, join industry groups, network and set up meetings with peers in the profession.

“This is a great profession that needs hardworking people of integrity, and there are spots open for people like you,” he said.

Dugas said he took special care to design his practice to provide himself “maximum flexibility” and “attract those skeptical-, curious-, analytical-minded types” he enjoys working with.

“If I could do it again, I’d do it all the same,” he said.

Advertisement

Adams said she cherishes her relationships with clients and loves “getting into the nitty-gritty details of investing and financial planning.”

“I honestly don’t think I’d change a thing if I could do it all over again, because that path I took somehow led me right to where I am,” she said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Oregon Legislature passes controversial campaign finance changes

Published

on

Oregon Legislature passes controversial campaign finance changes
play

Legislators passed a bill March 5 to modify forthcoming changes to Oregon’s campaign finance system despite outcry from good government groups who say the bill creates new loopholes.

Those groups were key in creating House Bill 4024, which was created and passed in 2024 in place of warring ballot measures seeking to overhaul the system.

That legislation included new limits on contributions, including capping individual spending on statewide candidates each cycle at $3,300, and other changes. Parts of the bill were set to go into effect in 2027 and 2028.

Advertisement

Under the new proposal, House Bill 4018, the limits would still begin in 2027, but disclosure requirements and penalties would be pushed to 2031. It also gives the Secretary of State money to update the campaign finance system, but far less than the office previously thought it might need.

Representatives voted 39-19 to pass the bill. A few hours later, the Senate passed it 20-9.

Fourteen of the “no” votes in the House were Democrats, including Reps. Tom Andersen, D-Salem, and Lesly Muñoz, D-Woodburn.

Muñoz told the Statesman Journal she voted against the bill after hearing from people upset with the bill’s process.

Advertisement

Six Democratic senators cast a “no” vote on HB 4018.

Oregon campaign finance reform advocates say they were left out of negotiations

After working together in 2024, advocates said Speaker of the House Julie Fahey, D-Eugene, “ghosted” them.

Good government groups said the bill does far more than address necessary technical fixes to HB 4024.

HB 4018 is “a complete betrayal of the deal that was made two years ago,” Norman Turrill of Oregon’s League of Women Voters said.

Advertisement

Should the bill be signed by Gov. Tina Kotek, the groups said they will push their own changes through a 2028 ballot initiative.

Those advocates have outlined at least 11 different changes they believe the bill creates. The bill’s contents were first shared through a Feb. 9 amendment that was posted after 5 p.m., hours before it received a public hearing in an 8 a.m. work session on Feb. 10 and later, Feb. 12.

Secretary of State Tobias Read told legislators in January his office was requesting $25 million as a placeholder to fund a new campaign finance system for the state. Read was not secretary of state when House Bill 2024 was passed and his office is now working to implement the bill’s changes on a fast approaching deadline.

An additional amendment to the bill instead gives the Secretary of State’s Office $1.5 million for staff, some of whom would be tasked with updating the state’s current system.

House members agreed March 4 to send the bill back to committee, presumably to be amended. A 5 p.m. committee meeting was canceled about an hour after initially being announced.

Advertisement

A work session on HB 4018 was moved to the next morning. After an hour of delay, legislators convened and finished the meeting, moving the bill back to the floor without any changes, in less than three minutes.

A new campaign finance bill, Senate Bill 1502, was introduced and scheduled for a public hearing and work session March 4.

The bill is “very simple,” Senate Minority Leader Bruce Starr, R-Dundee, said. It tells the Secretary of State’s Office to draft a bill for the 2027 session with necessary campaign finance improvements from HB 4024 and HB 4018.

Three senators voted against the bill March 5. It now moves to the House. Legislators have a March 8 deadline to end the session.

“SB 1502 would not correct the severe damage to campaign finance reform that will occur, if HB 4018 B is enacted in this session,” Dan Meek of Honest Elections Oregon wrote in submitted testimony.

Advertisement

Lawmakers appear unsatisfied, but supportive, toward Oregon campaign finance bill

House Majority Leader Ben Bowman, D-Tigard, said HB 4018 made positive changes but acknowledged it was “a challenging vote for many of us.”

“We are implementing this whole new system that is new for all of us, and there are a lot of opinions and there are a lot of details to figure out,” House Minority Leader Lucetta Elmer, R-McMinnville, said. Elmer and Bowman carried the bill in the House. “With that being said, we’re moving forward in good faith, knowing that we’ll also be coming back next year to make sure that those details and all those kinks are worked out.”

Rep. Mark Gamba, D-Milwaukie, said he was concerned about the bill and the “non-inclusive process” that led to it.

Gamba pointed to a letter from the Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center that states in part that the bill “would substantially revise critical campaign finance reforms enacted two years ago in Oregon” and weaken the state’s campaign finance law.

The current bill is not the only possibility for moving forward, Sen. Jeff Golden, D-Ashland, told lawmakers. Proposed amendments that would have extended implementation timelines without the additional changes were ignored, he said.

Advertisement

“House Bill 4024 and this bill, 4018, have two things in common. One, they were thrown together in a few days behind closed doors, mostly by organizations who dominate campaign funding in the current system,” Golden said. “And two, very few legislators understand what is actually in these bills.”

He urged lawmakers to abandon the system created in House Bill 4024 as an “uncomfortably expensive learning experience” and develop a new plan based on successful programs in other states.

Sen. Sara Gelser Blouin, D-Corvallis, also spoke against the bill on the Senate floor.

“The concern that I had and that my constituents had was technical changes are one thing, but it should not be increasing the amount of money that candidates can take in or hold or carry over,” Gelser Blouin said. “Unfortunately, as it’s drafted, this bill does all of those things.”

HB 4024 is too complicated and “unimplementable” without the fixes in HB 4018, Starr said.

Advertisement

Sen. Lew Frederick, D-Portland, agreed, saying HB 4018 and SB 1502 give reassurance about a system he has concerns about.

“If there were no cameras and the lights were off, I think most people would agree this is not the bill we want,” Rep. Paul Evans, D-Monmouth, said.

Some lawmakers expressed similar feelings of discontentment with the bill in Ways and Means and one of its subcommittees on March 3, but said they felt it was important to make some progress on the issue. Discussions could happen again in 2027, they said.

Rep. Nancy Nathanson, D-Eugene, who ultimately voted in favor of the bill, said March 3 supporting it “is a very painful choice to make.”

Statesman Journal reporter Dianne Lugo contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Anastasia Mason covers state government for the Statesman Journal. Reach her at acmason@statesmanjournal.com or 971-208-5615.

Continue Reading

Finance

Paramount ally RedBird says using Middle East money to help buy Warner Bros. could be a good idea

Published

on

Paramount ally RedBird says using Middle East money to help buy Warner Bros. could be a good idea

  • Last year, Paramount said it would use $24 billion in funding from Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar to help buy WBD.
  • Now that Paramount has won that deal, it won’t say whether that’s still the plan.
  • A key Paramount backer suggests that Gulf money would be a good thing for this deal.

We still don’t know if Paramount intends to use billions of dollars from Gulf states like Saudi Arabia to help it buy Warner Bros. Discovery.

But if Paramount does end up doing that, it wouldn’t be a bad thing, says a key Paramount backer.

That update comes via Gerry Cardinale, who heads up RedBird Capital Partners, the private equity company that helped finance Larry and David Ellison’s acquisition of Paramount last year and is doing the same with their WBD deal now.

In a podcast with Puck’s Matt Belloni published Wednesday night, Cardinale wouldn’t comment directly on Paramount’s previously disclosed plans to use $24 billion from sovereign wealth funds controlled by Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar to help buy WBD.

Instead, he reiterated Paramount’s current messaging on the deal’s financing: The $47 billion in equity Paramount will use to buy WBD will be “backstopped” by the Ellison family and RedBird — meaning they are ultimately on the hook to pay up. The rest of the $81 billion deal will be financed with debt.

Advertisement

Cardinale also acknowledged what Paramount has disclosed in its current disclosure documents: It intends to sell portions of that $47 billion commitment to other investors: “We haven’t syndicated anything at this time,” he said. “We do expect to syndicate with strategic, domestic, and foreign investors. But at the end of the day, that alchemy shouldn’t matter because it’ll be done in the right way.”

And when asked about concerns about Middle Eastern countries owning part of a media conglomerate that includes assets like CNN, Cardinale suggested that could be a plus.

“I think we want to be a global company,” he said. “You look at what’s going on right now geopolitically. What’s going on right now geopolitically out of the Middle East wouldn’t be, the positives of that would not be happening without some of those sovereigns that you’re referring to.”

He continued:

“The world is changing. We can stick our head in the sand and pretend it’s not, or we can embrace globalization and the derivative benefits both geopolitically and otherwise that come from that. Content generation coming out of Hollywood is one of America’s greatest exports.
I firmly embrace the global nature and orientation that we bring to this from a capital standpoint, from a footprint standpoint, etc. At the end of the day, I do understand some of the concerns that you’ve raised, but that will work itself out between signing and closing because at the end of the day, worst-case scenario, Ellison and RedBird are 100% of this thing.”

All of which suggests to me that Paramount still intends to use money from Gulf-based sovereign wealth funds to buy WBD.

What I don’t understand is why the company won’t say that out loud. Does that mean it’s still negotiating with potential investors? Or that it’s reticent to disclose outside investors, for whatever reason, until it has to? A Paramount rep declined to comment.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

Crypto bill hits new impasse, raising doubts over its future

Published

on

Crypto bill hits new impasse, raising doubts over its future
Talks on landmark crypto legislation have hit a new impasse after banks said they could not back a compromise pushed by the White House, a development that cast doubt on whether the bill will pass this year and sparked criticism from President Donald Trump ​who accused lenders of trying to undermine it.
Continue Reading

Trending