World
Supreme Court lifts restrictions on LA immigration stops set after agents swept up US citizens
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for federal agents to conduct sweeping immigration operations for now in Los Angeles, the latest victory for President Donald Trump’s administration at the high court.
The conservative majority lifted a restraining order from a judge who found that “roving patrols” were conducting indiscriminate stops in and around LA. The order had barred immigration agents from stopping people solely based on their race, language, job or location.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the broad order went too far in restricting how Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents can carry out brief stops for questioning.
“To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court’s case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a ‘relevant factor’ when considered along with other salient factors,” he wrote in a concurrence with the majority’s brief, unexplained order. He suggested that stops in which force is used could yet face more legal pushback.
In a stinging dissent joined by her two liberal colleagues, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, “Countless people in the Los Angeles area have been grabbed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labor. Today, the Court needlessly subjects countless more to these exact same indignities.”
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision comes as ICE agents also step up enforcement in Washington amid Trump’s unprecedented federal takeover of the capital city’s law enforcement and deployment of the National Guard.
Trump’s Republican administration argued the order wrongly restricted agents carrying out its widespread crackdown on illegal immigration.
U.S. District Judge Maame E. Frimpong in Los Angeles had found a “mountain of evidence” that enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. The plaintiffs included U.S. citizens swept up in immigration stops. An appeals court had left Frimpong’s ruling in place.
The lawsuit will now continue to unfold in California. It was filed by immigrant advocacy groups that accused Trump’s administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people during his administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration in the Los Angeles area.
Department of Homeland Security attorneys have said immigration officers target people based on illegal presence in the U.S., not skin color, race or ethnicity. Even so, the Justice Department argued that the order wrongly restricted the factors that ICE agents can use when deciding who to stop.
The Los Angeles region has been a battleground for the Trump administration after its hard-line immigration strategy spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines. The number of immigration raids in the LA area appeared to slow shortly after Frimpong’s order came down in July, but recently they have become more frequent again, including an operation in which agents jumped out of the back of a rented box truck and made arrests at an LA Home Depot store.
The plaintiffs argued that her order only prevents federal agents from making stops without reasonable suspicion, something that aligns with the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent.
“Numerous U.S. citizens and others who are lawfully present in this country have been subjected to significant intrusions on their liberty,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote. “Many have been physically injured; at least two were taken to a holding facility.”
The Trump administration said the order is too restrictive, “threatening agents with sanctions if the court disbelieves that they relied on additional factors in making any particular stop.”
Solicitor General D. John Sauer also argued the order can’t stand under the high court’s recent decision restricting universal injunctions, though the plaintiffs disagreed.
The order from Frimpong, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, barred authorities from using factors like apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone’s occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion for detention. Its covered a combined population of nearly 20 million people, nearly half of whom identify as Hispanic or Latino.
Plaintiffs included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens. One of the citizens was Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a June 13 video being seized by federal agents as he yelled, “I was born here in the States. East LA, bro!”
Gavidia was released about 20 minutes later after showing agents his identification, as was another citizen stopped at a car wash, according to the lawsuit.
___
Associated Press writer Jaimie Ding in Los Angeles and Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court and immigration at https://apnews.com/hub/immigration.
World
Sinclair Snaps Up 8% Stake in Scripps in Advance of Potential Merger
Sinclair, which owns and/or operates 185 television stations in 85 markets, has disclosed that it has taken an 8.2% equity stake in E.W. Scripps, with an eye toward acquiring the local broadcaster.
In a Monday filing with the Securities Exchange Commission, Sinclair reported it has picked up what amounts to $15.6 million in Scripps’ Class A common stock on the open market. The acquisitions were made “in contemplation of a possible combination with the issuer.”
In the same document, Sinclair went on to state that it has been “engaged in constructive discussions with [Scripps] for several months regarding a potential combination of the two companies.” Should an agreement be reached, Sinclair believes that a “transaction could be completed within nine to 12 months.”
Sinclair believes that a buyout of Scripps could unlock some $300 million in synergies. A takeover would add another 61 stations in 41 markets to Sinclair’s local TV portfolio.
Scripps also owns the Ion TV network, which in June hammered out a multiyear extension of its deal to carry Friday night WNBA games. Ion began partnering with the WNBA in 2023, inking a three-year pact worth $40 million. In the last month, Ion has averaged 549,000 viewers per day, making it the fifth-biggest broadcast draw behind NBC, ABC, CBS and Fox.
In addition to its WNBA slate, Ion also airs Saturday night NWSL doubleheaders.
Shortly after Sinclair filed its Schedule 13D form with the SEC, Scripps responded with a statement in which it emphasized that its board “will take all steps appropriate to protect the company and the company’s shareholders from the opportunistic actions of Sinclair or anyone else.”
Scripps went on to note that its board “has and will continue to evaluate any transactions and other alternatives that would enhance the value of the company and would be in the best interest of all company shareholders.”
The Sinclair gambit comes on the heels of Nexstar’s $6.2 billion acquisition of rival Tegna. While that deal awaits regulatory approval, FCC chairman Brendan Carr appears poised to eliminate or otherwise relax the legacy regulations that prohibit any station group from owning a portfolio that reaches more than 39% of all U.S. TV households. A review of the cap is currently underway.
Investors were bullish on the announcement, as shares of Scripps closed Monday up 39.87% to $4.28. On Friday, the stock closed at $3.06. Sinclair ended Monday’s trading up 4.91% to $16.87.
Sinclair owned the Bally Sports-branded suite of RSNs from August 2019 until late 2022, when subsidiary Diamond Sports Group moved to block its parent company from having any further say over the day-to-day operation of the channels.
World
UK officials recommend yoga and ‘climate cafés’ to combat ‘eco-anxiety’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Britons’ anxiety about climate change plays a big role in many mental health struggles among the country’s youth and can trigger guilt about having children, a new report has claimed.
The report by the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA) also suggests that yoga and visiting “climate cafés” could help stave off this “eco-anxiety” and build emotional resilience in times of change.
“An awareness of climate and environmental change can also lead to emotional or psychological responses, such as eco-anxiety,” it reads, defining the term as distress caused by the threat of climate change.
The authors also reference “solastalgia,” which is the sorrow people feel when their familiar environments are degraded by environmental change.
HOT TEA OR ICED COFFEE? STUDY SAYS YOUR CHOICE COULD AFFECT MOOD AND DIGESTION
A UKHSA report on climate anxiety among British youth faces criticism from Jason Isaac, who calls eco-anxiety a product of climate propaganda. (Reuters)
According to the UKHSA, reactions like this are not irrational but are natural responses to a destabilized world.
The data shown in the report, the Climate change and mental health: thematic assessment, also indicates that many young Britons are struggling with the psychological weight of environmental collapse.
For example, nearly 40 percent of survey respondents said that climate change made them hesitant to have children, citing fears about future safety, resources and quality of life.
“There is evidence that eco-anxiety is influencing reproductive choices for some individuals, as 39% of UK survey respondents described that climate change made them feel hesitant to have children due to concerns over the children’s future quality of life,” the report states.
In response to these findings, the UKHSA went on to recommend activities that promote community connection and resilience.
BILL GATES DISCOVERS THE WAY TO FIGHT CLIMATE BATTLE ACTUALLY INVOLVES HELPING HUMANS
The United Kingdom Health Security Agency recommends yoga and climate cafés to help British youth cope with eco-anxiety and build resilience against climate change distress. (CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)
“Participating in group and community-based activities, including yoga, citizen science, and climate cafés, was associated with reduced psychological distress,” the report notes.
The report has not escaped criticism, with Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, accusing the UK government of institutionalizing climate hysteria.
“The UK’s embrace of fringe terms like ‘eco-anxiety’ and ‘solastalgia’ shows how deeply climate propaganda has seeped into official policy,” he told the National Review.
Isaac argues that these are not legitimate medical conditions but rather the result of fear-driven messaging that makes people feel guilty about prosperity and family life.
“No climate café or government program will solve a mental health crisis created by the Left’s own apocalyptic narrative,” he added.
SURVEY SCHOOL ADMINS DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE ASKS YOUNG CHILDREN ABOUT GENDER IDENTITY, CLIMATE CHANGE FEARS
Billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates surprised social media users this week when he wrote that climate change does not represent a doomsday scenario for earth. (Bennett Raglin/Getty)
Similarly, Bill Gates, also took a step away from climate alarmism and said he thinks climate change and global warming are both issues that “will not lead to humanity’s demise.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Despite the controversy, the UKHSA maintains that addressing the psychological effects of climate change is essential to public health.
World
Calls for answers grow over Canada’s interrogation of Israel critic
Montreal, Canada – Canadian human rights activists are demanding answers from their government after a former United Nations special rapporteur who investigated Israeli abuses against Palestinians was interrogated at the Canadian border on “national security” grounds.
Richard Falk, 95, was stopped at Toronto Pearson International Airport on Thursday and questioned for several hours. He said a security official told him that Canada had concerns that he and his wife, fellow legal scholar Hilal Elver, posed “a danger to the national security of Canada”.
list of 3 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
The treatment of the couple has sparked anger and calls for an explanation from Ottawa.
“We need answers – and from the highest levels of government,” said Corey Balsam, national coordinator at Independent Jewish Voices-Canada, a group that supports Palestinian rights.
Despite the outcry, Canadian authorities have not publicly addressed the incident. But the office of Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree, who oversees the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), has acknowledged the case in a statement to Al Jazeera, saying he is seeking more information about what happened.
“National security safeguards are an integral part of our immigration and border-management framework and, while we cannot comment on specific cases, we are committed to ensuring that our border screening processes respect due process and international obligations,” Simon Lafortune, a spokesperson for Anandasangaree, told Al Jazeera in an email.
“To that end, Minister Anandasangaree has asked the CBSA to provide more specific details on how this particular incident occurred.”
Falk told Al Jazeera on Saturday that he and Elver were asked about their work on Israel, Gaza and genocide as well as about their participation in an event in Ottawa looking into Canada’s role in Israel’s war on Gaza, which a UN inquiry and numerous rights groups have described as a genocide.
After more than four hours of questioning, the pair – both US citizens – were allowed to enter Canada and take part in the Palestine Tribunal on Canadian Responsibility.
‘Patently ridiculous’
Alex Paterson, senior director of strategy and parliamentary affairs at the advocacy group Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East, called the government’s treatment of the couple “patently ridiculous”.
“I think it just lays bare for everyone the reality that they wanted to hamper the tribunal’s work and try and keep Canadian complicity in Israel’s genocide … in the shadows,” Paterson told Al Jazeera on Monday.
He added that the Canadian government “has been trying to avoid questions of its complicity in arming the genocide, and that’s reason enough to do this”.
Since Israel’s war on Gaza began in October 2023, Canadian human rights advocates have been calling on the government to apply pressure on Israel, a longstanding ally, to end its attacks on the Palestinian enclave.
Those calls for concrete action from Canada have grown as Israel’s military assault and restrictions on aid have killed tens of thousands of people and pushed Gaza into a humanitarian crisis.
Last year, the Canadian government announced it was suspending some weapons export permits to Israel amid the atrocities in the territory.
Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office in March, also voiced opposition to Israel’s blockade on aid to Gaza and a surge in Israeli military and settler violence in the occupied West Bank.
Meanwhile, along with several allies, Carney’s government recognised an independent Palestinian state in September.
But researchers and human rights advocates said loopholes in Canada’s arms export system have allowed Canadian-made weapons to continue to reach Israel, often via the United States.
They have also urged Canada to do more to stem continued Israeli attacks against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and to support efforts to hold Israel accountable for serious abuses, including at the International Criminal Court.
‘Climate of governmental insecurity’
In his interview with Al Jazeera on Saturday, Falk, who served as UN special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory from 2008 to 2014, said he believed his interrogation was part of a wider push to silence those who speak the truth about what is happening in Gaza.
“It suggests a climate of governmental insecurity, I think, to try to clamp down on dissident voices,” he said.
Al Jazeera has contacted multiple relevant Canadian government agencies to ask whether Ottawa views the 95 year old as a threat to national security – and if so, why.
A CBSA spokesperson said in an email on Monday that the agency could not comment on specific cases, but stressed that “secondary inspections are part of the cross-border process”.
“It is important to note that travellers referred to secondary inspection are not being ‘detained,’” spokesperson Rebecca Purdy said.
“Foreign nationals seeking entry into Canada can be subjected to a secondary inspection by an officer to determine admissibility to Canada. In some instances, the inspection may take longer due to information being gathered through questioning.”
Global Affairs Canada, the Canadian foreign ministry, has not yet responded to a request for comment from Al Jazeera sent on Saturday.
Balsam of Independent Jewish Voices-Canada said treating someone like Falk as a security threat sends a message that “actually none of us are safe from the suppression of dissent and crackdown on voices that are critical of the Israeli regime“.
“We all deserve an answer and an explanation from the government as to this incident, which casts a chill for all Canadians that are speaking out about human rights in general and Palestine in particular,” he told Al Jazeera.
-
Nebraska1 week agoWhere to watch Nebraska vs UCLA today: Time, TV channel for Week 11 game
-
Hawaii1 week agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
Vermont6 days agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
New Jersey1 week agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
West Virginia7 days ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoSoundgarden Enlist Jim Carrey and Seattle All-Stars for Rock Hall 2025 Ceremony
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoHere’s the snow forecast for Metro Detroit heading into next week
-
Louisiana1 week agoLouisiana high school football final scores, results — November 7, 2025