Connect with us

News

Mexico’s presidential frontrunner defends sweeping legal reforms

Published

on

Mexico’s presidential frontrunner defends sweeping legal reforms

The frontrunner in Mexico’s presidential election has defended a proposed constitutional overhaul as business-friendly, arguing that popular votes for top judges will enhance democracy.

Investors “have nothing to worry about”, Claudia Sheinbaum, 61, told the Financial Times while being driven between campaign rallies in the capital in a modest Chevrolet family saloon, as well-wishers pressed against the windows to offer flowers ahead of elections next month.

Proposals by leftist President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, of whom Sheinbaum is a close ally, to open up the choice of top election officials and supreme court judges to a popular vote as part of the overhaul have sparked concerns about the rule of law in Mexico.

But Sheinbaum maintained: “What we want is more democracy in the country. And their investments will be guaranteed.”

Sheinbaum, who holds a commanding lead in the polls, has pledged to continue López Obrador’s “transformation” of Mexico with the aim of bringing greater social justice, improving public services and burying a “neoliberal” economic model that she says brought “atrocious poverty and inequality”.

Advertisement

The proposal to amend the constitution to let the public vote for supreme court justices and election commissioners has been one of López Obrador’s most contentious reforms, and his alliance lacked the two-thirds majority needed to pass it in the last congress. His Morena party hopes to try again after the June elections, which also include a vote for a new congress.

Only one country, socialist Bolivia, currently elects supreme court judges, according to the Federal Judicial Center.

The opposition believes the changes would destroy Mexico’s judicial independence, and investors have privately expressed concerns about risks to the rule of law. But Sheinbaum said institutional reforms were needed because the supreme court had “acted politically, not in terms of justice”.

Asked whether she believes in checks and balances, a major concern for civil rights groups and investors, she said: “I believe in freedom. I believe in democracy. And that the people should decide.”

Mexico will almost certainly elect its first female president on June 2. Most polls give Sheinbaum, who cut her teeth in student politics and later served as mayor of Mexico City, a double-digit lead over the main opposition candidate, entrepreneur-turned-politician Xóchitl Gálvez.

Advertisement
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s party has upended Mexican politics since his landslide presidential victory in 2018 © Rashide Frias/AFP/Getty Images

A skilful communicator with an instinctive popular touch, López Obrador — who is standing down after a single six-year term in line with Mexico’s constitution — has greatly expanded welfare programmes and more than doubled the minimum wage. Those measures reduced poverty and inequality, and won him enduring support among Mexico’s less fortunate.

At the same time, the president will hand his successor Mexico’s biggest fiscal deficit since the 1980s, having abandoned austerity in his final year in office. But Sheinbaum played down the gap, projected at 5.9 per cent of GDP this year, as a temporary blip.

“This is a one-year deficit because all the president’s strategic infrastructure projects are being paid for. Next year that will reduce significantly,” she said.

Sheinbaum believes there is scope to raise revenues further through better enforcement and technology. Pressed on whether her flagship promises of better education, health and infrastructure would require higher taxation, she replied “yes” before quickly adding: “But we’re not thinking about it in the first instance. We don’t want to propose a deep fiscal reform until we’ve really looked things over when we take office.”

Mexico’s economy has been transformed over 30 years by its free trade agreement with the US and Canada, and Sheinbaum is keen not to rock the boat, especially when US companies are considering moving production from China to countries such as Mexico.

Advertisement

“We need to take advantage of the opportunity the trade agreement with the United States and Canada gives us,” she said.

However, she wants the government to take a more active role in planning economic development to ensure that investment reaches poorer regions and that Mexico adds value to manufactured products rather than simply assembling components.

“You can’t just put any kind of company in any place, because different territories have different vocations, especially when it comes to natural resources like water,” she said. “We don’t think investment should just create jobs per se. We believe in well-paid jobs, and jobs with wellbeing.”

Beijing has made big inroads in Latin America this century, displacing the US as the biggest trading partner in most of South America, but Sheinbaum is clear where Mexico’s priorities lie. “We don’t have a free trade agreement with China and I don’t think we should have one,” she said.

With the US election later this year, the candidates are preparing for the possible return of former president Donald Trump, who has lambasted Mexico over trade, migration and fentanyl. Sheinbaum insisted the relationship would be “good”, even if Trump wins.

Advertisement

She spoke to the Financial Times after a rally in Coyoacán, a middle-class area in the capital’s south, where she gave an assured speech in blazing midday sun.

Recalling Mexico’s defeat of the invading French army in 1862, she painted her Morena party as the heirs of the patriots who defended their country. She denounced the opposition as the corrupt heirs of the traitors who invited a foreign emperor to govern them.

Mexican army personnel in Ciudad Juarez
Mexican army personnel arrive in Ciudad Juarez to reinforce security at the airport. López Obrador has called in the armed forces to perform tasks traditionally handled by civilians, such as building train lines and running airports © Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters

“What does Coyoacán want? Transformation or corruption? . . . Patriotism or subservience?” she asked the crowd, who chanted “Presidenta! Presidenta!”

López Obrador’s party has upended Mexican politics since his landslide presidential victory in 2018. It now controls two-thirds of state governorships and, with its allies, holds majorities in both houses of congress. This political dominance worries opponents, who recall that Mexico was ruled by a single party for 71 years until 2000.

Juanita Goebertus, Americas director at Human Rights Watch, said Morena’s proposals threatened judicial independence. “It would make it much easier for any political party that’s in government to control the nomination of judges,” she said.

Mexico is a key exporter of cocaine and fentanyl to the US and the country has become a battleground for rival cartels. Polls show security is a top voter concern but Sheinbaum believes she can bring down violent crime by deploying methods she used as mayor in the capital.

Advertisement

“We need to strengthen [the policy of] zero impunity in our country. It doesn’t matter who commits murder, murder has to be punished by the law.” She dismissed the opposition’s calls for head-on confrontation with the cartels, saying that in the past they gave security forces a “licence to kill” innocent civilians.

“Our vision is the construction of peace,” she said.

López Obrador has replaced the federal police with a new 130,000-strong National Guard run by the military, and has called in the armed forces to perform tasks traditionally handled by civilians, such as building train lines and running airports, ports and the customs service.

Sheinbaum says she is comfortable with the strategy because the military ultimately answers to the president.

“Maybe people don’t understand it from the outside, but it’s not militarisation,” she said. “The Mexican army comes from the Mexican revolution, it comes from a social revolution, it doesn’t come from the elites.”

Advertisement

A climate change expert with a doctorate in environmental engineering, Sheinbaum wants to accelerate Mexico’s transition to clean energy, using minority private investment with the state in the driving seat. “I dedicated my whole life, before my public life, to climate change. So obviously when we take office we’re going to push it,” she said.

Famously disciplined, Sheinbaum is keen to make clear that while she has been a loyal disciple of López Obrador during her ascent to power, she will govern in her own style.

Although Mexico has “historically been characterised by very strong machismo”, Sheinbaum believes her probable victory is proof that this is changing.

“I think machismo is being left behind . . . Otherwise, a female president would be unthinkable.”

Advertisement

News

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

Published

on

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

President Trump announced a three-week extension of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon that had been set to expire in a few days, after hosting a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats at the White House on Thursday.

Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that has been attacking Israel from southern Lebanon, did not have representatives at the meeting and did not immediately comment on the announcement. The prime minister of Israel and the president of Lebanon also did not comment.

A successful peace agreement would hinge upon Hezbollah halting attacks, which Lebanon’s government has little power to enforce because it does not control the militia. Lebanon’s military has mostly stayed out of the fighting and is not at war with Israel.

The cease-fire, which was scheduled to end on April 26, would last until May 17 if it takes effect as Mr. Trump described it. Before the cease-fire was brokered last week, nearly 2,300 people were killed in Lebanon and 13 in Israel. Since then, the number of Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah attacks have been dramatically reduced, though the two sides have continued exchanging fire.

The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Nada Hamadeh, credited Mr. Trump for extending the cease-fire, saying that “with your help and support, we can make Lebanon great again.” Mr. Trump replied, “I like that phrase, it’s a good phrase.”

Advertisement

Asked about the potential of a lasting peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, Mr. Trump said that “I think there’s a great chance. They are friends about the same things and they are enemies on the same things.”

But Lebanon and Israel have periodically been at war since Israel’s founding in 1948. Israel has invaded Lebanon for the fifth time since 1978, incursions that have destabilized the country and the delicate balance of power between Muslim, Christian and Druze communities.

In the hours before the president’s announcement on social media, Israel and Hezbollah were trading attacks in southern Lebanon, testing the existing cease-fire.

Mr. Trump said the meeting at the White House had been attended by high-ranking U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the U.S. ambassadors to Israel and Lebanon.

Earlier on Thursday, an Israeli strike near the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh killed three people, according to Lebanon’s health ministry. Hezbollah claimed three separate attacks on Israeli troops who are occupying southern Lebanon, though none were wounded or killed.

Advertisement

Hezbollah set off the latest round of fighting last month by attacking Israel soon after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran. Israel responded to Hezbollah’s attacks by launching airstrikes across Lebanon and widening a ground invasion of the country’s south.

Continue Reading

News

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Published

on

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Smoke rises from Port of La Guaira in Venezuela on Jan. 3, 2026 after U.S. forces seized the country’s president, Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images

Federal prosecutors on Thursday unsealed an indictment against a U.S. Army soldier, accusing him of using his insider knowledge of the clandestine military operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January to reap more than $400,000 in profits on the popular prediction market site Polymarket.

The Justice Department says Gannon Ken Van Dyke, 38, who was stationed at Fort Bragg, in North Carolina, was part of the team that planned and carried out the predawn raid in Caracas earlier this year that resulted in the apprehension of Maduro.

The Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed the actions against Van Dyke, the first time U.S. officials have leveled criminal charges against someone over prediction market wagers.

Advertisement

According to the indictment, Van Dyke now faces counts of wire fraud, commodities fraud, misusing non-public government information and other charges.

Trading under numerous usernames including “Burdensome-Mix,” Van Dyke allegedly traded about $32,000 on the arrest of Maduro, resulting in profits exceeding $400,000.

“Prediction markets are not a haven for using misappropriated confidential or classified information for personal gain,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Those entrusted to safeguard our nation’s secrets have a duty to protect them and our armed service members, and not to use that information for personal financial gain.”

Van Dyke’s defense lawyer is not yet publicly known. Polymarket did not return a request for comment.

The charges against Van Dyke come at a sensitive time for the prediction market industry, which has been growing exponentially, despite calls in Washington and among state leaders for the sites to be reined in.

Advertisement

Van Dyke is the first to be charged in the U.S. for suspected Polymarket insider trading, but Israeli authorities in February arrested several people and charged two on suspicion of using classified information to place bets about military operations in Iran on Polymarket.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

Published

on

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

The Senate early Thursday morning adopted a Republican budget blueprint that would pave the way for a $70 billion increase for immigration enforcement and the eventual reopening of the Department of Homeland Security.

Republicans pushed through the plan on a nearly party-line vote of 50 to 48. It came after an overnight marathon of rapid-fire votes, known as a vote-a-rama, in which the G.O.P. beat back a series of Democratic proposals aimed at addressing the high cost of health care, housing, food and energy. The debate put the two parties’ dueling messages on vivid display six months before the midterm elections.

Republicans, who are using the budget plan to lay the groundwork to eventually push through a filibuster-proof bill providing a multiyear funding stream for President Trump’s immigration crackdown, used the all-night session to highlight their hard-line stance on border security, seeking to portray Democrats as unwilling to safeguard the country.

Democrats tried and failed to add a series of changes aimed at addressing cost-of-living issues, seizing the opportunity to hammer Republicans as out of touch with and unwilling to act on the concerns of everyday Americans.

Here’s what to know about the budget plan and the nocturnal ritual senators engaged in before adopting it.

Advertisement

The budget blueprint is a crucial piece of Republicans’ plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security and end a shutdown that has lasted for more than two months. After Democrats refused to fund immigration enforcement without new restrictions on agents’ tactics and conduct, the G.O.P. struck a deal with them to pass a spending bill that would fund everything but ICE and the Border Patrol. Republicans said they would fund those agencies through a special budget bill that Democrats could not block.

“We can fix this with Republican votes, and we will,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and the Budget Committee chairman. “Every Democrat has opposed money for the Border Patrol and ICE at a time of great peril.”

In resorting to a new budget blueprint, Republicans laid the groundwork to deny Democrats a chance to stop the immigration enforcement funding. But they also submitted themselves to a vote-a-rama, in which any senator can propose unlimited changes to such a measure before it is adopted.

The budget measure now goes to the House, which must adopt it before lawmakers in both chambers can draft the legislation funding immigration enforcement. That bill will provide yet another opportunity for a vote-a-rama even closer to the November election.

Democrats took to the floor to criticize Republicans for supercharging funding for federal immigration enforcement rather than moving legislation that would address Americans’ concerns over affordability.

Advertisement

“This is what Republicans are fighting for,” said Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the Democratic leader. “To maintain two unchecked rogue agencies that are dreaded in all corners of this country instead of reducing your health care costs, your housing costs, your grocery costs, your gas costs.”

Democrats offered a host of amendments along those lines, all of which were defeated by Republicans — and that was the point. The proposals were meant to put the G.O.P. in a tough political spot, showcasing their opposition to helping Americans afford high living costs. Fewer than a handful of G.O.P. senators crossed party lines to support them.

The G.O.P. thwarted an effort by Mr. Schumer to require that the budget measure lower out-of-pocket health care costs for Americans. Two Republicans who are up for re-election this year, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, voted with Democrats, but the proposal was still defeated.

Republicans also squelched a move by Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Democrat of New Mexico, to create a fund that would lower grocery costs and reverse cuts to food aid programs that Republicans enacted last year. Ms. Collins and Mr. Sullivan again joined Democrats.

Also defeated by the G.O.P.: a proposal by Senator John Hickenlooper, Democrat of Colorado, to address rising consumer prices brought on by Mr. Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran; one by Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, to require the budget measure to address rising electricity prices, and another by Mr. Markey to create a fund to bring down housing costs.

Advertisement

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat who is up for re-election in Georgia, also sought to add language requiring the budget plan to address health insurance companies denying or delaying access to care, but that, too was blocked by Republicans.

While Republicans had fewer proposals for changes to their own budget plan, they also sought to offer measures that would underscore their aggressive stance on immigration enforcement and dare Democrats to vote against them.

Mr. Graham offered an amendment to allocate funds toward a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to the apprehension and deportation of adult immigrants convicted of rape, murder, or sexual abuse of a minor after illegally entering the United States. It passed unanimously.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, sought to bar Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood, which provides abortion and other services, and criticized the organization for providing transgender care to minors. Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, also attempted to tack on the G.O.P. voter identification bill, known as the SAVE America Act. Both proposals were blocked when Democrats, joined by a few Republicans, voted to strike them as unrelated to the budget plan.

The Republicans who crossed party lines to oppose their own party’s proposals for new voting requirements were Ms. Collins along with Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Advertisement

Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski also opposed the effort to block payments to Planned Parenthood.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending