Connect with us

World

A second Alabama IVF provider pauses parts of its program after court ruling on frozen embryos

Published

on

A second Alabama IVF provider pauses parts of its program after court ruling on frozen embryos

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A second in vitro fertilization provider in Alabama is pausing parts of its care to patients after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are legally considered children.

Alabama Fertility Services said in a statement Thursday that has “made the impossibly difficult decision to hold new IVF treatments due to the legal risk to our clinic and our embryologists.”

The decision comes a day after the University of Alabama at Birmingham health system said in a statement that it was pausing IVF treatments so it could evaluate whether its patients or doctors could face criminal charges or punitive damages.

“We are contacting patients that will be affected today to find solutions for them and we are working as hard as we can to alert our legislators as to the far reaching negative impact of this ruling on the women of Alabama,” Alabama Fertility said. “AFS will not close. We will continue to fight for our patients and the families of Alabama.”

Doctors and patients have been grappling with shock and fear this week as they try to determine what they can and can’t do after the ruling by the all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court that raises questions about the future of IVF.

Advertisement

Alabama Fertility Services’ decision left Gabby Goidel, who was days from an expected egg retrieval, calling clinics across the South looking for a place to continue IVF care.

“I freaked out. I started crying. I felt in an extreme limbo state. They did not have all the answers. I did not obviously any answers,” Goidel said.

The Alabama ruling came down Friday, the same day Goidel began a 10-day series of injections ahead of egg retrieval, with the hopes of getting pregnant through IVF next month. She found a place in Texas that will continue her care and plans to travel there Thursday night.

Goidel experienced three miscarriages and she and her husband turned to IVF as a way of fulfilling their dream of becoming parents.

“It’s not pro-family in any way,” Goidel said of the Alabama ruling.

Advertisement

Dr. Michael C. Allemand, a reproductive endocrinologist at Alabama Fertility, said Wednesday that IVF is often the best treatment for patients who desperately want a child, and the ruling threatens doctors’ ability to provide that care.

“The moments that our patients are wanting to have by growing their families — Christmas mornings with grandparents, kindergarten, going in the first day of school, with little backpacks— all that stuff is what this is about. Those are the real moments that this ruling could deprive patients of,” he said.

Justices — citing language in the Alabama Constitution that the state recognizes the “rights of the unborn child” — said three couples could sue for wrongful death when their frozen embryos were destroyed in a accident at a storage facility.

“Unborn children are ‘children’ … without exception based on developmental stage, physical location, or any other ancillary characteristics,” Justice Jay Mitchell wrote in Friday’s majority ruling. Mitchell said the court had previously ruled that a fetus killed when a woman is pregnant is covered under Alabama’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act and nothing excludes “extrauterine children from the Act’s coverage.”

While the court case centered on whether embryos were covered under the wrongful death of a minor statute, some said treating the embryo as a child — rather than property — could have broader implications and call into question many of the practices of IVF.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

DOJ Officials May Have Tried to Sway 2020 Election for Trump, Watchdog Says

Published

on

DOJ Officials May Have Tried to Sway 2020 Election for Trump, Watchdog Says
By Brad Heath and Sarah N. Lynch WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Three senior U.S. Justice Department officials committed misconduct in the final months of Donald Trump’s first presidency by leaking details about a non-public investigation, a move that may have been intended to sway the 2020 election, the …
Continue Reading

World

Trump reinforces 'all hell will break out' if hostages not returned by inauguration

Published

on

Trump reinforces 'all hell will break out' if hostages not returned by inauguration

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Trump reiterated that “all hell will break out” if the hostages still held in Gaza have not been freed by the time he enters office in two weeks on Jan. 20. 

Trump was asked about the threats he first levied in early December at the Hamas terrorist organization that has continued to hold some 96 hostages, only 50 of whom are still assessed to be alive, including three Americans. 

Advertisement

“All hell will break out,” Trump said, speaking alongside Steve Witkoff, special envoy to the Middle East and who has begun participating in cease-fire negotiations alongside the Biden administration and leaders from Egypt, Qatar, Israel and Hamas. 

(Seven American hostages are being held in Gaza. From left, Edan Alexander, Sagui Dekel-Chen, Keith Siegel, Omer Neutra, Judi Weinstein Haggai, Gadi Haggai and Itay Chen, of whom three are still believed to be alive.)

PARDONS, ISRAEL, DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND MORE: BIDEN’S PLANS FOR FINAL DAYS OF PRESIDENCY

“If those hostages aren’t back – I don’t want to hurt your negotiation – if they’re not back by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East,” he added in reference to Witkoff.

Trump again refused to detail what this would mean for Hamas and the Trump transition team has not detailed for Fox News Digital what sort of action the president-elect might take. 

Advertisement

In response to a reporter who pressed him on his meaning, Trump said, “Do I have to define it for you?”

“I don’t have to say any more, but that’s what it is,” he added. 

Trump speaking

President-elect Trump makes remarks at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, Jan. 7, 2025. (Reuters/Carlos Barria)

ISRAELI PM OFFICE DENIES REPORTS THAT HAMAS FORWARDED LIST OF HOSTAGES TO RELEASE IN EVENT OF DEAL

Witkoff said he would be heading to the Middle East either Tuesday night or Wednesday to continue cease-fire negotiations. 

In the weeks leading up to the Christmas and Hanukkah holidays, there was a renewed sense of optimism that a cease-fire could finally be on the horizon after a series of talks over the prior 14 months had not only failed to bring the hostages home, but saw a mounting number of hostages killed in captivity. Once again, though, no deal was pushed through before the New Year. 

Advertisement

After nearly 460 days since the hostages were first taken in Gaza in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, Witkoff appeared to be holding onto hope that a deal could be secured in the near future. 

Steve Witkoff

Steve Witkoff, speaks during a campaign event for former President Trump at Madison Square Garden in New York, on Oct. 27, 2024. (Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“I think that we’ve had some really great progress. And I’m really hopeful that by the inaugural, we’ll have some good things to announce on behalf of the president,” Witkoff told reporters. “I actually believe that we’re working in tandem in a really good way. But it’s the president – his reputation, the things that he has said that are driving this negotiation and so, hopefully, it’ll all work out and we’ll save some lives.”

In addition to the roughly 50 people believed to be alive and in Hamas captivity, the terrorist group is believed to be holding at least 38 who were taken hostage and then killed while in captivity, as well as at least seven who are believed to have been killed on Oct. 7, 2023, and then taken into Gaza.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Former Cambodian opposition MP shot dead in Bangkok ‘assassination’

Published

on

Former Cambodian opposition MP shot dead in Bangkok ‘assassination’

Lim Kimya, 74, had refused to flee Cambodia even after former PM Hun Sen threatened to make opposition MPs lives ‘hell’.

Lim Kimya, a former member of Cambodia’s National Assembly with the now-exiled opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), has been shot in Thailand’s capital, Bangkok, in an attack labelled an “assassination” by former colleagues.

According to The Bangkok Post newspaper, 74-year-old Lim Kimya was shot dead soon after he arrived in the Thai capital on a bus from Siem Reap, Cambodia, on Tuesday evening with his French wife and Cambodian uncle.

The CNRP confirmed the death in a statement, saying it was “shocked and deeply saddened by the news of the brutal and inhumane shooting” of Lim Kimya, who had served as the CNRP’s member of parliament for Kampong Thom province.

The former opposition MP, a dual Cambodian and French national, had reportedly continued to live in Cambodia, even as many other former opposition politicians fled, seeking political exile elsewhere in the face of threats from the governing Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) under then-Prime Minister Hun Sen.

Advertisement

The once hugely popular CNRP was dissolved in Cambodia and all its political activities banned by Cambodia’s Supreme Court in 2017. The party still exists as an organisation in Cambodian diaspora communities in Australia, the United States and elsewhere. In a statement shared on social media, the CNRP described Lim Kimya’s killing as an “assassination”.

“The CNRP strongly condemns this barbaric act, which is a serious threat to political freedom”, the statement said, adding that the political party is “closely following the murder case and calls on the Thai authorities to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation”.

Thailand’s Metropolitan Police Bureau is searching for a gunman who fled the scene on a motorbike, The Bangkok Post reported.

Human rights groups have called on authorities in Thailand to conduct a swift and thorough investigation.

Advertisement

Human Rights Watch’s Asia Director Elaine Pearson said the “cold-blooded killing” sent a message to Cambodian political activists that “no one is safe, even if they have left Cambodia”.

Phil Robertson, director of the Asia Human Rights and Labour Advocates (AHRLA), said the killing had “all the hallmarks of a political assassination”.

“The direct impact will be to severely intimidate the hundreds of Cambodian political opposition figures, NGO activists, and human rights defenders who have already fled to Thailand to escape PM Hun Manet’s campaign of political repression in Cambodia,” Robertson said in a post on social media.

Hun Sen’s son Hun Manet became the country’s new leader by replacing his father as prime minister in August 2023.

Advertisement

Hun Sen calls for crackdown on Victory Day

Lim Kimya’s killing fell on January 7, the anniversary known as Victory Day for the governing CPP, which marks the date that Vietnamese troops, supported by a small contingent of Cambodian soldiers, entered Phnom Penh and toppled Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge regime in 1979.

Since then, the country has remained under the iron-fisted rule of Hun Sen and now his son, Hun Manet, with little room for political opposition.

At a ceremony on Tuesday to mark the anniversary, Hun Sen called for a new law to brand people who wanted to overthrow his son’s government as “terrorists… who must be brought to justice”.

While there has been little effective political opposition to the CPP since 1979, that almost changed in 2013, the year that Lim Kimya was elected as an opposition member of Cambodia’s parliament following a general election in which the governing party was almost defeated by the CNRP.

The opposition had tapped into a groundswell of popular support for political change after decades of hardline rule by Hun Sen.

Advertisement

While the CNRP was once considered the sole viable opponent to the CPP and a potential election winner, it was dissolved by Cambodia’s politically-aligned judicial system in 2017.

Many opposition leaders and supporters have since fled into exile amid a wave of arrests and Hun Sen, promising to make their lives “hell”.

Continue Reading

Trending