Connect with us

Utah

Utah lawmaker says immigration bills stalled partly due to Utah Impact’s lingering influence

Published

on

Utah lawmaker says immigration bills stalled partly due to Utah Impact’s lingering influence


SALT LAKE CITY — Numerous proposals from those pressing for more action to crack down on illegal immigration emerged during the Utah legislative session.

Most stalled or failed to gain traction, however, and an immigrant advocate who follows immigration matters closely suspects a couple of things factored into the inaction, including that immigration law and policy are the domain chiefly of federal lawmakers.

“The federal government needs to fix immigration. That is not within our purview or jurisdiction,” said Utah Sen. Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City. A naturalized U.S. citizen originally from Mexico, she represents a diverse section of the city’s west side and said the immigration issue is of growing concern for some of her constituents.

She also cited the continued influence of the Utah Compact on Immigration, initially adopted in 2010 and reaffirmed in 2019. The compact, signed by a cross-section of Utahns and reps from a range of business and nonprofit organizations, is a set of principles calling for “a humane approach” in contending with immigration, among other things.

Advertisement

The principles “still resonate now,” Escamilla said, and some of the legislative proposals that emerged “were really going against the Utah Compact.”

Detaining and deporting immigrants in the country illegally is a priority of the administration of President Donald Trump and a major concern for many. It’s a big issue in Utah as well, and Utah lawmakers proposed several bills targeting illegal immigration and immigrants in the country illegally in the session that ended last week.

One proposal would have eliminated the state’s driver privilege card program, which lets immigrants in the country illegally secure documentation allowing them to legally drive on Utah’s roads. Another would have required more widespread use among Utah employers of the E-Verify system to prevent the hiring of immigrants in the country illegally. A third, which garnered the most public attention, would have prevented immigrants in the country illegally from tapping into government benefits. Those, among others, stalled or, in the case of the driver privilege card initiative, never got a hearing in the first place.

Lawmakers approved two measures that bear on immigration, one creating new safeguards against voting by immigrants. The other, meant to keep unlicensed drivers off the roads by letting police impound their cars, targets all unlicensed motorists, though part of the debate focused on what some see as the worrisome impact of immigrant drivers without licenses.

During the session, Utah Rep. Trevor Lee, R-Layton, voiced support for increased efforts targeting immigrants in the country illegally. He sponsored the driver privilege card measure and the proposal that would have prevented immigrants in the country illegally from accessing state-funded benefits like immunizations, food at food pantries, space at homeless shelters, crisis counseling and more.

Advertisement

He didn’t respond to a query for comment, but had argued that the availability of driver privilege cards serves as a magnet to immigrants in the country illegally. Halting it, he said, would be one way to temper the incentive for them to come to Utah. In promoting the measure related to state-funded benefits, Lee said reserving such services for citizens was “our fiscal and moral responsibility” in part to be good stewards of public funds.

Read more:

Escamilla, for her part, said availability of jobs is the key magnet for immigrants in the country illegally, countering Lee’s contentions about the driver privilege card program. More significantly, perhaps, she said, ending the driver privilege card program could lead to more unlicensed drivers on Utah’s roads, creating a public safety issue.

The initiative related to benefits like crisis counseling and even provision of health care to children in the country illegally came across as “targeting families and children,” she said.

Beyond that, Escamilla said the immigration question is complex and that immigrants in the country illegally fall into a wide range of categories, including those who illegally crossed into the country, asylum-seekers and others trying to regularize their migratory status.

“One of my concerns with trying to address this issue is how people think it’s so simple, and it’s not,” she said.

Advertisement

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Utah

Kratom company sues over Utah’s new law limiting sales of the compound

Published

on

Kratom company sues over Utah’s new law limiting sales of the compound


SALT LAKE CITY — An Oklahoma-based kratom manufacturer is suing over Utah’s new law limiting sales of the compound, saying it could cost the company more than $10 million when it takes effect next month.

Botanic Tonics LLC manufacturers, distributes and sells a dietary supplement made of kratom and noble kava root known as “feel free,” according to a lawsuit filed in federal court on March 31. The company said SB45, which lawmakers passed in the recent legislative session, would prohibit it and three other companies from selling products at more than 300 retail locations statewide.

“Immediate projected losses to plaintiffs due to the statute’s ban on combination kratom dietary supplements exceed $10,704,428,” the complaints states. “To comply with the statute, plaintiffs have notified their direct to store distributors that all kratom leaf products combined with any other ingredient must be removed from store shelves and not made available for sale as of May 6, 2026, unless action is taken by this court to enjoin implementation of the statute.”

It went on to say that the law “denies access to such products for which there is clinical trial data establishing that they do not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit was filed against Utah Attorney General Derek Brown and several state officials: Kelly Pherson, commissioner of the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food; Amber Brown, deputy commissioner of the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food; and Bradon Forsyth, director of the Utah Specialized Product Division.

Botanic Tonics filed the suit in conjunction with the Kratom Coalition Inc., asking a judge to declare Utah’s limits on kratom sales unconstitutional and block the state from enforcing it through a preliminary injunction. The company sued Utah’s Department of Agriculture and Food in a separate state court last year, but that complaint was eventually dismissed.

Kratom comes from a tropical tree and is used by some people for pain management. Kratom products have been sold in retail shops and include powders, gummies, teas and energy drinks.

The substance has been called “gas station heroin” because it can act on the same receptors in the brain that opioids do. Synthetic products derived from kratom can lead to overdose.

SB45 takes effect May 6 and will only allow for the sale of pure leaf kratom in Utah, and only in smoke shops and similar stores. It also gives manufacturers one year to stop producing anything other than pure kratom leaf in the state.

Advertisement

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, said the law was meant to protect Utahns from the product. He said based on an informal poll he took of gas station clerks, “feel free” is one of the most popular kratom products sold in Utah, and called the product “extremely potent, extremely addictive.”

“I’m not worried about it being struck down,” he said of the law. “And the lawsuit doesn’t surprise me. This company has been very aggressive. They’ve sued the state in the past. Ultimately that case was dismissed, but I am confident in our case.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Legion Health AI Cleared to Provide Faster Refills for Utah Patients | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Legion Health AI Cleared to Provide Faster Refills for Utah Patients | PYMNTS.com


Utah regulators have cleared Y Combinator-backed Legion Health to let its artificial intelligence (AI) renew certain psychiatric prescriptions without a doctor signing off each time, The Verge reported on Friday (April 3). The $19-a-month pilot runs for a year and covers non-controlled, non-benzodiazepine maintenance medications.

Renewal, Not New Prescribing

Utah started testing AI for prescription refills without physician signoff in January, as PYMNTS reported at the time. The state partnered with startup Doctronic to cover common chronic medications like statins and blood pressure drugs, spanning nearly 200 medications across primary care, according to Fierce Healthcare.

Legion’s scope is narrower, aimed squarely at mental health access. Most Utah counties are designated mental health provider shortage areas, leaving up to 500,000 residents without adequate behavioral care, according to the Utah Office of AI Policy.

The AI’s guardrails are tight. It cannot issue new prescriptions, adjust doses or handle controlled substances, benzodiazepines or antipsychotics. Patients must be stable and on an existing treatment plan with a licensed psychiatrist and must not have had a psychiatric hospitalization in the past year. Any signs of suicidality, mania, severe side effects or pregnancy trigger an immediate handoff to a human clinician, as detailed by the Utah Office of AI Policy.

Advertisement

The oversight structure is phased. The first 250 renewals by the AI require physician review before reaching the pharmacy, with a minimum agreement rate of more 98% required to proceed.

The next 1,000 renewals are reviewed after the fact, requiring a greater-than-99% threshold before shifting to randomized monthly tests, the Utah Office of AI Policy stated. Legion is required to file monthly reports on accuracy, physician alignment and any adverse outcomes under the policy.

We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

Advertisement

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The structure reflects Doctronic’s earlier mishaps. Within weeks of its launch, security researchers were able to push the system to triple a patient’s opioid dosage and generate misinformation about vaccines, as reported by The Verge.

The Access Case and Its Limits

State officials said the program would allow patients to get care “much more quickly and affordably,” freeing providers to focus on more complex cases, according to The Verge. Legion Co-founder and CEO Yash Patel described the pilot as “the beginning of something much bigger than refills.”

The demand for AI in healthcare is already there. More than 40 million people worldwide use ChatGPT daily for health-related queries, with about 70% happening outside clinic hours, as covered by PYMNTS.

Advertisement

Stanford GSB research found that a customized AI system cut prescription near-misses by about 33% in a pharmacy setting, but only with tight domain constraints and human review at dispensing. Without those conditions, broader AI models produced error rates between 50% and 400% higher than existing systems.

Critics aren’t convinced the access argument holds. Brent Kious, a psychiatrist and professor at the University of Utah School of Medicine, told The Verge the benefits of an AI refill system “may be overstated” and won’t reach the patients who need care most, since users must already be in treatment. He also warned of an “epidemic of over-treatment,” with patients staying on medications longer than necessary.

Utah’s 12-month pilot is designed to collect safety data to determine whether the model can expand to other states or tighten the limits regulators allow. Findings are due before the end of the year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Taylor Frankie Paul faces protective order hearing in Utah after ‘Bachelorette’ cancellation

Published

on

Taylor Frankie Paul faces protective order hearing in Utah after ‘Bachelorette’ cancellation


By HANNAH SCHOENBAUM and ANDREW DALTON

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A Utah judge is set to hear arguments Tuesday on a protective order sought by a former partner against Taylor Frankie Paul, the star of “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” and a recently filmed season of “The Bachelorette” that was canceled over abuse allegations in the relationship.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending