Connect with us

Lifestyle

Paintings on paper reveal another side of Rothko

Published

on

Paintings on paper reveal another side of Rothko

Mark Rothko, Untitled (seated figure in interior), c. 1938, watercolor on construction paper sheet.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


Mark Rothko, Untitled (seated figure in interior), c. 1938, watercolor on construction paper sheet.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

It’s easy to interpret the large, dark paintings of Mark Rothko’s final months as bleak, the work of an artist whose long struggle with ill health and depression ended when he took his own life in 1970. Too easy, as it turns out. A series of lesser known pieces on paper in dreamy pastel hues from that same period counter an enduring narrative of gloom.

The intimate paintings are the pièce de résistance in a show at the National Gallery of Art in Washington running through March 31 that features more than 100 works on paper of an artist best known for towering color fields painted on canvas in the last two decades of his life. It will travel in May to the National Museum in Oslo for the artist’s retrospective in Scandinavia.

Advertisement

Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1969, acrylic on wove paper mounted on linen overall.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

toggle caption

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

Advertisement


Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1969, acrylic on wove paper mounted on linen overall.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

“I find them incredibly optimistic,” said Pace Gallery founder Arne Glimcher, a friend of Rothko’s who was his neighbor in New York. “There’s this immediate freshness and minimalist touch to those pictures where he lays the brush down in each color only one time or a couple times, and they’re not worked over like the oil paintings are.”

‘The interpretation is yours’

To conclude that the dark paintings are depressing and the light ones are happy is simply “mindless,” according to Glimcher.

Once, he recalls Rothko telling him, a woman came to the studio for a purchase. Rothko liked to pick himself the work he would sell to individual buyers, in an effort to match the painting to the person who would live with it. This time, he chose a piece redolent with burgundy, dark blue and rust. The woman was not pleased, asking instead for a bright red, yellow and orange painting, which she thought would be more cheerful.

Advertisement

“And he said to the woman, ‘Red, yellow and orange, isn’t that the color of an inferno?’” Glimcher said. “So you see, the interpretation is yours, but it’s not necessarily his and it’s not necessarily what the work is about.”

Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1969, acrylic on wove paper.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1969, acrylic on wove paper.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

In his black and gray paintings on paper, as well as a similar series in blacks and browns, Rothko was also investigating the use of a white edge — using masking tape, he created a sort of frame that’s absent in other paintings.

“Other paintings are like weather coming across the plains, coming into the face,” Glimcher said. “And as soon as you put the white edge around them, you’re looking at something that could be interpreted as a landscape.”

Advertisement

The ‘essence’ of a life’s work

Glimcher sees in the darker works an artist distilling his oeuvre to “a kind of essence.”

“It’s a natural effect in an artist’s career that they become more and more subtle,” he said, citing Picasso and Matisse as other examples.

Mark Rothko, Baptismal Scene, 1945, watercolor and graphite pencil on paper.

Digital Image © Whitney Museum/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Digital Image © Whitney Museum/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


Mark Rothko, Baptismal Scene, 1945, watercolor and graphite pencil on paper.

Digital Image © Whitney Museum/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

The National Gallery’s show also provides a chronological sample of Rothko’s evolution as an artist. Portraits and landscapes in the 1930s that reference European impressionists like Paul Cézanne give way to surrealist compositions of the 1940s that recall Yves Tanguy or Joan Miró.

Advertisement

Origin story

By 1949, Rothko was experimenting with what became his recognizable format. In one painting, soft-edged horizontal rectangles glow atop a sunny background.

Mark Rothko, Untitled, c. 1949, oil and watercolor on watercolor paper.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


Mark Rothko, Untitled, c. 1949, oil and watercolor on watercolor paper.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

“Over the course of the late ’40s, Rothko decided that recognizable imagery should be pulverized, that the best way to communicate directly with a viewer was to reduce his compositions to pure color and form,” explained Adam Greenhalgh, curator of the show, which travels in May to the National Museum in Oslo for the artist’s retrospective in Scandinavia.

Paintings on canvases dominated Rotkho’s work during the next decade. In 1958, he accepted a commission to paint murals for the Four Seasons restaurant in New York’s Seagram building, hoping the pieces would always be shown as a group. What became known as the Seagram Murals were also his first series to focus on a dark palette of browns, blacks and reds.

Advertisement

Vibrant palette

Ultimately, Rothko grew disillusioned with the project and abandoned it. He then turned back to paper, where the full range of his palette comes through in vibrant yellows, oranges, reds and blues.

“These paintings pulse. They shimmer. They swell. They recede. They’re magnetic and compelling,” said Greenhalgh, the curator.

Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1958, oil on watercolor paper mounted on hardboard.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko


Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1958, oil on watercolor paper mounted on hardboard.

ShootArt Mobile 1/Copyright © 2023 Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

After suffering an aortic aneurysm in early 1968, Rothko worked mainly on paper, creating mostly smaller works.

Advertisement

He used dynamic brushstrokes, using quick-drying acrylic and ink.

Peering into Rothko’s hazy rectangles of color can be such a visceral experience that some liken it to a spiritual one. Art collector Duncan Phillips, who helped introduce modern art to the United States, used the word “chapel” to describe the room of three Rothko paintings in America’s first modern art museum, the Phillips Collection in Washington, D.C. And Houston is home to an actual Rothko Chapel. These are non-denominational sanctuaries of sorts, where the visitor is called upon to meditate and turn inwards.

As Rothko once put it, “The people who weep before my pictures are having the same religious experience I had when I painted them.”

The radio and digital versions of this story were edited by Jennifer Vanasco. The radio version was produced by Mansee Khurana.

Advertisement

Lifestyle

L.A. Affairs: I had casually known her for 5 years. Was I finally ready to make a move?

Published

on

L.A. Affairs: I had casually known her for 5 years. Was I finally ready to make a move?

In Fairfax, nestled on Beverly Boulevard near Pan Pacific Park, I ran a modest yet beloved pan-Asian restaurant called Buddha’s Belly. More than a place to eat, it was a gathering spot where our team and loyal regulars created an atmosphere of warmth and community. Every day, we exchanged stories about our guests, the generous, the quirky and the kind souls whose smiles lit up our little corner of L.A.

For five years, one regular stood out. The Buddha’s Belly team referred to her as “Aloha.” She had a familiar and beautiful face and she adored our shao bing finger sandwiches and pad Thai. During those five years, all I ever said to her was: “How’s your pad Thai?,” “Nice to see you” and “Thanks for coming in!” Her friendly smile and presence were the highlights of our routine interactions.

Then one hectic afternoon changed everything. Rushing to a meeting and about to leap into my car, I caught a glimpse of Lynda sitting at Table 64, smiling at me through our bamboo-lined patio (a.k.a. “bamboo forest”). I went over to say a quick hi.

“How’s your pad Thai?” I asked, and then I was off.

Advertisement

A couple blocks from the restaurant, I was struck by the feeling that our brief encounter was different this time. There was a spark — a look in her eye. So I did something out of character: I called the manager on duty and asked him to go to Table 64, Seat 3, and ask for her number.

The next day, I found a business card on my desk with Lynda’s cell number. It was on! That small gesture signaled the start of something extraordinary.

Eager to seize the moment, I called and invited her out for a date that same weekend. However, it was her birthday month, and that meant her calendar was booked solid for the next three to four weekends. Not wanting to let time slip away, I proposed an unconventional plan: to join me and an octogenarian friend at our annual opening night at the Hollywood Bowl. Little did I know this would turn out to be equal parts amazing and mortifying. My friend was so excited — she had no filter.

Shortly after picking up our dinner at Joan’s on Third, my friend started asking Lynda questions, first light questions like “Where are you from?” and “What do you do?” Then once seated at the Bowl, her questions continued. But now they were more pointed questions: “Have you ever been married?” and “Do you have kids?”

Amazingly, Lynda didn’t flinch, and her honesty, unfiltered yet graceful, was refreshing and alluring. She had been through life’s fires and knew that when it’s a fit, it should not be based on any false pretense. Although I did manage to get a few questions in that evening, I still chuckle at the memory of myself, sitting back, legs extended with a note pad in hand taking notes!

Advertisement

After dropping her off, she didn’t know if she would hear from me, as she didn’t know anything about me. But I didn’t wait three days to contact Lynda. I called her the next day to make plans to see her again. With it still being her birthday month, I asked her to join me that night for a surf film at the Ford with my best buddy. She said yes, and there we were on another chaperoned date.

By our third date, we were finally alone. We ventured to an underground gem affectionately dubbed the “Blade Runner” restaurant. Hidden on Pico Boulevard behind no obvious sign and characterized by hood-free mesquite grills and stacked wine crates, the place exuded a secret charm. Sharing a bottle of wine with the owner, our conversation deepened, and the electricity between Lynda and me became undeniable.

Our story took another turn when I was opening a new bar named Copa d’Oro (or Cup of Gold) in Santa Monica that was similar to a bar down the street called Bar Copa. The owner of Bar Copa invited me to discuss whether the concept was going to be too like his own. While we waited in the packed room, I instinctively put my hand around the small of Lynda’s back to steady us from the ebb and flow of the crowd of people around us. The intensity of our closeness and the energy between us was palpable, and we soon found ourselves at a quieter bar called Schatzi on Main where we had our first kiss.

Our courtship continued, and it would be defined by ease and grace. There were no mind games or calculations. One of us would ask whether the other was free, and it was an easy yes. Our desire was to be together.

I fondly remember being at a Fatburger not far from where Lynda lived, and I phoned her to ask if she wanted to sit with me as I scarfed down a Double Kingburger with chili and egg (yum!), and she said yes. By the time she arrived, I was halfway through eating the sandwich. But I was practicing a new way of eating a sloppy burger that my brother taught me. Why bother to continuously wipe your mouth when you’re only going to mess it up with the next bite? To save time and energy, wipe your mouth once at the end.

Advertisement

I was practicing this new technique with a smear of sauce on my face, and it didn’t faze her one bit. I could only imagine what her internal monologue was!

After six months of effortless companionship, I asked Lynda to move in, and a year later, while at Zephyr’s Bench, a serene and cherished hiking spot in the Santa Monica Mountains behind Bel-Air, I asked her to marry me.

Now, more than 17 years later, with two beautiful boys and our pandemic dog in tow, I can say I found my own aloha right here in the vibrant chaos of Los Angeles.

The author lives in Santa Monica with his wife and two children. They go to the Hollywood Bowl every chance they can. He’s also aspiring to make it into the Guinness World Records book.

L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@latimes.com. You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

‘The Mask’ and ‘Pulp Fiction’ actor Peter Greene dies at 60

Published

on

‘The Mask’ and ‘Pulp Fiction’ actor Peter Greene dies at 60

Actor Peter Greene at a press conference in New York City in 2010.

Bryan Bedder/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bryan Bedder/Getty Images

Actor Peter Greene, known for playing villains in movies including Pulp Fiction and The Mask, has died. Greene was found dead in his apartment in New York City on Friday, his manager and friend, Gregg Edwards, told NPR. The cause of death was not immediately provided. He was 60 years old.

The tall, angular character actor’s most famous bad guy roles were in slapstick and gritty comedies. He brought a hammy quality to his turn as Dorian Tyrell, Jim Carrey’s nemesis in the 1994 superhero movie The Mask, and, that same year, played a ruthless security guard with evil elan in the gangster movie Pulp Fiction.

“Peter was one of the most brilliant character actors on the planet,” Edwards said.

Advertisement

He went on to work steadily, earning dozens of credits in movies and on TV, such as the features Judgment Night, Blue Streak and Training Day, a 2001 episode of Law & Order, and, in 2023, an episode of The Continental, the John Wick prequel series.

At the time of his death, the actor was planning to co-narrate the in-progress documentary From the American People: The Withdrawal of USAID, alongside Jason Alexander and Kathleen Turner. “He was passionate about this project,” Edwards said.

Greene was also scheduled to begin shooting Mickey Rourke’s upcoming thriller Mascots next year.

Rourke posted a close-up portrait of Greene on his Instagram account Friday night accompanied by a prayer emoji, but no words. NPR has reached out to the actor’s representatives for further comment.

Peter Greene was born in New Jersey in 1965. He started pursuing acting in his 20s, and landed his first film role in Laws of Gravity alongside Edie Falco in 1992.

Advertisement

The actor battled drug addiction through much of his adult life. But according to Edwards, Greene had been sober for at least a couple of years.

Edwards added that Greene had a tendency to fall for conspiracy theories. “He had interesting opinions and we differed a lot on many things,” said Edwards. “But he was loyal to a fault and was like a brother to me.”

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

How maths can help you wrap your presents better

Published

on

How maths can help you wrap your presents better

Acute solution

The method sometimes works for triangular prisms too. Measuring the height of the triangle at the end of the prism packaging, doubling it and adding it to the overall length of the box gives you the perfect length of paper to cut to cover its triangular ends with paper three times for a flawless finish.

To wrap a tube of sweets or another cylindrical gift with very little waste, measure the diameter (width) of the circular end and multiply it by Pi (3.14…) to find the amount of paper needed to encircle your gift with wrap. Then measure the length of the tube and add on the diameter of one circle to calculate the minimum length of paper needed. Doing this should mean the paper meets exactly at the centre of each circular end of the gift requiring one small piece of tape to secure it. But it’s best to allow a little extra paper to ensure the shape is completely covered or risk spoiling the surprise.

Circling back

If you have bought anyone a ball, then woe – spheres are arguably the hardest shape to wrap. It’s impossible to cover a ball smoothly using a piece of paper, not only because the properties of paper stop it from being infinitely bendable, but because of the hairy ball theorem, says Sophie Maclean, a maths communicator and PhD student at King’s College London. The theorem explains it is impossible to comb hair on a ball or sphere flat without creating at least one swirl or cowlick.

“If you think about putting wrapping paper round a ball, you’re not going to be able to get it smooth all the way round,” says Maclean. “There’s going to have to be a bump or gap at some point. Personally, I quite like being creative with wrapping and this is where I would embrace it. Tie a bow around it or twist the paper to get a Christmas cracker or a present that looks like a sweet.”

If paper efficiency is your goal when wrapping a football, you may want to experiment with a triangle of foil. An international team of scientists studied how Mozartkugel confectionery – spheres of delicious marzipan encased in praline and coated in dark chocolate – are wrapped efficiently in a small piece of foil. They observed that minimising the perimeter of the shape reduces waste, making a square superior to a rectangle of foil with the same area.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending