HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – A new Aloha United Way report released today shows 1 in 3 Hawaii households considered moving away over the past year. Should the trend continue, it would have a devastating impact on our economy.

Hawaii’s high cost of living and lack of affordable housing mean more than half a million residents are barely scraping by.

That’s one of the findings from the 2024 State of ALICE in Hawaii report, which looks at the struggles of Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed households, known as ALICE.

First the good news: fewer Hawaii households are living in poverty — down to 12% versus 14% in 2022. ALICE households remained the same at 29%.

Advocates attribute the slight drop to government programs and increased minimum wages, but also more ALICE families are leaving the islands.

“180,000 people right now are considering leaving the state of Hawaii, from our workforce, from our younger families, our Hawaiian families, and that is something that we are deeply concerned about at Aloha United Way and of course, Bank of Hawaii and Hawaii Community Foundation.” said Suzanne Skjold, COO of Aloha United Way.

These working poor make too much to qualify for government aid and live paycheck to paycheck. Many are on the brink of financial crisis.

“This is absolutely critical, because affordability and just economic well being in our state is not where we need it to be,” said Peter Ho, Bank of Hawaii CEO.

So who is ALICE? They’re likely to be women or have children.

58% of native Hawaiians and 52% of Filipinos live under the ALICE threshold.

You’re more likely to be ALICE if you live on the neighbor islands. Maui is especially vulnerable, especially since the Lahaina fires.

“The people that are leaving hawaii are the people that can afford to leave their workforce and the people our engine. And if this continues, we’re going to have this hollow community where our engine is is just not there, right? And you’re gonna have very, very poor people, and we’re gonna have very, very wealthy,” said Micah Kane, President/CEO of Hawaii Community Foundation.

Advocates hope the report compels policymakers, businesses and community leaders to work together to reverse the trend.

“Employers will never be able to elevate wages and meet the cost of living requirements of this place,” Kane said. “Unless we come up with a host of very disruptive policies that drive down the cost of living, these people that are striking are going to leave.”

To fill gaps in services, Aloha United Way and other nonprofits are helping ALICE families access financial stability, affordable housing and higher paying jobs.

Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi said he plans to lobby for ALICE-focused funding during this legislative session.

“We need to own this, all of us, and so from that standpoint this data becomes the argument you put on the table when you say we have to change,” Blangiardi said.

Some ways to ease the burden on ALICE families include tax credits, safety net programs, support for caregivers, mental health resources, debt reduction programs and financial incentives.

Read the full 2024 ALICE Report here.

Copyright 2025 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.

Most Idaho state employees could see about a 5% raise come July in a recommendation approved by a legislative committee Thursday.

Specifically, the proposal calls for a $1.55 hourly pay bump. That works out to at least a 5% raise for those earning less than $64,500 annually.

Democrats on the Change in Employee Compensation Committee, like Sen. Janie Ward-Engelking (D-Boise), voted against the measure, saying it didn’t go far enough – especially for higher paid workers.

“I’m worried that they’re not even going to keep up with the cost of living and that’s really a problem for me,” Ward-Engelking said.

After experiencing some of the highest rates of inflation in the country in 2022, prices in the Mountain region rose just 1.7% from November 2023 to November 2024.

The latest data from an Idaho Department of Human Resources labor market study show state workers here, on average, earn 15.1% less than the median wage of public and private sector employees in the region.

That’s also factoring in healthcare and retirement benefits, which are more generous than the private sector.

Base salaries across Idaho state workers are 25.1% below average compared to the median regional public and private sector employees.

The CEC Committee approved an 8% pay raise for Idaho State Police troopers to help retain and recruit more officers.

“It takes years of training and expense to produce a trooper with the experience to handle all the things that a trooper has to handle and this has become, in my opinion, a public safety issue,” said Sen. Dan Foreman (R-Viola).

Nurses and healthcare staff would get a 3% raise under the plan, with IT workers earning up to 4.5% pay hikes.

The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee will consider the recommendation before finalizing a bill.

Copyright 2025 Boise State Public Radio

Montana’s property tax system is a complicated thing, involving mind-boggling math and a bewildering array of rules aimed at fairly dividing the bill for public services like schools and police departments between hundreds of thousands of properties.

It’s a tricky task, of course, to agree on what exactly fair means when it comes to taxes — and a trickier one for lawmakers to write a tax code that implements a fair framework without loopholes. Earlier this week, Montana Free Press and High Country News published a lengthy investigation into a facet of the state’s tax code that has been a perennial concern on the loophole front for decades: whether a property tax break intended for farms and ranches is being abused by people who own luxury homes on rural parcels.

Our full story, which you can read here, runs more than 3,400 words. If you’re looking for something briefer, here are some of the key takeaways:

1. Agricultural tax status offers farm and ranch properties a discount relative to residential properties by marking down the value of the underlying land.

If you own a Montana home in an urban or suburban neighborhood, it’s almost certainly classified as a residential property. For those, both the house structure and the home lot beneath it are valued and taxed based on their market value — how much the Montana Department of Revenue thinks they would sell for.

Structures on agricultural properties are also valued and taxed based on their market value, but the underlying land is not. Instead, agricultural land is valued for tax purposes based on its production value — how much money the revenue department thinks its owner could make growing crops or grazing livestock.

That’s a significant difference. Home lot prices vary from place to place across Montana, but the average residential property had a land value of about $127,000 in 2023. Production values are much, much lower. Some of the properties we looked at, for example, had grazing land valued at less than $50 an acre.

2. The agricultural discount can translate into hundreds or thousands of dollars in annual tax savings.

One example we looked at was a property on the Flathead River near Kalispell, described in a Zillow listing as a “gorgeous Montana river estate” with a putting green and orchard. Classified as agricultural land, the 10-acre property paid about $7,000 in property taxes in 2023, all but $20 of that based on the value of the property’s structures, according to our analysis.

A 10-acre residential property next door, including a slightly less valuable home, paid about $9,100 in taxes in 2023, including about $3,300 in land taxes.

That sort of disparity is typical. For parcels smaller than 20 acres, we found that residential properties paid a median effective land tax of $1,609 an acre in 2023, compared to only $6.61 for agricultural parcels.

3. Critics worry that it’s too easy for high-end real estate to qualify for agricultural tax benefits.

Unlike most western states, larger Montana properties automatically qualify for agricultural tax treatment without being required to document that the land is being used for agriculture. Properties of 160 acres or more are automatically granted a full agricultural designation, while properties bigger than 20 acres automatically qualify for a partial agricultural designation that offers slightly reduced tax benefits regardless of whether the land is being put to significant agricultural use.

Smaller properties can qualify for the full designation by reporting at least $1,500 a year in agricultural income. Critics say that threshold, which hasn’t been updated since 1986, is low enough that savvy property owners can reach it with relatively little effort.

4. Thousands of million-dollar Montana homes are benefiting from the ag tax treatment. Gov. Greg Gianforte’s Bozeman home is one of them.

Looking at state property data for 2023, MTFP and HCN found more than 3,000 properties with million-dollar structure values that qualify for the full or partial agricultural tax benefit. In some cases, like the Flathead River example, those properties are adjacent to otherwise comparable residential properties, resulting in stark tax disparities.

Another example is Gianforte’s home on an 11-acre parcel with an agricultural designation on the outskirts of Bozeman. According to our calculations, the governor and his wife, Susan, paid about $5.75 an acre in land taxes on it in 2023 while a neighbor with a residential parcel across the street paid $826 per acre. (The governor’s office said that the Gianfortes’ property, which also includes additional parcels, is used for barley and alfalfa production and is also used to board horses and mules.)

The governor’s $66 land tax bill for the 11-acre parcel is also less than what the vast majority of urban homeowners in Montana pay each year for the lots beneath their homes.

5. Lawmakers could change the tax code as the Montana Legislature meets this year.

As the session opened in early January, there were two bills under consideration that would tighten qualification standards for the agricultural designations (House Bill 27) and increase taxes on homesite portions of high-value ag properties (Senate Bill 4).

Similar measures have floundered in the past, in part because of opposition from people who would face higher tax bills. The sponsors of both measures told MTFP this week that they are working on revisions to their proposals in an effort to make the bills politically viable.

READ MORE: Montana’s agricultural tax rules slash bills for thousands of million-dollar homes.