Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland woman joins lawsuit against TikTok ban

Published

on

Maryland woman joins lawsuit against TikTok ban


A Maryland woman is among eight content creators who have joined a lawsuit suing the U.S. government, arguing that a new law forcing the sale or ban of the app TikTok violates their First Amendment rights.

Advertisement

Talia Cadet of Capitol Heights, Maryland joined TikTok in March 2020. It wasn’t until 2021 and 2022 when she began creating and posting content on the platform. 

Cadet’s account has amassed nearly 130,000 followers. Her content includes books, Black-owned businesses, and other DMV-related topics.

“On TikTok, there’s just something really different about that platform, where my content took off. Now, I’m a user and content creator on the platform,” Cadet told FOX 5. “I think storytelling is one of the most distinctive features about TikTok. I think another thing people love about TikTok is they have really perfected the algorithm, the ability to curate your own algorithm and see the kind of content you want to see.”

Advertisement

According to the 33-page complaint filed this week, the law is “unconstitutionally overboard” as it “bans an entire medium of communication and all the speech communicated through that medium, even though, at the very least, the vast majority of that speech is protected.”

It was filed about a week after TikTok filed its own lawsuit against the federal government, also citing constitutional concerns over free speech.

Advertisement

“Other than the threats to our livelihood and the communities we built, and we fostered, I think what’s really scary is what is a violation of our First Amendment rights. That’s the concerning part,” Cadet said. “The government is essentially telling us what platform we can use, how and with whom we can communicate.”

The law, formally known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, was signed by President Biden in April. 

There was bipartisan support behind the move to ban the app from the U.S. market if its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, does not divest it. 

Advertisement

Those who supported the legislation have long expressed concerns that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over data on the roughly 170 million Americans who use TikTok – a concern stemming from a set of Chinese national security laws that compel organizations to assist with intelligence gathering.

The eight content creators who are a part of the latest lawsuit filed this week in a U.S. Court of Appeals court in D.C., represent different backgrounds in terms of content and home states.

Advertisement

Michael Carroll, a professor of law at American University, said there is some validity to the plaintiff’s claims.

“When we think about this lawsuit, it’s a bit derivative, right? The law is directed at TikTok’s ownership structure, but it does have the consequences of…if you don’t change that ownership structure, then the app will become unavailable,” Carroll said. “A lot of the claim is, you’re really targeting our speech. It’s only on TikTok we can effectively communicate. We have tried Facebook, and Instagram, our followers are much, much more fewer.”

Advertisement

Carroll said while there is no definitive deadline for the court to respond, the court likely recognizes there is attention on this topic. He told FOX 5, there could be some elements of urgency under consideration.

In a statement Friday, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice said the legislation addresses national security in a manner that is consistent with the First Amendment. The DOJ looks forward to defending the legislation in court, a statement read in part.

“Alongside others in our intelligence community and in Congress, the Justice Department has consistently warned about the threat of autocratic nations who can weaponize technology – such as the apps and software that run on our phones – to use against us. This threat is compounded because those autocratic nations regularly force companies under their control to turn over sensitive data to the government in secret,” a statement to FOX 5 read.

Advertisement

Check out the full lawsuit below: 



Source link

Maryland

4 takeaways from Michigan Basketball’s 101-83 win at Maryland

Published

on

4 takeaways from Michigan Basketball’s 101-83 win at Maryland


It wasn’t a 40-point win like the Michigan Wolverines have been used to, but they put together a strong second half to take down the Maryland Terrapins, 101-83, on the road Saturday night.

The Wolverines haven’t had a true road test in over a month, and it took 30 minutes to shake off the dust. While Maryland had a strong night from the three-point line to flirt with an upset, Michigan stuck to its game plan and went on a run in the final 10 minutes of the contest to win the game.

There is a lot to unpack, so here are four takeaways:

David “Diggi” Coit legacy first half

Advertisement

The Terrapins gave Michigan its first deficit going into halftime this season, and it can be largely thanks to point guard David “Diggi” Coit. The Northern Illinois and Kansas transfer was on another level in the first half, scoring 22 points on 7-for-13 shooting, including six makes from three.

Coit wasn’t just sitting in the corner either. He was creating his own shot from everywhere on the hardwood, going up against Michigan’s Elliot Cadeau, Yaxel Lendeborg, and even hitting one in the face of Morez Johnson Jr., all of whom are taller than the graduate transfer.

He continued his hot streak to start the second half, but eventually cooled off and finished with 31 points. It was a remarkable showing, and it should be a good sign for the Terrapins going forward if he can produce every night like Saturday.

As for Michigan, it was a good test to face a player who could not miss for a half, and learn how to adjust at halftime to take away the threat. It will happen again, and as Dusty May always says, it is better for it to happen now than in March.

Michigan hasn’t played a close game since Nov. 14. Its reserve players have seen a ton of action, but it came at the expense of the Wolverines having to put games away at a consistent rate. While Maryland put the pressure on Michigan for 30 minutes, the final 10 are what gives May confidence in a potential national championship for this team.

Advertisement

The Wolverines shot 8-for-10 from the field to balloon their lead from five to 15 in a matter of minutes. It was an uncomfortable, yet promising finish for the Wolverines.

When many top teams would start forcing shots, Michigan continue to attack the paint and get the ball in the hands of its go-to players, capitalizing on a Maryland cold streak to go from a deficit to a double-digit lead late in the game.

There are a lot of talented teams on Michigan’s schedule, and there will be a few more matchups with spunky teams like Maryland that will force the Wolverines to lock in. They passed this test and can rest easy as they face some lighter non-conference opponents before the New Year.

When Michigan has needed a spark since its tournament in Las Vegas, the Wolverines have turned to their top transfer portal get — Yaxel Lendeborg. He led Michigan scorers with 13 points in the first half, but coming out of halftime down seven points, he was on a whole other level. Lendeborg put the ball in his own hands with 20 minutes to go, scoring 10 straight points to start the second, bringing Michigan within one point.

As Maryland continued to keep pace, Lendeborg would not let up and put together seven more points to get to 29 points for the night and 16 for the half with 11 minutes still to go.

Advertisement

When Maryland started double-teaming Lendeborg, he started spreading the wealth and giving his teammates open-opportunities. Elliot Cadeau knocked down a couple of shots, L.J. Cason made back-to-back threes and Mara was putting on a show with reverse dunks and alley-oops. Before long, Michigan held a 15-point lead.

While it was tough-sledding for most of the team in College Park, Michigan showed it only needed a couple of guys to be in rhythm to keep pace and even lead opponents who were having their best shooting night.

Michigan continued dominance in the paint

You can try to beat Michigan with the three-ball, but it is going to be very hard to claim ultimate victory if you can’t stop it in the paint. The Terps shot 55 percent from behind the arc in the first half and 48 percent in the second half, but Michigan didn’t mess around down low in the paint.

The Wolverines dominated Maryland, 20-10, in the paint in the first half, and put on an even stronger showing in the second with 24 points down low. It didn’t help that Maryland best front court player, Pharrel Payne, went down with a knee injury in the first half. As a result, Michigan quietly continued to grow its lead when the Terps’ threes stopped falling.

Advertisement

Between Mara, Will Tschetter, Johnson and Lendeborg, the options are limitless for the Wolverines in the post.

After gritting it out to stay undefeated, Michigan heads back home and will get a week off before facing La Salle on Sunday, Dec. 21 (4 p.m., BTN).



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland HOA holiday lights dispute highlights what homeowners can and can’t do

Published

on

Maryland HOA holiday lights dispute highlights what homeowners can and can’t do


A Maryland family’s ongoing battle with their homeowners’ association over a Christmas light display has reignited a broader conversation about how much control HOAs can legally exercise over holiday decorations.

7News has been following the case, in which the family continues to face fines from their HOA over their holiday lights.

To better under how homeowner associations operate and what options residents may have, 7News spoke with Alfredo Vásquez, a Washington, D.C.-based homeowner defense attorney.

RELATED COVERAGE | HOA vs. Christmas decorations: Maryland family facing hundreds in fines for lights

Advertisement

Why HOAs often cite holiday decorations

According to Vásquez, disputes over holiday decorations are common, but they usually center on timing rather than style.

“It may vary by community or HOA,” Vásquez said. “The most common reason would be that residents put decorations up too early or take them down too late.”

He explained that most HOA governing documents regulate how long decorations can remain on display, outlining specific start and end dates of holiday decor.

Are there rules on lights, music, or colors?

While many homeowners wonder whether HOAs can ban flashing lights, colored bulbs, or loud holiday music, Vásquez said those restrictions are less common.

“I haven’t seen any restrictions that are specific in that way,” he said. “Most governing documents I’ve reviewed focus on whether lights or music interfere with a neighbor’s lot.”

Advertisement

In other words, enforcement is often tied to nuisance complaints rather than aesthetics.

What if homeowners feel targeted?

Vásquez emphasized that HOA boards are legally required to enforce rules consistently.

“The Board of Directors has a duty to implement regulations in an equitable manner across the entire community,” he said.

If homeowners believe they are being unfairly singled out, the first step is reviewing the HOA’s governing documents to confirm whether the association actually has authority to regulate the issue at hand.

MORE COVERAGE | HOA still not specifying ‘nuisance’ in Germantown, Md. family’s Christmas decorations

Advertisement

Can issues be resolved without going to court?

Yes, and in most cases, that’s the recommended path.

HOAs must follow state condo and HOA laws, which typically require formal processes for enforcement, including notices of violations and opportunities for hearings.

“It would be ideal for homeowners to act quickly and request a hearing with the board,” Vásquez said. “They should present their case and allow the board to decide whether the violation and fines can withstand scrutiny.”

Do homeowners have any recourse after signing HOA bylaws?

Once a homeowner buys into an HOA-regulated community, they are generally bound by its bylaws, Vásquez said.

“As long as those bylaws comply with federal and state laws, homeowners’ hands may be tied,” he explained.

Advertisement

However, bylaws can be changed, usually through a supermajority vote of the community. Homeowners may also have stronger grounds to challenge newly adopted amendments, as long as they act promptly.

Vásquez added that staying engaged in HOA meetings and decisions is critical.

“Homeowners have to pay attention to what’s going on in their community so they can challenge changes in a timely manner,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Attempted traffic stop leads to arrest of Maryland man wanted for kidnapping

Published

on

Attempted traffic stop leads to arrest of Maryland man wanted for kidnapping


Frederick County Sheriff’s Office (FCSO) announced the arrest of a man wanted for kidnapping on Thursday afternoon.

Suba Washington Jr., 27, of Williamsport, Maryland, was apprehended in Frederick after an attempted traffic stop early Thursday morning, according to deputies. 

The pursuit

When officers tried to pull over a Hyundai Elantra in the 7300 block of Crestwood Blvd., the driver, later identified as Washington, refused to stop. 

Deputies were later notified that Washington was wanted on charges of kidnapping, first-degree assault, second-degree assault, and reckless endangerment in Washington County, Maryland.

Advertisement

As Washington fled northbound on Route 85, he struck a car near Crestwood Blvd. and Buckeystown Pike; however, the driver of the vehicle was unharmed as the suspect continued onto northbound I-270 and then westbound I-70.

Washington’s tires were eventually flattened after deputies deployed stop sticks near the Middletown exit. 

Though the pursuit still wasn’t over, as the vehicle managed to cross over into Washington County, where the Washington County Sheriff’s Office (WCSO) and Maryland State Police (MSP) aided in apprehension.

Washington was taken into custody after his vehicle approached the Route 40 exit, coming to a full stop on the highway. 

The charges

A 17-year-old in the passenger seat was found with Washington during the pursuit. The teenager was released to WSCO.

Advertisement

According to FCSO, Washington Jr. was taken to the Frederick County Adult Detention Center and charged with numerous traffic citations, including reckless driving, negligent driving, and two counts of attempting to elude law enforcement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending