Connect with us

West Virginia

Wildlife Section presents recommended game and fish law changes – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Wildlife Section presents recommended game and fish law changes – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. —  Members of the Natural Resources Commission heard the recommendations of Division of Natural Resources biologists Sunday for the coming big game seasons in the state.  However, the most notable suggestion presented at the Claudia L. Workman Nature Education Center had very little to do with bag limits or season dates.

A proposal from the Director of the DNR recommended the youth whitetail hunting seasons be changed to allow the young hunter to kill a buck or a doe.   Previously the hunts were strictly for antlerless deer.

“The Director of the Division of Natural Resources proposes that youth hunters during the Special Youth Deer Season be allowed to harvest either sex deer,”  read the proposal as it was presented to the Commission.

The proposal goes on to say the youth hunter would be allowed to kill one buck during the youth season and it would count toward the young hunter’s season bag limit of two antlered deer.   There is an exception for hunting in the CWD Containment Area where the season bag limit remains three antlered deer for the season.  The propsoal would allow the youth to kill one antlerless deer during the youth season which would not count toward their season bag limit of antlerless deer.

Advertisement

The proposal from the Director wasn’t the only suggested change for the youth hunting seasons.   There is also a proposal from the DNR Wildlife Section to change the limit in the youth squirrel hunting season to six squirrels in aggregate per day and the possession and season limit to 12 squirrels in aggregate.  The change is proposed to take effect in the 2025 squirrel hunting season.  Assistant Chief for Game Steve Rauch told Commissioners the change was to enable youth hunters to kill a limit of squirrels on both days of the season and corrects an oversight when the season went from a Saturday to a Saturday-Sunday season.

As for bag limits in the upcoming whitetail deer season, the biggest change is the well documented reduction of the overall number of bucks a hunter can kill in West Virginia from three to two.   This fall will be the first season the new limit will be in place and hunters will only be allowed to kill two bucks combined across the archery, firearms, and muzzleloader seasons.

The rest of the proposed changes for big game hunting in the state for the coming year were minimal.

There is a proposal to loosen the restrictions on antlerless hunting in southern Kanawha County.  Those areas were closed to antlerless hunting in 2023. For this year, the agency recommends allowing resident land owners to kill one antlerless deer and issuing 250 permts for non-landowners for antlerless deer hunting in the area.  It’s likely a change which will be welcomed since two of the public speakers at Sunday’s meeting asked for the restrictions on antlerless huning in Kanawha County be loosened.

The agency proposed  unlimited antlerless hunting permits for the eastern section of Raleigh County with a bag limit of one.   The bag limiit for antlerless deer in 2024 in Brooke and Ohio County is recommmended to be raised to three.

Advertisement

There were no counties or areas of the state where antlerless hunting restrictions were tighened.

The proposed bear hunting regulations were also minimal.  The DNR recommended a more liberal hunting season without dogs to a 7 day season running September 21-27.   The season would be open in

–Barbour County west of Route 92

–Braxton County west of I-79

–Calhoun County

Advertisement

–Clay County north of the Elk River

–Harrison

–Lewis

–Mercer

–Monongalia

Advertisement

— Monroe County west of Route 219

–Roane

–Taylor

–Summers

–Upshur County west of Route 20

Advertisement
O’Brein, Woodrum, Elk Fork, and North Bend Lakes would be opened up for bass harvest in hopes of improving the average size of fish in the lakes which has always been catch and release. PHOTO: Rob Ciarapica

There is only one fishing regulation change presented to the commission.  The DNR Fisheries section proposes to establish a regulation on black bass at Elk Fork, North Bend, O’Brien, and Woodrum Lakes with a 6-fish per day creel limit, of which only one may exceed 16 inches. Possession limit of 12, only two of which may exceed 16 inches.

The four lakes have been catch and release waters ever since they were built.   Bioloigists said without any harvest, the population of black bass has grown to the point it has created a uniform size structure among the bass population.

“Biological data has illustrated an overall decline in size structure, while abundance data remains extremely high in comparison to most of WV’s impounded waterbodies. Additionally, the observed relative weight, a statistic used to evaluate body condition, of black bass is less than standard targets. These data suggest that an overabundance of black bass is negatively influencing growth rates, size structure, and ultimately maximum lengths obtained by fish in these waters,”  wrote fish managers in thier presentation to the Natural Resoruces Commission.

“The goal of the proposed regulation is to encourage angler harvest of fish under 16 inches to reduce densities of smaller fish. Should these regulations work as intended, growth rates and size structure of black bass are expected to increase on these waters,”  the proposal added.

The idea is experimental and would be augmented by ongoing tagging studies and annual electrofishing on the four waters to determine if the new regulation improves the average size of fish caught from the four impoundments.

Advertisement

All other fishing regulations are proposed to be unchanged from last year.

