Iranians were able to access more than 1,500 Binance accounts last year, and $1.7 billion was transferred from two of them to terrorist proxies, The New York Times reported Monday.
Crypto
Cryptocurrency Investing Is Not For the Faint-hearted or Uninformed – Tekedia
Cryptocurrencies are a fascinating and complex topic that attracts many investors, enthusiasts and researchers. However, they are also very volatile, risky and unpredictable, and require a lot of knowledge and expertise to navigate successfully. I will explain some of the challenges and opportunities that cryptocurrencies present, and why they are not for the faint-hearted or the uninformed.
Cryptocurrencies are digital assets that use cryptography to secure transactions and control the creation of new units. They operate on decentralized networks of computers that follow a set of rules or protocols. Unlike traditional currencies, they are not issued or backed by any central authority, such as a government or a bank.
This gives them some advantages, such as lower transaction costs, faster processing times, greater transparency and anonymity, and resistance to censorship and manipulation.
Tekedia Mini-MBA (Feb 5 – May 4, 2024) registration has started; beat early birds for discounts here.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
However, cryptocurrencies also come with many drawbacks and risks. One of the main challenges is their high volatility, which means that their prices can fluctuate dramatically in a short period of time. For example, in 2017, the price of Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency, rose from about $1,000 to almost $20,000, and then fell to below $4,000 in 2018. Such swings can be influenced by various factors, such as supply and demand, technical issues, regulatory changes, hacking attacks, media coverage, public sentiment and speculation.
Another challenge is their security and reliability. Cryptocurrencies rely on cryptography and blockchain technology to ensure the validity and integrity of transactions. However, these technologies are not foolproof and can be vulnerable to errors, bugs, hacks or malicious attacks.
For instance, in 2014, Mt. Gox, the largest Bitcoin exchange at the time, lost about 850,000 Bitcoins (worth about $450 million) due to a hacking attack. In 2016, a hacker exploited a flaw in the code of a smart contract platform called Ethereum and stole about $50 million worth of Ether, another cryptocurrency.

A third challenge is their regulatory and legal uncertainty. Cryptocurrencies are subject to different laws and regulations in different countries and jurisdictions. Some countries have banned or restricted their use or trade, while others have embraced or regulated them.
For example, China has banned cryptocurrency exchanges and initial coin offerings (ICOs), while Japan has recognized Bitcoin as a legal tender and licensed several cryptocurrency exchanges. The lack of a clear and consistent legal framework can create confusion and ambiguity for users, investors and businesses.
These challenges and risks mean that cryptocurrencies are not for the faint-hearted or the uninformed. They require a lot of research, education and caution to understand and use them properly. They also require a high tolerance for risk and uncertainty, as well as a long-term perspective and patience.

Cryptocurrencies are not a get-rich-quick scheme or a magic bullet for financial problems. They are an innovative and experimental phenomenon that may have a significant impact on the future of money and society.
Trading, market making, staking see funding after Spot ETF approval
The recent approval of the first cryptocurrency exchange-traded fund (ETF) by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sparked a wave of interest and investment in the crypto space. Many traders, market makers and stakers are looking for ways to capitalize on this opportunity and increase their returns.
One of the main benefits of an ETF is that it allows investors to gain exposure to a basket of assets without having to buy and store them individually. This reduces the risks and costs associated with custody, security and regulation. An ETF also provides more liquidity and transparency than other types of funds, as it can be traded on a stock exchange like any other security.
However, an ETF also comes with some challenges and limitations. For example, an ETF may not track the underlying assets perfectly, due to fees, tracking errors and rebalancing issues. An ETF may also face competition from other similar products, such as trusts, futures and options. Moreover, an ETF may not capture the full potential of the crypto market, as it may exclude some segments or innovations that are not yet mainstream or regulated.
This is where trading, market making and staking come in. These are three different ways of participating in the crypto ecosystem that can offer higher returns, more flexibility and more innovation than an ETF. Let’s take a look at each one in more detail.
Trading
Trading is the act of buying and selling cryptocurrencies or other digital assets for profit. Traders can use various strategies, such as arbitrage, scalping, swing trading or trend following, to exploit price movements and market inefficiencies. Traders can also use leverage, derivatives and margin trading to amplify their gains or hedge their risks.
Trading requires a high level of skill, knowledge and discipline, as well as access to reliable platforms, tools and data. Trading also involves significant risks, such as volatility, liquidity, slippage and counterparty risk. Traders need to be aware of the regulatory and tax implications of their activities, as well as the ethical and social impact of their decisions.
Market making
Market making is the act of providing liquidity to a market by quoting both buy and sell prices for an asset. Market makers earn profits from the spread between the bid and ask prices, as well as from fees or rebates from the platform or exchange they operate on. Market makers also help reduce price fluctuations and improve market efficiency by facilitating trade execution and price discovery.
Market making requires a large amount of capital, as well as sophisticated algorithms, models and systems to manage inventory, risk and orders. Market making also involves high competition, low margins and regulatory uncertainty. Market makers need to constantly monitor the market conditions, the demand and supply of the asset, and the actions of other market participants.
Staking
Staking is the act of locking up a certain amount of cryptocurrency in a smart contract or a wallet to support the security and operation of a blockchain network. Stakers earn rewards from the network for validating transactions, producing blocks or participating in governance. Staking also gives stakers voting rights and influence over the network’s direction and development.
Staking requires a long-term commitment, as well as trust in the network’s stability, security and performance. Staking also involves opportunity costs, as stakers forego other uses of their funds while they are locked up. Stakers need to carefully choose which network to stake on, based on factors such as reward rate, inflation rate, lock-up period and slashing risk.
Trading, market making and staking are three different ways of engaging with the crypto market that can offer more benefits than an ETF. However, they also come with more challenges and risks that require careful consideration and preparation. Ultimately, each investor needs to decide which option suits their goals, preferences and risk appetite best.
Crypto
Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban
Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota
Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.
There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.
Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.
Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.
Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.
Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users
Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.
Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.
Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.
Lawmakers weighing next steps
Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.
Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.
The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.
In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.
As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.
10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks
Crypto
Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India
Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.
Crypto
Terror groups receive $1.7b. from Iran through Binance | The Jerusalem Post
That was a potential violation of global sanctions, the report said, citing company records and documents collected by internal investigators.
The cryptocurrency exchange site reportedly fired or suspended at least four employees cited in the internal investigation. The company blamed “violations of company protocol” relating to its clients’ data, the Times reported.
The report came days after The Jerusalem Post spoke with experts from blockchain intelligence platform NOMINIS.io about how the Iranian regime was evading Western sanctions through cryptocurrencies.
The regime maintains a steady income using cryptocurrency through oil sales to Russia and China, NOMINIS CEO Snir Levi said at the time.
Regarding the latest scandal, he told the Post this week: “The latest allegations about Binance come months after the lawsuit by the victims’ families of October 7 – the ongoing Balva [versus] Binance case.
The majority of the allegations can be easily confirmed by on-chain data. There are thousands of cases where money has been sent and received to and from wallets that have clear connections to Iran.”
Binance founder Changpeng Zhao is being sued by the families of American victims and hostages of the October 7 massacre. He has been accused of knowingly enabling Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to transfer more than $1b. through its platform, including more than $50 million after the October 7 massacre.
Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering violations in connection with Binance in 2023. US President Donald Trump pardoned him last October.
“They say what he did was not even a crime,” Trump told reporters last October. “It wasn’t a crime. That he was persecuted by the Biden administration, and so I gave him a pardon at the request of a lot of very good people.”
Binance representative Rachel Conlan said the accounts linked to the $1.7b. in Iranian transactions have been removed and the relevant authorities were informed.
“Any suggestion that Binance knowingly allowed sanctionable activity to continue unchecked is incorrect and defamatory,” she said, despite Zhao’s earlier admission of anti-money-laundering violations.
More than half a dozen compliance officials have left Binance, including a sanctions manager and the leader of the enterprise compliance team, over the past few months, the Times reported.
“No investigator was dismissed for raising compliance concerns or for reporting potential sanctions issues,” Conlan said in a statement to The Guardian.
Democrat senator opens inquiry into cryptocurrency company
While Conlan insisted there was no wrongdoing, US Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) opened an inquiry into Binance on Tuesday, seeking records of the company’s dealings in Hong Kong , where funds have previously been transferred in a network against sanctions.
“Binance appears to have ignored warnings and recommendations to prevent Iranian money-laundering schemes on its cryptocurrency exchange,” Blumenthal wrote in a letter to Binance co-chief executive Richard Teng.
“According to documents obtained by the Times and the Journal, Binance was even warned that Hexa Whale was financing terrorist organizations such as the Yemeni Houthis, and internal investigators found cryptocurrency transfers to wallets associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and payments to crew members of Russia’s sanctions-evading shadow fleet of oil tankers,” he wrote.
“Instead of actually preventing illicit use, Binance has sought to evade accountability and influence the White House through lobbying and a financial partnership with World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the cryptocurrency firm owned by the sons of President Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff… This influence campaign has worked: In May 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was dismissing a lawsuit against Binance for lying to regulators and mishandling funds, followed in October by the stunning Presidential pardon of founder Changpeng Zhao.”
“The scale of the newly revealed illicit transfers – uncaught until nearly $2 billion flowed to sanctioned entities – and the unexplained firing of internal investigators call into question Binance’s compliance with American sanctions and banking laws, and its 2023 agreement to resolve the previous federal investigation,” Blumenthal wrote.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making