Connect with us

Minnesota

Why are counties, GOP pushing against the Minnesota state flag and seal?

Published

on

Why are counties, GOP pushing against the Minnesota state flag and seal?


With Minnesota poised to officially adopt a new state flag and seal, some counties are passing resolutions opposing the new symbols and Republicans have pushed to make the change into a bigger political issue.

At least five counties across Minnesota have voted to formally complain about the new state symbols, raising issues about what they call unfunded mandates. And just a few weeks ago, the state Republican Party launched a website with a petition to reject the new flag, saying it erases state history.

The new state flag and seal come after decades of calls for change. Minnesota’s current flag includes the state seal against a blue background. The seal depicts a Native American riding off into the sunset while a white settler plows his field with his rifle leaning on a nearby stump.

The current version of Minnesota’s state seal was adopted in 1983, though it has its roots before statehood in 1858. (Courtesy of the State Emblems Redesign Commission)

Many found the imagery offensive because of its depiction of white settlers displacing the state’s original inhabitants, and to boot the design was seen as overcomplicated and unoriginal as it resembled many other state flags.

Advertisement

There is some political disagreement over whether the flag and seal are necessary, but counties also have had practical questions about when they’ll have to adopt the new symbols and how much it will cost.

Confusion among some counties

Flags are more or less an afterthought for counties when considering replacement expenses.

The biggest cost so far appears to come from law enforcement. Many sheriff’s departments incorporate the soon-to-be-gone state seal into their logos, meaning car decals, badges and letterheads will have to be replaced.

That’s the biggest question local governments have so far about the new flag and seal, though they’re under no requirement to make the changes immediately when the new symbols take effect, says Matt Hilgart, government relations manager with the Association of Minnesota Counties.

“Most of it that, what I’ve seen is just the concern about in the illusion that they’re under some kind of mandate to change everything that they have now, and that they’re very concerned with the costs,” he said, adding he hasn’t heard members say they are passing the resolutions purely to go against what’s coming out of the Capitol.

Advertisement

“I’m not hearing, you know, ‘I hate this flag and I’m gonna let St. Paul know I hate it,’” Hilgart said.

County opposition

In the past month, five counties outside the Twin Cities metro have passed resolutions against the flag. Though so far, none have said they’ll outright reject the flag and seal and hold on to the old one — though there isn’t anything in the law stopping them from doing so.

Crow Wing, Douglas, Houston, McLeod and Nobles counties approved measures criticizing the process that led to the new flag and the new expenses. Fillmore County sent a letter to state officials over their concerns with the new state symbols.

On Dec. 12, 2023, the State Emblems Redesign Commission voted to adopt design modifications to the official Great Seal of the State of Minnesota. Members of the commission picked their final designs from more than 2,600 public submissions in December, and barring intervention by the Legislature. Commission members who supported the measure say they think the whole state should have been brought into the process.

“That doesn’t seem fair to me … that should be voted on by their elected officials, or by the people,” said Eric Johnson, a Houston County commissioner.

Advertisement
A state seal featuring a loon.
On December 12, 2023, the State Emblems Redesign Commission voted to adopt design modifications to the official Great Seal of the State of Minnesota. The design is subject to further changes and final approval by the Commission. (Courtesy of the State Emblems Redesign Commission)

Expenses

In Houston County, the sheriff’s department expected it would cost about $32,000 to replace squad car decals and badges that incorporate the old state seal.

“That’s that’s the main reason why we’re pushing back on this — because this is this is going to be an unfunded mandate,” Johnson said.

Houston County has about 18,000 residents and an annual budget of about $14 million. In much bigger counties, officials have already estimated much higher costs for updating law enforcement equipment and other areas where state symbols appear. None have passed resolutions protesting the new state symbols.

Here’s a list of some counties with their cost estimates:

• Dakota County — Replacing state flags and seals in Dakota County will cost up to $170,000 when the new symbols go into effect, according to county spokesperson Mary Beth Schubert. Most of that cost is for the sheriff’s department, which expects to spend $140,000 to $150,000. Facilities officials expect to spend about $20,000.

• Hennepin County — Sheriff’s department symbols here incorporate the old state seal, and replacing uniforms will cost about $500,000, according to the sheriff’s office. That’s an initial estimate and does not include vehicles and other equipment. Replacing flags will cost about $300 per flag at seven different buildings, a county official said.

Advertisement

• St. Louis County — Officials here haven’t done a full tally of how much it’ll cost the county to replace its symbols. The St. Louis County Sheriff’s Office logo has the state seal at its center, and updating things like signage and badges would cost about $50,000 if it all had to happen at once, according to county spokesperson Dana Kazel.

• Ramsey County and Washington County didn’t have estimates as of late January.

Hilgart, with the county association, says his group has been telling members there is flexibility on adopting the new state symbols, and counties won’t be forced to do anything immediately.

Historic and cultural objections

Underlying budget concerns are some questions about the outgoing symbols’ significance to the state’s identity. Johnson, of Houston County, expressed a similar sentiment to what some GOP lawmakers and the Minnesota Republican Party have said.

“All those symbols on that flag are in honor of our heritage and our history of our state,” Johnson said.

Advertisement

In a statement launching a petition to keep the flag, Minnesota GOP Chairman David Hann and Deputy Chairwoman Donna Bergstrom had stronger words.

“The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War,” they wrote. “Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861, beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected.”

Asked about the new flag design, Johnson first said he didn’t have an opinion, but later added of the minimalist blue and white design: “It’s pretty plain to me; it doesn’t really stand for much.”

What can opponents do?

There has been plenty of noise the past month over the new design, but besides firing up conservatives, what exactly can Republicans and any other officials who oppose the new flag and seal actually do?

On the legislative side? Not much.

Advertisement

Following the adoption of the new state symbols, Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, and Rep. Bjorn Olson, R-Fairmont, non-voting members of the redesign commission, said they wanted to put the new flag and seal up to a statewide vote, but Democratic-Farmer-Labor leaders in control of the Senate and House have no interest.

However, on the local government level, there may be more room for regional expression. The law that set the new flag and seal into motion only applies to the state of Minnesota and does not compel cities and counties to do the same.

But again, no counties have signaled they’d keep the old symbols. So far, their criticism has been about the process and cost.



Source link

Advertisement

Minnesota

Minnesota weather: What to expect with Thursday’s snow, strong winds

Published

on

Minnesota weather: What to expect with Thursday’s snow, strong winds


Temperatures dropping, snow and strong winds are set to come through the state Thursday. 

Here’s what to expect for Thursday’s winter weather. 

Advertisement

What to expect for Thursday’s snow, dropping temps

What to expect:

A winter weather advisory is in place for parts of Minnesota, including the Twin Cities Thursday.

Advertisement

A warm front overnight Wednesday will bring rain, then a cold front Thursday is expected to bring snow. 

Temperatures are expected to drop significantly, which could cause slippery roads for the morning and evening commute. 

There is also a blizzard warning for the far northwest of Minnesota Thursday. 

Advertisement

A wind advisory is in place for the southwest portion of the state on Thursday, which could bring wind speeds of up to 50 mph. 

An inch or two of snow is expected, but road conditions will deteriorate throughout the day Thursday. As the cold front moves through the state late Thursday morning, winds could be 40–50 mph.

Advertisement

Due to strong winds, any snow that falls could reduce viability when driving Thursday. Temperatures are expected to fall into single digits by the evening. 

Extended forecast

What’s next:

Advertisement

Friday could see a few flurries with temperatures in the low 20s. Saturday will have occasional passing clouds and highs in the upper 20s, while Sunday is cooler, but comes with more sunshine. 

Temperatures warm back into the 30s for the start of next week. 

Weather ForecastMinnesota
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Inver Grove Heights chosen as official location of Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame

Published

on

Inver Grove Heights chosen as official location of Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame


The future location of the Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame (MNHHOF) will be in the city of Inver Grove Heights.

The future location of the Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame (MNHHOF) will be in the city of Inver Grove Heights.

In the announcement made on Wednesday, the MNHHOF said the new site will be a 120,000-plus-square-foot, multi-purpose facility located adjacent to Interstate 494 and just east of Vikings Lakes and the Minnesota Vikings training complex.

Advertisement

“Since announcing this legacy project in August, the outpouring of support from players past and present, Minnesota-based companies, and hockey fans statewide has been overwhelming,” said MNHHOF CEO Natalie Darwitz. “We’re truly excited to build our permanent home in Inver Grove Heights, honoring the past and inspiring the future of Minnesota hockey.”

The current plans for the facility are to build it on a 40-acre section of land, featuring an ice rink, a 20,000-square-foot performance venue, a 30,000-square-foot museum, a hockey-themed restaurant and taproom and multiple event and community spaces.

“The City is thrilled that the Minnesota Hockey Hall of Fame has selected Inver Grove Heights as its home, and we look forward to welcoming them to our community,” said Inver Grove Heights Mayor Brenda Dietrich. “The site is in our Northwest Area, which has long been envisioned for major development, and the Hall of Fame offers the opportunity for new amenities and attractions that will benefit Inver Grove Heights for years to come.”

MNHHOF plans to break ground in 2026, with a planned opening in late 2028.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

KSTP/SurveyUSA poll results: Trump, Walz both below 50% approval in Minnesota

Published

on

KSTP/SurveyUSA poll results: Trump, Walz both below 50% approval in Minnesota


KSTP/SurveyUSA poll results: Trump, Walz both below 50% approval in Minnesota

The political feud between President Donald Trump and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is frequently documented.

While both try to score political points with their criticism of each other, neither has much in the way of bragging rights when it comes to approval ratings in Minnesota.

According to our exclusive KSTP/SurveyUSA poll, the president has a 42% approval rating in Minnesota with 55% disapproval. That 13-point difference is six points worse than our last survey three months ago.

Advertisement

Trump retains the approval of 89% of Republicans but just 35% of independents.

“Trump is always running a bit below the national average in job approval in Minnesota and that is the case here,” says Carleton College political analyst Steven Schier. However, the newest Associated Press/Reuters poll showed the president with a 39% approval rating and 59% disapproval, slightly better than his Minnesota results.

The president’s approval is bogged down by a 43% approval of his handling of the economy.

Gov. Walz doesn’t fare much better in our survey. For the second survey in a row, Walz is at 48% approval and 48% disapproval. Those ratings are his lowest in the 20 times we’ve surveyed his approval in the past four years. He’s seeking an unprecedented third four-year term as governor of Minnesota.

“Gov. Walz’s approval puts him in sort of a flashing yellow light zone,” says Schier. “There’s some danger ahead. He’s below 50% approval.”

Advertisement

The Walz approval numbers are weighed down by just 14% who say he’s done enough to stop state government fraud.

Our survey included 35% Democrats, 31% Republicans and 29% independents.

SurveyUSA interviewed 650 adults from the state of Minnesota 12/09/25 through 12/12/25. Of the adults, 578 were identified as being registered to vote and were asked the questions which follow. This research was conducted online, using nonprobability sample of online adult panelists chosen randomly by Cint USA. The combined pool of survey respondents was weighted to US Census ACS targets for gender, age, race, education, and home ownership.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending