Connect with us

Utah

A new Utah law was hailed as a win for air quality. But what impact will it have?

Published

on

A new Utah law was hailed as a win for air quality. But what impact will it have?


Note to readers • The following story is Part 2 of two stories reported by The Utah Investigative Journalism Project in partnership with The Salt Lake Tribune and support from the McGraw Center for Business Journalism at CUNY’s Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism. Read Part 1 here.

As Utah continued its trend of violating federal air pollution limits, state air quality officials asked the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for help in 2017.

On NOAA’s first day of data collection, aimed at better understanding the atmospheric chemistry above the state, an airplane flew over US Magnesium in Tooele County. It picked up some of the highest levels of halogens — a group of chemicals including chlorine — that the agency has ever measured.

That finding, revealed in a study published in 2023, has been debated ever since — from its accuracy to what it should mean for how the state governs Utah’s air quality.

Advertisement

This spring, Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore claimed a victory when Gov. Spencer Cox signed HB420 into law, giving the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) new authority to regulate the emission of halogens.

Halogens include chemicals whose interaction in the environment “worsens our winter inversions on the Wasatch Front by 10 to 25%,” said Cullimore, R-Cottonwood Heights, who sponsored the bill.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Salt Lake City, during the 2025 legislative session, Wednesday February. 26, 2025.

But it’s not yet clear whether HB420 will result in any additional, independent monitoring of air quality near the magnesium plant — the absence of which has already impacted research into Utah’s persistently poor air quality.

Federal and state regulation of US Magnesium relies significantly on self-reports from the company about its emissions. And even if the state installed air monitors near US Magnesium, it’s unlikely that they would pick up everything — because sensors capable of detecting all of its halogen emissions in real time were only recently invented, according to Jessica Haskins, an assistant professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of Utah.

Advertisement

Scientists have brought these devices to the state for research purposes, but only temporarily, she said. Permanently installing a monitor capable of measuring all of the plant’s halogen emissions would cost the state about $1 million, Haskins estimated, which she suspects would be outside the state’s budget.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Jessica Haskins, an assistant professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City on Thursday, June 5, 2025.

HB420 did not include specific directives about how monitoring related to the bill should be carried out, DAQ spokesperson Ashley Sumner said, adding that the division is still weighing its options.

The air quality monitors currently nearest to US Magnesium, Sumner said, are located in the town of Erda, on a site state regulators selected because they believed it to be representative of the average conditions experienced by the majority of Tooele Valley residents. Air monitoring is focused, per federal regulation, on the state’s most populous areas, she said.

For now, US Magnesium has idled the plant following equipment breakdowns and a drop in lithium prices.

Advertisement

The question of bromine

(Steve Brown | NOAA) Carrie Womack, at left, is seen in 2017 with other researchers in the plane used in the Utah Winter Fine Particulate Study in January and February. The study was an effort by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Chemical Sciences Division and the Cooperative Institute for Research In Environmental Sciences. Womack works in the Chemical Sciences Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado.

When NOAA began the study in 2017, it didn’t plan to look specifically at US Magnesium, according to Carrie Womack, a researcher in the NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, and one of the lead authors on the 2023 report.

Instead, it was responding to Utah’s DAQ query about why years of attempts to improve the state’s air quality weren’t curbing the trend of federal air pollution violations.

The emissions that NOAA measured on that first day matched what US Magnesium had reported about its releases of chlorine, specifically, Womack said. But the mining company’s monitoring didn’t capture the release of another halogen, bromine, because air quality regulations at the time did not require tracking or reporting it.

And that chemical turned out to be responsible for a good deal of the chemical reaction causing the state’s poor winter air quality, according to NOAA’s research. It concluded that emissions from US Magnesium’s West Desert facility could account for as much as a quarter of the small particulate pollution that famously accumulates in Utah’s air most winters.

Advertisement

But US Magnesium believes the study’s conclusions are “non-factual and … based on a series of poorly executed measurements, estimates, and conclusions,” the company said in an April 1 statement signed by CEO Ron Thayer and Rob Hartman, its environmental manager.

The company said it has hired a third-party engineering firm to conduct its own study of the company’s emissions and their impact on local air quality.

While it is accurate that US Magnesium is the only significant source of halogens in the area, Thayer and Hartman said, data from the DAQ show no direct correlation between its emissions and the state’s overall air quality.

“As USM production has decreased over the last eight years,” Thayer and Hartman said, “the average Salt Lake Valley smog related particulates have remained consistent.”

Indeed, the plant’s shutdown of magnesium mining in 2022 and of lithium mining last year have had no apparent impact on air quality trends in northern Utah, according to the state DAQ. State monitors have never observed a correlation between overall air quality in the state and daily operations at US Magnesium, Sumner said.

Advertisement

A complex equation

Womack said this is to be expected. The relationship between US Magnesium’s halogen emissions and wintertime particulate pollution is complex, and dependent on other factors such as temperature and snowfall, she said.

The presence of pollutants from other sources, such as cars and wildfires, also changes the equation. Barring an unlikely, exact repeat of the conditions seen in the winter of 2017, it’s improbable that a correlation with US Magnesium’s operations would show up in day-to-day air quality trends, Womack said.

She also noted that the study only considered data from 2017, a year when US Magnesium reported higher-than-usual chlorine emissions. Because the company did not report bromine emissions at the time, it’s difficult to say whether bromine emissions were also elevated in 2017, Womack said.

But if they were, it is possible that the resulting calculations by NOAA represent uncharacteristically high emissions by US Magnesium — and an inaccurate snapshot of its contributions to air quality in normal years.

These facts point to a need for greater, long-term study of emissions and air chemistry in Utah, Womack said, though she says the agency stands by its conclusions about the company’s contributions to air pollution in Utah.

Advertisement

“That was interesting to us because it’s not that often that you come across a source you didn’t know was there emitting a huge amount of something that has a negative impact on air quality,” Womack said, adding that NOAA took its time with analyzing the data after its collection to ensure its figures were accurate.

How Utah has and hasn’t taken action

The NOAA study triggered a push in 2023 by regulators and state lawmakers to pass a law that would impose limits on emissions of bromine from US Magnesium, but HB220 was ultimately rewritten to require a broader study of halogen emissions in northern Utah.

The Renco Group, US Magnesium’s parent company, gave $50,000 to Cox’s reelection campaign after the bill was rewritten, although US Magnesium said the donation was probably a routine expression of support for Cox’s larger policies by its parent company.

“USM has NEVER solicited assistance from Governor Cox regarding air quality regulations or proposed State emissions legislation,” Hartman and Thayer said. In a previous statement about the donation, a spokesperson for Cox noted: “The governor has no control over who chooses to contribute to his campaign.”

State lawmakers returned to the issue this year with the passage of HB420.

Advertisement

In a separate email to the Utah Investigative Journalism Project, Thayer said that unlike the first proposed law, this new law took a recommendation “periodically promoted by [US Magnesium] in the past” into account, by requiring the company to install “additional ducting to collect and treat one chlorine containing vapor stream in the magnesium plant.”

Thayer later clarified that the additional ducting in question would “process chlorine during downtime hours on the chlorine reduction burner,” which is a critical control device responsible for limiting chlorine emissions.

A sweeping notice of violation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency against US Magnesium in March 2023 focused on the chlorine reduction burner. It alleged the plant operated between January 2016 and July 2022 with the burner offline some 1,100 times — resulting in chlorine emissions in excess of the company’s permit during those years.

No further action has occurred, an EPA spokesperson said, because US Magnesium’s plant had been closed for months when the notice was issued.

HB420 does not specify what, exactly, US Magnesium must install to control emissions. The bill refers to “halogens” broadly and not to bromine specifically, and calls for the Utah DAQ to analyze which technologies or pollution control systems might best address halogen emissions — likely opening the door to the exact solution described by Thayer.

Advertisement

However, Thayer also said that “none of this is relevant at this time” because the plant is no longer operating, and the ducting in question would only be installed “should” the company decide to restart the plant.

The continuing challenge

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Lexi Tuddenham at the Great Salt Lake, on Monday, June 2, 2025.

Lexi Tuddenham, executive director of HEAL Utah, said she hopes that funding associated with HB420 will prove large enough to install regulatory-grade monitors closer to US Magnesium.

The longstanding lack of independent, granular data on the company’s emissions presents a huge barrier to identifying regulatory actions that could help improve Utah’s air quality, she said.

The magnesium plant has been essentially protected by the region’s remoteness, low population and its longstanding use as an environmental “sacrifice zone” by the U.S. military, she said, which historically worked to discredit the concerns of Tooele residents in order to avoid criticism of its own operations there.

Advertisement

Tooele County was previously identified as a “Justice40” community, a designation for census tracts with significant historical environmental harms due to the presence of things like abandoned mine or military sites.

The initiative ensured that at least 40% of certain federal incentives — such as investments in affordable housing or electric school buses — went to such areas. An executive order signed by President Donald Trump ended the Justice40 program in January.

And since then, the Environmental Protection Agency under the Trump administration has said it is reconsidering whether the northern Wasatch Front should have to adhere to strict federal air quality standards for ozone.

“That area in Tooele and Grantsville, where HEAL was founded, has been particularly hard hit over the decades, between the Dugway Proving Ground, the biological agents that were tested in the area, the incineration of chemical weapons including things like nerve gas, and the [nuclear waste] storage facilities out at Energy Solutions,” Tuddenham said.

The lack of a large public outcry about emissions from US Magnesium “represents what always happens — people with less political power and less money get less voice,” she said. “ … And it’s just devastating, but unsurprising, that these things are still happening.”

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

Utah Jazz’s Direction for the No. 2 Pick Is Becoming Clear

Published

on

Utah Jazz’s Direction for the No. 2 Pick Is Becoming Clear


The Utah Jazz are just hours away from the 2026 NBA Draft to determine who will be their franchise’s next cornerstone piece to add into their exciting core with their second-overall pick on the board.

And in the lead-up to the Jazz’s selection, there’s been tons of buzz surrounding who will be the one landing at that No. 2 slot. Between AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, and Cameron Boozer, each has seen various connections to Utah as being the guy they’ll end up with.

However, as we continue to get closer to when the Jazz are on the clock, we’re starting to get some clearer intel on who their selection ultimately might be. And in reality, it might just be a two-man race, rather than three.

Advertisement

Darryn Peterson Remains in the Driver’s Seat at No. 2

ESPN‘s Jeremy Woo recently released his final 2026 mock sorting out how each of the draft’s 60 picks are going to go. When it came to the Jazz, the pick would be none other than Kansas guard Darryn Peterson; someone that Utah has reportedly shown “strong interest” in leading up to the draft.

If Peterson ends up going first to the Washington Wizards, though, AJ Dybantsa seems like the most likely outcome for the Jazz at two.

“Sources say the Jazz have shown strong interest in Peterson throughout the process, and the expectation from rival teams has been that Utah will pick whichever of Peterson or Dybantsa falls to them,” Woo wrote.

Advertisement

“Peterson’s initial decision to only visit Washington was more reflective of his confidence in his security as a top pick and desire to hear his name called first.”

Advertisement

Despite the noise that had surrounding Peterson, his canceled workout, and any possible disinterest in landing with Utah, that buzz has since been shut down in the days leading up to Tuesday night’s first round.

Not only did Peterson confirm he has met with the Jazz before coming to New York following his canceled draft workout, but he also made it clear at Monday’s media day that he’s not dodging any team that’s willing to select him.

That, of course, would include the Jazz. So no worries on that front.

But even if Peterson does end up going ahead of the Jazz’s slot in what would be a surprise pickup for the Wizards at the first pick, Utah’s decision looks like it could be a relatively simple one. BYU’s AJ Dybantsa would be sitting up for grabs, and would be an ideal fit on the wing to Utah’s two-guard spot for the future.

Advertisement

Jan 24, 2026; Columbia, Missouri, USA; Kansas Jayhawks guard Darryn Peterson (22) looks to pass against BYU Cougars forward AJ Dybantsa (3) during the first half at Mizzou Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images | Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images

So if Woo’s intel is a sign of anything, it seems like, even with the appeal that might be had in Duke’s Cameron Boozer as a potential option at number two, he’s looking more and more like the odd man out when it comes to being the guy for Utah.

Both Peterson and Dybantsa have a projected ceiling that tops what Boozer brings to the table, and fits better with this current Jazz core as their future two-guard. In a draft where all three prospects are seen as franchise-changing talents, those factors might just be what’s narrowly separated the top two as the targets to watch for Utah.

Advertisement

All of the chatter that’s ensued before the draft surrounding who the Jazz are going to take with their highest pick on the board in over 40 years will officially come to an end Tuesday night. But with the time quickly approaching before that decision becomes final, the writing might be on the wall for who they’ll be landing on.

Advertisement

Be sure to follow Utah Jazz On SI on X for daily Utah Jazz news, rumors and analysis!

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Inside Utah’s facial recognition system: How police use the technology

Published

on

Inside Utah’s facial recognition system: How police use the technology


Utah law enforcement agencies are increasingly using facial recognition technology to identify criminal suspects, but state law limits its use to specific circumstances and imposes some of the strictest safeguards in the nation.

Under Utah law, facial recognition technology may only be used for certain law enforcement purposes, including felony investigations, violent crimes, threats to human life, and efforts to identify deceased, incapacitated or at-risk individuals.

The technology recently came under scrutiny in the case of Brad Johnston, who faced a felony charge related to the vandalism of an Uber driver’s vehicle after a facial recognition match linked him to the case. Johnston maintained he was not involved.

“The only way I can describe it was just terrifying,” Johnston said.

Advertisement

MORE: Facial recognition AI misidentifies Utah man in felony vandalism case

The match was generated from surveillance video taken from inside the Uber ride, but Johnston insisted investigators had identified the wrong person. After months of court proceedings, the case was ultimately dismissed.

According to the most recently available data, Utah law enforcement agencies submitted 1,191 facial recognition requests between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. Of those, 706 resulted in probable matches, a rate of about 59%.

State law requires all facial recognition requests to be processed through the Utah Department of Public Safety.

Tanner Jensen, chief of investigations for the department, said requests from law enforcement have increased over the past five years.

Advertisement

Jensen said the system will analyze biometric data and measurements and two people manually review each image submitted for comparison. The process results in one of two outcomes: a possible match or no result. Once findings are returned to the requesting agency, the department’s involvement ends.

“If they do both feel like the match is viable, they’ll send that to the officer for further investigation with a disclaimer that this is an investigative lead and not necessarily something that’s part of the evidence,” Jensen said.

Most identifications are generated through comparisons with a driver’s license photographs. Jensen said biometric characteristics remain consistent over time, but human review is still critical.

“You may get a percentage below 90%, but that’s not to indicate that that’s not the individual,” Jensen said. “Or you may get a percentage that’s above 90% and we still don’t feel confident that that would be the individual. It really comes down to the human-in-the-loop aspect.”

Retired Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank said law enforcement agencies have adapted quickly to emerging technologies, much as they did when body-worn cameras were introduced.

Advertisement

“The technology is just moving so fast and furious,” Burbank said. “One of the things is the availability of AI to analyze a large database.”

Burbank said strong policies must guide the use of technology in policing.

“We need to ensure, again, is this policy sound for the public or is it just good for policing?” he said.

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

How would Keaton Wagler fit with the Utah Jazz? – KSL Sports

Published

on

How would Keaton Wagler fit with the Utah Jazz? – KSL Sports


SALT LAKE CITY — Although likely not in contention for the Utah Jazz with the No. 2 overall pick, Illinois guard Keaton Wagler is a name to remember in this year’s draft cycle.

As somewhat of a late-bloomer, Wagler dazzled with his offensive game in just one season with the Fighting Illini. But would the combo guard fit well with the Jazz?

Below is a full breakdown of his game, strengths, weaknesses, and potential fit in Utah.

Keaton Wagler: NBA Draft Snapshot

School: Illinois
Position: Guard
Age: 19

2025–26 stats

Advertisement
  • 17.9 points
  • 5.1 rebounds
  • 4.2 assists

Shooting splits

  • 44.5% FG
  • 39.7% 3PT
  • 79.6% FT

Strengths

  • Positional size
  • Shooting & shot-making
  • Creation & pace

Weaknesses

  • Defense
  • Athleticism
  • Strength

What Makes Keaton Wagler A Top Prospect In The NBA Draft?

The projected top ten in the upcoming draft is littered with guards, especially once you get past the first four. Of those guards, Wagler has arguably the best positional size.

Standing at 6-foot-6 with an unconfirmed wingspan of 6-foot-9, the Illinois freshman burst onto the scene with his smooth offensive game.

Maybe most impressively about Wagler is his ability to control the pace and tempo with the ball in his hands, a trait mastered by superstars in the NBA like Luka Doncic and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.

Wagler demonstrated plenty of craft and control to get to his spots on offense, and he was just as prolific when it came to finishing the play.

He shot a blistering 39.7 percent on threes with a 59.6 true shooting percentage, both of those marks around or above the 80th percentile in college basketball.

It got to the point where other teams opted to foul Wagler instead of letting him pick apart their defense. He finished the season with 11 free throw attempts a night (89th percentile), and he shot a respectable 79.6 percent from the stripe.

When he wasn’t scoring or getting sent to the line, Wagler showed decent playmaking chops, dishing out 4.2 assists per game with a very solid 2.4 assist-to-turnover ratio.

His passing game is at a base level right now. He has the ability to find the open man and make the right play, but there weren’t many eye-popping, “How did he see that?” passes across his 37 games with the Fighting Illini.

Advertisement

There is a real argument for Wagler as one of the best shooters in the class. He has a lot to flesh out on both ends, but having the jumpshot as a fallback keystone skill could be very important for his development.

As a best-case scenario, Wagler could be a do-it-all combo guard offensively whose length lends him to be a passable perimeter defender. Think 18-5-5 averages with the ability to pop off for 30 points with five made threes on any given night.

Advertisement

Why Drafting Keaton Wagler Is Somewhat Of A Gamble

Wagler is somewhat of a late bloomer physically. It was reported that he stood at 5-foot-8 as a high school freshman and joined the Illinois program at a measly 168 pounds.

The silver lining is that he put on 14 pounds in just one summer of training on campus. With the assistance of an NBA strength training regimen, it is fair to project growth in that area.

Also, despite being outmatched physically most nights, Wagler showed no hesitation in driving into traffic and throwing his body around. Although he finished the season with zero dunks, and just one attempt.

Often, he struggled when the opposing team had either a daunting rim protector or physical point of attack defenders.

As could be expected, his lack of strength and athleticism showed most on the defensive end.

With 1.3 stocks per game and just about average advanced defensive metrics, it’s unclear how much blame can be placed on the fact that he is underdeveloped physically.

He has great feel and basketball IQ on offense. Optimistically, that could eventually extend to the defensive end. But reality could see him evolve into a mostly one-sided player.

How Would Keaton Wagler Fit With The Utah Jazz?

From a positional and skillset view, Wagler could fit in well with the Jazz. As an off-guard, he could slide in as the two alongside Keyonte George, while also not interfering with the loaded frontcourt rotation.

He would likely come off the bench for the first few seasons of his career, with the opportunity to join the first five as he grows and matures.

Advertisement

It is worth noting that two of Utah’s recent first-round picks, Cody Williams and Ace Bailey, also came in needing to put on weight. Williams struggled early, while Bailey had enough offensive talent to negate the clear need for physical progression.

As the Jazz move toward playoff contention, the path for development isn’t as unobstructed as that of other teams in the lottery. Still, Wagler would have ample opportunity to become an effective rotational piece with enough time to make the necessary improvements.

Chandler Holt is a Utah Jazz insider for KSLSports.com and co-host of the Jazz Notes podcast. Follow Chandler on X for Jazz and NBA updates.

Take us with you, wherever you go.

Download the new & improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. You can stream live radio, video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending