After finally evicting a contractor-turned-squatter from their new home, a pair of Texas homeowners said that law enforcement made them feel like wrongdoers throughout their two-month ordeal.

Yudith Matthews and Abram Mendez, who bought the San Antonio home to accommodate their growing family, said they are “relieved” that the contractor has finally cleared out the last of his things. On Wednesday night, their family got together to secure and board up their new home to ensure the squatter — or other potential intruders — didn’t sneak back inside. 

Until this week’s long-fought victory, they said they felt “powerless” amid a legal system that “takes advantage of homeowners… and the working class” over “entitled” squatters — even, they said, when their safety was jeopardized.

“If I [tried] to protect my house, I [would] get arrested,” Matthews told Fox News Digital. “Your heart is about to jump out of your chest. You’re concerned, you don’t sleep. What else is going to happen? How much damage is he going to do?”

TEXAS HOMEOWNERS FURIOUS AFTER SQUATTER REFUSES TO LEAVE PROPERTY, POLICE WON’T REMOVE HIM: ‘TRUST NO ONE’

Other than “unloading some materials,” Matthews and Mendez told Fox News Digital the handyman never completed any of the work he was hired to do. 

The married couple said they have incurred about $17,000 in damages, utilities and court fees, clearing out the “last actual dollars” in their account. The squatter allegedly destroyed new plumbing work in their garage, barbecued inside with a propane tank, sprayed mahogany cabinets with a bleach mixture, smoked and urinated indoors and broke doors and molding throughout the house to facilitate his legal entry and exit. 

The couple said they fell in love with the seven-bedroom, three-bathroom home in a peaceful neighborhood and purchased it in November. They couldn’t wrap their heads around why someone would “destroy it” needlessly.

TEXAS HOMEOWNERS CONFRONT SQUATTERS, SAY POLICE WON’T HELP

“Out of spite? To someone you don’t even know? Are you taking the world’s anger out on one person? [Is it] because they don’t need to pay? They just walk away and they are not responsible,” Matthews said.

Allegedly, their squatter bought a blender to leave running throughout the day during his unwanted stay and intentionally turned off their new freezer, letting meat and broken eggs spoil inside. Matthews and Mendez were ordered to restore electricity and water to the home and pay fines after, they claim, the squatter and his female accomplice stole water and electricity. 

Even obtaining a writ of possession — a formal document that a property owner posts on their door to inform a tenant or squatter that they must leave in 24 hours or be removed by force by police — cost an additional $300. 

HOMEOWNERS SCORE VICTORY AGAINST SQUATTERS IN NEW YORK AFTER LANDLORD HANDCUFFED IN $1M HOME HEIST

“All they care about is bail money, all they care about is bond money, all they care about is fees — they were ‘feeing’ us to death,” Mendez, a father of three, told Fox News Digital. “As long as the squatter is off the street and in someone’s home, that’s going to generate revenue — lawyer’s fees, other things that will stimulate the local economy. But it’s all footed by a taxpaying homeowner who’s worked hard, who has little income or some equity where the best case is to flip it.”

If the contractor had paid a fee and appealed the judge’s decision, they said, their ordeal could have persisted past this week. But by a “stroke of luck,” they said, he was late to a Tuesday court hearing and narrowly missed the window.

The contractor, a man in his forties who the couple said has gout, had asked to stay on a couch inside the house. When they realized he had amassed an alarming number of possessions inside, they called the San Antonio Police Department. 

BLUE STATE SQUATTERS PUT ON NOTICE WITH ‘AGGRESSIVE’ LAW AND ORDER BILL: ‘PEOPLE ARE GETTING KILLED’

He had not stayed in the home for the requisite 30 days to be considered a squatter under Texas property law when police were first called to the property on Feb. 29, but the couple claim officers made no efforts to verify his opposing account, or even check his identification. 

“[The squatter] said, ‘No, I live here’ and the police said right away, ‘You’re the resident, you have the right to live here,’” Mendez recalled. “The police came so many times, we have him red-handed, we might have him on video, but police just walk away and say it’s a civil matter.”

“That’s a cop out,” Mendez said. “Police are entitling these people to a right they’re not entitled to… they don’t quite care because they know the lieutenant is going to cover them, they don’t want to write a report.”

The couple said they have filed complaints with the San Antonio Police Department after one encounter where an officer allegedly raised his voice, saying that he “didn’t have time to deal with this.”

“You feel so disappointed, you don’t even bother calling the police when they treat you like you are a criminal,” Matthews said.

Previously, footage of the couple confronting their squatter as he entered the home through a propped window was aired on “FOX & Friends.” After that encounter, the couple were prohibited from entering the home. 

From that point on, the legal process and surveying the property became a full-time job.

“My husband did runs around the house, [we are] taking turns to supervise the property,” Matthews said. “[The squatter] took from us family time, so many events, so many fun things that we do with the kids on the weekend… it’s very unfair. Our kids, they get really stressed.” 

After serving seven years as an intelligence officer in the Navy, many of them on active duty tours in Asia, Afghanistan and Iraq, Mendez is fortunate enough to be retired. He couldn’t have managed the nightmare otherwise, he said. 

“How do families where mom and dad have to work — what a nightmare,” Matthews remarked. “Imagine a family who are working 9-5 by themselves with zero support, dealing with this type of thing.”

In one of dozens of visits San Antonio police made to the property, per records provided by the department, the couple claimed the squatter flashed a knife at them. Matthews and Mendez say arriving police “kicked the knife into a corner” and “told him he had a right” to the weapon as a tenant in the house. 

Matthews claims he shined high-wattage flashlights in her face and even threatened to spray her with bleach in one of their many clashes. 

“We are fighting, risking our lives because we don’t get protection from the police, the government, anyone,” she told Fox News Digital. “We saved up enough money, we’re in our mid-forties, we’re focusing on our home and now someone is stealing hard-earned decades of money from us for their laziness. That’s it, they’re lazy.”

“We saved up enough money, we’re in our mid-forties, we’re focusing on our home and now someone is stealing hard-earned decades of money from us for their laziness.”

— Yudith Matthews

Officer Ricardo Guzman of the SAPD told Fox News Digital that law enforcement’s “hands are tied” in these situations.

“A big thing about these squatting things, the hard part on us is the squatter’s rights. Once they move in and they have property, even if it’s an abandoned building, that’s their property,” he told Fox News Digital. “There are laws preventing us from grabbing their property and throwing them out. That’s where it becomes a civil matter, the owner will have to go through the eviction process.”

Although the worst is over for the couple, they are still in the process of obtaining a restraining order against their squatter and inventorying damage and stolen items, they said.

“The law did not work for us,” Mendez said. “It eventually worked for us — but after a month of what bills, what losses. [Now] that’s more elbow grease, more sanding, more painting — time eaten up by a squatter who has nothing to lose because the police entitled him by saying, ‘You have a right to stay there.’”

Fox News Digital could not reach the squatter, or an attorney who had represented him in previous criminal court cases, for comment.