Connect with us

News

Mirroring Obama, Biden rebukes Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. Wade in SOTU address

Published

on

Mirroring Obama, Biden rebukes Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. Wade in SOTU address

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

President Biden lashed out at members of the Supreme Court for their controversial Dobbs decision during his State of the Union address on Thursday night. It mirrored the actions of former President Barack Obama, who rebuked a decision made by justices on the High Court during his 2010 State of the Union address to Congress.

During Thursday’s high-profile speech from the Capitol, which was attended by six sitting Supreme Court justices, Biden spoke at length about abortion and women’s health care. At one point, the president took direct aim at the justices over their June 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and implied they weren’t aware of the “electoral or political power” women in America hold.

Advertisement

“With all due respect, justices, women are not without … electoral or political power,” Biden said. “You’re about to realize just how much.”

BORDER PATROL UNION BOSS SAYS BIDEN ‘SLAPPED EVERY AMERICAN IN THE FACE’ DURING STATE OF THE UNION

President Biden’s decision to target Supreme Court justices during his State of the Union address on Thursday mirrored that of former President Barack Obama in 2010. (Getty Images)

“Those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women, but they found out when reproductive freedom was on the ballot and we won in 2022 and we won in 2020 and when we win again in 2024,” he added.

Biden’s remarks drew an immediate round of applause and a standing ovation from Democrats, as well as members of his cabinet, who had gathered in the House chamber to hear the president’s remarks.

Advertisement

The six justices in attendance — Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson — remained seated and looked on as Biden vowed to “restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land” should he be given a “Congress that supports the right to choose.”

Though uncommon, Biden’s move to directly target the justices for a decision they had made resembled the actions of Obama when he expressed frustration with a Supreme Court ruling during one of his own State of the Union addresses.

Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court listen to President Biden’s State of the Union address in the House Chamber at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. (Julia Nikhinson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

BIDEN CAUGHT ON HOT MIC REVEALING PRIVATE ‘COME TO JESUS’ CONVERSATION WITH NETANYAHU

While addressing a joint session of Congress in January 2010, Obama criticized the court’s 5-4 ruling in Citizens United, which slashed corporate campaign spending limits.

Advertisement

“With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said from the chamber of the House of Representatives that year.

“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems,” he added.

President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a Joint Session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 27, 2010. (Toni L. Sandys/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

In apparent disagreement with Obama’s remarks at the time, Justice Samuel Alito could be seen mouthing what appeared to be the words “not true.”

Alito, along with Justices Amy Coney-Barrett and Clarence Thomas, did not attend Biden’s Thursday evening address. Alito, who is part of the court’s conservative majority, has not attended a State of the Union address since 2010.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Following Obama’s 2010 remarks, Biden, who served as vice president at the time, reportedly argued during an appearance on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that Obama “didn’t question the integrity of the court. He questioned the judgment of it.”

News

Video: Prosecutors Release Body Camera Footage of Luigi Mangione’s Arrest

Published

on

Video: Prosecutors Release Body Camera Footage of Luigi Mangione’s Arrest

new video loaded: Prosecutors Release Body Camera Footage of Luigi Mangione’s Arrest

transcript

transcript

Prosecutors Release Body Camera Footage of Luigi Mangione’s Arrest

The footage shows officers confronting Luigi Mangione at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pa. Lawyers for Mr. Mangione, who is accused of killing the former C.E.O. of UnitedHealthcare, argued that the evidence recovered at his arrest should not be admitted into trial, as it was obtained without a warrant.

“What’s your name?” “Mark.” “What is it?” “Mark.” “Mark?” “Yes, sir.” “Mark what?” “Rosario.” “Someone called, they thought you were suspicious.” “Oh, I’m sorry.” “Hey, sir. How are you doing?” “Pull your mask down real quick for me.” “Yes, sure.” “Appreciate it. Thank you. What’s your name?” “Mark.” “What is it?” “Mark.” “Mark?” “Yes, sir.” “Mark what” “Rosario.” “Someone called, they thought you were suspicious.” “Oh, I’m sorry.” “Do you have your ID on you?” “Yes, sir.” “Thanks. Thought you looked like someone.”

Advertisement
The footage shows officers confronting Luigi Mangione at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pa. Lawyers for Mr. Mangione, who is accused of killing the former C.E.O. of UnitedHealthcare, argued that the evidence recovered at his arrest should not be admitted into trial, as it was obtained without a warrant.

By Jamie Leventhal

December 9, 2025

Continue Reading

News

San Diego officials approve $30M settlement for family of teen killed by police | CNN

Published

on

San Diego officials approve M settlement for family of teen killed by police | CNN


SAN DIEGO
AP
 — 

The San Diego City Council on Tuesday approved a $30 million payment to the family of a 16-year-old killed by police in one of the largest such settlements in US history.

The settlement exceeds the $27 million the city of Minneapolis agreed to pay the family of George Floyd, whose May 2020 murder by a police officer who knelt on his neck sparked a nationwide racial reckoning.

Surveillance and body-worn camera footage from Jan. 28 showed Konoa Wilson running away from someone who pulled a gun and fired at him in a downtown train station. As he exited the station, Wilson encountered San Diego Police Officer Daniel Gold.

In the lawsuit against the city and Gold, the family alleged the officer “instantly, without any warning,” fired two shots at Wilson as he ran by, striking him in the upper body. The lawsuit identified Wilson as Black.

Advertisement

Councilmember Henry Foster III became emotional when speaking about the shooting, sharing his fears about the dangers that Black youth face: “If only you could understand the fear I feel when my son leaves the house.”

“Kanoa’s life was taken while fleeing from gunshots, and he found himself running into the arms of a police officer. This should not have happened,” Foster said.

He also questioned the state of reform since Floyd’s death: “Where’s the progress? Where’s the protect and serve? Better yet, where’s the accountability?”

He challenged Mayor Todd Gloria and Police Chief Scott Wahl to do better.

Lt. Cesar Jimenez, a spokesperson for the San Diego Police Department, said Gold is currently on an administrative assignment while the shooting is under investigation.

Advertisement

The lawsuit said Gold did not announce he was a police officer until after shooting him in the back. It said Wilson was running past the officer “in an attempt to get to a place of safety.”

Wilson was pronounced dead less than an hour after he was taken to the hospital.

Continue Reading

News

Black bear populations are bouncing back. Here’s how these Texas towns are coping

Published

on

Black bear populations are bouncing back. Here’s how these Texas towns are coping

Ken Clouse and his wife Pam look at a still image taken from a game camera on their porch. The couple says in the last two years, they’ve regularly seen black bears in their neighborhood south of Alpine, Texas.

Carlos Morales/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Carlos Morales/NPR

ALPINE, Texas — In one of the most remote corners of Texas, Matt Hewitt is unlocking the door to a giant steel trap he’s hoping will catch a black bear.

“It’s completely empty,” Hewitt says, as he reaches for a bucket with bait – days-old glazed donuts and frozen cantaloupe.

Hewitt, a researcher at the Borderlands Research Institute, affiliated with Sul Ross State University, leads a group that captures and collars black bears to try and get an idea of just how many are roaming the mountains and desert stretches of Far West Texas. And although it’s too soon to say exactly how many bears there are, Hewitt believes “there’s more than people realize.”

Advertisement

Historically, black bears were once the biggest predator to travel the region in large numbers, but overhunting and habitat loss led to their decline over several decades.

But in recent years, the number of black bears in West Texas have been on the rise: sightings in the state have jumped from nearly 80 in 2020 to at least 130 so far this year, according to state data. And in other states, researchers believe black bear populations are growing too.

Inside an eight-foot steel trap, researcher Matt Hewitt has sprinkled stale doughnuts and chunks of cantaloupe. Hewitt hopes the bait’s enough to lure and trap a Black bear.

Inside an eight-foot steel trap, researcher Matt Hewitt has sprinkled stale doughnuts and chunks of cantaloupe. Hewitt hopes the bait’s enough to lure and trap a black bear.

Carlos Morales/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Carlos Morales/NPR

Matt Hewitt, a researcher with Borderlands Research Institute, heads for his truck after securing a snare, which he hopes will snag tufts of bear hair.

Matt Hewitt, a researcher with Borderlands Research Institute, heads for his truck after securing a snare, which he hopes will snag tufts of bear hair.

Carlos Morales/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Carlos Morales/NPR

But in West Texas, for all the celebration of the bears’ return to the wilderness, there are challenges and concerns as bears have ventured into neighborhoods, gotten into yards and posed a threat to livestock and pets.

Advertisement

“I don’t mind the bears coming back, we don’t want them wiped out, that’s for sure,” said Pam Clouse, who lives in Alpine, an area that’s seen a number of bear encounters in recent years. “You know, they were almost extinct.”

Clouse and her husband, Ken, both grew up in West Texas, and consider themselves wildlife enthusiasts. During drought years, the couple would sprinkle buckets full of corn on their yard and keep troughs of water on their property for wandering wildlife like deer and javelina.

Recently, they removed the food and water at the suggestion of state officials, and have even electrified their fence, too — all in effort of keeping the bears away.

But the bears are still coming, they say. “These bears are pretty large,” said Pam Clouse, as she pulled up an image of a bear from a trail camera at their house. “They’re probably about 4, 500 pounds if I had to guess.”

A still image taken from a game camera Pam and Ken Clouse have on their porch in Alpine, Texas.

A still image taken from a trail camera Pam and Ken Clouse have on their porch in Alpine, Texas.
hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

The Clouses feel like more can be done to ease residents’ concerns over bears wandering onto their property. “I’m not promoting a hunting season for the black bears,” said Ken Clouse. “But there’s got to be some type of control.”

A mural in downtown Alpine, Texas highlights the wildlife that call the Trans-Pecos region of West Texas home – including the black bear.

A mural in downtown Alpine, Texas highlights the wildlife that call the Trans-Pecos region of West Texas home – including the black bear.

Carlos Morales/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Carlos Morales/NPR

Learning to live with bears

In states like Montana and Colorado, residents have adapted to living with bears by installing bear-resistant dumpsters and trash bins and, in some cases, installing alarm systems or sprinklers — things to try and startle bears.

But of all the measures, wildlife biologists stress removing food and anything that might attract a hungry bear.

During the late summer and fall months, as black bears prepare to den, they’re looking to eat as much as possible, and they’ll go through great lengths to consume the 20,000 daily calories they’re after.

Advertisement

“They have a great sense of smell, much better than our own,” said Raymond Skiles, former wildlife biologist at Big Bend National Park in West Texas. “So, number one, they can smell food when you and I would never have a clue.”

Skiles was at Big Bend National Park when black bears made their return there in the late 1980s. He said it took time and work at the park, but they were able to adapt to the return of bears there. The park brought in dumpsters that were hard for bears to get into, educated visitors about the animal, and put into place rules that ensured food wasn’t being left out.

Today, Skiles said, those measures have gone a long way in reducing the possibility of bear-human conflict in the Chisos Mountains, one of the most popular corners of the park. Now, Skiles wonders if the same can happen in cities and towns across West Texas.

Krysta Demere sits in the offices for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in Alpine. Part of her job as a wildlife biologist is getting people ready to live with Black bears and educate them in hopes of reducing bear-human conflict.

Krysta Demere sits in the offices for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in Alpine. Part of her job as a wildlife biologist is getting people ready to live with black bears and educate them in hopes of reducing bear-human conflict.

Carlos Morales/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Carlos Morales/NPR

From the national park, an expansive stretch of desert land roughly the size of Rhode Island, the bears are now pushing north. Wildlife conservationists here say it’s likely because the land has reached what they call “carrying capacity.”

Advertisement

“And when you’re over carrying capacity, there’s not [enough] resources on the natural landscape for those animals,” explained Krysta Demere, a wildlife biologist with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. “So, then they begin to move out and search for new food sources.”

Part of Demere’s job is to help people across West Texas get ready to live with bears, something they haven’t experienced in well over 80 years.

“And that’s a long time,” said Demere. “That means there’s not a generation alive today that’s had to live with [the] black bear before.”

But the next generation in Alpine and the ones after that will likely grow up knowing this place, once again, as bear country.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending