Entertainment
Kieran Culkin's take on Logan Roy's parenting? 'He could have raised them better'
Most child actors don’t make the transition to adulthood on the big screen. Sure, there are exceptions, but for every Jodie Foster there are a dozen Shirley Temples. At age 10, Macaulay Culkin was one of the biggest stars of the 1990s. His brother Kieran, younger by two years, wasn’t. He appeared with him in both “Home Alone” movies and established his own career in supporting parts as the years passed.
In 2017, he was handed a script called “Succession.” The part was for Roman Roy, youngest in the Roy clan led by media mogul Logan Roy (Brian Cox). Loosely based on the real-life Murdoch family of Fox News, the show quickly became a breakout hit, catapulting Culkin to center stage playing not a kid, not a ‘tween, but a man, albeit one with no spine. At first glance, he knew the writing was strong but didn’t see an audience for it, including himself.
“As we were shooting, I was like, ‘I might not watch it, this isn’t for me.’ And then something clicked,” Culkin tells The Envelope. “The first few episodes, they’re good, there’s quality there, but I just don’t care about the characters. And somehow after a few episodes, I started to care.”
If older brother Kendall (Jeremy Strong) is the Roy Family’s Fredo, Roman is Kendall’s Fredo. Overwhelmed with insecurity and a profound lack of impulse control, he is the show’s cringe king, initiating an affair with much older in-house legal advisor Gerri Kellman (J. Smith-Cameron), sending her crotch shots — accidentally sending one to his father.
Kieran Culkin often played the cringe king as Roman Roy in “Succession,” especially in his scenes with J. Smith-Cameron as Gerri.
(Peter Kramer / HBO)
As the series winds down, Roman, along with Kendall and sister Shiv (Sarah Snook), vies for control of the family company, Waystar Royco, even though in his heart he knows that he, like his siblings, is unfit to lead. The point is amplified by Logan, who tells them, “You aren’t serious people.”
“He could have raised them better, he could have taught them a bit better,” Culkin says of the fractious family dynamic. “In various ways, he taught them that emotions were weak, and they all handled them in very different ways. And I think that Roman was always just told to bury it. You can acknowledge that you love someone, just don’t show them love or give them love.”
Emotional impediments take center stage halfway through the fourth and final season when Logan dies unexpectedly. (No cries of “spoiler!” here, the show is called “Succession” after all). “Roman convinced himself that he had pre-grieved,” Culkin says. “He hasn’t been given a moment to actually accept what happened and how he feels and who he is. I don’t feel like he really knows himself, outside of being his father’s son.”
Although he worked steadily as a child actor, Culkin credits “Igby Goes Down” director Burr Steers for teaching him about process when he was just 20. “The next big one for me was doing ‘This Is Our Youth,’ with Kenny Lonergan,” he says of the 2014 Broadway production co-starring Michael Cera. “I had more of an understanding of language and how to play with it. On stage, you’re not playing with the dialogue. Without changing a single syllable there’s room to play.”
Up until “Succession,” Culkin would prepare by getting off book and absorbing the full arc of his character. But with the hit series, they got scripts and changes so late that he was seldom sure of his lines. “The nature of the writing was very alive but very last-minute. So, I had to completely change my process,” he notes.
Much has been made of Strong’s Method acting, but Culkin found himself adjusting to all of his co-stars, including Matthew Macfadyen and Nicholas Braun. “Brian worked differently than anyone else. If we did a group scene, we knew the lines but were encouraged to talk over each other and try it a different way, or stay loose with blocking. That would throw Brian. So, we’d often have to stay pretty tight to the script. Then, if I have a scene where it’s just me and Sarah or me, Sarah, Matthew and Nick, we can play a lot more. With Jeremy, there were times to play, too. It wasn’t like we had to stick to a certain way, but we did have to adjust to personal preference. And now I have to go into my next job knowing that they’re probably not going to let me do what I did on ‘Succession.’”
Kieran Culkin stars with Jesse Eisenberg in the Sundance hit “A Real Pain.”
(Sundance Institute)
The next job was “A Real Pain,” starring and directed by Jesse Eisenberg, which recently premiered at Sundance to stellar reviews. In it, Culkin and Eisenberg play cousins who travel to Poland to honor their grandmother, a Holocaust survivor, following her death. Early press had noted on-set differences between Culkin and Eisenberg.
“He had a very set way that he wanted to direct this film, and I was like, ‘I don’t even get to pick my own blocking.’ That feels weird. It’s his film, not mine. I don’t want to step on his toes. But if I’m hired to do a job, I feel like, to a reasonable degree, I should be able to do it how I want. So, I think for a day or two he was a little bit sensitive about this process. And after a few days, we started to adapt a little.”
His recent though long-delayed Emmy for lead actor in a drama series (besting co-stars Strong and Cox) joins his Golden Globe and Critics Choice Awards, well-deserved accolades, though some question whether Roman is a lead role.
“I wanted to switch categories [to lead], and I got a lot of pushback on that,” Culkin says, noting HBO was supportive but others told him he’d be hurting his odds that way. “If switching to the other category meant accepting that I would not be receiving any awards, I was fine with that. Snook and I said that we should switch two seasons earlier. She and I switched this year.”
During his acceptance speech, Culkin gave a shout-out to his wife, holding her to a promise that if he won, they would start planning for more children. Toward the end of our interview, he receives a photo of his kids playing in the snow in Central Park and is reminded of his own childhood with his six brothers and sisters, raised in a single room in Manhattan’s Yorktown neighborhood by their mom (whom he thanked in his acceptance speech). “I really wish I was there for it,” he says, looking at the photo. “Those moments really matter.”
Movie Reviews
Miyamoto says he was surprised Mario Galaxy Movie reviews were even harsher than the first | VGC
Nintendo’s Shigeru Miyamoto says he’s surprised at the negative critical reception to the Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
As reported by Famitsu, Miyamoto conducted a group interview with Japanese media to mark the local release of The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
During the interview, Miyamoto was asked for his views on the critical reception to the film in the West, where critics’ reviews have been mostly negative.
Miyamoto replied that while he understood some of the negative points aimed at The Super Mario Bros Movie, he thought the reception would be better for the sequel.
“It’s true: the situation is indeed very similar,” he said. “Actually, regarding the previous film, I felt that the critics’ opinions did hold some validity. “However, I thought things would be different this time around—only to find that the criticism is even harsher than it was before.
“It really is quite baffling: here we are—having crossed over from a different field—working hard with the specific aim of helping to revitalize the film industry, yet the very people who ought to be championing that cause seem to be the ones taking a passive stance.”
As was the case with the first film, opinion is divided between critics and the public on The Super Mario Galaxy Movie. On review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, the film currently has a critics’ score of 43% , while its audience score is 89%.
While this is down from the first film’s scores (which were 59% critics and 95% public) it does still appear to imply that the film’s target audience is generally enjoying it despite critical negativity.
The negative reception is unlikely to bother Universal and Illumination too much, considering the film currently has a global box office of $752 million before even releasing in Japan, meaning a $1 billion global gross is becoming increasingly likely.
Elsewhere in the interview, Miyamoto said he hoped the film would perform well in Japan, especially because it has a unique script rather than a simple localization as in other regions.
“The Japanese version is a bit unique,” he said. “Normally, we create an English version and then localize it for each country, but for the first film, we developed the English and Japanese scripts simultaneously. For this film, we didn’t simply localize the completed English version – instead, we rewrote it entirely in Japanese to create a special Japanese version.
“So, if this doesn’t become a hit in Japan, I feel a sense of pressure – as the person in charge of the Japanese version – to not let [Illumination CEO and film co-producer] Chris [Meledandri] down.
“However, judging by the reactions of the audience members who’ve seen it, I feel that Mario fans are really embracing it. I also believe we’ve created a film that people can enjoy even if they haven’t seen the previous one, so I’m hopeful about that as well.”
Entertainment
Review: Monica Lewinsky, a saint? This devastatingly smart romance goes there
Book Review
Dear Monica Lewinsky
By Julia Langbein
Doubleday: 320 pages, $30
If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support independent bookstores.
First loves can be beautiful or traumatic, sometimes both. They are almost always intense, with emotions on speed dial and hormones running amok. Nothing like the durable consolations of late-life romance, but headier, more exciting and, in the worst cases, far more damaging.
Even decades later, Jean Dornan, the protagonist of Julia Langbein’s smart, poignant and involving novel “Dear Monica Lewinsky,” can’t recollect her own first love in tranquility. Its after-effects have derailed her life, and an unexpected email invitation to attend a retirement party in France honoring her former lover sends her into a tailspin.
An agitated Jean finds herself praying to none other than Monica Lewinsky, the patron saint of bad romantic choices, or as Langbein puts it, “of those who suffer venal public shaming and patriarchal cruelty.” In Langbein’s comic, but also deadly serious, imagination, this is no mere metaphor. The martyred Monica has literally been transfigured into a saint. And why not? Surely, she has suffered enough to qualify.
Jean and Monica have in common a disastrous liaison with an attractive, powerful, married older man. Monica was humiliated, reviled, then merely defined by her missteps. Meanwhile, her arguably more culpable sexual partner survived impeachment, retained both his political popularity and his marriage and enjoyed a lucrative post-presidency.
Jean’s brief fling during the summer of 1998 coincided with the public airing of Monica’s doomed romance. Jean’s passion took a more private toll, but she still lives with what Monica calls “this deepening suspicion that your existence is a remnant of an event long since concluded.”
Though framed by a fantastical conceit, “Dear Monica Lewinsky” is at its core a realist novel, influenced by the feminism of #MeToo and precise in its delineation of character and place. Langbein’s Monica — having finally transcended her past and ascended to spiritual omniscience — becomes Jean’s interlocutor. Together, they relive the fateful weeks that Jean spent studying the Romanesque churches of medieval France and charming David Harwell, the Rutgers University medieval art professor co-leading the summer program.
Every now and again, Monica, as much savvy therapist as all-knowing seer, interrupts Jean’s first-person account to offer guidance. Threaded through the narrative, as contrast and commentary, is a martyrology of female saints. These colloquially rendered portraits, reflecting a punitive, patriarchal morality, describe girls and women who would rather endure torture or even death than sully their sexual purity — stories so extreme that they seem satirical.
The portraits play off the novel’s milieu: a series of churches, as well as the medieval French castle that is home to an eccentric and mostly absent prince. The utility of religious doctrine and practice is another of the book’s themes. One graduate student, Patrick, is a devoted Roman Catholic, unquestioning in his faith. Others are merely devout enthusiasts of medieval architecture. Judith, a doctoral candidate at Harvard, has an addiction of her own: an eating disorder that threatens to disable her.
A rising junior at Rutgers, Jean is one of just two undergraduates in the program. Her initial dull, daunting task involves measuring and otherwise assessing the churches’ “apertures” — windows and doors. Later, she is assigned to collaborate on a guidebook and write a term paper.
A language major unversed in art, architecture or medieval history, Jean feels overwhelmed at times. But she does have useful talents: fluent French and the ability to conjure delicious Sunday dinners for her bedazzled colleagues. (The author of the 2023 novel “American Mermaid,” Langbein has both a doctorate in art history and a James Beard Foundation Journalism Award for food writing, and her expertise in both fields is evident.)
As the summer wanes, Jean’s fixation on David grows. Langbein excels at depicting the obsessive nature of illicit, unfulfilled desire — how it swamps judgment and just about everything else. A quarter-century Jean’s senior, David is trying to finish a stalled book project, laboring in the shadow of his more prolific and successful wife, Ann. An expert on the erotically charged religious life of nuns and the art it produced, she shows up briefly in the story and then conveniently disappears.
David is smooth, seductive and, to 19-year-old Jean, far more appealing than the fumbling schoolboys she has known. But he turns out to be no more grown-up or emotionally mature. After the flirtation and its consummation, David beats a hasty (and unsurprising) retreat. Then he does something worse: He allows his guilt to shred his integrity.
In the aftermath of that summer, a wounded Jean stumbles through her last two years of college, “berserk, unfocused, humiliating.” She abandons her academic and career ambitions, takes a job as a court interpreter, and marries Michael, an affable nurse who has little idea of her emotional burdens.
Then that invitation, inspiring “a racy heat,” arrives, and Jean must decide whether to confront her past or keep running from it. Is there really much of a choice? Fortunately, she has the saintly Monica as her guide. More clear-eyed now, Jean must reject her martyrdom and reclaim her own truth and agency. If she does, David, at least in the realm of the imagination, may finally get his comeuppance.
Klein, a three-time finalist for the National Book Critics Circle’s Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing, is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia.
Movie Reviews
‘I Swear’ Review – Heart Sans Sap, Cursing Aplenty
The sixth outing in the director’s chair for filmmaker Kirk Jones, I Swear dramatizes the real-life story of touretter John Davidson (played by Robert Aramayo). Tourette’s Syndrome, for those unfamiliar with the condition, is a nervous system disorder that causes various tics, the most prolific being erratic and explicit language. However, as I Swear expertly showcases, the syndrome is far more than ill-timed outbursts of curse words. Davidson’s story is one of societal frustration, finding your people (both with and without the condition), and using your voice to help others rise. The subject and subject matter are handled with absolute care and understanding under Kirk’s measured vision and Robert Aramayo’s BAFTA-winning performance.
The film kicks off with the greatest exclamation to democracy ever uttered (*%#! the Queen!), as a nervous John Davidson prepares himself before entering an awards ceremony hosted by Britain’s royal family. Right away, the film tells us what it is: a triumph over adversity that blends humor and human drama with education. It’s an important setup, as the film flashes back to Davidson’s 1980s youth, where we see his time as a star soccer recruit flatline as his condition takes hold. Davidson’s life spirals from there. Some aspects, like school bullying and accidental run-ins with authority figures, are expected but important to empathizing with young Davidson’s (young version, played with heart by Scott Ellis Watson) new everyday life. The more tragic, a complete meltdown of his family system, is unsettling if quick. His father (Steven Cree) is never given enough screen time to explore his alcohol coping tendencies. However, his mother Heather’s descent into easy fixes and blaming is crushing and convincing. Harry Potter series actress Shirley Henderson (Moaning Myrtle) gives a layered performance as Heather. Someone who loves her son, but also feels cursed by him as the entire family exits the picture. It’s bitter, she’s tired, and fills each conversation with ‘only medication and your mother can save you’ energy.
From there, the viewer and Davidson find refuge in a host of characters. Maxine Peake plays Dottie, the mother of a childhood friend and a retired mental health nurse. Screen vet Peter Mullan plays maintenance man Tommy Trotter. Together, they help Davidson build a life and an understanding of himself that carries the film forward into its second half. After that, the film is primarily a 3-actor show as director Kirk fills the screen with these tour-de-force performances. Peake and Mullan are great vessels to get the film’s main message across: patience, love, and a shared responsibility between the diagnosed and those who understand their struggle can help change the path for people quickly left behind by a normative world. Together, they are the soul of the movie, with the filmmakers clearly hoping the audience will follow their lead after they exit the theater (in my case, the beautiful Oriental Theater for the Milwaukee Film Festival). Both performances are perfectly warm and reflective and shouldn’t be left out in discussions of I Swear.
I say this because the movie is anchored by The Rings of Power actor Robert Aramayo, who leaves Elrond’s elf ears behind to bring an acute naturalism to his performance of main character John Davidson. Aramayo’s physicality and timing of the fitful Tourettes Syndrome never feel out of place or overplayed. In fact, the movie as a whole does an amazing job of never veering into sentimentality. While many moviegoers left with tissues dabbing their eyes, the filmmaking never felt like it was forcing that reaction out of audiences. It straddles the line between feel-good and reality with every story beat and lands squarely on the side of letting the real inform our feelings. Anyone with an ounce of empathy will grasp the film’s message and hopefully take it with them into life.
I Swear continues at the Milwaukee Film Festival on Tuesday, April 21st, and releases nationwide April 24th, 2026, courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.
-
Wyoming1 minute agoWyoming’s Title X Family Planning network remains a critical part of the state’s health care system
-
Crypto7 minutes agoCurrent price of Ethereum for April 22, 2026 | Fortune
-
Finance13 minutes agoGerman finance minister wants to scrap spousal tax splitting
-
Fitness19 minutes agoPut the fun back in your fitness routine with this 10-minute follow-along workout from The Curvy Girl Trainer Lacee Green
-
Movie Reviews31 minutes agoMiyamoto says he was surprised Mario Galaxy Movie reviews were even harsher than the first | VGC
-
World43 minutes agoNaomi Watts to Star as Ballerina Margot Fonteyn in Romantic Drama ‘Margot & Rudi,’ With WestEnd Films Selling in Cannes
-
News49 minutes agoCalifornia Candidates to Appear in First Major Debate After Swalwell
-
Politics55 minutes agoVideo: Virginia Voters Approve New Map Favoring Democrats
