Connect with us

Utah

Utah police departments adopt a new non-lethal tool — but they haven’t used it yet

Published

on

Utah police departments adopt a new non-lethal tool — but they haven’t used it yet


SALT LAKE CITY — At least 12 police departments across the state — from Logan to Washington County — have purchased a new less-lethal device they say will help them restrain people more safely.

 

But none of them have actually used it yet.

For some agencies, that’s because they still haven’t trained their officers on the BolaWrap, which deploys a 7-and-a-half-foot Kevlar cord that winds its way tightly around a suspect like a lasso. At least one department doesn’t plan to use the tool at all.

Advertisement

 

Other agencies say they simply haven’t needed to deploy them – something Keith Squires, the chief safety officer at the University of Utah, sees as a positive.

 

“If we never have to use it, that would be a good thing,” he said in a recent interview with FOX 13 News. “But if it happens that an officer is in a situation where they know that there’s potential of engaging with someone who is ready to fight or use force against them – whatever it is – and they can use this tool to be able to de-escalate that situation, that’s a win.”

 

Advertisement

The university’s police force is one of the biggest adopters of the new technology in the state, spending around $76,500 to arm all its patrol officers with the tool.

 

While they haven’t yet used BolaWraps in the field here, the decision by Utah police departments to spend a collective $238,000 on them comes at a time when agencies are continuing to evaluate their policing practices in the wake of local and national outcry over officer use of force in recent years.

 

Rodney Sherrod, vice president of training at BolaWrap, said he believes the device has the potential to reduce injuries to both officers and suspects. It could also lower the temperature on “the community outrage [that] is really unparalleled in law enforcement right now,” he said.

Advertisement

 

Wrap Technologies, the company behind the BolaWrap, has marketed it as particularly useful in situations with people who are “emotionally disturbed,” suicidal and mentally ill – as well as with subjects under the influence of alcohol or drugs or who are “passively resistant and non-compliant.”

The device is designed to be deployed from a distance of 10 to 25 feet, in order to allow an officer to gain control of someone without having to go “hands on” or use a riskier less-lethal tool, like a Taser.

“We’re actually helping those in crisis now,” Sherrod said, “whereas before the traditional tools of the trade affect their pain and it escalates a situation.”

 

Advertisement

A little more than half the uses of the BolaWrap nationwide have been on people in some kind of mental or behavioral health crisis, he said.

 

Rob Wesemann, executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Utah, noted that people experiencing severe mental illness are disproportionately represented in violent encounters with officers. The population is more than 10 times as likely to experience force in an interaction with police as those without mental illness.

 

That’s often because officers misinterpret their symptoms as hostility, or their inability to respond to commands as noncompliance, he said.

Advertisement

 

“For [an officer] with limited training, they may see someone’s behavior as simply being defiant: ‘No, I’m not going to do what you tell me,’” he said. “When it could be much, much more complicated than that.”

 

Wesemann said NAMI Utah is in favor of having additional non-lethal tools available to officers. But as more officers put BolaWraps on their belts, he said continued emphasis on de-escalation and training – as well as on understanding people with mental illness – will be important, too.

 

Advertisement

“Our initial response is it’s a little problematic developing this kind of stuff that’s only supposed to be used for folks with mental health conditions,” he said of the BolaWrap. “However, we are not law enforcement, as well, and so we acknowledge the very difficult situation that law enforcement gets placed in. And so again, we really encourage the training piece.” 

VIDEO BELOW: Watch as Rob Wesemann with NAMI Utah discusses the BolaWrap.

Bolawrap explanation/demo

Advertisement

Squires, with the University of Utah, said officers in the state receive ongoing training on de-escalation. And no matter how many less lethal devices officers have on their belts, he said, their “greatest tool is usually their ability to communicate with an individual.”

 

“What we want to do is give every opportunity for our officers to have options,” Squires said. “And as they assess the situation, being able to have a tool that doesn’t require them to have to use a firearm or other lethal means – potentially lethal means – for me is an investment and an opportunity to save somebody from being harmed.”

 

But as with most policing tools marketed as “less lethal,” the BolaWrap isn’t without risk.

Advertisement

 

The company notes in its safety guidelines that the device “involves the possibility that a person may get hurt or die from direct effects of force or from secondary effects including tripping or falling, physical impact or exertion, or unforeseen circumstances.” The guidelines also warn that the barb on the end of the cord may “cause a mark, scratch, puncture, or [cause] other skin or tissue damage with possible infection hazard.”

 

When the university’s police department tested out the BolaWrap on Squires last year, he said the barb punctured his skin and had to be manually removed.

“But for me, the [injury] alternative compared to what the other tools are that we possibly would have to use in a situation like that was very minor,” he said.

Advertisement

 

To prevent injury, BolaWrap suggests officers avoid aiming the devices at someone’s head or using them on a target more susceptible to tripping or falling.

 

As departments across the state buy into the promise of the BolaWrap, at least one agency has decided against the new technology.

When Roy Police Chief Matthew Gwynn was appointed in 2021, he decided not to put the BolaWraps into use, based on concerns about increasing decision fatigue for officers who may need to make a split-second decision in the field.

Advertisement

 

“I don’t want them to have to spend a significant amount of time trying to decide which less lethal tool they have to go to and try to find that and then deploy that,” Gwynn, who’s also a state lawmaker, said in an interview. “I think this just further complicates that decision making when time counts.”

 

Previous departmental leadership on the BolaWraps through federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act money in Gwynn said the department ultimately wasn’t able to secure a refund for the devices – so for now, the BolaWraps are “currently being stored” in the agency’s armory, he said.

 

Advertisement

These other Utah departments have also purchased the BolaWraps:

 

  • Utah Highway Patrol spent nearly $48,250 on the devices in May 2023 – at a cost of around $1,300 per unit, plus cartridges and holsters – as part of an effort to “provide more methods and tools for de-escalation,” according to an internal memo FOX 13 News obtained through an open records request. The department said it hasn’t yet had a chance to issue the BolaWraps and train officers on their use.
  • The Tooele Police Department purchased the BolaWraps through a grant in January for around $17,400 and trained officers on how to use them in late May. The department said none of its officers have deployed the device yet.
  • The Sunset Police Department said it had only recently purchased the BolaWraps and set a date for training, so the devices have not yet been used. The office purchased 10 of them for about $16,530.
  • The North Salt Lake Police Department said it has not deployed the BolaWrap outside of training. The department spent $925 each for 14 devices, at a cost of approximately $12,950.
  • The Washington County Sheriff’s Office spent about $6,670 on six BolaWraps, as well as belt clips and cartridges. The department initially said in a response to FOX 13 that it had used the tool twice, but police reports obtained through records requests on those instances revealed that wasn’t the case. Instead, both incidents involved the uses of WRAP’s full-body restraint.
  • The Kanab Police Department spent $6,000 on the devices. In the year and a half since officers have had them, the department said it has not had “any incidents that required the tool to be used.”
  • The Millard County Sheriff’s Office spent $5,685 on the BolaWrap tools but said it has not yet “issued nor implemented the BolaWrap” and didn’t “have any deployments or usage.”
  • The Nephi Police Department said it has not had any deployments of the BolaWrap since it purchased them in September 2020. The department spent about $2,930 for two devices and cartridges.
  • The Logan Police Department said it spent $2,370 on the BolaWraps. The agency said it trained four officers on the devices in August 2021, but they haven’t yet been deployed.
  • The Hurricane Police Department said it purchased two BolaWraps for $2,340 and received a grant to pay for three additional devices. The department said it hasn’t deployed them in any incident since officers were trained on their use in October 2023.

 

More than 1,000 other departments across the United States have adopted the devices so far, while others are in the process of testing them, according to BolaWrap. And Sherrod said he expects more agencies in Utah to adopt the tools in the coming months as well.

 

“Our vision is to ensure that we equip every police officer that is responding to calls of service” in the country, he said. “We would like to see all the frontline officers who respond to calls each day be equipped with a BolaWrap on their person.”

Advertisement





Source link

Utah

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up

Published

on

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up


The 2025-2026 winter season isn’t quite over, but it’s no secret that it’s been a rough one when it comes to snow. Right now, statewide snowpack numbers are hovering around 60% of the median.

But you don’t have to know those numbers to understand what a strange winter it’s been.

“It’s kind of good,” said Carrie Stewart, who lives in Salt Lake City. “I mean, I like it because I like a milder climate. But I realize this summer is going to be hard.”

MORE | Snowpack

“I’m not sad I’m not shoveling,” said Sally Humphreys of Salt Lake City. “But it’s definitely worrying.”

Advertisement

State water officials are also worried. The clock is ticking to bulk up those snowpack numbers.

“We’re running out of time to get the snowpack that we need,” said Jordan Clayton, supervisor of the Utah Snow Survey. “We have about 40 or so days until our typical snowpack peak.”

There is still some time to make up lost ground, but the odds aren’t great. Clayton estimates a 10% chance of reaching normal by the end of the season.

“Those are terrible odds,” he said.

In fact, the odds of having a record low snowpack are greater, sitting at 20%. It’s a grim reality that has officials looking toward the summer anxiously.

Advertisement

“I would expect to see watering restrictions outdoors for a lot of places,” said Laura Haskell, Utah’s drought coordinator.

It’s unknown what the next few weeks will bring, but if Haskell had to guess, she doesn’t see state reservoirs filling up much from where they are now.

“In the spring when that runoff hits, we do get a noticeable peak in our reservoir storage,” Haskell said. “The water just starts coming in. But this year, we don’t anticipate getting that.”

Haskell says we have enough reservoir storage to likely make it through the summer, but there are other implications to worry about.

Our autumn season was pretty wet. That led to decent soil moisture levels, which can then lead to higher vegetation growth.

Advertisement

“If we then have a snowpack that melts out really early, we’ll have a longer than normal summer, if you will, with forage growth that might dry out, and so that’s kind of a bad recipe for promoting fire hazard,” Clayton said.

Utahns have dealt with low snowpack levels in the past. Many Utahns are familiar with their lawn turning brown because of water restrictions.

“We’ll probably just let it go that nice, sandy, golden color that it gets in the summer in a dry climate,” said Dea Ann Kate, who lives in Cottonwood Heights.

As we wait to see what the next few weeks bring, people like Carrie Stewart are just reflecting on an unusual winter.

“It is worrying,” she said. “We need snow. We’ve only shoveled once this season, and that’s very unusual.”

Advertisement

Water officials are now hoping for something else unusual: climbing out of the snowpack hole that’s been created.

“But there are no times going back where the snowpack totals for the state were close to where they are right now, and we ended up actually at a normal peak,” Clayton said. “So while it’s possible, it’s very unlikely.”

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some

Published

on

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some


SALT LAKE CITY — The presence of federal immigration agents tracking immigrants has increased in Salt Lake County-area courtrooms since mid-February as have complaints about how they’re carrying out their duties.

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents may have carried out operations at the Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City, according to Lacey Singleton, a public defender who’s regularly at the facility.

“Now it is like they are there all the time … They just basically hang out, and they’re either sitting in the courtroom, or they’re lurking in the hallways,” she said. They wear normal street garb, she said, but for regulars in the courtroom, “they stand out.”

Immigration enforcement action at courthouses around the country has become “a cornerstone” in the efforts of the administration of President Donald Trump to detain and deport immigrants in the country illegally, according to the American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group. Since an arrest of one of Lacey’s clients around Feb. 12 or 13, she and others say, the practice has become more and more common in Utah.

Advertisement

ICE didn’t respond to a KSL query seeking comment, but the practice aligns with the Trump administration’s push to crack down on illegal immigration. Agency guidance notes that the people ICE seeks may appear in courthouses to address unrelated criminal and civil matters, and that such facilities are typically secure.

“Accordingly, when ICE engages in civil immigration enforcement actions in or near courthouses, it can reduce safety risks to the public, targeted alien(s) and ICE officers and agents,” reads a May 27 memo on the matter.

Critics, though, say immigration agents’ efforts can be disruptive and could spur immigrants, otherwise trying to resolve their legal issues, to steer clear of court, jeopardizing their cases. As word spreads of the activity, it could also spur fearful immigrant witnesses and crime victims to steer clear of the legal system, Lacey worries.

Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera brought the issue up at a Salt Lake County Council meeting on Tuesday, saying her office has received “multiple complaints” about ICE agents’ activity in Salt Lake County courthouses, where sheriff’s officials, serving as court bailiffs, provide security.

U.S. agents have ratcheted up immigration enforcement action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some. The photo shows attorney Lacey Singleton, center, questioning a suspected agent recently at Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City. (Photo: Salt Lake City Bail Fund)

Part of the problem, she said, is that the agents typically wear plain clothes and don’t identify themselves, not even to bailiffs. Another issue relates to the actual process of taking an immigrant into custody, which Rivera says should occur outside of public view with the suspects’ lawyers present.

Advertisement

In one instance, she said, a bailiff heard a scuffle and thought someone was getting assaulted, only to find out it was ICE agents detaining somebody.

A bailiff and an ICE agent subsequently “got into a verbal altercation,” Rivera said. “We are addressing that issue, but I want you to understand, these deputies are put in a really tough situation, and in this situation, I understand how he could get to that point where he had no idea who they were, and he was trying to make sure that somebody wasn’t being assaulted at the time.”

Video from last week, posted to social media by the Salt Lake City Bail Fund, shows Lacey walking past a suspected immigration agent at the Matheson Courthouse, asking for identification but getting no reply. The Salt Lake City Bail Fund, critical of ICE activity, sends observers to the Matheson Courthouse to monitor the agency’s activity.

“That’s a problem because it’s like, who are you?” Lacey said. “For all I know, you’re some random dude who is just, like, off the street and participating in kidnapping people.”

Video supplied to KSL shows an incident outside Riverton Justice Court on Wednesday — four apparent immigration agents in plain clothes wrestling on the ground with an apparent suspect they were trying to take into custody.

Advertisement

“Don’t resist,” someone off-camera says in Spanish while filming the incident. “Son, don’t resist. Calm down. They’re going to hurt you more.”

The woman asks for his name and contact info after the agents cuff him and take him to a nearby car, while another man on the scene shouts at the officials and berates them. “You guys are disgusting,” the man says.

Anna Reganis, a public defender with the Salt Lake Legal Defender Association, like Lacey, said immigration agents detained a man at Salt Lake City Justice Court on Wednesday. She didn’t witness the actual detention, but heard the aftermath.

“All of a sudden, in my courtroom, we could hear from the lobby blood-curdling screams,” Reganis said. She went to the main lobby, finding a woman holding her infant baby “just inconsolably screaming and crying.” Turns out the woman had gone to the courthouse with her husband, and he had just been detained by immigration agents.

Read more:

Lacey maintains that the people the ICE agents seem to be pursuing aren’t the most hardened of criminals, which the Trump administration said would be the focus when the crackdown started. Reganis echoed that, noting that those with business in the Salt Lake City Justice Court face relatively minor offenses.

Advertisement

“Myself and my co-workers all had a bit of a wake-up call because we kept telling ourselves that this wasn’t going to happen at the justice court because all of our cases are class B and C misdemeanors and infractions,” she said.

The Salt Lake City Bail Fund launched training sessions late last year for volunteers to serve as courthouse observers, particularly at the Matheson Courthouse. Liz Maryon, who helps oversee the effort, foresees another round of training to get more help. “We’re currently working on expanding our capacity so that we can be there every day,” she said.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Iranians in Utah, Middle East eye future after U.S. military action in Iran – KSLTV.com

Published

on

Iranians in Utah, Middle East eye future after U.S. military action in Iran – KSLTV.com


SALT LAKE CITY — Iranians in Utah said Sunday they were celebrating and grateful for U.S. military action against Iran after nearly 47 years of the Islamic Republic regime.

They expressed hope for a future that might bring greater freedom to the people of that country.

“Thank you, Mr. Trump, for helping us,” said Kathy Vazirnejad as she sat inside Persian restaurant Zaferan Café. “The 21st of March is our New Year. For our New Year’s, we do exchange presents and I think President Trump gave us the best gift as any for this year in attacking this government and killing all of those people.”

Vazirnejad moved from Iran to Utah in 1984, graduated from the University of Utah, and obtained U.S. citizenship.

Advertisement

She said the regime was oppressive and “vicious.”

“They’re just a devil,” she said. “I mean, it’s a government that kills its own people.”

Though she has continued to return to Iran to visit family, she said those visits had become increasingly tense and uncertain, even though most Iranians opposed their own government.

“I have a dual citizenship, Persian passport and an American passport,” Vazirnejad explained. “It’s hard. Each time I go there to the airport, I’m showing them my Persian passport and I’m like, ‘Oh my gosh, if they see I’m very active in my social media against the government?’”

Numerous other Iranians shared similar stories of their departure from their homeland, including Ramin Arani, who once served for two years in the Iranian army at the age of 18.

Advertisement

“It was right after the Iran and Iraq war and I was part of the team that was cleaning the war zone basically in terms of unexploded shells and land mines and all that,” Arani explained. “I put my life on the line for the sake of my country, although I was not treated as a first-hand citizen.”

Arani said when he left Iran, he migrated to the U.S. and graduated from the University of Utah with an engineering degree.

“Every day, I appreciate the opportunity that was provided to me,” Arani said.

He said for decades, Iranians didn’t believe the day would come when much of the Islamic Republic’s leadership would be taken out in military strikes.

“I believe we are watching history unfolding,” Arani said. “Potentially, the course of history is about to change.”

Advertisement

What that change looks like exactly remains largely uncertain, though there has been much discussion about potential regime change or the Iranian people taking matters into their own hands.

“Regime change is, you know, a be-careful-what-you-wish-for,” said Amos Guiora, a University of Utah law professor and Middle East analyst with family in Israel. “I say, ‘regime change,’ I get the phrase, but how it comes about, time will tell.”

Guiora questioned how long the U.S. intended to stay involved and what the endgame truly is.

“There’s an expression in Hebrew, if I may—zbang ve’ga’mar’no—which means ‘it ends just like that’—that’s not how these things end and obviously there are political calculations,” Guiora said.

He said he feared for the potential loss of life if boots-on-the-ground are ultimately required.

Advertisement

“(If) any of these things turn into a war of attrition, that would be horrible,” Guiora said.

Guiora, however, said he saw the obvious benefit of different leadership in Iran.

“You know, a shah-like Iran that would not be focused on the support of terrorist organizations and committing acts of terrorism—I think that would be a win-win for the world,” Guiora said.

Arani said if regime change does happen in Iran, he would like to see a constitutional monarchy take root like those in Great Britain and elsewhere in Europe.

“Sweden, Norway, these are all systems that are democratic, or I call them semi-democratic and they still have a monarch, which is a continuation of their culture,” Arani said.

Advertisement

Arani talked of the rich and proud long history of Iran, dating back thousands of years, and he believed there is much of that to share with the world today.

“The culture of Iran that is hidden underneath the layers of history I’m talking about, it’s all about light,” Arani said. “Iranian culture, the real one I’m talking about, is all about appreciating life, not ‘death to this,’ ‘death to that.’”

Vazirnejad believed as many as “85 percent” of Iranians supported the return of the shah’s family to Iran to lead, and she predicted a future where Iran is a partner with the U.S. and Israel.

She suspected that maybe one in five Iranians who left Iran because of the regime might consider returning permanently to the country under new leadership.

“It’s going to be very good,” she said. “Hopefully, we are celebrating the New Year with (the Islamic Republic) gone and hopefully by next year, the New Year’s 21st of March, we all go back to Iran, at least to visit.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending