Connect with us

News

China’s treatment of local debt ‘ulcer’ threatens growth target

Published

on

China’s treatment of local debt ‘ulcer’ threatens growth target

China is scrapping a string of infrastructure projects in indebted regions as it struggles to reconcile a need to save money with this year’s target for economic growth.

Beijing has ordered a dozen highly indebted areas, many of them less-developed and far from the coast, to curb infrastructure spending as it tries to unwind a decade-long investment binge many believe is unsustainable.

But analysts say the austerity drive may make it even more difficult to achieve the ambitious 5 per cent target for annual growth set by Premier Li Qiang during China’s “Two Sessions” political gathering this month — with potentially far-reaching implications for the global economy.

Among the projects being scrapped are a highway in Yunnan province and a tunnel in Gansu. Guizhou province has sidelined so many infrastructure schemes that provincial outlays for major projects this year are projected to fall 60 per cent.

China’s economy is still bearing the impact of a real estate sector crisis that began after authorities sought to rein in developers’ vast borrowing.

Advertisement

“In 2021 they went after property, this year they have been addressing the infrastructure side of the equation and local government debt,” said Michael Pettis, a finance professor at Peking University.

Investment in property and infrastructure had been significant sources of economic expansion, Pettis said. “So the question is: where is growth going to come from?”

In a policy document seen by the Financial Times, the State Council, China’s cabinet, ordered 10 debt-laden provinces and regions and two major cities to strengthen oversight and approvals of government projects.

The rules, which took effect on January 1, bar the 12 areas from launching many types of new projects, such as building highways or government buildings, and call for a suspension of some early-stage schemes.

“Governments of all levels better get used to belt-tightening and start to understand that this is not a temporary need, but a long-term solution,” finance minister Lan Fo’an told a press conference during the Two Sessions, which closed on Monday.

Advertisement

Officials from several provinces sought debt relief from state bankers in discussions on the sidelines of the parallel sessions of the National People’s Congress, China’s rubber-stamp parliament, and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, an advisory body.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Provincial delegates hailed the government’s clampdown on infrastructure spending.

“If you have an ulcer and you ignore it, you may just look healthy but actually are not,” said Wang Chunru, a CPPCC member from debt-stricken Inner Mongolia, one of the 12 province-level governments targeted. “Only by treating it and getting rid of it can you actually live longer and better.”

But analysts at Goldman Sachs describe the push to shelve projects in some of the most indebted areas, while providing enough fiscal stimulus elsewhere to boost economic growth, as a “balancing act”.

Beijing is betting that increasing infrastructure investment in richer coastal provinces such as Zhejiang or Guangdong can offset the cutbacks in the 12 targeted areas, which include the province-level cities of Tianjin and Chongqing and rustbelt north-eastern provinces.

Advertisement

Together, Goldman said the 12 areas accounted for 22 per cent of China’s fixed asset investment and 18 per cent of gross domestic product last year.

Fixed asset investment was expected to fall this year by 60 per cent for the western province of Guizhou and between 11 per cent and 15 per cent for several others, Goldman said.

At the NPC, Premier Li said: “We will make concerted efforts to defuse local government debt risks while ensuring stable development.”

But analysts believe that will be easier said than done.

Li has signalled more support for the economy in 2024, with plans to issue Rmb1tn in long-term central government special bonds — an instrument used to raise extra funds.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

This should help overly indebted local governments to deleverage, said Chris Beddor of Gavekal Dragonomics. The deleveraging process started last year, with state banks restructuring debts. Local governments have also issued more than Rmb1.4tn in bonds to repay implicit debt from off-balance sheet financing vehicles.

“It’s clear that policymakers think they can get around this by essentially having the central government issue more bonds and do more of the fiscal work itself for the local governments while at least some of them engage in a sort of fiscal retrenchment,” said Beddor. “I think it creates a lot of room for policy error.”

While it was not his “base case”, it was possible the government could fail to calibrate the adjustment properly and the economy would actually “get a drag instead of a push”, Beddor said.

The enthusiasm for a spending clampdown expressed by some of those attending the Two Sessions is also likely to fuel economists’ concerns about the strength of Chinese consumption.

“All of us Chinese people need to tighten our belts, not just local governments,” said Zhang Shuyang, a Guizhou NPC delegate. “Living frugally is our glorious tradition as the Chinese nation.”

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Guizhou, one of China’s poorest provinces, is now home to nearly half of the world’s highest 100 bridges, including four of the top 10. Yuekai Securities estimates the province’s infrastructure building spree has left it with total debt, including off-balance-sheet liabilities, at 137 per cent of its GDP.

Chinese local government debt, including off-balance-sheet financing vehicles and shadow credit, was probably equivalent to between 75 and 91 per cent of national GDP in 2022, according to a paper last year by Victor Shih and Jonathan Elkobi of the University of California San Diego.

Twelve province-level governments had outstanding bonds alone equivalent to more than 50 per cent of their GDP, they wrote. China says its total central and local government debt is less than 51 per cent of GDP.

In the Chinese capital last week, Guizhou governor Li Bingjun said he understood living frugally was the new norm and pledged to strictly manage projects and cut expenditures.

“We continue to reduce various festivals, forums and exhibition activities,” Li told reporters. “If it’s not necessary, we don’t hold it.”

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Wenjie Ding and Nian Liu in Beijing

News

Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote

Published

on

Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote

A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show documentary proof of citizenship when they register to vote.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper in Boston effectively converts a preliminary injunction she issued a year ago, in which she temporarily blocked many of Trump’s efforts to overhaul elections, into a permanent ban.

Casper rejected the Republican administration’s argument that the lawsuit to block the changes brought by Democratic state attorneys general was premature because the rules had yet to be put in place. Instead, she agreed that the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority to regulate elections, and that Trump’s requirements violated the separation of powers.

The Constitution “does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,” wrote Casper.

Among other proposed changes, Trump’s order would have required people to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote, prevented mail ballots from being counted if they arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked by then, and punished states that failed to comply by withholding certain federal money.

Advertisement

In a statement, New York Attorney General Letitia James said she was grateful the court had blocked Trump’s “unconstitutional attempt to seize control of our elections” and would continue to defend voting rights in this year’s midterm elections.

“Generations of Americans fought tirelessly for the right to vote, and we honor their legacy by protecting that right against anyone who tries to undermine it,” said James, a Democrat.

A voter casts a ballot during New York’s primary election on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, in New York. (AP Photo/Ryan Murphy)

Advertisement

Advertisement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose state was the lead plaintiff in the case, said the ruling reaffirmed the constitutional principle that it s up to the states and Congress to set election rules.

“While we are proud of this result, we are clear-eyed that President Trump’s attacks on voting rights and our elections show no signs of slowing down,” Bonta, a Democrat, said in a statement. “So let me be clear: we will keep fighting back every step of the way.”

Requests for comment sent to the White House and he U.S. Department of Justice were not immediately returned.

The ruling was the latest in a series against the elections executive order Trump signed just months after taking office for his second term. The Republican president has since signed another executive order on elections that seeks to create a national voter list and limit mail balloting. That directive also faces multiple legal challenges.

Advertisement

Last fall, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., overseeing a separate challenge to the first election executive order by civil rights and Democratic Party-aligned groups blocked the government from taking steps to include the proof-of-citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form. That judge later barred Trump’s defense secretary from requiring documentary proof of citizenship when military personnel register to vote or request ballots.

In an apparent nod to the difficulty of implementing a proof-of-citizen requirement by executive order, Trump is pushing legislation in the Republican-controlled Congress to create such a mandate. The SAVE America Act has passed the House but has stalled in the Senate, leading Trump to advocate for eliminating the filibuster that is blocking the legislation.

On Wednesday, he abruptly canceled the expected signing of a bipartisan housing bill, saying he would not sign legislation until Congress passes his proof of citizenship requirement for voting.

The president and many of his Republican allies have been promoting the narrative that voting by noncitizens is a major problem, when in fact it’s quite rare. The federal voter registration form already requires people to attest that they are U.S. citizens. Violating that is punishable as a felony that can lead to prison or deportation.

In another major voting case, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to issue an opinion soon on whether mail ballots must arrive by Election Day. That could immediately change the rules in 14 states that allow grace periods ranging from days to weeks if the ballots are postmarked by Election Day.

Advertisement

Casper, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, is the chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

Published

on

Video: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

new video loaded: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

transcript

transcript

Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s progressive coalition had a big night on Tuesday. Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez won their Democratic House primaries.

“I see a New York that we can all afford. I see a New York that truly invests in its babies, not bombs.” Reporter: “What’s the first thing you’re looking forward to doing in Congress?” “Well, tomorrow — thank you — I mean, tomorrow morning, you know, I’m going to be back at 26 Federal Plaza doing court watching, and we want to carry that into Congress as well.”

Advertisement
Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s progressive coalition had a big night on Tuesday. Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez won their Democratic House primaries.

By Julie Yoon

June 24, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Appeals court allows Trump administration expanded use of speedy deportations

Published

on

Appeals court allows Trump administration expanded use of speedy deportations

A massive 826,780-square-foot warehouse sits illuminated Feb. 12, 2026, in the El Paso suburb of Socorro, Texas, that was recently purchased by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for $122.8 million.

Morgan Lee/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Morgan Lee/AP

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to resume carrying out speedy deportations of undocumented migrants throughout the United States, not just near the border.

A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit threw out a lower court decision that temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s expanded use of expedited removal. The ruling was a big victory for the Republican administration, which views the expansion of so-called expedited removal as a key tool for carrying out its mass deportation policy.

Expedited removal — quick deportation without a chance to appear before a judge — has previously been applied to migrants arriving by sea or caught at or near the border shortly after crossing.

Advertisement

In January, Trump expanded its use to undocumented migrants all over the United States. Immigration agents began whisking migrants away from courthouses where they had gone for immigration proceedings and then removing them from the country within days.

“The Trump administration’s push for fast-track deportations will subject people to an unfair and error-prone system,” Anand Balakrishnan, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said in a statement.

Balakrishnan represented plaintiffs in arguments before the appellate panel and said its ruling “undermines the fundamental principle that people receive due process when the government seeks to deport them.”

DC Circuit Judge Justin R. Walker, one of the judges on the panel, said the plaintiffs had not shown the expanded use of expedited removal violated due process rights. Immigrants received notice of removal proceedings and were given a chance to respond, he wrote in his opinion.

Walker and the second judge in the majority, Neomi Rao, were appointed by Trump. The third judge on the panel was appointed by President Barack Obama, a Democrat.

Advertisement

Walker said there was no requirement that the administration inform immigrants that they can avoid expedited removal if they can show they have been in the United States for more than two years.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending