Connect with us

Utah

Utah Karen learns fate after facing sexual battery charges for yanking down 19 year-old girl’s skirt in steakhouse after complaining it was so short

Published

on

Utah Karen learns fate after facing sexual battery charges for yanking down 19 year-old girl’s skirt in steakhouse after complaining it was so short


A Utah Karen who was caught on camera confronting a 19-year-old girl about the size of her miniskirt after yanking it down in a steakhouse.

Ida Lorenzo, 49, had faced a Class A misdemeanor charge of sexual battery following the viral incident at Sakura Japanese Steakhouse in St. George, but entered a plea deal on July 30.

As part of the deal, Lorenzo – a former legal secretary at the state Attorney General’s office – pleaded no contest to a reduced class B misdemeanor charge of ‘knowingly and intentionally touch[ing] the buttocks of another person under the circumstances she should have known would cause affront or alarm,’ according to ABC 4.

She will now be held with no sentence for one year so long as she complies with the terms of the agreement – which stipulate she is to have no contact with the victim – and commits no new offenses.

Advertisement

Ida Lorenzo, 49, has accepted a plea deal after she was caught on camera pulling down a 19-year-old girl’s skirt 

After the one year is up, the criminal case against her could be dismissed.

But if she fails to abide by the terms of the agreement, a warrant could be issued for her arrest, her guilty plea will be accepted and she could face a maximum penalty of 180 days in jail.

According to a record of the hearing obtained by Utah News Dispatch, the victim in the case supported the plea deal. 

Lorenzo was seen in a viral TikTok video pulling down the 19-year-old girl’s skirt and then flashing a badge while asserting, ‘I happen to work for the state.’

She told the alleged victim that if she has to watch her ‘a** cheeks hanging out again’ and see her pubic hair, she would call Child Protective Services. 

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the young victim’s friends can be heard telling Lorenzo: ‘You do not get to touch her,’ and they later accused her of sexually assaulting the victim.

Lorenzo - a former legal secretary at the state Attorney General's office - pleaded no contest to a reduced class B misdemeanor charge of 'knowingly and intentionally touch[ing] the buttocks of another person under the circumstances she should have known would cause affront or alarm'

Lorenzo – a former legal secretary at the state Attorney General’s office – pleaded no contest to a reduced class B misdemeanor charge of ‘knowingly and intentionally touch[ing] the buttocks of another person under the circumstances she should have known would cause affront or alarm’

But the incident only came to the authorities attention after Lorenzo reported it to police herself on the same night. 

She told police that the teenager’s skirt was ‘hiked above her vagina and butt,’ exposing her pubic hair, ABC4 reported. 

Lorenzo also reportedly explained that she pulled the skirt down as young children were present and the restaurant staff did not act. 

After footage of the incident was posted online Lorenzo phoned 911 again to claim that a ‘threat on her life’ had been made as she is a state employee, according to the police report seen by ABC.

Advertisement

She told police she first asked the young woman to pull her skirt down but that she was ignored, and therefore acted herself. 

When asked why she thought it was appropriate to touch the girl, Lorenzo reportedly replied that she only touched her skirt.  

But the teenager had also contacted police following the incident to report that she had been ‘sexually assaulted while in the lobby’ of the St. George restaurant.

She was seen in body camera footage telling officers how she could feel ‘someone’s cold hands against my skin’ before turning around – coming face to face with her accoster.

Police-worn body camera footage shows Lorenzo defended her actions to cops

Police-worn body camera footage shows Lorenzo defended her actions to cops

The teen recalled how she initially thought it was one of her friends having fun, and how stunned she was to see it was a middle-aged woman whom she did not know.

Advertisement

‘Not even the physical side of things, but mentally,’ she said of the lasting impact left by the ordeal. ‘I’m struggling so much with weight problems.’

Others who filled out witness statements shared a similar account of what happened, cops said – paving the way for Lorenzo’s arrest the next day.

The teenager added the incident – which was recorded by friend CC Snow – made her feel insecure about her body.

‘It’s outrageous to me,’ she says in the clip. 

But when police later questioned and arrested Lorenzo, she defended her actions. 

Advertisement

She told officers she first asked the young woman to pull her skirt down but that she was ignored, and therefore acted herself. 

When asked why she thought it was appropriate to touch the girl, Lorenzo reportedly replied that she only touched her skirt. 

An officer then told her that she had still ‘engaged in criminal behavior by touching the female’s clothing, and her behavior was not appropriate.’

The officer explained that touching someone’s private areas was against the law even if just touching clothing.

She then seemed startled when officers said they would arrest her for sexual assault

She then seemed startled when officers said they would arrest her for sexual assault

Still, the former state employee seemed shocked that she would be arrested for the caught-on-camera incident – claiming she thought the teen was nude underneath her skirt.

Advertisement

‘You are going to arrest me?’ she says in police-worn body camera footage, during which she reenacted how she ‘harmlessly’ tugged at the girl’s skirt.

‘I should have called the police at that time. I should have reported it,’ she adds, in footage filmed from the St George Police Department on April 22.

‘You would do whatever you needed to do, but that wasn’t going to resolve the issue,’ she goes on to claim. ‘It would have taken you probably forever to get there.’

She goes on to claim that her intervention garnered a ‘standing ovation’ from those in attendance. 

Then, when asked why she took the matter into her own hands, she responds: ‘[I was] protecting the kids by covering the private parts.’

Advertisement

The officer, in turn, replies: ‘Correct, but that’s not your job to do.’

Lorenzo is seen being walked to a police car following her arrest on April 24

Lorenzo is seen being walked to a police car following her arrest on April 24

Following her arrest, Lorenzo was fired from the state Attorney General’s office.

She later blamed her firing on ‘circumstances beyond my control’ in a GoFundMe to provide some form of income until she lands a new job. 

‘My career and sole means of income is currently on hold for an indefinite period, and it is urgent that I reach out to try and raise funds to help support my two sons and myself during this difficult period,’ Lorenzo wrote, pleading for sympathy.

‘I’m a single mother and I’ve never asked for any help until now. My son is a suicide survivor (bullied in middle school) and I am a survivor of domestic violence. For the first time in my life, I myself could use the help. Any amount of your generosity would be so very appreciated.’

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

Utah weather conditions trigger historic red flag warning as wildfires rage in state

Published

on

Utah weather conditions trigger historic red flag warning as wildfires rage in state


The National Weather Service in Salt Lake City issued red flag warning Friday morning as emergency workers continued to battle one of the state’s largest wildfires in its history.

The red flag warning, issued when critical fire warnings are occurring or imminent, was to be in place through midnight Saturday.

This is the FIRST Particularly Dangerous Situation Red Flag Warning issued in NWS Salt Lake City history. This is an exceptionally rare event,” the federal agency said in its warning.

A map of the area under the warning covered much of central and southwest Utah, with an area of the southwest, central and southern mountains also outlined as “particularly dangerous red flag.”

Close-up aerial video showing large billowing flames and massive plumes of smoke surrounding mountains in Eureka, Utah, on June 24, 2026.
Large billowing flames and massive plumes of smoke surrounded mountains in Eureka, Utah, on June 24.Courtesy Jefe Lobo

The particularly dangerous area includes the Cottonwood Fire, near the town of Beaver, which started Monday and had grown to covering almost nearly 71,000 acres by Thursday, 15 News reported. The fire forced evacuations.

The NWS warned that gusty winds and dry conditions would lead to rapid fire growth.

Utah also was dealing with the Iron Fire, which started June 19, and nearly destroyed the town of Eureka. The fire was about 27% contained Friday morning.

Advertisement

The fire danger led Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to issue executive order restricting fireworks statewide during the July 4 holiday, which marks the nation’s 250th birthday this year. The ban is in effect through July 5.

“Nothing about this decision was easy,” Cox said in a statement issued by his office Thursday.

“This is unlike anything we’ve seen in recent memory. We’re seeing fires spread farther and faster under conditions that defy historical expectations” Jamie Barnes, Utah state forester and director of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, added in the statement.

Cox allowed cities and local communities to set aside areas where fireworks could be safely used. The city of Provo announced it would enforce a citywide prohibition on fireworks and would not designate a safe area for fireworks.

“This year is different,” Provo Mayor Marsha Judkins said in a statement. “The wildfire danger facing our community is real, and protecting lives, homes, and our natural spaces must come first.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Lawsuit claims Utah prison wrongfully conducted mass strip search of more than 100 women

Published

on

Lawsuit claims Utah prison wrongfully conducted mass strip search of more than 100 women


Earlier this month, 2News Investigates brought you a former inmate’s federal lawsuit alleging Utah Department of Corrections leaders failed to address reports of alleged sexual assault by correctional officers. Now, 2News Investigates examines another key claim in that lawsuit.

MORE: Federal lawsuit alleges Utah prison leaders covered up guards’ sexual assaults on inmates

The lawsuit alleges a mass cross-gender strip-search operation – women being viewed by men was intended to further silence female inmates.

Federal law generally prohibits cross-gender strip searches of female inmates except during emergencies or when conducted by medical personnel. UDC says that during body-search procedures, male correctional officers are not allowed in the immediate area and inmate privacy is maintained. Former inmates say that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Advertisement

Three former inmates agreed to speak with 2News Investigates but asked that their identities not be revealed.

“It was very traumatic.”

According to the lawsuit, on May 13, 2025, UDC carried out a large-scale operation known as a “reset” in women’s housing units at the Utah State Correctional Facility (USCF) in Salt Lake City.

Wendy: “They call it a reset. What do you call it?”

“A violation.”

Advertisement

“It’s like a rape.”

The lawsuit alleges UDC Deputy Warden Derick Zorn and Warden Sharon D’Amico directed the operation, along with more than a dozen members of the Critical Incident Response Team, or CIRT.

According to the plaintiffs, officers stormed dormitories, shouted profanities, and issued conflicting commands.

The women say and the lawsuit states they were ordered to pack their belongings into totes and change into state-issued uniforms in front of male CIRT officers. They were then marched to the Emerald Building for processing.

“It felt almost like we were at a concentration camp.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges the women were required to undergo body scans and then strip completely naked. Plaintiffs claim they were ordered to lift their breasts, spread their buttocks, and cough while visible to male staff.

Women who were menstruating allegedly were instructed to remove menstrual products in full view of others.

“Just use one hand to remove it. Hold it up in front of you.”

“I felt really small and worthless.”

The lawsuit alleges some women were forced to hold soiled menstrual pads while performing physical maneuvers.

Advertisement

“I just did what I was told. I just wanted to get it over with.”

The plaintiffs also claim they were required to sit on toilets or squat to provide urine samples while completely naked and visible to male officers.

“It was humiliating. It was degrading.”

The lawsuit further alleges cell doors were left open, exposing naked women to other inmates and male staff.

An overhead observation booth with reflective glass overlooked the strip-search area. Plaintiffs say they observed movement inside and believed they were being watched from above.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges the female inmates were being watched from above during a mass strip search on May 13, 2025

“I could see in the overhead, the two-way mirror. There were multiple men walking around up there who had direct vision inside those cells.”

The lawsuit alleges Captain Jared Beers and Lieutenant Matthew Coombs were inside the booth and that Deputy Warden Derick Zorn observed women in various states of undress.

“I made eye contact with Officer Arroyo, and I also saw Deputy Zorn.”

“I knew if I could see the male officers, they could see me.”

Advertisement

One former inmate described the experience as state-sanctioned sexual violence.

“When that happens, and you’ve gone through the same kind of thing as a child, it’s very traumatic.”

The lawsuit alleges Warden D’Amico knew male officers were viewing naked female inmates and “ratified, condoned, and failed to stop it.”

An allegation in the lawsuit filed on May 15, 2026

An allegation in the lawsuit filed on May 15, 2026

“You’re pretty much a hostage.”

Advertisement

UDC Executive Director Jared Garcia declined repeated requests for an on-camera interview. A letter sent said:

“During the body search process in female living areas, male correctional officers are not allowed in the immediate area, and privacy is maintained. In general, resets are conducted routinely, according to UDC policy and under strict protocols designed to ensure safety while also preserving the privacy and dignity of incarcerated individuals.”

“The manner matters.”

Walter Mason represents the plaintiffs.

He told 2News Investigates, “The law protects inmates from being exposed to members of the opposite sex viewing their naked bodies unless there’s an emergency. Unless there’s what the law calls an exigent circumstance, the prison can take necessary actions to protect safety. There was no emergency. There was no exigency.”

Advertisement

UDC says the reset involved approximately 150 trained staff members and was conducted according to department policy.

UDC’s letter goes on to say:

“Every effort was made to treat belongings with care and document confiscated items appropriately. UDC stands by our methods and policies, which are intended to maintain the highest standards of integrity, safety, and efficiency during the reset process.”

Written response from the Utah Department of Corrections regarding 2News investigations

Written response from the Utah Department of Corrections regarding 2News investigations

I asked UDC whether any exigent circumstances existed on May 13, 2025, during the reset operation.

Advertisement

The response:

“No exigent circumstances occurred on May 13, 2025.”

I also requested information about what items were confiscated. UDC said it could not provide a specific list.

Response to questions posed by 2News Investigates to UDC regarding mass strip search and if exigent circumstances existed that day

Response to questions posed by 2News Investigates to UDC regarding mass strip search and if exigent circumstances existed that day

The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and accuses the defendants, all supervisors, of participating in a “coordinated effort to humiliate, mock, and psychologically degrade the plaintiffs … operating with a brazen and intentional disregard for clearly established law, fueled by an institutional custom of impunity.”

Advertisement

_____



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Royals FC Announce the Addition of Assistant Coach Jessie van den Broek to 2026 Coaching Staff | Utah Royals

Published

on

Utah Royals FC Announce the Addition of Assistant Coach Jessie van den Broek to 2026 Coaching Staff  |  Utah Royals


HERRIMAN, Utah – (Thursday, June 25, 2026) – URFC announced today the addition of assistant coach Jessie van den Broek to the 2026 technical staff.

The Dutchwoman brings experience from several levels of soccer across Europe. Her coaching journey has steadily progressed through commitment to player development, making her a strong addition to the Royals as the club continues to build for the future. 

Advertisement

After gaining coaching experience at various levels, van den Broek made the jump to professional soccer in Germany’s Bundesliga, joining as an assistant coach and second in command to head coach Robert de Pauw and helping to support the club in its sixth place finish during the 2023-24 season. After a year and a half in Germany, she followed de Pauw to England, joining the coaching staff of Aston Villa Women, continuing to expand her experience in one of Europe’s top leagues. 

In 2025, van den Broek returned to her native country of the Netherlands to join the coaching staff of HERA United, the country’s first stand-alone women’s soccer club. Her work with HERA United further strengthened her coaching abilities and her dedication to the women’s game. Following the conclusion of the club’s season in May 2026, she has now accepted her first position overseas, joining the Utah Royals, bringing the international experience and diverse coaching background with her. 

Away from the pitch, van den Broek attended Radbound University in the Netherlands, earning a bachelor’s degree in Public Administration. She also earned an A Licence through the Union of European Football Associations in 2025. Her combination of education and coaching credentials, along with her experience in Germany, England and the Netherlands gives Utah Royals FC a coach with high-level experience and a proven commitment to the game of women’s soccer. 

Advertisement

The Royals return to NWSL play on July 5 to take on the Chicago Stars at Northwestern Medicine Field at Martin Stadium with kickoff set for 3:00 p.m. MT. The match is available to watch on CBS Sports Network and KMYU.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending