Entertainment
'Vanderpump Rules' executive producer Alex Baskin on 'Scandoval' and what's in store for Season 11
There were many signs that last year’s cheating scandal involving three cast members of “Vanderpump Rules” — Bravo’s reality series built on the cheating, breakups, hookups and messy friendships of it cast — pierced into the zeitgeist to become a pop culture phenomenon. There was the way it was named Scandoval (a portmanteau of “scandal” and “Sandoval,” the last name of the cast member at the center of the affair), the endless stream of TikTok videos unpacking the scuttlebutt, the way it had Hollywood stars like Jennifer Lawrence and Molly Shannon rapt, and even the coverage from legacy media outlets, including the New York Times, Washington Post and our own.
For Alex Baskin, executive producer of the long-running series, it was among the first times he got recognized out in public.
“I had a really strange moment when the reunion was airing,” he says, referring to the three-part special, where the cast reflects on what‘s unfolded. “As a producer, you’re anonymous, which is totally fine. I had a dinner and I go to the restaurant, and someone says to me, ‘Great to see you, Mr. Baskin. I can’t wait to see tomorrow night’s reunion.’ It was so weird for me. I remember thinking we’ve penetrated something; people really care that much.”
In March 2023, a few weeks after the show’s 10th season premiered, news hit that Tom Sandoval cheated on Ariana Madix, his girfriend of nine years, with Rachel “Raquel” Leviss, their friend and co-star on the reality series. While production on the season was completed before the drama-filled affair started making headlines, filming quickly resumed to capture the fallout. It all provided a much-needed jolt to the series that had been in a rut since its heyday early in its run.
Ariana Madix, left, Andy Cohen, Lisa Vanderpump and Tom Sandoval during the Season 10 “Vanderpump Rules” reunion.
(Nicole Weingart/Bravo)
“Five years ago, I don’t know that we would have picked the cameras back up once the season ended,” Baskin says. “And by the way, there was some sentiment within the cadre of people who make these decisions that we should just wait until the reunion, which was already scheduled to film three weeks after the news broke. I vehemently disagreed. Because my feeling was if we could capture that moment in real time, that would be more powerful.”
Years before he was at the helm of some of Bravo’s most addictive reality series — he’s also an executive producer on “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” and “Real Housewives of Orange County” — Baskin got his first taste of Hollywood as a summer intern at MTV, when he was just a high school senior. Baskin eventually went on to study law, but he later realized he didn’t want to actually practice law. During his time at MTV, he met with an executive at Evolution Media, a production company with a long roster of reality TV programs, and Baskin left enough of an impression to land a job there later, leading to a fruitful career in reality TV.
He left the MGM-owned company last year to launch his own, 32 Flavors, to develop and produce a range of unscripted, scripted and feature film projects.
At his home in Beverly Hills, he talked about the challenges of filming the new season (premiering Tuesday) in the wake of an explosive scandal; reality TV personalities who have become superstars; and how the Bravo fandom has evolved, becoming part of the stories on-screen.
‘It doesn’t get any less intense going forward’
The heated Season 10 reunion of “Vanderpump Rules” was shot at the end of March and, at one point, production thought about forgoing the usual hiatus between seasons to continue filming from the reunion into Season 11. But that idea was quickly nixed. Cameras were back up in May to shoot the new season.
“We could do less storyboarding or anticipating than we had ever done before, because we didn’t know how the pieces would assemble back together — or even if they would in the first place. I will say that we were grateful for every day that we weren’t shooting because we think the group needed time to recover. I thought that if the feelings were that heated that I didn’t know how that would ultimately land. On the one hand, a couple of months [gap in shooting] is a long time, but it’s also not. As you see [in the first two episodes], we aren’t in a terribly different place. There’s very little we could do here. All of the questions that we faced about how Ariana and Tom would shoot together, our feeling was, well, we just don’t know. We didn’t know whether Rachel was returning, so we had to kind of roll with it as it developed. We are documenting a group of people. We follow the story as it develops. I will tell you, it doesn’t get any less intense going forward.”
The uptick in public interest, not to mention the series landing its first-ever Emmy nominations, also gave the cast some bargaining power heading into the new season.
“This is as hard as it’s ever been because typically, we have a rate card, a tenure card, we’ve used in prior seasons. There are all sorts of asks across the board. Something like a producer credit is off the table because that isn’t something that we could open up. But otherwise, I knew that it would take a little bit of time for the cast expectations to settle. Because a lot of the time, too, we are making sure that they’re aware of the state of the industry and the fact that shows are challenged these days. Their point is, rightfully, ‘You guys are touting the show’s success. Where is our piece of that?’ Those are tough conversations. I did think that everybody, with the exception of Rachel, who had to make a personal decision, wanted to come back. Everybody did better than what they had previously gotten.”
The Raquel of it all …
Leviss, who checked herself into a facility for mental health and trauma therapy in April, ultimately decided not to return to “Vanderpump Rules” for its 11th season. She, however, remains a topic of conversation, at least in the first couple of episodes of the season.
A “Vanderpump Rules”-themed candle is among the decor in Alex Baskin’s home. He says a line producer from the series, who makes candles, gave it to him as a gift.
(Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times)
“We had conversations with both her reps and her directly. Our first concern was how she was doing, and whether or not it made sense for her to come back — personally, emotionally. She was very conflicted about it. She expressed a concern about the way that the group would treat her or concern for being in a group situation. We said we don’t expect you to be in any situation in which you don’t feel safe or comfortable. There was, frankly, a lot of conversations about money. Her team was very clear that they felt that she should be rewarded. At one point, they raised the idea of her getting a development deal.”
“We would have liked it [if she came back] because I think there’s a great interest in how she was doing. I also think that it’s the best platform for her to tell her story, more so than any podcast, but that’s ultimately up to her. I think that she would have been surprised by the consideration that was given to her, and I think, as you’ll see in the first episode, there was a willingness to hear her out. And I’m not saying that everything would have healed right away. But I think it would have been a different experience than she would have anticipated. I think that would have been a good story to tell. I will say on the other side of things, if she still wanted to move on from Tom and didn’t want anything to do with him, then perhaps her absence allowed that to happen.”
‘Everywhere we went was a zoo’
“Vanderpump Rules” isn’t the first reality TV series to contend with the conundrum of a cast whose real lives have outgrown the confines of a show’s premise. When “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” spinoff launched in 2013, most of the cast were wait staff at a West Hollywood lounge, which was owned by then-”RHOBH” star Lisa Vanderpump, and had aspirations of making it as actors, models or music artists, but turned into celebrities with millions of social media followers and press attention through sharing their lives.
In the months after the scandal, Madix was fielding a number of opportunities, which included joining the cast of “Dancing With the Stars” and making her Broadway debut in “Chicago.” The hubbub surrounding the cast, especially heading into Season 11, made filming more challenging. Baskin had to consider how much it should all factor into the season as more reality series have become less precious about maintaining the fourth wall — which separates the camera crew and viewers from what’s playing out in front of the camera.
“The fact that we now break the fourth wall, routinely, has meant that there is no distinction between production and developments in real life, which means when something happens, we pick up, and we acknowledge that we’ve done it. I have very mixed feelings about the breaking down of the fourth wall. I’m not surprised that we got here. I think sometimes we assemble the fourth wall, as opposed to breaking it down, meaning that we create a distinction that shouldn’t exist. For example, in “Housewives” to refer to the “last time that we were together as a group,” it’s like, let’s be real about what that last time was: you were filming a reunion with Andy Cohen. On the other side of things, I’m in favor of it, when it contributes to the authenticity and the reality. I’m not in favor of it when there’s a self-consciousness about it. . I’ve had a funny experience where there was someone we were in discussions with to join one of the “Housewives,” and she wanted to be able to break the fourth wall when she wanted. She said to me, “What if I’m in a sitcom and everyone else is on ‘The Real Housewives.’” I just didn’t think that would work. The audience doesn’t like artifice.”
How much does “Vanderpump Rules” lean into it, acknowledging its cultural impact outside its Valley Village and West Hollywood bubble, this season?
“We have to because we wouldn’t be able to tell the real story. If we were to frame this season just as Tom and Ariana are a couple that had the messiest breakup of all time, I don’t think that’s quite accurate. The truth is, Tom and Ariana are a couple that had the messiest breakup times a million and the magnitude was because of the public reaction [to it]. And Ariana’s star was on the rise, and Tom’s went in a different direction. We have to acknowledge that. We don’t get to the point where we refer to the Emmy nomination [which was announced while the show was in production] because that’s self-referential in a way that would just be a turnoff. So we’re careful about that. But we do open up the fact that the very public nature of what we’re doing impacts us. It was harder for us to shoot this year because everywhere we went was a zoo. At one point in our final trip, there was an incident in San Francisco [Tom Sandoval appeared to be caught in the middle of a fight]. We try to screen it out, but we do acknowledge that this is a group that has a ton of outside interest, and that actually does impact their lives and, therefore, it’s a reality that we have to document.”
A flask with a line popularized by actor Denise Richards when she was a cast member of “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.”
(Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times)
Bravo-verse
Real-life controversies in the Bravo television universe have left fans seeking answers in real-time, often long before a new season unfolds. And a cottage industry of podcasts, as well as fan and gossip accounts have sprung up to serve them. But the latest season of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” found itself confronting the dynamic in a meta way. In the Season 4 finale, it was revealed that Monica Garcia, a new addition to the cast, is behind Reality Von Tease, an Instagram troll account that has had a history of posting negative things about the “RHOSLC” stars. It was an explosive moment that rocked the “Housewives” franchise. (Garcia will not return for the show’s fifth season.) Is it great TV or a reality TV producer’s nightmare? Baskin, who is not an executive producer on the series, shared his thoughts.
“It would be a nightmare. I would say that there is a 0% chance that that was set up because you would never set that up; you wouldn’t put yourself in a situation in which you’re confronting something that threatens your existence. I just don’t think that’s very smart. It’s the show eating itself. You face a lot of accusations that a lot of the cast members across the shows are involved with those accounts, but not that they are those accounts and not that they infiltrated the show or the friend group. ‘Vanderpump’ is a little bit insulated from that versus a bunch of the other shows that I do because it’s a group of real friends; outsiders don’t really exist in that way. And that’s something that may make good television in the moment, but on the whole, is not something you’re excited about.
I don’t see how that could be avoided. All the time, there are people that try out for any of the shows that very clearly are super fans. We’re careful about that. We also don’t love people who don’t have any idea what they’re signing up for. I’ve had a few of those. Like Diana Jenkins — it’s like, ‘Here’s what we’re making. Here’s what it is.’ I love the audience and the fans because their avid interest obviously feeds everything. I don’t love social media, and I don’t love the impact that it can end up having.”
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years
“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway.
It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.
Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.
We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.
Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.
That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.
Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.
The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.
And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged.
“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.
HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.
Entertainment
How a mural of Altadena became a symbol of resilience for one small store, through fire and flood
Every time Adriana Molina drives up Lake Avenue to her retro-style women’s clothing shop Sidecca in Altadena, she sees the new outdoor mural she commissioned for the store by muralist and illustrator Annie Bolding. It gives her hope.
“I’m here to stay, and this mural solidified my decision to reopen my business,” said Molina on a recent winter day, sitting next to Bolding inside the boutique. “I grew up in Altadena. The community has motivated me this whole time, and I want them to drive by this mural and smile.”
“ALTADENA.” The word — in big white letters, set against layers of blue — appears toward the top of the mural, on the store’s brick wall facing Lake. Above are the San Gabriel Mountains, painted a deep brown, California poppies and Mariposa Street and Lake Avenue street signs. Below are green grass, a monarch butterfly and Altadena’s Christmas Tree Lane. A bright blue house is on a multicolored striped path in the middle of the mural. Next to it, on a hiking trail, a sign says, “Welcome Home Altadena… With Love, Sidecca.”
For Molina and Bolding, the mural is a personal ode to the Eaton fire-ravaged community — art as a message of optimism and healing.
A car passes by the new Altadena mural on the side of Sidecca apparel shop, which commissioned the piece after fire and floods devastated the community.
(Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)
When the fire tore through Altadena in January 2025, Sidecca and a few other stores on the north side of Mariposa Street’s bustling Mariposa Junction survived, while the other half-block of businesses burned to the ground. The fire leveled Bolding’s parents’ house off Lake and the home of one of Molina’s close relatives.
Molina staged pop-ups and sold merchandise online during months of remediation, and officially reopened Sidecca’s doors in November as part of Mariposa Junction’s larger comeback. Then the store suffered another blow: flooding and damage during rainstorms in late December. While Molina prepped to temporarily close her store yet again for renovations, Bolding began work on the mural. She started painting on the one-year anniversary of the fire and finished eight days later.
“On the day I started it, it was so cold and windy, and I was scared being up on the ladder,” said Bolding. “But getting to talk to community members while I was painting was very special. People were excited and honking as they drove by. That night, I drove up to the lot where my parents’ place was, and I stood there and all the feelings flooded back.”
The mural’s origin story is that of two creative women bound by strength and a desire to give back.
Molina, who has worked in the fashion industry for more than 30 years, opened Sidecca’s Altadena spot in 2023, after closing its longtime Pasadena location. Voted Pasadena’s best women’s clothing store five times by Pasadena Weekly, Sidecca sells fun vintage-inspired merchandise and clothes, from ‘50s style dresses to snazzy magnets, tote bags and sunglasses. A big rainbow zips across the top of one of the store’s walls.
A display in Sidecca in 2023, two years before the Eaton fire devastated Altadena.
(Alejandro R. Jimenez)
“A few months after Sidecca opened in Altadena, my mom walked in and saw how colorful it was, and said, ‘This reminds me of my daughter,’ ” Bolding said. “With zero hesitation, my mom said to Adriana, ‘Here’s her Instagram. This is my daughter’s stuff.’ ”
Bolding, who goes by Disco Day Designs, calls herself “a joyful creator who loves to intentionally transform spaces.” Known for the bright murals she creates for brands and shops, Bolding gained attention on social media for a trash bin she painted with palm trees and stripes. She brought it to the 2024 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival as part of a contest organized by the festival’s sustainability partner, Global Inheritance.
“I fixated on the trash can,” said Molina. “I looked at Annie’s murals and was like, ‘Oh, she has to do something in here for us.’ ”
“Game recognizes game,” added Bolding, smiling.
Molina wanted to rebrand Sidecca with a new logo, bags and art, and connected with Bolding about that and a possible mural inside the store. “I wanted ‘Sidecca’ painted across a wall as an acronym that stands for style, individuality, diversity, expression, community, culture and art,” she said. “That’s who we are.”
Then came Jan. 7, 2025.
The store was closed all day for a holiday lunch. Then the winds picked up and the flames roared. Molina, who lives with her husband and two children on the Altadena-Pasadena, evacuated with her family to Long Beach and came back days later. She knew the store was OK because she’d seen it — intact — on the news.
“As soon as we could come up to the shop, we went,” Molina said. “There were ashes all over.”
Bolding and her husband were in Palm Springs fixing up an AirBnb they cohost when Bolding got a call from her mom about the fire in Altadena. She urged her mom, dad and younger brother to evacuate. After they did, their home burned down. Her parents now live in a Pasadena apartment.
When Molina started selling Altadena-themed merch on Sidecca’s website, Bolding donated three designs, including one with lively retro daisies. In July, she wrote an email to Molina reviving the idea of a mural, but outside versus inside, as an ode to Altadena.
“It felt like anything I could do to bring joy, let’s go,” said Molina. “And I really wanted a little house in there, and for it to say, ‘Welcome home.’ ”
The mural would be Bolding’s first public piece of art on a main street.
“Lake always felt like the road going home,” she said. “That rainbow road in the mural, leading to the mountains, is so symbolic. Very ‘Wizard of Oz.’ The mountains, their silhouette, have always felt majestic, safe, and why it was so heartbreaking anytime to see them burn. To me, they feel like mother.”
Muralist Annie Bolding stands in front of her new Altadena mural on the side of the Sidecca apparel shop. The work is Bolding’s first piece of public art on a main street.
(Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)
Bolding’s joyful daisies decorated the Sidecca tote bag given to customers at November’s reopening, just before December’s intense rainstorms. Water gushed through Sidecca’s ceiling. Molina and her employee Manisa Ianakiev were overwhelmed.
“We were like, ‘Is this really happening?’ ” said Molina. “Then people started bringing tools and towels. It was an example of community.”
Bolding planned to start painting the mural Jan. 4, during the Altadena Forever Run, but rain swept through. After Molina’s landlord installed a plywood base, Bolding started on the mural several days later.
Since then, the shop’s ceiling has been replaced, and Molina is working on trying to replace the floor — while continuing to stage pop-ups and sell merchandise online — before fully reopening the bricks-and-mortar boutique this spring.
“People say, ‘Every time I go into your store, I just get happy. I’m in a better mood,’ ” said Molina. “I get that all the time. And what Annie has done, this mural, is beautiful. It makes me happy.”
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon4 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Technology1 week agoArturia’s FX Collection 6 adds two new effects and a $99 intro version
-
News1 week agoVideo: How Lunar New Year Traditions Take Root Across America