Connect with us

Washington

Unclear when pilot became unresponsive before crash that sparked Washington DC security scare

Published

on

Unclear when pilot became unresponsive before crash that sparked Washington DC security scare


WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) – Authorities do not yet know when the pilot of a light plane that crashed Sunday became unresponsive or why the plane was on a flight path taking it over heavily restricted airspace near Washington, D.C., the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said on Monday.

The Pentagon scrambled F-16 fighter jets, which created a sonic boom over the U.S. capital as they pursued the Cessna Citation 560 that crashed in southwest Virginia.

“That will absolutely be part of this investigation of looking at when exactly did the pilot become unresponsive and why did the airplane fly the flight track that it did fly? We don’t know the information yet,” NTSB investigator Adam Gerhardt told reporters near the crash site.

He said the wreckage is highly fragmented and in heavily wooded, rural mountainous terrain and will be “a very challenging accident site.” The NTSB will remove wreckage and move it to a secure location in Delaware and the agency may use a helicopter to move wreckage.

Advertisement

“Basically everything is on the table,” Gerhardt said of the investigation. “The airplane, the engines, the weather conditions, pilot qualifications, the maintenance records — all aspects will be of course items we routinely look at.”

A U.S. official said the fighters did not cause the crash.

The plane was carrying four including the pilot, a source told Reuters Sunday when it crashed near the George Washington National Forest. No survivors were found, Virginia State Police said.

The Cessna was registered to Encore Motors of Melbourne, Florida, according to the flight-tracking website Flight Aware.

Encore owner John Rumpel told the Washington Post his daughter, a grandchild and her nanny were on board.

Advertisement

“We know nothing about the crash,” the Post quoted Rumpel as saying. “We are talking to the FAA now,” he added before ending the call.

The U.S. military attempted to contact the pilot, who was unresponsive, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) said in a statement. They also used flares in an attempt to get the pilot’s attention.

The Cessna appeared to be flying on autopilot, another source familiar the matter said.

The Cessna took off from Elizabethton Municipal Airport in Elizabethton, Tennessee, and was bound for Long Island MacArthur Airport in New York, about 50 miles (80 km) east of Manhattan, the FAA said.

Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Lisa Shumaker

Advertisement

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

The 5 O’Clock Club: Washington’s tight ends

Published

on

The 5 O’Clock Club: Washington’s tight ends


The 5 o’clock club is published from time to time during the season, and aims to provide a forum for reader-driven discussion at a time of day when there isn’t much NFL news being published. Feel free to introduce topics that interest you in the comments below.


CLICK HERE to see the full 5 o’clock club archive


Zach Ertz

Washington’s tight end room is led by 11-year veteran Zach Ertz, who spent most of his previous pro career with the Philadelphia Eagles. He appears to have ended up in Washington, however, due to his connection to offensive coordinator Kliff Kingsbury, who was Ertz’s head coach in Arizona in 2021-22. Three of Ertz’s last four seasons (2020, ‘22, ‘23) were marred by injury. Rather than attempting to recount the career of a player most Commanders fans are quite familiar with, I’ll just post his career stats.

Receiving & Rushing Table
Games Receiving Rushing Total Yds
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS Tgt Rec Yds Y/R TD 1D Succ% Lng R/G Y/G Ctch% Y/Tgt Att Yds TD 1D Succ% Lng Y/A Y/G A/G Touch Y/Tch YScm RRTD Fmb AV Awards
2013 23 PHI TE 86 16 3 57 36 469 13.0 4 25 50.9 38 2.3 29.3 63.2% 8.2 0 36 13.0 469 4 0 4
2014 24 PHI TE 86 16 5 89 58 702 12.1 3 42 58.4 35 3.6 43.9 65.2% 7.9 0 58 12.1 702 3 1 5
2015 25 PHI TE 86 15 7 112 75 853 11.4 2 40 51.8 60 5.0 56.9 67.0% 7.6 0 75 11.4 853 2 1 6
2016 26 PHI TE 86 14 12 106 78 816 10.5 4 42 57.5 30 5.6 58.3 73.6% 7.7 0 78 10.5 816 4 0 7
2017* 27 PHI TE 86 14 13 110 74 824 11.1 8 46 56.4 53 5.3 58.9 67.3% 7.5 0 74 11.1 824 8 1 8 PB
2018* 28 PHI TE 86 16 16 156 116 1163 10.0 8 66 57.1 34 7.3 72.7 74.4% 7.5 0 116 10.0 1163 8 1 9 PB
2019* 29 PHI TE 86 15 15 135 88 916 10.4 6 50 56.3 30 5.9 61.1 65.2% 6.8 0 88 10.4 916 6 1 7 PB
2020 30 PHI TE 86 11 11 72 36 335 9.3 1 16 38.9 42 3.3 30.5 50.0% 4.7 0 36 9.3 335 1 0 3
2021 31 2TM TE 17 14 112 74 763 10.3 5 40 50.0 47 4.4 44.9 66.1% 6.8 1 4 0 0 100.0 4 4.0 0.2 0.1 75 10.2 767 5 0 8
ARI TE 86 11 11 81 56 574 10.3 3 30 51.9 47 5.1 52.2 69.1% 7.1 1 4 0 0 100.0 4 4.0 0.4 0.1 57 10.1 578 3 0 6
PHI TE 86 6 3 31 18 189 10.5 2 10 45.2 28 3.0 31.5 58.1% 6.1 0 18 10.5 189 2 0 2
2022 32 ARI TE 86 10 10 69 47 406 8.6 4 24 55.1 32 4.7 40.6 68.1% 5.9 0 47 8.6 406 4 0 3
2023 33 ARI TE 86 7 7 43 27 187 6.9 1 8 41.9 17 3.9 26.7 62.8% 4.3 0 27 6.9 187 1 0 2
Career 151 113 1061 709 7434 10.5 46 399 53.4 60 4.7 49.2 66.8% 7.0 1 4 0 0 100.0 4 4.0 0.0 0.0 710 10.5 7438 46 5 62
9 yrs PHI 123 85 868 579 6267 10.8 38 337 54.0 60 4.7 51.0 66.7% 7.2 0 579 10.8 6267 38 5 51
3 yrs ARI 28 28 193 130 1167 9.0 8 62 50.8 47 4.6 41.7 67.4% 6.0 1 4 0 0 100.0 4 4.0 0.1 0.0 131 8.9 1171 8 11

Ben Sinnott

I’ll defer to Ben Sinnott’s biggest fan to explain who he is and his expected role with the Commanders.

Advertisement

In his four years at Kansas State, Sinnott never put up gaudy numbers, though his 2023 stats were very solid, catching 49 balls for 676 yards and 6 TDs (better numbers than Sanders and All, it should be said). It was enough to earn him Honorable Mention All-American recognition as well as First Team All Big 12 honors.

With measurables that comp pretty closely to former first round pick TJ Hockenson and LaPorta, it was (and still is) baffling to me that people weren’t drawing the parallels.

When most fans think about tight ends, they usually want to envision the splashy plays: Oversized slot receivers grabbing a ball over the middle and taking it to the house, ideally having smashed some diminutive defensive back into oblivion on the way there. And, don’t get me wrong, I love that too. But that’s generally not how young tight ends get their break in the pros.

Coaches have a decision with their inexperienced TEs:

Do we risk our pass protection, and our quarterback, by testing a tight end who’s not quite ready? Or do we ease that tight end into the lineup, and hope that slowing down the process produces results down the road?

Generally speaking, coaches choose option two. So when you see a college player who is a talented pass catcher, and can do this, you pay attention:

Advertisement

Sinnott offers a bit of positional flexibility, being reminiscent of the Joe Gibbs “H” back. Here’s what Chris Cooley had to say about Sinnott this past week:

“I will tell you right now, Joe Gibbs would love Ben Sinnott. This would be his guy. He would draft this guy. This is his H-back who can play receiver and tight end. He is a versatile tight end.”

That kind of versatility could end up allowing the Commanders to keep 4 players at the tight end position, with Sinnott moving around the formation in a variety of roles.


Armani Rogers

On May 18, 2022, I was so excited about Armani Rogers that I devoted an entire 5 O’Clock Club post to him.

Here’s how I summarized that article:

In 2022, Armani Rogers was targeted 6 times. Five of those passes were completed for 64 yards (12.8 average) and 4 first downs.

Washington was 3-0 in games in which Rogers was targeted.

Advertisement

Like Logan Thomas, 25-year-old Armani Rogers is a converted college quarterback (UNLV). He was undrafted last year, and played well in training camp and the preseason. He was one of 5 tight ends on the initial 53-man roster.

What I see in these 6 plays is a guy with good hands, an understanding for how to get open, an ability to get north and south in a hurry, awareness of where the first down marker is, and an ability to break tackles.

As you can see from his film clips above, Rogers was having a pretty good rookie season, but missed several games due to injury — he was on IR from Week 11 to Week 17. I’m thinking that Eric Bieniemy might be excited when he sees these plays by the young 2nd-year tight end.

At that time, I expected Armani Rogers to develop into a good NFL tight end during the ‘23 season, and then take over as the team’s No. 1 option this season. Of course, all of that came to a crashing halt when Rogers tore his Achilles tendon in the team’s first OTA session of the ‘23 offseason in late May.

He isn’t quite a year removed from his injury, though Aaron Rodgers and Kirk Cousins each suffered Achilles tears in the regular season and are expected to play this season, so I am cautiously optimistic that Armani will be able to participate in OTAs, attend training camp, and earn a spot as one of the team’s tight ends this season.

Advertisement

Right now, there’s little to base that hope on other than a handful of regular season snaps from 2022 and good reports from coaches and beat reporters about what he showed in practice, but if he is able to come back healthy and get back on his earlier track, Rogers could provide a strong element to the TE group.

John Bates

I may be the biggest John Bates fan among the Washington faithful. I like what he did in college and I like what he adds to the Commanders roster. He was drafted in the 4th round of the 2021 draft by the Washington Football team.

Here’s what Hogs Haven said about Bates in July last year, ahead of the ‘23 season:

While Bates’ 2022 performance fell below that threshold, his rookie performance, in 2021, exceeded it. His 2021 numbers, 20 receptions for 249 yards and 1 TD were among the best in his draft class, and they would have placed him 12th in receptions and 8th in yardage among TE2s in 2022.

As a tight end primarily drafted for his blocking proficiency, I’m not sure anyone ever expected Bates to be among the most productive tight ends in the league. However, during his initial – admittedly short – two season sample, he certainly appears capable of performing as a decent TE2 in the league, in terms of offensive performance.

The only thing that can really be said for John Bates’ receiving stats in 2023 is that they were slightly better than his 2022 stats.

Advertisement
Receiving & Rushing Table
Games Receiving Rushing Total Yds
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS Tgt Rec Yds Y/R TD 1D Succ% Lng R/G Y/G Ctch% Y/Tgt Att Yds TD 1D Succ% Lng Y/A Y/G A/G Touch Y/Tch YScm RRTD Fmb AV
2021 24 WAS TE 87 17 8 25 20 249 12.5 1 11 68.0 32 1.2 14.6 80.0% 10.0 0 20 12.5 249 1 1 2
2022 25 WAS TE 87 16 7 22 14 108 7.7 1 4 50.0 20 0.9 6.8 63.6% 4.9 0 14 7.7 108 1 1 1
2023 26 WAS TE 87 17 4 28 19 151 7.9 0 6 50.0 35 1.1 8.9 67.9% 5.4 0 19 7.9 151 0 0 1
Career 50 19 75 53 508 9.6 2 21 56.0 35 1.1 10.2 70.7% 6.8 0 53 9.6 508 2 2 4

Personally, I think Bates has a role on an NFL team, and I’d like it to be in Washington. Looking beyond this season to 2025, when Zach Ertz may well be retired from the NFL, it would be good to have Bates returning as a home-grown free agent.

But if we assume that Ertz and Sinnott are roster locks, then Bates could find himself fighting for a spot on the 53-man roster in the final year of his rookie contract.

Cole Turner

Cole Turner was a big receiver (listed by the Commanders at 6’6”, 240 pounds) who converted to tight end as a college sophomore in 2020.

Much was expected from Turner in his rookie season after being drafted in the 5th round of the 2022 draft by the Washington Commanders. That season, however, turned out to be rather disappointing, as he was often inactive or unused due to a chronic hamstring injury. He ended up being targeted only 9 times, and ended up with 2 receptions for 23 yards.

Last year, Turner showed up to training camp sporting a new look that was both stronger and leaner.

Advertisement

Expectations were again high going into the ‘23 season with new offensive coordinator Eric BIeniemy. Again, Turner’s actual production was disappointing, seeing just 142 offensive snaps (17%). He had 11 receptions on 15 targets for 120 yards, but he was all but invisible in the team’s offense. It seemed like he was ‘in the doghouse’ with coaches because there was no clear reason for how scarcely he was used.

Snap Counts Table
Games Off. Def. ST
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct
2022 22 WAS TE 85 10 2 245 36% 0 0% 61 23%
2023 23 WAS TE 85 12 1 142 17% 0 0% 86 25%
Career 387 0 147

If the Commanders keep only 3 tight ends (and even if they keep 4), Turner could find himself as the odd man out, being a less capable blocker than John Bates. His role as a little-used receiving target who also plays only about 25% of special teams snaps is unlikely to endear him to coaches unless he impresses mightily in minicamps, OTAs and training camp.

Colson Yankoff

Like Cole Turner, Yankoff is a big(ish) former receiver (6’3”, 233 pounds) who changed positions — first to running back for his final two seasons at UCLA, and now to an aspiring tight end, a position he never played in college.

As an undrafted college free agent, Yankoff’s best-case scenario for his rookie season is to end up on the practice squad.

Advertisement

Based on this profile from Lance Zierlein, Yankoff’s chances of sticking around while he develops his skills as a tight end seem to rely almost solely on his special teams skills.

Yankoff’s talent rests in his ability to get down the field to find and tackle punt and kick returners. He has adequate top-end speed as an F tight end, but he has very little practical experience as a route runner. He will need to prove his ball skills and show he can wall off defenders as a run blocker in space. His experience as a running back should help him after the catch. Unless a team decides to use him exclusively as a special-teams ace, he will need to prove to be at least functional at an offensive position to secure a roster spot.

This is mirrored in a slightly more enthusiastic summary of his play published in mid-April:

The former four-star recruit at quarterback (and Elite 11 participant) committed to Washington before transferring to Westwood after redshirting his first year. Yankoff moved to wide receiver in 2020, then to running back in 2022. He’s clearly a projection at tight end, but he showcased the necessary skills and tested well at the Bruins’ pro day. If given an opportunity, he could become a special teams ace — Yankoff produced 10 tackles in 2023. Projected: PFA


Poll

Which of these three players is LEAST likely to make the Commanders 53-man roster in 2024?

Poll

Which of these three players is MOST likely to make the Commanders 53-man roster in 2024?

Poll

Will Colson Yankoff manage to get a spot on the Commanders practice squad in 2024?





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Congress cancels hearing on George Washington U protests after police clear encampment

Published

on

Congress cancels hearing on George Washington U protests after police clear encampment


(JTA) — Police in Washington, DC cleared a pro-Palestinian encampment from the campus of George Washington University and arrested 33 people early Wednesday, hours before a Congressional hearing was set to pressure local leaders on their response to the protest.

Shortly after the arrests, the Republican-led congressional committee canceled the hearing. Lawmakers had planned to grill DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and police chief Pamela Smith on why, prior to Wednesday morning’s arrests, the district had not clamped down on “unlawful activity and antisemitism” at the encampment. Washington police had previously rejected the university’s pleas to intervene on campus, citing the optics of disciplining protesters.

Advertisement

The arrests also follow the publication of dueling faculty letters supporting and opposing the encampment. One of the professors who had circulated the anti-encampment letter backed the arrests. 

“It’s always upsetting when police have to get involved in this way, but I think there was no alternative,” Daniel Schwartz, a professor of Jewish history at GWU, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. “Their presence was a disturbance to many students, especially given the location. Final exams were being moved.”

THE TRUSTEES GATE at George Washington University (Illustrative). (credit: Sabrina Soffer)

Concerns about campus antisemitism

The letter Schwartz and a non-Jewish GWU colleague, Eric Arnesen, had circulated was signed by more than 100 university faculty and staff, many of them Jewish and most from the DC area.

Advertisement

The letter endorsed protecting peaceful protest but expressed concern about the allegations of antisemitism and said the demonstrations weren’t representative of the campus as a whole.

“While we oppose any attempt to ascribe antisemitic intent to all or even most of the protesters, it is indisputable that there have been numerous cases of harassment, abuse, and even physical violence against Jewish students on college campuses since October 7,” Schwartz and Ernesen’s open letter states. Later, they write, “We agree that student speech and protest should be respected — provided they follow reasonable university regulations and do not veer into the realm of harassment.”

Advertisement

A separate open letter from area faculty that had expressed support for the encampments, and downplayed reports of antisemitism among their participants, was signed by more than 500 people.

Universities across the country have struggled to find the right response to the encampments, which have gone up at dozens of schools over the past few weeks. Some have struck deals to clear them peacefully, and others have sent in law enforcement to break them up, leading to more than 2,500 arrests nationwide. 

Jewish students and faculty on campuses with encampments have reported being harassed by protesters and say they create a hostile atmosphere, while many of the protests have featured Jewish contingents.

Advertisement

Protests at GWU over the Israel-Hamas war have often taken on a more aggressive tone than similar campus protests. Last fall the school suspended its chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, and the White House specifically called out the activists’ actions, after “Glory to our martyrs” was projected onto the side of a campus building named after a Jewish donor. 

The campus had calmed down since the fall, but tensions flared up again with the recent encampments, Schwartz said. Recent encampment behavior has reportedly included blocking students’ ability to move through campus, replacing an American flag with a Palestinian flag and putting a keffiyeh onto a campus statue of George Washington. GWU President Ellen Granberg has also been a direct target of the protesters, both at fundraisers and on campus. 

Advertisement

When the encampments sprang up in late April, GW Hillel called for the university “to take all needed actions to maintain a safe campus environment for all,” calling them “an embrace of hate” and stating, “We say unequivocally that no student’s rights to be safe, to pursue their education, and to be proud Jews should be compromised in response to another student’s actions.”

Days before the arrests, Granberg made a plea to DC law enforcement to help manage the “illegal” protests. Both Granberg and police said they gave the protesters several warnings to leave the encampment before arrests were made and offered an alternative protest site. Granberg wrote in a message to campus that the administration had “conducted regular and sustained dialogues” with encampment leaders.

“I fully support and encourage our community to speak out and engage in controversial and critical dialogues on these crucial issues — as long as they occur within the limits of our university’s policies and the District’s laws,” she wrote. “However, what is currently happening at GW is not a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment or our university’s policies. The demonstration, like many around the country, has grown into what can only be classified as an illegal and potentially dangerous occupation of GW property.”

Advertisement

Prior to their arrest, members of the recent encampment at the school chanted slogans linking the Israel Defense Forces to the Ku Klux Klan, according to the Hatchet, the student newspaper. 

Granberg “deserves a lot of credit for how she’s handled this,” Schwartz said. “And I’m certain she’ll be taking an enormous amount of flak, not only from students but from faculty.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Mount Washington Auto Road opening ahead of schedule for daily drives this season

Published

on

Mount Washington Auto Road opening ahead of schedule for daily drives this season


Road to the top of Mount Washington opening early

Advertisement


Road to the top of Mount Washington opening early

00:22

Advertisement

GORHAM, N.H. – Has your car climbed Mount Washington? The Mt. Washington Auto Road is opening ahead of schedule for daily use.

The famous scenic 7.6-mile drive that takes visitors all the way up to the 6,288-foot summit of New England’s tallest peak will open for daily usage on May 11 at 9 a.m. Typically, the Auto Road only opens on weekends, weather-permitting, before Memorial Day.

“A strong ‘Spring Clearing’ effort by the MWAR Road Crew paired with less extreme weather conditions over the winter allow for daily operations to start two weeks early,” the Auto Road said in a statement.

While the snowfall may not have been extreme this winter, the Mount Washington Observatory at the summit did record a 150 mph wind gust in March.

History of Mt. Washington Auto Road

The Mt. Washington Auto Road bills itself as the “oldest man-made tourist attraction in North America.” It was first opened in 1861, with a horse-drawn carriage making the first trip to the summit.

Advertisement

More than 45,000 cars drive the Auto Road annually. It takes about 30 minutes to go up the mountain and another 30  – and driving is not recommended for those with a fear of heights. For those who don’t want to drive, guided tours are available.

It costs $45 for a car and driver to take the Auto Road to the summit and back. Adult passengers are $20 each and kids between 4 years old and 12 are $10.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending