Connect with us

Utah

Power bills for many Utahns are going up. Here’s why.

Published

on

Power bills for many Utahns are going up. Here’s why.


The state approved a trimmed-down version of Rocky Mountain Power’s rate increase request.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Protesters gather during a Monopoly-themed rally to protest utility-driven rate hikes and obstacles to renewable energy at the corporate headquarters for Rocky Mountain Power in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, April 1, 2025.

Utahns’ electric bills are about to get a little more expensive.

Nearly a year after first asking Utah’s Public Service Commission (PSC) to approve a rate increase that would amount to $667.3 million additional annual revenue, the commission ruled Friday to instead approve a $87.2 million sum. That will amount to an average increase of $4.31 per month for single-family households and $3.31 for multi-family households, effective immediately.

Advertisement

The order is the final step in a year-long process in which the PSC interrogated Rocky Mountain’s expenses and its executives to understand how the utility was spending its money, what expenses it was trying to account for in the rate increase and what expenses Utah rate payers should be responsible for paying.

“The Public Service Commission’s order is a significant step toward ensuring that Utahns have fair utility rates while allowing Rocky Mountain Power to make necessary investments in infrastructure and wildfire risk mitigation,” Margaret Woolley Busse, executive director of the Utah Department of Commerce, said in a news release. “It’s vital that we balance the needs of our utility providers with the interests of consumers, and this order does just that.”

RMP’s initial rate case would have been a more than 30% increase. It amended the request to 18% — or $330.2 million — in August. Its final request, according to the Department of Commerce, was an increase of $243 million. The commission ultimately approved a sum of roughly 26% of that final request.

“Rocky Mountain Power is disappointed with the order,” spokesperson David Eskelsen said in a statement. “It is lengthy, at nearly 200 pages. We need to determine its full financial implications and evaluate our next steps in meeting our responsibility to provide electric service to our customers.”

In its ruling, the commission said the difference between RMP’s first and final request would have appeared on the company’s Energy Balancing Account (EBA) — a pool of money that covers fluctuations in energy costs — and would ultimately reflect on customers’ bills.

Advertisement

So the commission, which reviews and approves Rocky Mountain Power’s EBA each year, ruled instead to defer roughly $240 million to future EBA filings.

RMP argued throughout the process that its rate increase accounted for rising energy costs and new infrastructure. But state officials — lawmakers and commissioners alike — said they worried the company was asking Utahns to pay for problems associated with RMP’s parent company, PacifiCorp, which is owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Energy.

PacifiCorp has paid billions of dollars in settlements in Oregon, where the company was held liable for wildfires in 2020 that sparked after the company did not shut down power lines in areas of extreme fire danger. A report released last month by the Oregon Department of Forestry found seven of the 19 fires that devastated Santiam Canyon were caused by down power lines, but those fires did “not contribute to the spread of large fires in Santiam Canyon” and were quickly suppressed.

To PacifiCorp, the report proved the utility was not responsible for the fires.

“The report confirms PacifiCorp‘s long-held position that any wildfire ignitions linked to the company’s electrical equipment in the Santiam Canyon did not contribute to the widespread devastation that occurred when the Beachie Creek fire tore through the canyon,” the president of PacifiCorp‘s west coast utility said in a news release last month.

Advertisement

But the company is still paying the price, both in settlements and increased insurance costs. In its ruling, the Utah commissioners wrote that it is “unreasonable to expect RMP’s ratepayers in Utah to pay higher rates because of the wildfires in Oregon and the depletion of cash reserves by these dividend payments.”

The commission also trimmed several million in costs it said were associated with “specific state climate action policies” in other states, “particularly Washington and Oregon.”

Shannon Sollitt is a Report for America corps member covering business accountability and sustainability for The Salt Lake Tribune. Your donation to match our RFA grant helps keep her writing stories like this one; please consider making a tax-deductible gift of any amount today by clicking here.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Voices: My health care costs are about to triple. Utah’s elected officials refuse to help.

Published

on

Voices: My health care costs are about to triple. Utah’s elected officials refuse to help.


I grow more and more angry as I go over our budget with a fine-toothed comb, trimming where I can, negotiating our non-negotiables and obsessively checking every line item.

(U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service | The Associated Press) This file image provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service shows the website for HealthCare.gov.

I woke just after 3 a.m. unable to breathe and with a chest cramp that, for me, signals only one thing — a panic attack. It took a few minutes to catch up to what my panic had already figured out and, when it did, an unsettling dread joined the chest cramp and I began to sort the facts.

The night previous we had our annual meeting with an insurance broker to go over our choices for our 2026 healthcare. The news? Bleak. Out of two options, we picked the one that would cover doctors actually in our town instead of the cheaper alternative that would only cover five random doctors but no hospitals or tests. Our first payment, triple the cost from what we are paying now, is due sometime within the next month, just after our last payment for our current plan.

My husband started his business nearly 20 years ago. At that time, I was worried about not qualifying for private insurance due to pre-existing conditions I had sustained surrounding the birth of our son while my husband was serving in the military. Obamacare was on the horizon and, when it passed in 2010, it finally ended expensive coverage for me.

Advertisement

After our broker meeting, I was curious how much our healthcare premiums had changed. From 2009 until 2019, I only have insurance totals from all of our various insurances (health, car, home, work, etc.), but in those early years we were saving around $850 a month to cover it all. I wish I knew what specific portion of that was medical, especially in those couple of years before the Affordable Care Act passed.

Saving of all insurances lumped together topped out at $1,400 a month in 2018. Starting in 2019, we were paying $950 a month for medical insurance, $990 in 2020, $1,020 in 2021, $1,075 in 2022 and $1,270 a month in 2023. In 2024, we finally qualified for a little relief in the form of subsidies and our bill went down to $800 a month instead of the $1,800 it would have been. In 2025, we paid $860 a month.

Being self-employed, you cobble together whatever system works for you to put money aside for months that are a little lean while making sure you keep out money for taxes and medical costs and retirement and life. But there is absolutely no system for any working person that gives the ability to pay a bill that is three times higher from one month to the next.

The “cheaper” option which covered nothing and which we ultimately turned down? $2,100 a month.

The option in which we can stay in our town and not head at least an hour away any time we need medical care? $2,400 a month.

Advertisement

In mid October, I tried to contact my members of Congress, urging them to work on extending health care subsidies while reopening the government. I gave them our personal story, trying to show them the damage to small businesses if they did not. I asked them to do this in tandem with opening the government and working toward more permanent solutions to solve the cost of medical care in this country. It was nearly a week before I heard anything at all.

I am aware of Mike Lee’s reputation for not answering constituents and was therefore not at all surprised when it proved true. Blake Moore, my representative, finally reached out — but he ignored my situation completely. John Curtis also ignored my situation. He did say this, however: “On September 30th, I voted to keep the federal government open and to prevent unnecessary harm to hardworking, taxpaying families in Utah and across America. Sadly, the measure failed…and once again Washington’s dysfunction has forced a shutdown. Utahns know the simple truth: you prepare, you live within your means, and you finish the job.”

I was confused at how, exactly, we are supposed to “prepare” in this situation. I grow more and more angry as I go over our budget with a fine-toothed comb, trimming where I can, negotiating our non-negotiables and obsessively checking every line item to plug holes, bandage hemorrhages and wonder why we are the ones constantly admonished to be smart with our money, to suffer the sins from those in power.

I am completely aware that we fall into a small box of people who will be able to keep coverage, despite the price tag. My heart hurts for the ones that cannot. It is estimated that between 4 and 7 million people will lose their health care coverage as the subsidies expire. And while we are not in that category this time, I worry about how many more years until we are.

This is not sustainable, and it feels like there is no one coming to help.

Advertisement

(Tawnya Gibson) Tawnya Gibson is a freelance writer living in northern Utah.

Tawnya Gibson is a freelance writer living in northern Utah. Her work has appeared in TODAY online, Newsweek, Zibby Mag, Under The Gum Tree, Sky Island Journal and Blue Mountain Review (among others) and she was a longtime contributor to Utah Public Radio.

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Judge denies Utah State Legislature request to return to 2021 Congressional map

Published

on

Judge denies Utah State Legislature request to return to 2021 Congressional map


SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Legislature’s attempt to restore the state’s Congressional maps to how they were in 2021 has been denied.

In her ruling Friday, Judge Dianna Gibson turned down the request by the Republican leadership in the Legislature that demanded a stay of the new redistricting map that was chosen last month.

Gibson ruled that the request was “procedurally improper and fails to comply with Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.” The judge also rejected the Legislature’s claims that political leaders opposed to the new map had no opportunity to appeal the decision, saying it was their choice not to file an appeal.

Utahns on both political sides hope new redistricting map sets example for nation:

Advertisement

Utahns on both political sides hope new redistricting map sets example for nation

Later in the ruling, Gibson wrote the request to stay the new map “merely repeats previously rejected arguments without any attempt to address the Court’s legal analysis and identify any specific error.”

Gibson also shot down the opinion of the Legislature’s Republican majority that the court didn’t have the authority to choose the map, especially after they had agreed to the process in which it was to be chosen.

Advertisement

Finally, the judge added that the Map C, a version proposed by the Republican majority Legislature, was “extreme partisan gerrymander,” as it favored one party over another, and violated Proposition 4.





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Endangered Missing Advisory issued for Utah boy, authorities say he could be in Idaho – East Idaho News

Published

on

Endangered Missing Advisory issued for Utah boy, authorities say he could be in Idaho – East Idaho News


BOUNTIFUL, Utah — An Endangered Missing Advisory has been issued for a 5-year-old Utah boy after his non-custodial father did not return him from a visitation and left with the child in a pickup truck believed to be towing a trailer.

James Despain was last seen at 5:30 p.m. Thursday when he was picked up from his mother, Natalie Despain, at her home in Bountiful, the advisory from the Utah Department of Public Safety says.

When she went to retrieve him after the scheduled visit, neither James nor his father, 45-year-old Benjamin Despain, were at the dad’s home in Murray.

Investigators say Despain’s pickup truck — a red 2006 Toyota Tacoma with Utah license plate 255PCJ — was missing from the residence. A white 2004 Forest River trailer was also gone and detectives believe Despain is using the Tacoma to pull the trailer.

Advertisement

James is around 3 feet 11 inches tall and 47 lbs. He has blond hair and was last seen wearing a gray astronaut shirt with a rocket on it and green pants.

The boy’s mother has sole physical and legal custody, according to authorities. An ex parte child protective order listing James as the protected party was issued Wednesday, but attempts to serve it have failed because Despain has not been located.

In an email to the child’s mother, Despain said he was taking their son “away” to prevent him from having surgery. James was scheduled to undergo adenoid removal surgery.

Family members tell investigators they believe Despain may have taken the child to Idaho or to the St. George area in southern Utah, though officials say he may have traveled elsewhere.

Anyone with information is asked to call 911 or the Bountiful Police Detective Williams (801) 631-9357.

Advertisement

James has been entered into the National Crime Information Center database as missing and endangered.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending