Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin mailbag: How did O-line become a question mark? Where will Badgers be better?

Published

on

Wisconsin mailbag: How did O-line become a question mark? Where will Badgers be better?


MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin is one-third of the way through its 15 spring football practices. You had questions for the Badgers mailbag about where things stood for the program on multiple fronts. Here are the answers:

It sounds like OL depth is a concern. How did we get here? For the past few years, everyone was concerned that there wouldn’t be enough reps to go around because there was a backlog of four- and five-star guys on the second and third teams. How did things swing so drastically in the other direction? John H.

The biggest reason Wisconsin finds itself in this position is because two of the players you’re talking about — Nolan Rucci and Trey Wedig — transferred, as did reserve lineman Dylan Barrett. Michael Furtney, who started all 13 games at right guard last season, used up his eligibility, and Tanor Bortolini left early for the NFL.

Wedig, in particular, was a tough loss because he started eight games in 2022 (five at right tackle, two at right guard and one at left guard) but had a substantially diminished role last season and moved on to Indiana. Rucci was the backup left tackle to Jack Nelson, and there likely weren’t going to be more opportunities for Rucci this season with Nelson returning. That’s why Rucci is now at Penn State, where he’s competing for the starting right tackle job.

Advertisement
The Pulse Newsletter

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox. Sign up

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox. Sign up

BuyBuy The Pulse Newsletter

In a hypothetical world where those guys stayed, then Wisconsin would have 15 scholarship offensive linemen and at least a couple of veterans in the second group. Wisconsin did not add an offensive lineman during the first transfer portal window, but the Badgers did sign five offensive linemen in the 2024 class.

What we’ve seen during the first five practices is a group working with the first-team offense that has good experience and talent: Jack Nelson, Joe Brunner, Jake Renfro, Joe Huber and Riley Mahlman. All those players other than Brunner started in the bowl game. What coaches have to figure out is how to handle the backup spots in the event of an injury because all the other offensive linemen have played a total of 33 snaps on the O-line, according to Pro Football Focus: 27 for JP Benzschawel and six for Barrett Nelson.

It’s worth pointing out that three of the signed offensive linemen — Derek Jensen, Ryan Cory and Emerson Mandell — won’t be on campus until the summer and Barrett Nelson has been sidelined this spring with an injury. Those absences have drastically impacted what the depth chart looks like, with six non-scholarship players working in the second and third units, including two players on the third team who weren’t listed on the initial spring practice roster.

Advertisement

During practice Tuesday, Wisconsin mixed up some of its offensive line rotations with the top unit. Brunner took snaps at left tackle and right tackle, which allowed Benzschawel to move up and play left guard. Huber also earned snaps at center in place of Renfro as the Badgers look for a capable backup to Renfro for next season. The second-team unit often has consisted of freshman early enrollee Kevin Heywood at left tackle, redshirt freshman James Durand at left guard, walk-on Kerry Kodanko at center, Benzschawel at right guard and walk-on Peyton Lange at right tackle.

“We’re just making sure that we build the depth there because we lost quite a bit with some of those guys that left and transferred that were really guys that were going to compete to play and to start,” Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell said after practice Tuesday.

I think the loss of Renfro last year was an underappreciated factor in the underperformance of our passing game. What can you tell us about the development of a No. 2 “true” center (including incoming freshmen)? Jay B.

If the season began tomorrow and Renfro was unavailable, my sense is Wisconsin would simply shuffle around its top offensive line group by moving Huber to center and elevating Benzschawel at right guard. Huber can play every position along the offensive line. He started 12 games at right tackle for Cincinnati in 2022 and 13 games at left guard for Wisconsin last season, where he did not allow a sack over 475 pressure opportunities.

The other centers have been Kodanko working with the second group and freshman early enrollee Colin Cubberly working with the third group. Although Durand was a reserve center last season, coaches have him playing guard this spring. Cory, a three-star signee from Pennsylvania, is an interior lineman who could earn snaps at the position during preseason practices as well.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What I learned at Wisconsin practice: New wrinkles, impact transfers, QB battle and more

Any true freshman early enrollees standing out in practices or getting more opportunities? I know it is early in spring camp, but curious what these new recruits look like and if any are trending toward moving up the depth chart when fall camp rolls around. CJ H.

It’s too early to say whether any of the early enrollees will carve out a significant role, but a few of them have caught my eye at this stage. Heywood playing left tackle with the second-team offense is, in part, due to the lack of experience behind the top group. But it also speaks to his talent as a four-star prospect and the No. 6 offensive tackle in the country, per the 247Sports Composite.

When Fickell was asked for his thoughts on some of the early enrollees dipping their toes in the water this spring, he immediately went to the offensive line.

“Well, the O-linemen have not dipped into the water,” Fickell said. “They’ve been thrown into the water and those guys, a lot of that is baptism by fire. They’re in there with the twos and they’re seeing Leon Lowery on the edge and they’re seeing John Pius on the edge and Darryl Peterson. They’re not guys that are maybe seeing some three work.”

Advertisement

A couple of early enrollees who have impressed me while working with the reserves are outside linebacker Thomas Heiberger and slot receiver Kyan Berry-Johnson. Heiberger’s athletic frame and instincts have allowed him to make a handful of plays, and Berry-Johnson caught a deep pass down the field from quarterback Mabrey Mettauer on Tuesday. Mettauer has earned some good work with the third-team unit as he learns the offense.

“That life as an early enrollee freshman is tough,” Badgers quarterback Braedyn Locke said. “I lived it. Most guys have. I think that he’s constantly trying to get his feet underneath him a little bit. I think he’s doing a good job. I think he cares a lot. I think he loves football and I think when you’re young, that’s what’s important.”

Any thoughts on whether we’ll make it past the spring transfer portal window with our current QB room intact? Martin P.

I don’t envision Wisconsin losing any of its quarterbacks during the spring transfer portal window, though I’m obviously not inside the head of any player on the roster. Tyler Van Dyke and Braedyn Locke are competing for the starting job. Mabrey Mettauer was the first Class of 2024 prospect to commit under the new coaching staff and just got here.

The other two quarterbacks on scholarship are Nick Evers and Cole LaCrue. There has been a lot of talk this spring about how much progress Evers has made in one year with his knowledge and execution of the offense. He gives Wisconsin a totally different dynamic with his running ability, though he still appears to have plenty of ground to make up to compete on Van Dyke and Locke’s level.

Advertisement

I’m not sure where LaCrue fits into the future plans at quarterback, but the staff liked him enough to want him even though he committed before the new coaches came on board. LaCrue is not practicing this spring and posted on his X account that he had undergone two surgeries in two years, so he’s in the process of rehabbing his way back.


Bryson Green had 105 yards and a TD in the ReliaQuest Bowl. (Matt Pendleton / USA Today)

With so many things going wrong on offense last season (Tanner Mordecai injury, injured/depleted RBs, depleted TEs, poor OL performance, WR drops), where is this team going to be better? At which position (other than probably RB)? Mark A.

I’ll start with wide receiver. Will Pauling had a breakout season when he led the team with 74 catches for 837 receiving yards and six touchdowns. He’s again going to be a focal point in Phil Longo’s offense. I think the pieces around him might better fit in Year 2. Trech Kekahuna, for example, is a true slot receiver who can complement Pauling.

Skyler Bell was second on the team in receptions with 38, but he was moved from the outside to the slot under the new coaching staff and never had a game where he finished with more than 53 receiving yards. Bell is now at UConn. Kekahuna went for 64 receiving yards in the bowl game, which was his first college game on offense.

I’m not going to make any bold proclamations about the receiving corps after what we saw last season. But Bryson Green is capable of being much more productive, and the hope is that he can build on the bowl, when he had 105 yards receiving and a touchdown. One key will be finding more consistency from the other wideout on the field, whether that be CJ Williams, Vinny Anthony II or Quincy Burroughs. Burroughs had a strong week of practice and made a great diving catching in the end zone on a reserve defense back during practice Tuesday.

Advertisement

Quarterback play has the potential to be better depending on how well Tyler Van Dyke can take to the offense. And, yes, the running backs offer plenty of intrigue. Chez Mellusi fits this system so well, which he showed before he broke his leg in Week 4. If he can stay healthy and Wisconsin can get contributions from Tawee Walker or one of the two incoming four-star freshmen, then there is reason for optimism at running back.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Can Tyler Van Dyke capitalize on fresh start at Wisconsin? ‘A lot to prove, just ready to work’

What do you see different from last year at the same time? We all were high on everything being done, but ended up with an underwhelming season. Paul Q.

Longo said he turned on the video of the first two spring practices from a year ago and described what he saw this year as being “light years ahead.” A lot of that has to do with the fact that the installation of an entirely new system, both on offense and defense, slowed the learning curve last year. This time, there are 54 returning players on scholarship, by my count. That makes a big difference.

The challenge every year is trying to incorporate so many early enrollees (11 this spring) and transfers (12 this spring) because everything is going to be new for them. Having this many returning players has to help with that process. I’d say what’s noticeable isn’t so much a particular play being executed better but the speed and intensity at which it appears Wisconsin is performing. I asked Fickell how different he believed things were for the group in Year 2, and he noted that the staff had created more competition and added length and athleticism at some key positions.

Advertisement

“My objective is to continue to push as hard as I possibly can to all of us to increase the intensity and the attention to detail and how we do things so at the end of spring we’ve got a better idea,” Fickell said. “That’s what I didn’t feel like after Year 1 we really had a good idea —I didn’t — of who we were. I thought I did and then I thought as we performed, I didn’t know who we really were.

“Regardless of what we did last year, this competitive spirit that we’re trying to have more and more of and put them in some situations, hopefully we can all get a better grasp of who we think we really are. So as we go into fall, we can start to formulate a better plan for what we need to do to be successful.”

(Top photo: Jeff Hanisch / USA Today)





Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin population growth slows as international migration shrinks by more than half

Published

on

Wisconsin population growth slows as international migration shrinks by more than half


play

Wisconsin’s population is on the rise, but the rate of growth has slowed over the past year amid a plunge in international migration to the state, according to recent estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.

As of July 2025, Wisconsin had 5,972,787 residents, the Census Bureau reported Jan. 27. That’s about 15,000 residents – or about 0.26% – more than in 2024. That growth rate is nearly half what it was the year before and the lowest of the post-pandemic years so far.

Advertisement

Wisconsin is not alone in the trend. Nationwide population growth also slowed significantly in 2025 due to a dip in international migration. The year saw President Donald Trump begin a sweeping crackdown on immigration, which has involved everything from halting refugee programs to revoking protected status for hundreds of thousands of migrants.

In Wisconsin, the latest estimates show the number of international migrants coming to the state fell by more than 62% in 2025.

Here’s what else the Census Bureau report found.

Wisconsin’s population growth rate falls to lowest since pandemic

After several years of post-pandemic recovery, Wisconsin’s population growth in 2025 was its lowest since 2021, according to Census Bureau estimates.

The state’s 0.26% population growth rate was down from about 0.45% in 2023 and 2024, and 0.36% from 2022. Nationally, population growth halved last year, with the country’s population growing by 0.5%, or 1.8 million residents, compared to 1%, or 3.2 million residents, in 2024.

Advertisement

Various projections have predicted a long-term decline of Wisconsin’s population. In early 2025, the Department of Administration projected most Wisconsin counties would face a shrinking population by 2050, with an estimated statewide loss of nearly 200,000 residents.

Milwaukee County, though, defied these expectations when its population grew for the first time in a decade in 2024. The county’s population reached just under 925,000 residents as of July 1, 2024, which was up by 2,880 people, or 0.31%, from the prior year. The slight growth came after the county lost about 15,000 residents between 2020 and 2024 – the most of any Wisconsin county in that time period.

The Census Bureau has not yet released county population data for 2025.

Advertisement

After reaching record levels in 2024, international migration plunges

For both Wisconsin and the country, a rapid decline in international migration is driving the slowdown in population growth.

The drop comes after migration to Wisconsin reached the highest level in two decades in 2024, largely spurred by people moving to the state from other countries, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates. Between July 2023 and June 2024, Wisconsin saw about 19,300 international migrants and about 5,800 domestic migrants move to the state.

In contrast, between June 2024 and July 2025, the number of international migrants dropped to 7,200 – the lowest since 2020. Nationwide, the number of international migrants fell by more than 50% from 2.7 million to 1.3 million last year.

The latter half of that yearlong period saw the Trump administration start its nationwide crackdown on immigration, including in Wisconsin.

For several years, global unrest drove people to the U.S. and Wisconsin: The fall of Kabul in Afghanistan and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to a national and local influx of refugees from those countries. Biden-era sponsorship of immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela also allowed more legal immigrants, and Milwaukee in particular became a hub for Burmese refugees from Myanmar.

Advertisement

In his first few weeks in office, Trump issued a slew of executive orders on immigration, including indefinitely suspending federal refugee programs. More recently, the Trump administration announced Jan. 14 it would stop processing visas from 75 countries, halting the legal immigration process for hundreds of local immigrants and refugees in Milwaukee.

The curbing of international migration comes as some economists and population experts have argued that more immigrants will be key to growing the economy in Milwaukee and Wisconsin – especially with a declining birth rate and projections of a shrinking population.

Midwest sees domestic migration grow for the first time since pandemic

Despite the dip in international migration, the Midwest was the only region of the country where all states gained population last year, the Census Bureau reported.

It’s a change from when the region saw a steep population decline in 2021, followed by small growth in 2022, and then steadier growth each year after that. The past year was the first time this decade that the Midwest saw positive domestic net migration, meaning more people moved to the Midwest from other U.S. states than moved away.

Advertisement

Through domestic migration, the Midwest gained 16,000 residents last year, compared to net losses of more than 175,000 residents in 2021 and 2022.

Still, Midwest states were not immune to the effects of the immigration decline: The region’s population grew by about 244,000 residents in 2025, compared to about 386,000 in 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin lawmakers debate ban on data center secrecy deals

Published

on

Wisconsin lawmakers debate ban on data center secrecy deals


play

  • Wisconsin lawmakers are considering a bill to ban non-disclosure agreements for data center projects.
  • The legislation aims to prevent developers and officials from concealing project details from the public.
  • Supporters argue the bill increases transparency, while some business groups oppose it.
  • The bill would also prohibit local governments from approving projects that used such secrecy agreements.

MADISON – Data center developers and government leaders would be barred from concealing key information about their projects from Wisconsin residents under legislation moving through the state Capitol this week.

State lawmakers on Tuesday heard public testimony on a slate of bills aimed at governing the boom of data center construction in the state. One bill would ban developers and government officials from entering into non-disclosure agreements aimed at keeping details of the project secret as negotiations are underway.

Advertisement

Reviews of data center proposals by NBC News and Wisconsin Watch revealed local officials across the country and in the state are entering into such secrecy agreements, especially when it comes to large-scale projects.

The Senate Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism held a public hearing Tuesday on the bill, which drew several supporters, including Wisconsin-centric comedian Charlie Berens.

“I think it is an imperative we implement stronger guardrails to protect people and not greedy data centers that only care about their own profit and not of the best interest of the community,” Erin Pintar of Milwaukee said.

The Wisconsin Data Center Coalition and the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce organizations registered against the bill, which is authored by Republican lawmakers.

Advertisement

Prescott Balch, a retired tech executive and candidate for Caledonia trustee, said lawmakers also should address the timeline for public input, arguing a typical timespan of less than two months is not enough for a community to understand a proposal and advocate for itself. He suggested a “cooling off period” of at least four months.

“An eager village board and staff coupled with a well-funded, marketing-savvy tech company makes it nearly impossible for the community to have a chance at making their voices heard,” Balch testified. “Give us four months as a community to organize. … Just level the playing field.”

The bill would prohibit developers of data centers from entering into a nondisclosure agreement or any similar arrangement with the “purpose or effect of concealing the details of the development of the data center with, or preventing the public review of, a (political subdivision) or person selling property to the data center.”

The bill would also prevent a local government from approving a data center development project if the operator had entered into such an agreement.

Lawmakers could take up the bill yet this session, which is slated to end by March.

Advertisement

Molly Beck can be reached at molly.beck@jrn.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin primary election: Brown County, Green Bay area race results

Published

on

Wisconsin primary election: Brown County, Green Bay area race results


play

Some Wisconsinites head to the polls Tuesday, Feb. 17, for just a handful of contested primary races. The spring primary determines who advances to the general election April 8. In Wisconsin, spring elections are for nonpartisan races, as opposed to fall elections. Nonpartisan public office includes courts, school boards and local councils. There are no statewide races on the primary ballot, but voters will get to vote for State Supreme Court in April.

Polls open at 7 a.m. Tuesday, Feb. 17, in Wisconsin. Results aren’t available until after the polls close at 8 p.m. Get results for three contested Brown County Board races and five contested Green Bay City Council races.

Advertisement

Brown County Board

Green Bay City Council



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending