Oklahoma
Federal court halts Oklahoma’s newest immigration law before going into effect
OKLAHOMA CITY (KSWO) – A federal judge approved a preliminary injunction on Oklahoma’s newest immigration law after the U.S. Government filed a lawsuit against the measure. House Bill 4156 was set to go into effect July 1.
Immigration bill sees movement
The embattled measure would have allowed for the placing of criminal penalties upon those in the state who entered the country illegally.
In particular, the law would make it illegal for anyone who does not have legal authorization to enter the United States to come into Oklahoma.
The first offense would be a misdemeanor and carry a jail time no longer than a year and fines up to $500. A second offense would be a felony and carry a jail time up to two years and a fine up to $1,000. In both cases, the individual charged would have 72 hours to leave the state after punishment is complete.
Even before the measure was signed into law by Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, advocacy groups alongside some state legislators voiced their concerns amongst Republican cheers for the bill.
But it was Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond who urged the passage of the bill after the U.S. Supreme Court was hesitant on blocking Texas’ SB4 immigration measure.
“The Biden Administration has been utterly derelict in its duty to enforce federal law,” Drummond said after the state Senate passed HB4156. “If the president won’t secure the nation’s border, then our state must step in to protect Oklahomans. I appreciate President Pro Tempore Treat and Speaker McCall for their swift work on this bill and I encourage Gov. Stitt to sign it into law.”
Southwest-based legislator Sen. Jessica Garvin (R-Duncan) voted for the bill because she believes it will keep Oklahoma safe. Garvin lost her primary race in June.
“Immigration is top of mind for many Oklahomans as we see an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants crossing our nation’s Southern border, bringing illicit drugs and criminal activity that pose a threat to our public safety,” Garvin said.
However, a quite different view was held by the Oklahoma Association of Chiefs of Police and Metro Law Enforcement Agency Leaders.
“Law enforcement leaders from state organizations and municipalities were not substantively involved during the process of drafting and signing HB4156 into law,” the groups wrote. “This bill places crime victims at risk by increasing the fear of reporting to law enforcement. Further, HB4156 brings forth legal challenges in fair and impartial policing and anti-racial profiling.”
Democratic State Sen. Michael Brooks (D-OKC) said he thought the bill missed the mark on truly helping residents of the state.
“We could have provided the framework to give a state ID or driver license to those individuals who comply with specific requirements, including paying state and federal income tax, verifying their identity with the state, registering their address, and submitting a fingerprint to the largest law enforcement database in the nation,” Sen. Brooks said. “These are real solutions that would move our state forward in terms of both our economy and in addressing public safety concerns.”
The bill passed the House by way of a 39-8 vote and the Senate by a vote of 77 to 20.
Every Southwest-based state representative voted in favor of the measure, except for Reps. Trey Caldwell and Daniel Pae who were listed as excused.
Gov. Stitt signed the bill into law April 30.
The DOJ filed lawsuit
In May, the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit challenging the newly signed measure.
The lawsuit claimed the bill violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause as well as the Foreign Commerce Clause. The DOJ is further claiming the Constitution gives only the federal government the ability to regulate immigration and international borders.
“Oklahoma cannot disregard the U.S. Constitution and settled Supreme Court precedent,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We have brought this action to ensure that Oklahoma adheres to the Constitution and the framework adopted by Congress for regulation of immigration.”
Republican leaders in the state quickly answered with a pushback toward the lawsuit. One of them was Oklahoma Speaker of the House Charles McCall (R-22).
“House Bill 4156 was a carefully crafted, well-thought-out piece of legislation designed to acknowledge the role of the federal government in immigration matters, while at the same time protect the sovereignty and security of our state’s borders,” McCall said.
Now the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma has issued a preliminary injunction halting the law from going into effect. It was set to take effect July 1.
Members of the Latino Caucus of the Oklahoma Legislature sent out reactionary comments following the issuing of the injunction.
“This bill was a clear political stunt meant to secure the primary elections of our Republican leaders and it wasn’t even successful,” said Rep. Annie Menz, D-Norman. “Instead, it targeted a large portion of Oklahoma, angered law enforcement officials, and attempted to bypass the constitution. An injunction is the obvious choice.”
One member of the caucus said they will not stop working on the behalf of Oklahoma residents to keep them protected.
“Please know that we are working tirelessly to protect your rights and ensure that this bill does not go into effect,” said Rep. Arturo Alonso-Sandoval, D-Oklahoma City. “HB 4156 is a cheap political move that will cost taxpayers millions and will only manage to lose an essential workforce to the state. Oklahoma will be so much better once we are willing to have conversations about actual solutions.”
Those who advocated for this bill’s passage from the beginning, like AG Drummond, were upset at the court’s decision.
“While today’s court ruling is disappointing, I will not stop fighting for Oklahoma and our right to protect our borders,” Drummond said. “The Biden Administration’s complete failure to enforce federal immigration laws made House Bill 4156 a necessity. We intend to appeal today’s decision and defend one of the most powerful tools we have to fight the criminal activity largely being fueled by illegal aliens in Oklahoma.”
As it currently stands, Oklahoma is unable to enforce the provisions of HB4156 until further court rulings.
You can read the full preliminary injunction order below:
Copyright 2024 KSWO. All rights reserved.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma County commissioners weigh state audit of jail trust amid detention center woes
OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLA. (KOKH) — An investigative audit into the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority; it’s something the Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners is considering.
Fox 25 has been covering issues with the Oklahoma County Detention Center for years, from failed inspections to staffing issues and missed paychecks.
The issues had members of the Jail Trust recommending last June they undergo a performance review. Now, in a letter recently issued, county commissioners are asking State Auditor Cindy Byrd to look into the county Criminal Justice Authority, also known as the jail trust. But whether it’s tied to those ongoing issues remains unclear.
“I really wouldn’t know. I wouldn’t know where to begin with that. I just wouldn’t even want to speculate, honestly,” said Commissioner Myles Davidson.
Commissioner Davidson told FOX 25 if the audit were to happen, it wouldn’t be cheap.
“To go into a budget that we’re extremely tight on, and start adding hundreds of thousands of dollars, and time, these audits don’t happen overnight. I don’t know that we would have an answer to any question we could possibly ask before the budgetary cycle is over,” said Davidson.
Davidson said that cycle ends June 1. Instead, he’s suggesting they look into existing audits to see if there’s any useful information there first.
“I would simply say that we need to look at the audits that have been submitted already to the state auditor that the jail trust has already paid for, and then if we have questions about those, we need to bring in that auditing agency and question them. We do have the authority to do that,” Davidsons said.
However, Davidson isn’t sure they have the authority to request this audit.
“When it comes to statute, we have to have it lined out, expressly in statute that we have this authority, and every county commissioner across the state has to abide by that,” he said.
Davidson said they’ll be meeting Monday to find out whether or not they do have the authority to request this audit. He told FOX 25 the Oklahoma County District Attorney’s office reached out to folks with Cindy Byrd’s office and was told the audit would cost $100,000, adding that she’s so swamped that she can’t do it this calendar year.
FOX 25 also reached out to Jason Lowe’s office but they said they have no comment.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma lawmakers vote to rename turnpike in honor of Toby Keith
OKLAHOMA CITY (KSWO) — Oklahoma lawmakers have voted to honor country music artist and Oklahoma native Toby Keith.
House Concurrent Resolution 1019 recognizes Keith’s lasting impact on music and proposes renaming a planned turnpike in his memory.
The concurrent resolution was authored by Rep. Jason Blair, R-Morgan, and Sen. Lisa Standridge, R-Norman.
The planned route will extend from Interstate 44 east to Interstate 35, then continue east and north to I-40 at the Kickapoo Turnpike.
Copyright 2026 KSWO. All rights reserved.
Oklahoma
What could happen if Oklahoma State Superintendent becomes an appointed position
Governor Kevin Stitt has said he wants the State Superintendent of Education to be a governor-elected position instead of an elected one. Political analyst Scott Mitchell examines what this would mean for the state.
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt is urging lawmakers to send a state question to voters that would make the state superintendent an appointed position, as he named Lindel Fields of Tulsa to the role and announced a turnaround team to help implement his education agenda.
Is the State Superintendent an elected role?
Yes, the State Superintendent of Education is still an elected role. Elections are scheduled for Nov. 3, 2026.
Cons of making the superintendent an appointed position
Mitchell said making this position appointed could cause distrust among some Oklahomans
“Over the years, we’ve seen that capture of regulatory sort of is easy to do when you have term limits, then lobbies become more powerful, and they have all the history. It’s very complicated.
He also said if the position were to be elected, they would likely have the same agenda as the governor.
“Yes, and I think the governor would be absolutely saying, ‘Yes, they’re going to do what I want them to do.’”
Changing how the superintendent is chosen changes what the founding fathers set.
“Voters are going to have to say yay or nay if it gets to them, is whether or not we want to change the way that the founding fathers set up the way that we make sure that power is not concentrated in Oklahoma,” he said.
Is Ryan Walters’ term the reason Stitt wants to make this position appointed?
Mitchell said he believes the former State Superintendent played a role in the government wanting to appoint this position.
During his time as superintendent, Walters was known to have multiple controversies. He resigned in 2025, allowing Stitt to appoint Lindel Fields.
“His impact on this, even though he’s gone, is certainly evident,” said Mitchell. “Walters left midstream, right? And so the governor had a chance to appoint someone. Well, it wasn’t just an appointment; it was chaos before and relative calm and competency after. And that has given the governor an opening for people to see with their own eyes. Yeah, you can put somebody in, we’re talking about Lindel Fields, that appears to get up every day, not trying to find some, get a click on social media, but rather to do his job. And across the board, for the most part, this guy’s getting thumbs up.
Stitt said electing Fields has already given him some leverage since he has been well perceived so far.
“That allows a governor to say, Look, I’ve got some standing, some leverage to go to the voters and say, let’s put expertise as the main reason that a person’s there, not because they were able to win an election because they had some sort of populist or dramatic ideas.”
Who is running for Oklahoma State Superintendent?
Republican Ballot
- Sen. Adam Pugh
- John Cox
- Rep. Toni Hasenbeck
- Ana Landsaw
Democrat Ballot
- Craig Mcvay
- Jennettie Marshall
Independent
To learn more about each candidate, click here.
A full breakdown of candidates in the 2026 Oklahoma State Superintendent race, including party affiliation, background and key education priorities.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO3 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology7 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology7 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Politics7 days agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT