Entertainment
Pat McAfee apologizes after Aaron Rodgers' false claim that Jimmy Kimmel may be named in Epstein documents
ESPN sports analyst Pat McAfee apologized after Aaron Rodgers came on his talk show and implied that Jimmy Kimmel was among those named in the highly anticipated Jeffrey Epstein court documents.
McAfee opened his self-titled show Wednesday by addressing the controversy and chalking up Rodgers’ remarks to making a “s— talk joke” that became a “massive overnight story.” The documents, which were released Wednesday, included the names of Epstein associates and sex-trafficking victims, as well as others who were loosely tied to the late disgraced financier but not accused of wrongdoing. Kimmel was not named in Wednesday’s documents.
“Whenever you’re freewheeling and dealing in here … your conversations can certainly lead to places that cause international news. And whenever there’s accusations made about people, that can lead to lawsuits,” McAfee said before noting that he’d previously faced a lawsuit from Hall of Fame quarterback Brett Favre, which was dropped, according to McAfee, after he agreed to read a letter “stating that I know nothing that anybody else doesn’t know publicly already.”
The former football punter turned sports analyst said that his 3½-hour YouTube talk show gives those who participate an opportunity to talk about “damn near everything.” Although there’s an upside to the show’s format, he said, the flip side is that “there could be some things that were probably — I mean, we’re gonna have to hear from Aaron on that — meant to be a s— talk joke that can then become something that is obviously a very serious allegation.”
Kimmel and Rodgers had been publicly trading slights for years (Kimmel once called Rodgers a tinfoil hatter and a Green Bay whack-packer). But on Tuesday, the New York Jets quarterback appeared on “Pat McAfee” and suggested without evidence that the late-night host’s name could surface in the Epstein documents.
“There’s a lot of people, including Jimmy Kimmel, really hoping that doesn’t come out,” Rodgers said.
“I’ll tell you what, if that list comes out, I definitely will be popping some sort of bottle,” Rodgers added, while speaking on the show from what appeared to be his wine cellar.
Kimmel responded swiftly via social media, reposting a video of Rodgers’ comments on X (formerly Twitter) with a forceful rejection of Rodgers’ remarks. “Dear A—: for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’ other than the clearly-phony nonsense that soft-brained wackos like yourself can’t seem to distinguish from reality,” Kimmel wrote. “Your reckless words put my family in danger. Keep it up and we will debate the facts further in court.”
McAfee said Wednesday that he understood why Kimmel responded in anger but downplayed Rodgers’ remarks as the kind of trash talk that can often happen in locker rooms. “I think Aaron was just trying to talk s—. Did it go too far? Jimmy Kimmel certainly said that was the case,” McAfee continued. “Aaron and Jimmy, they’ve been jousting a bit.”
The ESPN sports analyst continued that he doesn’t like his show to be associated with anything negative and apologized. “We’d like our show to be an uplifting one, a happy one, a fun one, but because we try to make light of everything — some things people get very pissed off about, especially when they’re that serious of allegations. So we apologize for being a part of it.”
In December, a judge ruled that the court documents would be made public, leading to frenzied anticipation, especially among the radical right, including some conspiracy theorists.
The release follows a years-long legal battle and piecemeal disclosures. The identities of the people named in the document may provide a fuller picture of Epstein and his associates.
Julie K. Brown, the Miami Herald investigative journalist known for exposing Epstein’s crimes and bringing him to justice after many had failed, weighed in on the Kimmel vs. Rodgers dispute on X, writing “Is @ESPN also oblivious that the Jeffrey Epstein case is about the rape of young girls? It is absolutely shameful that the network would allow anyone to exploit this tragedy for cheap political fodder.”
Times staff writer Alexandra E. Petri contributed to this report.
Movie Reviews
‘Toy Story 5’ review: The franchise’s best movie in 16 years hilariously tackles AI
movie review
TOY STORY 5
Running time: 102 minutes. PG (some thematic elements, rude humor). In theaters.
Long before ChatGPT was a household name, Hollywood had been making AI the villain for decades — from HAL 9000 to Skynet to Agent Smith.
Yet the most emotionally involving spin on the terrors of tech in ages arrives not from groundbreaking sci-fi, but the smart, wonderful and tremendously funny fifth “Toy Story” movie.
That’s a surprise, since it’s a film that I really hoped would never happen. After middling “4,” which was a giant step down from the heartbreaking third, the world was more than ready for Woody and Buzz to ride off into the sunset. Woody actually did.
Well, it’s good that Tom Hanks and Tim Allen got back behind the mike, because the digital age gives Pixar’s playthings a renewed sense of purpose and atypically high stakes. Usually the gang helps a young person stay in touch with their childhood. This time, they save one in progress.
That’s the formative years of little Bonnie (Scarlett Spears), the girl who inherited the dolls from Andy (who’s now, like, 40) in the last movie. She’s 8 years old, paralyzed by shyness and totally friendless. Desperate, Bonnie begs her parents to buy her a Lilypad, an interactive touchscreen that’s all the rage at school.
Yes, the baddie that Woody (Hanks), Buzz (Allen) and Jessie (Joan Cusack) must face this time is an alarmingly cute tablet, voiced by Greta Lee.
So, rather than humanity’s fears of artificial intelligence taking control of the nuclear arsenal or replacing us with cyborgs, director Andrew Stanton’s “5” taps into a much more immediate concern: screens rewiring kids’ minds.
Much like when action figure Buzz arrived, sigh, 31 years ago, the toys are mortified by the mysterious intruder and her luminescent ilk. As they look across their neighborhood, all they can see for blocks are glowing blue windows with zombie youths staring into the 10×10 void.
The end is nigh, they think. How can a cowboy, cowgirl and a space cadet compete against a reactive mini-computer that connects a lonely child to the entire planet?
But these toys aren’t ready for the dark recesses of eBay just yet. They go head to head — or plastic to plastic — with Lilypad, whom Lee gives a voice that’s both bestie and “Mean Girls.”
You may recall lovebirds Woody and Bo Peep went off on their own at the end of the last chapter. Of course, they find their way back, but Jessie is running things now. That’s a refreshing and appropriate switch-up. Cusack’s maternal performance is better suited to this particular adventure than Hanks’ “old buddy, old pal” delivery.
After a sleepover mishap, Jessie winds up lost at another house — her first one, it turns out — where a girl named Blaze (Mykal-Michelle Harris) lives. And it’s there we meet perhaps the best new character in this franchise since 1995: Smarty Pants.
The real misfit toys aren’t the OG crew, we learn, but obsolete computer devices from the aughts. One is Conan O’Brien’s Smarty Pants, a hysterical, hyperactive box that teaches tykes how to use the toilet. He’s been powered down for years and therefore goes berserk when juiced up.
O’Brien is — and I’m sure he’d agree — a toy trapped in a man’s body. He’s practically typecasting. And his demented acting is so energetic and untethered, you can picture Disney security guards hauling him out of the recording studio. I mean that in a good way.
There’s also a lot of fun mined from a shipment of misplaced Buzzes. We check in on the look-alikes occasionally as they morph into a phalanx of determined Navy SEALs to eventually join Jessie and Co.
“Five” is arguably the first new “Toy Story” film to be both watched and understood by the kids of the 1995 original’s millennial audience. That shared experience is very moving all by itself.
But, even more poignantly, who can teach these young parents this vital lesson in 21st-century child-rearing better than their own toys?
Entertainment
Yes, Zendaya and Tom Holland have already tied the knot. The groom confirmed it himself
“Spider-Man” star Tom Holland won’t spin out too many details about his under-the-radar wedding with Zendaya, except that it’s already happened.
The British actor, who will star with his wife in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” and “The Odyssey” this summer, spoke to Esquire U.K. about the private celebrations and gushed about his spouse, whom he lovingly calls “Zee.”
“I found my person,” Holland told the outlet, “She’s my best friend, and I’m the happiest I ever have been when I’m with her.”
Holland, 30, confirmed his marriage to Zendaya, 29, months after fans stirred up the wedding rumor mill in February. Zendaya, who coyly confirmed her engagement to The Times at the 2025 Golden Globes, was spotted earlier this year wearing a plain gold band on her left ring finger in place of her engagement diamond. Weeks after that public sighting, the “Euphoria” star’s stylist and self-proclaimed image architect Law Roach boldly claimed to “Access Hollywood” on the Actor Awards red carpet that “the wedding’s already happened, you missed it.”
Adding to the frenzy, fans took it upon themselves to create and spread AI-generated images of the pair exchanging their vows, including a wild “photo” that depicted a luxurious ceremony on the Italian coast attended by previous “Spider-Man” duos Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone and Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst and officiated by Robert Downey Jr. During an appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!,” Zendaya had her fun with the AI pics and told the host that even her own loved ones had been duped by the fabricated photos.
“Babe, they’re AI,” the “Drama” star recalled telling loved ones. “They’re not real.”
While Holland said the AI-generated images also fooled some of his loved ones, he didn’t feel the need to do much explaining “because they were all there.”
He added, drawing the line: “That’s all you’ll get on that.”
Zendaya and Holland first shared the screen in “Spider-Man: Homecoming” in 2017 and on Monday stunned together at a red-carpet “Spider-Man” event in Madrid. Holland wore black trousers, a black jacket, a red dress shirt and black tie while Zendaya donned a strapless black gown with a fringed skirt. She accessorized her look with a pair of dangling earrings, a silver watch and a thin band on her wedding finger.
Zendaya and Holland will reunite onscreen for Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey,” which hits theaters July 17. The couple will follow that epic with Destin Daniel Cretton’s “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” which premieres July 31.
Movie Reviews
Review | Dog Day Evening: Kafkaesque comedy reflects on a Hong Kong hostage incident
3.5/5 stars
The notoriously treacherous hurdles that Hong Kong telecommunications company i-Cable used to put in front of customers looking to unsubscribe from its internet and pay-TV services throughout the 2000s and early 2010s provide the premise of this Kafkaesque comedy-drama – an alternately hilarious and heartbreaking case of raging against the system.
-
Detroit, MI9 minutes agoMegan Keller named top defender at PWHL awards in Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA17 minutes agoProposal aims to address rising grocery prices, closing supermarkets in SF
-
Dallas, TX24 minutes agoDallas residents frustrated by new water bill system
-
Miami, FL27 minutes agoPort to court: Miami-Dade approves eminent domain move in Fisher Island fuel yard fight
-
Boston, MA32 minutes agoTwo Things People Are Getting Wrong About Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Fit In Boston
-
Denver, CO39 minutes agoOld Denver Post building to lose signage as part of settlement with city
-
Seattle, WA42 minutes agoSeattle student wins Doodle for Google, redirects $50K prize
-
San Diego, CA47 minutes agoGame Discussion for St. Louis Cardinals vs San Diego Padres Tuesday Night