All of the proposed changes to game and fish laws will be up for discussion and public input at the March Sportsman’s Sectional meeting which are set for March 11-12.  The big game regulations will be voted upon by Commissioners at the next Commission meeting slated for April 24 at Blackwater Falls State Park.



Source link

West Virginia

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews

Published

on

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — West Virginia deer hunters killed 33,775 bucks during the recently completed two week buck firearms season.

According to information released Tuesday by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Greenbrier County was the top county in the state for bucks in 2025 with 1,730 killed during the gun season. Second was Preston County with 1,349, Randolph County 1,198, Hardy County 1,165 and Pendleton at 1,135. The rest of the top ten counties in order were Pocahontas, Monroe, Grant, Fayette, and Hampshire Counties.’

Click here to see county-by-county buck firearms season harvests for the last five seasons.

As predicted by the DNR prior to the season, the total harvest was 18.5 percent below 2024. All of the DNR’s districts registered a decrease in harvest, with the exception of District 4 which experienced a 7.5 percent increase compared to last year. The DNR predicted the lower harvest because of a major abundance of mast in the state. The conditions were such that deer didn’t have to travel far to find adequate food and therefore were not as exposed to hunters.

Advertisement

The agency acknowledged several counties along the Ohio River and central West Virginia experienced an outbreak of hemorrhagic disease in the early fall which also impacted hunter success especially in western counties of the state.

Several deer hunting opportunities remain for 2025. The state’s archery and crossbow season runs through Dec. 31, the traditional Class N/NN antlerless deer season will be open in select areas on public and private land Dec. 11-14 and Dec. 28-31, the muzzleloader deer season will be open Dec. 15-21 and the youth, Class Q and Class XS season for antlerless deer will be open Dec. 26-27 in any county with a firearms deer season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia American Water proposes $46 million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers

Published

on

West Virginia American Water proposes  million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers


A possible utility rate hike is being discussed for West Virginia American Water customers. It would affect 172,000 customers in 22 counties.

On Monday night, at a public hearing, only two people spoke out sharing their thoughts on the proposed hike.

“I’m here to ask the PSC to finally, once and for all, take care of the consumers of water by making sure the water company follows industry standards and international code,” WVAW customer, Howard Swint said.

According to a press release from West Virginia American Water, the new rates would be implemented in two steps with the first step of a $11 increase per month going into effect on March 1st, 2026.

Advertisement

The second step establishes final rates would be a $5 increase becoming effective on March 1st, 2027. Those numbers being based on the bill of an average residential customer.

“The system we’re hoping to get a hearing on today is terribly antiquated and it also has a lot of other shortcomings that cheat the water rate consumers by virtue of the fact that they’re putting band-aids on a system that should really be replaced. Now that’s going to require money, I understand that” Swint said.

In total, water rates would see a $46 million increase, and sewer rates would see a $1.4 million increase. According to the company, these increases would go towards making further improvements to their infrastructure.

“In downtown Charleston, last year it was flooded. We pay for that as consumers. We have to pay for that. It’s a system that’s antiquated that has to be fixed. So that requires money to bring it up to international code and industry standards. It’s something we all will pay less in the future for by virtue of having a system that’s reliable,” Swint said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews


West Virginia’s governor says it is inappropriate to ask questions about whether members of the National Guard patrolling Washington, D.C., are prepared to quickly and efficiently respond with firearms in case of attack.

Gov. Patrick Morrisey

“I can assure folks that the people that we send in — anytime you’re sending anyone potentially in harm’s way, you want to make sure that they’re fully prepared, they’re very well trained,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

In response to a question about Guard members’ readiness to defend themselves, he continued, “I can assure people that they are.”

More detail about defensive readiness than that, the governor went on to say, should be off limits to the public.

Advertisement

West Virginia National Guard members Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and Andrew Wolfe, 24, were shot Nov. 26 at the corner of 17th and I Streets NW. Beckstrom died on Thanksgiving Day, and Wolfe continues to recover from serious injuries.

A major with the National Guard who was nearby shot the suspect with his service weapon as the attacker was trying to reload his own gun, investigators said.

Authorities have said the suspect in the shooting, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, came around a corner, raised his gun and fired at Guardsmen who were gathered at the location near a Metro stop. He has been formally charged with murder.

Lakanwal, 29, drove from his home in the state of Washington. He had previously worked with CIA-backed counterterrorism units in Afghanistan known as Zero Units. He had a Special Immigrant Visa because of that work but apparently had significant struggles adjusting to life in the United States.

Advertisement

“This is a tragedy that resulted from an ambush. It was nothing to do with their readiness posture. So specialist Beckstrom was attacked from behind at point blank range by a member of a CIA backed paramilitary unit, you know, a terrorist. So this was really important,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

Warnings of possible danger

At least two memos introduced into evidence by attorneys representing the Trump administration in a federal court case challenging the presence of the National Guard in the nation’s capital make reference to potential danger for operations under Joint Task Force-D.C.

“JTC-DC service members may expect a heightened threat environment while supporting the “Make DC Safe and Beautiful” mission within the NCR,” according to an August advisory memo filed in the federal court case and referring to activity in the national capital region.

“Threat/nefarious actors engaging in grievance based violence and those inspired by foreign terrorist organizations may view the MDCSB mission as a target of opportunity. Additionally, civilian populations with varying political views may attempt to engage with JTF-DC SMs.”

Advertisement

On August 23, the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard gave an order allowing members supporting the mission in the district to carry their service-issued weapons after careful consideration of the security environment. Guard members on the mission were to carry M17 pistols, intended for personal protection.

In early December, after the shootings, the Pentagon reiterated The Pentagon that every National Guard member deployed in Washington D.C., would now be armed with live weapons.

An overriding question has been readiness to engage — whether the service weapons and ammunition were in position to be used quickly in case of attack.

COMMENTARY by T.J. MEADOWS: Did We Fail Our Guardsmen?

On statewide radio, the governor said the specifics of Guard’s access to weapons is not for the public to know.

Advertisement

“You know, it’s absolutely wrong to try to publicize everyone’s weapons readiness, sensitive operational information, if it could endanger the Guardsmen who are working in D.C. I think they are irresponsible questions, to be blunt. We have to protect our people,” Morrisey said.

“I don’t know why people would want to have everything about ‘This is exactly the operational information you need when you’re out in the field’ and you could subject our Guardsmen to harm. That’s outrageous, and I’m not going to do it.”

D.C. mission continues, and so do questions

On August 11, President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” for the District of Columbia, and just a few days later Governor Morrisey deployed 300 to 400 members of the West Virginia National Guard for support.

That developed as, on August 12, Leland Blanchard, interim commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, sent an email to James Seward, adjutant general of the West Virginia National Guard.

Advertisement

“Was told by SECARMY’s office that your governor has been in contact with SECARMY and may be willing to support ongoing operations in DC,” Blanchard wrote in an email that later appeared among the filings in the federal court case.

Blanchard went on to say work was still ongoing to determine tasks, “but wondering if you have some insights on number of personnel you might have to put against this mission once we get there.”

Seward responded to say, depending on orders and funding, that West Virginia could provide an estimated 500 to 600 Guard members. “Please let us know what we can do to help.”

The president’s emergency declaration, which placed the Metropolitan Police Department under federal direction, expired after 30 days, Sept. 10, but the National Guard presence continued.

About 2,000 members of the National Guard, overall, have been deployed to Washington, D.C., to patrol on the National Mall, in Metro public transportation stations and across D.C. neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Last month, the West Virginia National Guard announced participation in patrols in Washington, D.C., would continue until the end of the year. However, the mission was being scaled back.

About 160 West Virginia National Guard volunteers were approved to remain in D.C. All personnel not continuing as part of the D.C. Safe and Beautiful mission returned to West Virginia.

COMMENTARY by HOPPY KERCHEVAL: Governor Morrisey and the National Guard in D.C.

State Adjutant General Jim Seward

In a Dec. 1 press conference with the governor, Major General Seward of the West Virginia National Guard, said members “are trained professionals; they are deputized U.S. marshals in the district. When they’re on patrol they’re armed, and they are trained.”

That press conference included a question from MetroNews about what precautions or self-defense National Guard members were prepared to use as they were deployed to the city where crime emergency conditions were described as the basis from the outset.

The response was in general terms.

Advertisement

“These are people that are trained, and they have knowledge of the situation they’re going into. These are the same people going to all corners of the globe. They’re trained in terms of difficult circumstances,” Morrisey said, concluding “We believe they have the background and training to go in to Washington, D.C., to carry out the mission.”

The West Virginia National Guard specified in an August statement that members were providing support in “areas of sustainment, logistics, administration, public affairs and Joint Staff augmentation.

“Security missions include static and roving presence patrols.” That meant standing or walking in high-traffic areas and at Metro public transit stations along with assistance to U.S. Park Police.

The Democratic caucus in the state Legislature has formally requested an oversight hearing during January interim meetings to examine the circumstances surrounding the deployment of West Virginia National Guard members to Washington, D.C.

The proposed hearing would require testimony from leaders of the West Virginia National Guard and representatives from the Office of the Governor. Democrats say it is a necessary step to ensure future deployments are made lawfully, purposefully and with appropriate safeguards.

Advertisement
John Williams

“Our Guard members serve with honor. We owe them answers,” said Delegate John Williams, D- Monongalia.

“This tragedy demands a clear and factual review so that lessons are learned and protections strengthened moving forward.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending