World
EU member states spend 0.5% of their money on fire protection services
The European summer season season is more and more the theatre of apocalyptic scenes as heatwave-fuelled fires scorch hundreds of acres of land.
But authorities expenditure on fire-protection providers has largely remained on par with the place it was on the flip of the century.
The 27 member states of the European Union spent a mixed €30.9 billion on fire-protection providers in 2019, in line with the bloc’s official statistics company, Eurostat. More moderen knowledge isn’t but out there.
This amounted to about 0.5% of complete authorities expenditure on the EU degree, a determine that has remained steady since 2001, Eurostat added.
But, not all states spend the identical. Bulgaria spends about 0.9% of its complete expenditures on fire-protection providers, whereas Denmark simply 0.1%.
Of the Mediterranean member states, that are historically essentially the most impacted by wildfires, France meets the EU common (0.5%), Greece is barely above (0.6%), whereas Spain, Italy and Portugal are slightly below (0.4%).
Fires more and more shifting north-wards
Management efforts in so-called EUMED 5 — France, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Spain — have been efficient, because the burnt space has barely decreased since 1980, in line with the European Atmosphere Company (EEA).
However there may be “giant interannual variability” based mostly on meteorological circumstances, the EEA famous, underlining that the burnt space in 2017 throughout the EUMED5 was the second largest on file, due particularly to unprecedented fires in Portugal, whereas the burnt space in 2018 was the bottom on file.
The yr 2018 was additionally noteworthy as a result of extra international locations suffered giant forest fires than ever recorded earlier than, together with in central and northern Europe, which have been normally spared from fires. Sweden, for example, skilled its worst hearth season ever that yr and requested worldwide fire-fighting help.
In actual fact, forest fires accounted for 17% of the requests for help by means of the EU Civil Safety Mechanism between 2007 and 2021.
In response to European Fee figures, the mechanism —which permits member states or third international locations to request help if their very own capacities are overwhelmed by a catastrophe — was activated a mean of 6.5 occasions yearly between 2007 and 2019 solely to fight forest fires.
The next yr constituted a lull, with only one such request, whereas 9 have been made final yr, together with by EU neighbours equivalent to Türkiye, Algeria, North Macedonia and Albania.
2021 grew to become the second-worst wildfire season within the EU since 2000, surpassed solely by 2017 when over 1 million hectares (ha) burned within the EU. At the very least 86 folks misplaced their lives.
Drought and fires
As predicted, the 2022 season can be proving notably powerful. At the very least three folks have now misplaced their lives as they took half in firefighting efforts together with the pilot of a combating plane in Portugal and two crew members of a firefighting helicopter in Greece.
A whole bunch of firefighters in Portugal, Spain, Italy and France have been tackling a number of blazes on Monday.
These are fanned by a heatwave pushing temperatures in some components above 40°C and facilitated by a months-long drought in Europe that “might develop into the worst ever”, Maroš Šefčovič, the European Fee’s vice-president for inter-institutional relations, already warned in early June.
The EU sought to arrange its assets higher forward of this season, pre-positioning greater than 200 firefighters from a number of member states in Greece, the place stunning scenes of individuals speeding to boats to flee flames within the lifeless of the evening have been noticed in Evia final yr.
The Fee additionally financed the stand-by availability of a rescEU fleet of 12 firefighting planes and 1 helicopter put collectively by Croatia, France, Greece, Italy, Spain and Sweden and on the disposal of different member states in case of an emergency.
World
US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack
A U.S. official on Thursday confirmed to Fox News Digital that Ukrainian authorities were briefed ahead of Russia’s “experimental Intermediate-range ballistic missile” attack that this type of weapon may be used against Ukraine in order to help it prepare.
Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed the attack Thursday evening local time in an address to the nation and said it was in direct response to the U.S. and the U.K. jointly approving Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles to target Russia.
It remains unclear if there were any casualties in the attack on the city of Dnipro, which was originally reported as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) strike, and which would have marked the first time such a weapon had been used during a time of war, sending panic across the globe.
1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES
Putin and U.S. sources have since confirmed the strike was not an ICBM, but the Kremlin chief also claimed that the weapon used poses a significant challenge for Western nations.
“The missiles attack targets at a speed of MACH 10. That’s 2.5 miles per second,” Putin said according to a translation. “The world’s current air defense systems and the missile defense systems developed by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles.”
Fox News Digital could not immediately verify whether the U.S. or its NATO allies are capable of defending against this latest missile, dubbed the Oreshnik.
But according to one U.S. official, Putin may be playing up his abilities in a move to intimidate the West and Ukraine.
“While we take all threats against Ukraine seriously, it is important to keep a few key facts in mind: Russia likely possesses only a handful of these experimental missiles,” the official told Fox News Digital. “Ukraine has withstood countless attacks from Russia, including from missiles with significantly larger warheads than this weapon.
“Let me be clear: Russia may be seeking to use this capability to try to intimidate Ukraine and its supporters, or generate attention in the information space, but it will not be a game-changer in this conflict,” the official added.
US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS
Following President Biden’s position reversal this week to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against the Russian homeland, Kyiv immediately levied strikes against a military arsenal in the Russian region of Bryansk, more than 70 miles from Ukraine’s border.
While Ukrainian troops are the ones to officially fire the sophisticated missiles, the weapons system still relies on U.S. satellites to hit its target — an issue Putin touched on in his unannounced speech Thursday.
“We are testing the Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions in response to NATO countries’ aggressive actions against Russia. We will decide on the further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles depending on the actions of the U.S. and its satellites,” he said.
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Putin claimed Russia will alert Ukrainian citizens of an impending attack like the strike he carried out on Thursday, though it remains unclear if he issued a warning to the Ukrainians living in Dnipro.
The Kremlin chief said the “defense industry” was targeted, though images released by the Ukrainian ministry of defense showed what appeared to be civilian infrastructure was also caught in the fray.
The Pentagon on Thursday confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. of the impending attack, which corresponds with information obtained by Fox News Digital, but it is unclear if Moscow clarified which Ukrainian city was the intended target.
A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that the U.S. is committed to helping Ukraine bolster its air defense systems and has done so already by supplying Ukraine with hundreds of additional Patriot and Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles.
World
South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops
South Korea’s national security adviser says North plans to use the weapons to defend its airspace over the capital.
Russia has provided North Korea with anti-air missiles and air defence equipment in return for sending soldiers to support its war against Ukraine, according to a top South Korean official.
Asked what the North stood to gain from dispatching an estimated 10,000 troops to Russia, South Korea’s national security adviser Shin Won-sik said Moscow had given Pyongyang economic and military technology support.
“It is understood that North Korea has been provided with related equipment and anti-aircraft missiles to strengthen Pyongyang’s weak air defence system,” Shin told South Korean broadcaster SBS in an interview aired on Friday.
At a military exhibition in the capital, Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday called for developing and upgrading “ultra-modern” versions of weaponry, and pledged to keep advancing defence capabilities, state media reported.
Russia this month ratified a landmark mutual defence pact with North Korea as Ukrainian officials reported clashes with Pyongyang’s soldiers on the front lines.
The treaty was signed in Pyongyang in June during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It obligates both states to provide military assistance “without delay” in the case of an attack on the other and to cooperate internationally to oppose Western sanctions.
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service told lawmakers this week that the troops deployed to Russia are believed to have been assigned to an airborne brigade and marine corps on the ground, with some of the soldiers having already entered combat, the Yonhap news agency reported.
The intelligence agency also said recently that North Korea had sent more than 13,000 containers of artillery, missiles and other conventional arms to Russia since August 2023 to replenish its dwindling weapons stockpiles.
Experts say Pyongyang could be using Ukraine as a means of realigning foreign policy.
By sending soldiers, North Korea is positioning itself within the Russian war economy as a supplier of weapons, military support and labour – potentially bypassing its traditional ally, neighbour and main trading partner, China, according to analysts.
Russia can also provide North Korea access to its vast natural resources, such as oil and gas, they say.
North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui recently visited Moscow and said her country would “stand firmly by our Russian comrades until victory day“.
North Korea said last month that any troop deployment to Russia would be “an act conforming with the regulations of international law”, but stopped short of confirming that it had sent soldiers.
The deployment has led to a shift in tone from Seoul, which had so far resisted calls to send weapons to Kyiv. However, President Yoon Suk-yeol indicated South Korea might change its longstanding policy of not providing arms to countries in conflict.
World
How Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani's Alleged Bribery Scheme Took off and Unraveled
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business5 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics4 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Science2 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs