Connect with us

Washington

U.S. may need $7 billion for monkeypox, Biden administration estimates

Published

on

U.S. may need  billion for monkeypox, Biden administration estimates


Remark

The Biden administration privately estimated to Congress this month that it could want practically $7 billion to mount a response to the nation’s monkeypox outbreak that matches “the scope and urgency of the present scenario.”

The funding estimate, the small print of which have been contained in a memo addressed to President Biden and obtained by The Washington Put up, mirrored early talks amongst congressional Democrats and White Home officers in pursuit of a spending package deal that might enhance the supply of monkeypox checks, vaccine doses and coverings.

Advertisement

The quantity didn’t mark a proper request for assist to Congress. Moderately, it was one in all a collection of choices reflecting varied quantities that might fund various ranges of federal mitigation efforts. White Home aides just lately introduced the concepts on the request of Democratic leaders on the Senate’s high health-focused committee, in accordance with the memo. A Democratic aide, who spoke on the situation of anonymity to explain the non-public conversations, confirmed the funding particulars to The Put up.

The Biden administration additionally known as for as a lot as $31.4 billion in new funds to fight the coronavirus pandemic, because it seeks to make sure the federal government has the sources mandatory to buy extra remedies, testing and vaccines this yr.

The White Home already had urged Congress repeatedly to approve one other tranche of assist focusing on covid-19. However Republicans have raised quite a few fiscal objections to extra federal spending, leading to a stalemate that has pressured the Biden administration to ration the funds that stay. The brand new discussions round monkeypox assist may face comparable political obstacles, as a result of some GOP lawmakers beforehand have stated they’re solely prepared to repurpose present funds, not authorize new {dollars}.

The non-public discussions have unfolded as public well being specialists warn that monkeypox, which might unfold by skin-to-skin contact and trigger fever, lesions and extreme ache, is vulnerable to changing into completely entrenched in america. Federal officers have recognized about 3,500 instances, overwhelmingly amongst homosexual and bisexual males, and have warned that the virus is prone to unfold to broader populations.

The World Well being Group on Saturday declared that the worldwide monkeypox outbreak was a public well being emergency of worldwide concern, its highest-level warning, and Biden officers are considering an identical declaration, though the present outbreak has but to be linked to any U.S. deaths.

Advertisement

After publication of this story, an administration official confirmed the White Home’s present discussions with Congress about monkeypox funding.

“As a part of our routine conversations with Congress about varied useful resource wants, the Administration this weekend responded to a request from Hill workers for extra data on the Administration’s public well being response efforts, together with our monkeypox outbreak response and the extra sources wanted to proceed it,” the official, who requested anonymity, wrote in an e-mail.

Based on the memo obtained by The Put up, officers estimate that $6.9 billion in new funding for the monkeypox response would enable the Division of Well being and Human Companies to assist “home end-to-end vaccine manufacturing capability and expertise switch” in america. The one vaccine particularly permitted by the Meals and Drug Administration for monkeypox, Jynneos, is produced in Denmark, which has triggered important issues within the U.S. response — as an illustration, tons of of hundreds of Jynneos doses have been stranded abroad for weeks, awaiting U.S. inspection and transport.

With that a lot funding, officers additional estimate that they’d be capable of safe 19 million new doses of vaccine for monkeypox and replenish about 4 million doses for paused smallpox preparedness efforts, in addition to buy extra antiviral remedies, broaden testing, enhance vaccine distribution, and supply protection of companies for uninsured and underinsured Individuals, amongst different targets.

Well being officers additionally estimated the results of a “medium” second choice, looking for $2.2 billion in monkeypox funding to buy some vaccine doses and coverings that will be focused towards the homosexual and bisexual neighborhood, the place the outbreak is at present concentrated. However the quantity could solely present an efficient response if the outbreak stays contained and doesn’t spill into broader populations, “which isn’t assured,” the memo cautions.

Advertisement

Officers additionally estimated a bare-bones fallback choice of $500 million that will enable for buying some vaccine doses and persevering with “minimal” operations.

Well being officers have stated they’re funding the present monkeypox response by drawing on present appropriations and a response fund maintained by the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. The Biden administration has distributed 330,000 vaccines and contracted for a complete of 6.9 million Jynneos doses by mid-2023, along with different investments in checks and coverings.

The discussions come as Democrats on Capitol Hill sound rising alarms concerning the want for the federal authorities to behave swiftly and extra aggressively. Celebration lawmakers fired off a flurry of letters over the previous week that evinced a few of their discomfort with the scenario, in some instances arguing the U.S. authorities has not completed sufficient to supply checks, remedies and vaccinations to these in best want.

In a single letter to the Biden administration, despatched Monday, greater than 100 Home Democrats led by Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and David N. Cicilline (D-R.I.) known as for “extra funding” that might assist well being clinics tasked with responding to monkeypox. Lawmakers stated the shortage of monetary sources had imperiled native work to conduct contact tracing and supply different important companies, including to the burden on docs and aides who already are overtaxed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

“What we’re hoping is the expertise of covid will inform the response to this outbreak,” Cicilline stated in an interview Tuesday.

Advertisement

Individually, one other 22 Democrats led by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) aired their rising “concern” about current caseloads and known as on the Biden administration to extend entry to vaccines. The lawmakers stated the brief provide of immunizations had damage “at-risk” populations, significantly the lesbian, homosexual, bisexual and transgender communities, for whom well being care already could be “inaccessible or in any other case denied.”

“In gentle of this excessive demand and the communities which were impacted by the outbreak in america so far, we implore you to work with urgency to take the mandatory motion to answer this public well being concern and guarantee sufficient doses and equitable distribution of the vaccine in america,” the Democrats wrote of their missive.

And Markey on Tuesday additional known as on the CDC to “cut back limitations” to entry a key therapy, often known as tecovirimat, that has been exhausting to acquire for monkeypox sufferers. In doing so, Markey requested HHS and CDC officers in the event that they wanted “extra funding” to make sure its availability.

In the meantime, Senate Republicans have continued to press the White Home on its rising response to monkeypox and ongoing response to the coronavirus. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the highest Republican on the Senate’s well being panel, earlier this month despatched a letter to Biden officers, criticizing their “egregious failures” on monkeypox testing and vaccine distribution and demanding the administration’s “detailed technique” on how to answer the present outbreak. Burr has additionally spent months warning the White Home that he doesn’t plan to assist extra coronavirus funding till he’s assured that trillions of {dollars} in prior funding was well-spent.

Broadly, Republicans have demanded that Democrats repurpose previous stimulus {dollars} to cowl the prices of any new public well being spending. With out GOP assist, Democrats can not advance any assist package deal within the narrowly divided Senate.

Advertisement

The Biden administration has repeatedly known as for extra coronavirus funding, warning that it has more and more been pressured to shift cash from different wanted initiatives, resembling a transfer final month to take $10 billion from testing and different applications to purchase extra vaccines. The White Home on Tuesday hosted specialists who made the case for “the subsequent technology” of coronavirus vaccines that might last more and supply extra safety towards the virus, the administration’s newest effort to highlight the necessity for extra investments.

“We’ve got to proceed to innovate, be inventive, and propel nice concepts ahead in motion. We should proceed to fund these concepts with assist from Congress,” stated Alondra Nelson, the appearing director of the White Home science workplace.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?

Published

on

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?


play

For Michigan basketball, the recent West Coast trip went about as well as hoped.

The No. 24 Wolverines (12-3, 4-0 Big Ten) picked up a pair of double-digit wins against the Big Ten’s Los Angeles-based teams — topping USC, 85-74, last Saturday and then defeating No. 21 UCLA, 94-75, Tuesday night as wildfires raged a few miles away — and now return home looking to make it three consecutive wins against league newcomers, welcoming Washington (10-6, 1-4) to Ann Arbor on Sunday afternoon (2 p.m., Big Ten Network).

Advertisement

The Huskies’ first trip to the Midwest hasn’t started well; they were dog-walked by Michigan State in East Lansing, 88-54, on Thursday. U-W trailed by 29 points at the half (42-13) and by more than 40 points in the second half (82-41 with less than five minutes to play) in an utter annihilation.

After two tight wins in conference play — by three points over Wisconsin and two over Iowa — U-M has won four games in a row by double digits and could make it five straight, with one of the bottom teams in the Big Ten coming to town.

Advertisement

Great Osobor with not-so-great help

U-Dub forward Great Osobor made headlines this offseason when he transferred from Utah State to Washington (following head coach Danny Sprinkle) for a then-record NIL deal worth $2 million.

Apparently, money doesn’t buy wins, because while Osobor has been decent, it hasn’t been nearly enough for the Huskies.

The senior leads the Huskies in scoring (13.8 points per game) and rebounding (8.4) but his efficiency has taken a large drop, as he has shot just 45% from the floor on 3s after hitting at least 57.7% in each of his first three college seasons. Some of that might be attributable to his increased 3-point tries — after attempting just 18 3s (and making four, for a 22.2% success rate) in his first 104 games, he has 14 3-point tries in 16 games this season (with only two makes, a 15.3% rate). More concerning is his 2-point shooting percentage: After hitting 59.1% last season, he’s at 47.7% inside the arc this season.

Advertisement

He has scored in double figures in 11 games with the Huskies, though much of his success came in a weak nonconference schedule. Though he put up 20 points and 14 rebounds vs. Maryland, he had just nine points and three boards vs. USC and a combined 15 points and eight rebounds vs. Illinois and MSU.

Sophomore guard Tyler Harris (Portland) is next at 12.3 points and 5.3 rebounds per game while freshman point guard Zoom Diallo, a top-50 recruit according to 247 Sports’ composite rankings, averages 10.8 points per contest for Sprinkle’s team.

Overall, U-Dub is simply not up to Big Ten standard. On defense, the Huskies are No. 7 nationally in limiting 3-pointers (28%) and No. 69 in efficiency (99.9), per KenPom, but on offense, the Huskies are No. 149 in efficiency (107.4), No. 201 in 2-point shooting (50.1%) and No. 240 on 3s (32%).

Advertisement

Depth on display

The Wolverines, meanwhile, continue to flex their depth and balance with each passing game.

Michigan just defeated UCLA by 19 on the road and did so by scoring 94 points (the most a Mick Cronin team has ever allowed at home) without perhaps its most proven guard: Roddy Gayle Jr. (knee bruise) missed Tuesday’s game vs. the Bruins. U-M coach Dusty May said then it was too early to say if he’d play Sunday.

“Long-term health is priority No. 1 for us,” May said. “But I would say he’ll be back relatively soon.”

Gayle is one of five U-M players scoring in double figures for May in his first season in Ann Arbor. After putting up a career-high 36 points vs. the Bruins, center Vlad Goldin now leads the Wolverines at 15.8 points per game. Point guard Tre Donaldson (13.1 points) is next while Danny Wolf, Goldin’s frontcourt partner, averages a double-double at 12.5 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.

All three had standout games on the trip; Wolf started the L.A. double-dip becoming just the third NCAA player in more than 20 years with at least 20 points, 10 rebounds, seven assists and six blocks, and Donaldson made a career-high four 3-pointers vs. USC, then topped it with six vs. UCLA.

Advertisement

And then there’s Gayle (12.4 points) and Nimari Burnett (10.5 points), who are both shooting better than 50% from the floor. Every starter has led the team in scoring at least once this season, a major reason U-M leads the country in 2-point shooting (62%) and effective field goal percentage (60.2%).

“I mean numbers don’t lie,” Donaldson said. “We’re shooting over 60% inside the arc, I mean just continuing to do that. We got big guys out here … with Danny doing what he does in and out. It’s hard to guard. Nobody’s seen nothing like that before.”

Tony Garcia is the Michigan Wolverines beat writer for the Detroit Free Press. Email him at apgarcia@freepress.com and follow him on X at @RealTonyGarcia.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard


Washington’s citizen legislature kicks off its 2025 session Monday in Olympia. 

Lawmakers will have 105 days to make multi-billion dollar shortfalls disappear from state operations and transportation budgets. They’ll wrangle over policies for capping rent hikes, purchasing guns, providing child care, teaching students, and much, much more. With many new faces, they’ll spend a lot of time getting to know one another as well.

Here are six lawmakers and one statewide executive to keep an eye on when the action begins.

Sen. Jamie Pedersen, Democrat, of Seattle 

This is Pedersen’s first session leading the Senate Democrats. He takes over for the longtime majority leader Andy Billig, of Spokane, who retired last year. Pedersen represents one of the most progressive areas in the state, including Seattle’s Capitol Hill, which could indicate a shift in where his caucus is going politically. His new gig won’t be easy as he navigates the needs of 30 Democrats, seeks compromises with his 19 Republican colleagues, and deals with a gaping $12 billion budget hole. He takes the position after years as the majority floor leader, where he was well known for his efficiency, organization and Nordic sweaters.

Advertisement

Rep. Travis Couture, Republican, of Allyn 

As the lead Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, Couture will be the point person for his caucus as it looks to block tax bills and push the Legislature to tamp down state spending. This is a new responsibility for him. It will test his mettle to work with Democratic budget writers in both chambers while simultaneously carrying out his role as a vocal critic of Democratic initiatives his caucus opposes most strongly. For Couture, a conservative who some say can at times “sound like a Democrat” it might not be as difficult as it seems.

Sen. Noel Frame, Democrat, of Seattle

Frame stumbled into the spotlight last month after mistakenly sending an email to all senators — instead of just fellow Democrats — outlining ideas for new taxes. Those include taxing wealthy individuals and large businesses — proposals that are getting traction with her progressive colleagues. She also mentioned an excise tax on guns and ammunition sales, a lift of the 1% cap on annual property tax increases and a sales tax on self-storage unit rentals. Frame takes on a new role this year as vice chair of finance on the Senate Ways and Means Committee, giving her power to explore new revenue ideas and making her a central player in talks about how to solve the budget shortfall.

Sen. Matt Boehnke, Republican, of Kennewick

Boehnke, the top Republican on the Senate Energy, Environment and Technology Committee, is out to retool climate change laws passed by Democrats and outgoing Gov. Jay Inslee. He wants, for example, to repeal a law requiring Washington to adopt California’s tough vehicle emission standards for trucks. And he wants to cut the governor out of decision-making on major clean energy projects. Inslee stirred controversy when his actions led to approval of the state’s largest-ever wind farm, near the Tri-Cities, despite concerns from the community where it will be built. That community happens to be in Boehnke’s home county.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, Democrat, of Seattle

Alvarado will be a key lawmaker leading the charge to pass a cap on rent hikes. This was one of the more controversial bills to fail last year, passing the House but failing twice in the Senate. After the bill died, Alvarado said “momentum is building, and next year, I believe we will pass this bill.” She may have more success this time around, especially if she makes her way over to the Senate to fill Sen. Joe Nguyen’s vacancy (Nguyen is leaving to lead the state Department of Commerce. The appointment process for his seat is still ongoing). Democratic leadership said the rent proposal is a priority for their caucuses, and Pedersen said he believes the idea has more support in his chamber this year. But Alvarado still has her work cut out. The bill, which would cap yearly rent increases at 7% for existing renters, is sure to draw fire from powerful real estate groups and Republicans, who warn that capping rents could undercut the construction of new housing and end up hurting renters.

Rep. Jim Walsh, Republican, of Aberdeen 

Walsh made The Standard’s list of lawmakers to watch in 2024 because he was a legislator, the chair of the Washington State Republican Party and author of six initiatives, half of which are now law. He makes the cut again because he still wears two political hats giving him two separate pulpits to convey the Republican message. While he’s not pushing any ballot measures, yet, he did launch the state party’s “Project to Resist Tyranny in Washington” as a vehicle for opposing incoming Democratic governor Bob Ferguson.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard


Democratic state lawmakers are again pushing a proposal to restrict rent hikes across Washington.

Despite the rent cap bill’s dramatic failure last session, backers say its prospects this year are better given new lawmakers, revamped legislative committees and growing public support. The road to final passage, however, could still be tough.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, D-Seattle, prefiled a “rent stabilization” bill in the House on Thursday. It is similar to where the plan left off last year

The bill includes a 7% cap on yearly rent increases for existing tenants, with some exceptions, including buildings operated by nonprofits and residential construction that is 10 years old or less. It also requires landlords to give 180 days notice before an increase of 3% or more and limits some move-in and deposit fees.

Advertisement

“People are suffering, and I don’t know how anyone comes back to the legislative session and doesn’t want to support relief,” said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau, D-Tacoma, who will sponsor the legislation in the Senate.

Supporters say the proposal would help tenants and alleviate homelessness, but opponents say a rent cap could only worsen Washington’s housing shortage by disincentivizing new development.

Democratic leaders said Thursday that the proposal will likely be heard quickly in the House after the session kicks off next week but could move slowly in the Senate where it died last year. 

Trudeau said the new makeup of the chamber and the membership of key committees could be in the bill’s favor. Last year,  supporters blamed moderate Democrats on committees like Ways and Means and Housing for killing the bill. Two of those moderates — Sens. Mark Mullet and Kevin Van De Wege — did not run for reelection last year and will no longer be in the Senate. 

Trudeau also said that because the policy is being named early as a priority for their caucus, it will give lawmakers more time to consider it. 

Advertisement

“We’re still going to have conflict, just hopefully not as dramatic as last year,” she said. 

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, told reporters Thursday that he believes his caucus is ready to support the bill, but that it would take passing other legislation to increase housing supply and improve affordability. 

In the House, the outlook is more certain. “We passed it off the floor in the House last year, and we will pass it off the floor this year,” House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, said.

The bill is sure to cause some heavy debate.

Last year, it had support from affordable housing advocates, tenants and labor unions. 

Advertisement

Michele Thomas, at the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, said stabilizing rents is essential to help prevent evictions and homelessness. 

“I think lawmakers understand how much rising rents are contributing to housing instability, to homelessness, and to our state’s eviction crisis,” Thomas said.

Among those against the proposal are business groups, landlords and developers. 

Sean Flynn, board president and executive director at the Rental Housing Association of Washington, an industry group, criticized the idea, saying it would drive developers out of the state and lead to less home construction. 

“The fundamental problem that we have in our housing market is a lack of supply,” Flynn said. “This chokes off supply.”

Advertisement

Instead of a cap on all rents, Flynn said the Legislature should try to target tenants who need assistance most and specific landlords who use predatory rent increases without cause. 

One idea that has support from Republicans is creating a tenant assistance program that would give rental assistance vouchers to low-income tenants who may need help paying rent during a given month. Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, is sponsoring that bill. 

House Minority Leader Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, told reporters Thursday his caucus is working on similar proposals with a more targeted approach to helping tenants. 

Stokesbary and Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said their members likely will not support a rent cap policy this session. Stokesbary said he understands the short-term relief of the proposal but that the state ultimately needs more housing.

“In the long-run, this is a much worse deal for renters,” he said.  

Advertisement

Braun said lawmakers should find ways to make permitting easier and increase available land for home construction. He said there is “no quick solution” to the state’s housing and homelessness crisis.

But supporters of the rent cap bill push back on the idea that solely building more housing will solve the state’s problems.

Thomas said lawmakers have put a lot of emphasis in recent years on increasing the supply of homes and alleviating homelessness, but they have not passed legislation to help tenants struggling to keep their homes. Failing to do so will only result in higher levels of eviction and homelessness, Thomas said. 

“Rent stabilization stands alone,” she said. “Each of these issues are important, and the Legislature needs to address the entire housing ecosystem.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending