Connect with us

Denver, CO

A Denver Olympics? Why landing Winter Games — at least for now — is unlikely | Special report

Published

on

A Denver Olympics? Why landing Winter Games — at least for now — is unlikely | Special report


Press play for a time machine into Colorado’s last real chance to host the Olympics.

The Denver Chamber of Commerce produced a 14-minute promotional video for hosting the 1976 Winter Games. It opens with grainy aerial views of the Rocky Mountains, cowboys on horseback, a Native American ceremony, skiers busting through powder, a cheesy soundtrack and a booming voice:

The Denver Olympic story starts in a land of Olympian proportions. The American West.

Advertisement

The pitch worked. In 1970, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) awarded Denver the ‘76 Winter Games on promises made in their application. The video continues:

Already, nearly 80 percent of the facilities necessary to hold the ‘76 games are constructed and ready. … The proposed site for the men’s and women’s slalom, and giant slalom, at Loveland Basin is only 45 minutes from downtown Denver by superhighway. … Nordic events will be held in the Evergreen area. … Figure skating and ice hockey events can be held at the Denver Coliseum. … Speed skating will take place at a new rink near the Olympic village. … We hope we’ll see you in ‘76.

Of course, none of that happened.

Colorado voters in 1972 overwhelmingly approved Amendment 8, a grassroots effort prohibiting the state from levying taxes or allocating funds for the ’76 Winter Games. They went to Innsbruck, Austria, instead. It marked the first time in Olympic history that a selected host site boycotted.

Advertisement

“It’s really rare that a city would invest this kind of capital and then not ensure that its voters are lined up behind it,” said Samuel Bock, a public historian and exhibit developer for History Colorado. “But I think it’s important to understand the gulf in terms of the optimism of the people promoting the bid and the actual reality on the ground.”

Has anything changed in 50-plus years?

The Denver Gazette sought to understand why Colorado rejected the ‘76 Winter Games — and determine if the state is ready for another push to host — ahead of the upcoming Paris Olympics.

Matthew Payne, executive director of the Denver Sports Commission, is ready for that conversation.

“Visit Denver and the Denver Sports Commission would be thrilled to evaluate and, if appropriate, support a future Olympic bid if the state and city residents supported it,” Payne said in a statement to The Denver Gazette.

Advertisement

Call it a second gold rush. The 1960s were transformational in Colorado mountain towns.

Ski resorts opened in Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs and Vail, coinciding with massive population booms across the Front Range. It’s no surprise industry leaders and local politicians sought to share their mountains and grow business opportunities on the Olympic stage.

It began in 1963, according to the Denver Public Library, when Gov. John Love mentioned the possibility during a speech delivered in Colorado Springs. Momentum grew in 1967 when the U.S. Olympic Committee picked Denver as its official candidate for the ‘76 Winter Games. In 1968, the Denver Organizing Committee (DOC) traveled to the Olympics in France and Mexico City to help bolster the city’s candidacy.

Yet the DOC failed to predict an undercurrent of public skepticism back home.

Advertisement

Richard Lamm, a state representative in the early 1970s, was not convinced a Colorado Olympics were a good idea. He organized the Olympic opposition effort — Citizens for Colorado’s Future — for collecting signatures to include Amendment 8 on the ballot.

As it turned out, major roadblocks existed between Denver and the ‘76 Winter Games.

The city oversold its hosting ability and undersold the financial commitment.

Your daily report on everything sports in Colorado – covering the Denver Broncos, Denver Nuggets, Colorado Avalanche, and columns from Woody Paige and Paul Klee.

Success! Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

• Having “nearly 80 percent” of all required venues constructed was overstated. Denver and its adjacent mountain communities lacked an Olympic ski jump, luge and bobsled tracks, a speedskating facility, media housing and a modernized downtown arena.

• The IOC required all venues be within 50 miles of the Athletes’ Village in Denver, eliminating Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs and Vail. Alternative locations at Mount Sniktau and Evergreen did not receive much snow. Proposed solutions? Helicopter travel for Alpine athletes or trucking in snow to lower-elevation events.

Advertisement

• The DOC initially proposed a price tag of $15 million to host the Winter Games. Their estimate later grew to $35 million. But the final number would likely be much higher. A fitting example: The 1976 Summer Games left the city of Montreal with more than $1 billion in debt, according to The Guardian. 

Lamm later served three terms as Colorado Governor (1975-87). He died in 2021 due to complications from a pulmonary embolism. He was 85.

“I was on the legislative audit committee back in the 1970s,” Lamm told Colorado Politics in 2019. “And that’s when I started evaluating the pros and cons of the Olympics. We fought it back in those days in 1972. The voters made a decision, and I was convinced it was the right one.” 

Lessons from the 1976 boycott remain as conversation shifts to the present day.

Colorado Springs is home to the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center. Denver missed out as a host city for the 2026 World Cup. But it successfully held large-scale events like the 2008 Democratic National Convention and MLB, NHL, NBA all-star games.

Advertisement

But is the state ready to host a Winter Games?

Time for a reality check. The Olympics will not be held in Colorado, at the very earliest, until the 2040s.

The 2026 Winter Games are in Italy. It’s anticipated in 2030 the French Alps will host. Salt Lake City is the leading candidate for 2034.

Denver’s exclusion is not from a lack of effort.

Advertisement

In 2018, the city formed the Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games Exploratory Committee to “determine if hosting a future Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games could be done and should be done” for a potential 2030 bid.

Their conclusion: Yes. But with conditions.

The committee recommended the Olympics be privately financed, designed to prioritize existing or temporary venues instead of new construction, while being sensitive to traffic congestion and affordable housing. It should also be voted on by residents through a statewide initiative.

Their proposal, while innovative, ultimately didn’t sell. The United States Olympic Committee chose to nominate Salt Lake City over Denver for the Winter Games. Utah benefits from existing venues and facilities after the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake. Denver reimagined how the Olympics should operate.

It’s unclear when Colorado will re-enter the Olympics conversation. In 2019, Denver residents passed Initiative 302 to require a vote before the city spends public money on any future bid.

Advertisement

“The possibility of the Olympics being hosted in Colorado is a larger discussion that would require careful consideration from stakeholders across the state,” Colorado Springs mayor Yemi Mobolade told The Denver Gazette in a statement. “In the meantime, we will continue to champion the Olympic and Paralympic spirit and ideals as we showcase our city’s commitment to the movement and support for Team USA athletes.”

Colorado’s rejection of the ‘76 Winter Games shaped its trajectory for decades to come. The grainy Denver Chamber of Commerce promotional video is a glimpse into an unfulfilled vision of growth for the state. But at what real cost?

“The historian in me takes a look at the last 20 or 30 years and thinks: Who knows what would have happened if we had brought the Olympics here? We may not have really needed to,” Bock said. “It didn’t seem to be a bump in the road for anything. Because the state’s growth has been just meteoric.”



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

Where do Packers stand in NFC playoff picture after loss in Denver?

Published

on

Where do Packers stand in NFC playoff picture after loss in Denver?


The Green Bay Packers (9-4-1) dropped from first to second in the NFC North and from the second seed to the seventh seed in the NFC after losing to the Denver Broncos on Sunday.

Significant injuries suffered against the Broncos will mean lasting implications are felt past Sunday. The Packers are also now a long shot to catch the Los Angeles Rams for the No. 1 seed in the NFC, and it’ll take a win next Saturday night in Chicago to retake control in the NFC North.

But the Packers are still in a good spot in terms of making the postseason field, especially after the Detroit Lions, Carolina Panthers and Dallas Cowboys all lost on Sunday.

NFC playoff picture after Week 15

  1. Los Angeles Rams (11-3, 6-3 vs. NFC)
  2. Chicago Bears (10-4, 6-3 vs. NFC)
  3. Philadelphia Eagles (9-5, 7-3 vs. NFC)
  4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (7-7, 5-5 vs. NFC)
  5. Seattle Seahawks (11-3, 6-3 vs. NFC)
  6. San Francisco 49ers (10-4, 8-2 vs. NFC)
  7. Green Bay Packers (9-4-1, 7-2-1 vs. NFC)

Others: Lions (8-6), Panthers (7-7), Cowboys (6-7-1)

According to The Athletic’s NFL playoff simulator, the Packers have a 92 percent chance of making the postseason with three weeks to go. They become all but guaranteed of a playoff spot if they can beat the Bears in Chicago in Week 16. In fact, just one win over the final three weeks could be enough for the Packers to get in.

Advertisement

The NFC North winner looks like a coinflip. The Athletic’s model gives the Packers a 48 percent chance of winning the division right now, and it would go up to 82 percent with a win over the Bears on Saturday. Chicago took down the Cleveland Browns with ease in bitter cold temps at Soldier Field on Sunday.

The Athletic’s model also gives the Packers a 98 percent chance of being the No. 2 seed if Matt LaFleur’s team can win out. That will be much easier said than done without Micah Parsons (and potentially Christian Watson) down the stretch.

Two very possibilities for the Packers: Win the NFC North and host the Bears in the NFC Wild Card Round, or get in as the No. 7 seed and go to Chicago to play the Bears in the NFC Wild Card Round. A third round of the rivalry is increasingly possible in January.

Packers remaining games

Nothing easy here. The Bears, Ravens and Vikings all won Sunday. The Bears and Ravens won comfortably; the Vikings upset the Cowboys — who desperately needed to win — in Dallas. The Bears and Ravens are both playing to win division titles. The Vikings are a dangerously talented spoiler team, and winning at U.S. Bank Stadium is never easy. The Athletic’s model gives the Packers roughly a 40 percent chance of making the postseason even with an 0-3 finish. The Lions are the biggest threat to pass the Packers in the event they finish 0-3.

It appears the Packers can clinch a playoff spot next week with a win over the Bears and a Steelers win over the Lions.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Packers vs. Broncos Week 15 Game Discussion Thread

Published

on

Packers vs. Broncos Week 15 Game Discussion Thread


It’s time for the AFC’s #1 team to meet the NFC’s #2. Today the Denver Broncos host the Green Bay Packers in a key late-season inter-conference matchup that could have playoff seeding implications for both teams.

In Denver, the Broncos will be trying to hold on to the top spot in the AFC and keep their impressive win streak rolling. Denver has won ten straight games, some of them in fairly ridiculous fashion, but they sit at 11-2, sharing the top record in the NFL with the New England Patriots, who are just behind them in the playoff picture based on conference record.

The Packers, meanwhile, want to hold on to the lead in the NFC North before they have their rematch with the Chicago Bears next Saturday night. Green Bay sits behind only the Los Angeles Rams in the playoff race in the NFC, and they want to return to the Central time zone with that lead intact.

Join us here at Acme Packing Company to discuss today’s game, and Go Pack Go!

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver hosts Houston on 4-game home skid

Published

on

Denver hosts Houston on 4-game home skid


Houston Rockets (16-6, third in the Western Conference) vs. Denver Nuggets (18-6, second in the Western Conference)

Denver; Monday, 9:30 p.m. EST

BOTTOM LINE: Denver hosts Houston looking to end its four-game home slide.

The Nuggets are 13-5 in conference games. Denver averages 125.5 points while outscoring opponents by 9.6 points per game.

Advertisement

The Rockets are 9-5 in Western Conference play. Houston is fifth in the NBA scoring 120.6 points per game while shooting 48.6%.

The Nuggets’ 13.5 made 3-pointers per game this season are only 0.8 more made shots on average than the 12.7 per game the Rockets give up. The Rockets average 120.6 points per game, 4.7 more than the 115.9 the Nuggets give up.

The teams meet for the second time this season. In the last meeting on Nov. 22 the Nuggets won 112-109 led by 34 points from Nikola Jokic, while Reed Sheppard scored 27 points for the Rockets.

TOP PERFORMERS: Jokic is averaging 29.5 points, 12.3 rebounds and 10.9 assists for the Nuggets. Hunter Tyson is averaging 2.0 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

Alperen Sengun is averaging 23 points, 9.4 rebounds, seven assists and 1.5 steals for the Rockets. Amen Thompson is averaging 20.0 points over the last 10 games.

Advertisement

LAST 10 GAMES: Nuggets: 7-3, averaging 126.7 points, 41.4 rebounds, 30.3 assists, 5.8 steals and 4.1 blocks per game while shooting 53.1% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 119.8 points per game.

Rockets: 7-3, averaging 115.7 points, 47.2 rebounds, 24.8 assists, 9.3 steals and 5.1 blocks per game while shooting 48.0% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 107.0 points.

INJURIES: Nuggets: Christian Braun: out (ankle), Aaron Gordon: out (hamstring), Julian Strawther: day to day (back).

Rockets: Fred VanVleet: out for season (acl), Dorian Finney-Smith: out (ankle), Tari Eason: out (oblique).

——

Advertisement

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Copyright © 2025 ESPN Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending