Follow us on social media:
With former President Donald Trump being rushed off stage after shots were fired at his Pennsylvania rally, the only thing that’s safe to say that nobody knows what’s going to happen next in U.S. politics or the 2024 election.
The events on Saturday are tragic and police have reported that at least one attendee is dead, as is the alleged shooter. It’s hard not to feel like we’re living through particularly unstable times.
For more than two weeks, the news has been dominated by more mundane matters, like growing calls from Democrats, donors and political observers for President Joe Biden to drop out of the presidential race after his shaky first debate performance last month. There’s been a steady trickle of stories about the president’s health declining and concerns whether the 81-year-old is up to the job, as well as some devastating internal polls for Dems in swing states.
Biden tried to allay those fears as he barnstormed through Northville and Detroit on Friday, joking about his age but also delivering a defiant message.
“You made me the nominee,” Biden declared at Renaissance High School in Detroit — where he notably held his last rally in March 2020 before winning Michigan’s critical Democratic primary. “No one else. Not the press; not the pundits; not the insiders; not the donors. You the voters, you decided. No one else, and I’m not going anywhere.”
It’s going to take more than lesser-known lawmakers taking a stand while bigger names fling passive-aggressive comments. It would seem to me that any real effort to get Biden to stand down would have to start with his former running mate, President Barack Obama, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), one of the few people Biden appears to consider an equal.
The crowd was definitely into it, waving “Motown is Joetown” signs and chanting, “Four more years!” and “Don’t give up!”
Biden’s energized performance seemed to calm the jangled nerves of some Democratic leaders and assorted critics, as did his Wednesday press conference after the NATO summit, where he continued to demonstrate his mastery of foreign affairs.
At the moment, it appears that momentum to give the president the old heave-ho from the ticket has stalled, but check back tomorrow, because it doesn’t take much to get Democrats to hit the ol’ panic button.
But even as the dump Biden furor appeared to hit a fever pitch post-debate, I’ve looked for three factors to assess if the president will be the nominee. And so far, I’m not seeing the path to derail the Biden train.
First of all, Biden has made it clear that he’s not leaving willingly, defiantly announcing in an ABC interview that only the “Lord Almighty” could make him quit.
“I’ve got to finish this job,” he proclaimed days later at the NATO press conference. “Because there’s so much at stake.”
If you’re a Biden ally, you’ll probably view this as the president seeing a second term as a moral obligation to the country. He’s long cast himself as an underdog who’s been counted out again and again and now he’s determined to win his last fight.
If you’re in the camp that believes he’s stayed too late at the party, you’re more likely inclined to view this as an exercise in egoism from a man more concerned about his place in history than the nation he’s supposed to be fighting for. Biden has always been stubborn, but this time millions could pay the price if he falls to Trump.
Next, since Biden isn’t planning to leave quietly, that means that Democrats have to have a clear plan in place to broom him from the ticket. So far, more than a dozen members of Congress (and actor George Clooney) have told Biden to withdraw, including vulnerable first-term U.S. Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Grand Rapids).
Dozens of other leaders have expressed their support for the president, but not-so-subtly left the door open to him dropping out.
While Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer posted on social media last week that Biden “is in it to win it and I’m damn proud to support him,” she also said on CNN that “I don’t think that it would hurt” if both Biden and Trump took cognitive tests. And yes, Whitmer knows how to shut down a question — nobody forced her to say that.
But it’s going to take more than lesser-known lawmakers taking a stand while bigger names fling passive-aggressive comments. It would seem to me that any real effort to get Biden to stand down would have to start with his former running mate, President Barack Obama, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), one of the few people Biden appears to consider an equal.
While there have been some reports of private discussions, neither Obama nor Pelosi have taken the dramatic step of making a public statement for Biden to step aside. Both are considered to be extremely measured, so it would seem that they’ve yet to assess that such an effort would be successful.
Nobody knows how to count votes like Nancy Pelosi, after all.
Lastly, the anti-Biden forces have yet to unite over an alternative. Most lawmakers’ statements have just focused on Biden withdrawing without wading into what happens next. They’ve only proposed half a plan, which seems obscenely irresponsible, given the stakes.
The logical choice to replace Biden — and indeed, at this late hour, perhaps the only logistically viable one — is Vice President Kamala Harris. After all, she’s been training for the job for the last four years and has emerged as the administration’s clarion voice on Democrats’ best issue: reproductive rights.
Yet there’s a palpable unease from pundits, who have long judged Harris as being too shallow and liberal to run the country. There’s a yearning to bypass to first female, Black American and Asian-American vice president for (white) governors with star power, like Whitmer, California’s Gavin Newsom or Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker.
Naturally, these analysts tend to forget that African-American women are the base of the Democratic Party.
But of course, it can get dumber.
Some analysts are hankering for an open convention that probably would result in boffo ratings, but it’s hard to see how the nonstop “Dems in Disarray” coverage of floor fights and screaming matches would help the party effectively unite around a new nominee and win in November.
Other pine for a “blitz primary,” which would certainly fuel the charges of “rigged” elections we’ve been hearing from extremists since 2016. In something that reads like a fantastical script rejected from the old series “Scandal,” the nation would turn its lonely eyes to Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey and Taylor Swift to moderate weekly forums with hopefuls in the runup to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago next month.
Yes, I’m sure that wouldn’t all veer wildly off the rails (and T. Swift would definitely take a break from the European leg of her stunningly successful “Eras Tour” to join that circus).
So as of now, Democrats find themselves in the uneasy position with a weakened nominee who’s dug in, a handful of elected officials calling for him to go while party leaders assess their options, and an endless stream of backbiting, palace intrigue stories dominating the news (at least before the Trump rally shooting on Saturday).
In politics, inertia usually wins out. That could well be enough to save Biden’s nomination — but it remains to be seen if he can demonstrate the forcefulness and fortitude to lead Democrats to another victory in November.
Michigan Advance is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Michigan Advance maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Susan J. Demas for questions: [email protected]. Follow Michigan Advance on Facebook and X.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
New East Bay Bike Path bridges are open and ready for bikes
What’s it like to ride over the new East Bay Bike Path bridges? We sent a reporter to try them out.
I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.
We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.
It’s clearly a priority.
At least I thought it was.
But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.
The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.
There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.
Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.
The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.
But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.
To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.
That totally sounds worthy.
But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.
Especially for a particular reason in this case.
They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.
When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.
It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.
The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.
But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.
So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.
Too bad.
We were so close.
Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.
Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.
You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.
The PawSox.
The Washington Bridge.
But they’ve done great with bike paths.
And especially, linking many of them together.
Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.
But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.
That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.
We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.
But it’s now apparently dead.
Online commenters aren’t happy about it.
On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.
And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”
Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.
A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”
Hopefully not.
The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.
What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.
It doesn’t have to happen.
Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.
There’s got to be.
mpatinki@providencejournal.com
WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.
Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.
According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.
The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.
The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.
A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.
State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.
The investigation remains ongoing.
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
Follow us on social media:
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.
Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.
McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.
“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.
Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”
“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”
The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.
The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.
At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.
The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Upcoming ‘Bitcoin’ Movie With Casey Affleck, Gal Gadot Probes Satoshi’s Identity
Hong Kong reasserts role as safe haven in global finance amid Iran conflict
How the 3-3-3 Rule Helped Me Stick to an Exercise Routine
FILM REVIEW: ROSE OF NEVADA – Joyzine
Oil prices rise anew after a US-Iran standoff in the Strait of Hormuz strands tankers
Video: 8 Children Killed in Louisiana Shooting, Police Say
Poetry Challenge: Memorize “The More Loving One” by W.H. Auden
Photos: How overfishing in Southeast Asia is an ecological and human crisis