Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

The Store Cats of San Francisco

Published

on

The Store Cats of San Francisco









There is a specific kind of joy that only a store cat can deliver. You go in for a tallboy or a bag of cat litter (the irony is not lost on anyone) and you leave having made eye contact with a sphinx asleep on the register. It costs nothing. For a few seconds, the city is just a warm animal ignoring you, and that is enough.

In 2022, the designer and transit gadfly Chris Arvin did the civic work nobody asked for and everybody needed: Arvin mapped them. “San Francisco Store Cats,” stars next to the particularly friendly ones, a polite note reminding you not to wake the sleeping ones.

Photo from Chris Arvin’s Instagram.

Four years later, we wanted to see who was still on shift, and so did San Francisco. A single thread on r/sanfrancisco, started by a tourist hunting a bodega cat for their kid, turned into a sprawling, lovingly argued census of who is still working which counter. Arvin, the map’s own maker, showed up in the replies to admit it was overdue for a refresh. We took that as an assignment.

What follows is bigger than the original; the thread handed us dozens of cats with names and corners, so we tracked down addresses for the ones we could and sorted everyone by how sure we are. Most turned up in recent reports, this week’s thread especially, though we’re trusting those accounts rather than having staked out each counter. A few we are still taking on the 2022 map’s good word. One is gone, in a way that became, briefly, the whole city’s argument with itself. And the newest is a flower-market cat who survived a five-day catnapping the same week all of this blew up.

Advertisement




San Francisco Shop Cats Map

‘;
if (!s.cat) html += ‘

Catu2019s name not recorded

‘;
html += ‘

Advertisement

‘ + (s.cat ? s.store + ‘
‘ : ”) + s.street + ‘

‘;
html += ‘

‘;
html += ‘

Neighborhood‘ + s.hood + ‘

‘;
html += ‘

Advertisement

Store type‘ + s.type + ‘

‘;
html += ‘

‘;
if (s.note) html += ‘

‘ + s.note + ‘

‘;
if (!s.exact) html += ‘

Advertisement

Approx. location

‘;
if (s.link) {
html += ” + esc(s.linkLabel || ‘Visit’) + ”;
} else if (s.status === ‘memoriam’) {
html += ‘Gone, not forgotten‘;
}
html += ‘

‘;
return html;
}

var markers = CATS.map(function(s){
var icon = L.divIcon({ className: ”, html: ”, iconSize: [22,22], iconAnchor: [11,11], popupAnchor: [0,-11] });
var m = L.marker([s.lat, s.lng], { icon: icon });
m.bindPopup(popupHTML(s), { closeButton: true, autoPan: true, autoPanPadding: [24,24], keepInView: false });
return { marker: m, data: s, on: false };
});

function visible(s){ if (!state[s.status]) return false; return true; }
function render(){
var shown = 0;
markers.forEach(function(o){
var show = visible(o.data);
if (show && !o.on) { o.marker.addTo(map); o.on = true; }
else if (!show && o.on) { map.removeLayer(o.marker); o.on = false; }
if (show) shown++;
});
document.getElementById(‘cat-count’).innerHTML = ‘Showing ‘ + shown + ‘ of ‘ + markers.length + ‘ cats’;
}

var chipWrap = document.getElementById(‘cat-chips’);
Object.keys(STATUS).forEach(function(key){
var st = STATUS[key];
var chip = document.createElement(‘div’);
chip.className=”chip ” + st.cls + ‘ on’;
chip.innerHTML = ‘‘ + st.label;
chip.addEventListener(‘click’, function(){ state[key] = !state[key]; chip.classList.toggle(‘on’, state[key]); chip.classList.toggle(‘off’, !state[key]); render(); });
chipWrap.appendChild(chip);
});

Advertisement

document.getElementById(‘cat-foot’).innerHTML =
‘Sources: Chris Arvinu2019s 2022 u201CSan Francisco Store Catsu201D map, a May 2026 ‘ +
‘r/sanfrancisco thread, ‘ +
‘SFGATE, the S.F. Chronicle, plus 2024u20132026 listings. Cat residencies change over time.’;

render();
function fix(){ map.invalidateSize(true); }
setTimeout(fix, 200); setTimeout(fix, 800);
window.addEventListener(‘resize’, fix);
}
if (document.readyState === ‘complete’) initMap();
else window.addEventListener(‘load’, initMap);

On the color codes: Green (“reportedly around”) means the cat turned up in a recent account: this week’s thread, a recent review, or some other 2024-to-2026 sign. Cats are old, or wander, or get whisked off in a stranger’s Honda, so a green pin marks a recent mention, not a guarantee the cat will be there when you are. Amber means the cat was on Arvin’s 2022 map and didn’t resurface, so visit on faith. A single ember-red pin is for the one we lost.


Still on patrol, reportedly

Number Five at Grace Nursery, inside the San Francisco Flower Market, 901 16th St (Potrero Hill).

Advertisement

Number Five is a round-faced gray cat who has supervised the wholesale flower market for three years, the fifth pet of florist Grace Su; the name nods to the Chinese tradition of birth-order nicknames, and, she has said, to Chanel No. 5. He patrols the vendor stalls like a floor manager who suspects everyone is slacking.

In May 2026 he was scooped off the floor in the middle of the pre-Mother’s Day rush and driven across the Bay Bridge by catnappers. His admirers found him five days later, perched on a forklift in an Emeryville warehouse, and the police brought him home. He came back a little skinny and a little jumpy, but he came back.


Dogg at George’s Market, 702 14th St (Duboce Triangle).

A senior gray tabby; Arvin’s writeup and George’s regulars both call her “she.” She’s getting on in years, so she’s out front less than she used to be, but she remains a sweetheart, and people in this week’s thread were still checking in on her. There’s a tribute to her on the storefront mural.


FuFu at S&S Grocery, 1461 Grant Ave (North Beach).

A white cat with blue eyes and a job, which is lying in wait near the door to ambush passing dogs. Reviews still mention him doing exactly this, so the post appears to be filled.


Keanu at O’Looney’s Market, 588 Haight St (Lower Haight).

A goofy orange cat who guards the front in the afternoons, then heads out on neighborhood walkabouts, so he’s hit or miss. The visiting family whose post kicked off this week’s thread came looking for him and missed him; the owner tried to track him down anyway. Arvin’s map listed him as “Kiano,” but the block calls him Keanu.

We noted another kitty at this location, per Yelp.

Advertisement

Alex at S&A Liquor, 98 Sanchez St (Duboce Triangle).

A neighborhood favorite a half-block from Duboce Park; the kind of cat people post about just to say they love him.


Toasty & Meow Meow at Seven, 2345 Irving St (Outer Sunset).

Um this may be a couple of cats the writers of this actually saw. At least one of them. Seven is a home-goods store, not a corner store, and it still keeps a couple of very sweet cats. On Arvin’s map the pair was Toasty (who got a friendly star) and Meow Meow; the current cats may have rotated, but cats there are.


Lilly at Michaelis Wine & Spirits, 2198 Union St (Cow Hollow).

The cat of a wine and spirits shop open since 1986, which is a deeply correct place for a cat to be. She looks like she has a great time there.


Mojito at California & Lyon Market, 3100 California St (Presidio Heights).

A friendly cutie who hops onto the counter for pets, a short walk from the Presidio and the Palace of Fine Arts.


Whiskey & Tequila at New Star-Ell Liquor, 501 Divisadero St (NoPa). Whiskey is gray, Tequila is orange.

Reportedly, Tequila was briefly catnapped and came home. Neither is out front all the time, so you take your chances.


Buffy at Buffalo Whole Food & Grain, 598 Castro St (Castro).

Advertisement
Given how young Buffy is, this could be her or just a random kitty in the store that day. From Google reviews.

A playful kitten, about six months old, brand new to the beat.


Not pictured but still on patrol, reportedly:

  • Shadow at Randa’s Market, 3131 16th St (Mission). Reported in this week’s thread as Randa’s cat now, in the months after KitKat. Same counter, same corner.
  • Cinnamon at Stewart’s Market, 2498 Sutter St (Lower Pacific Heights). A corner-grocery cat at Sutter and Broderick.
  • Cookie at Oak Fair Market, 999 Oak St (Lower Haight). A tabby holding the counter on the Alamo Square edge; one thread regular went and said hi mid-conversation, then reported back.
  • Tiger & Bella at Hing Fung Trading Co., 717 Vallejo St (Chinatown). Tiger is a very friendly orange cat; Bella is around too, if you’re lucky. A herb-and-dry-goods shop near Stockton.
  • The Amro Market cat at 2901 Van Ness Ave (Marina). A very friendly cat at the corner of Van Ness and Chestnut.

From the 2022 map

These were on Arvin’s map and didn’t come up in this week’s thread, so we can’t promise they’re still on shift. Worth a look, but go in hopeful rather than certain.

Chucky and unnamed kitty at Flora Grubb Gardens, 3rd & Jerrold (Bayview).

The resident cat at the city’s prettiest plant nursery, which means Chucky lives somewhere that looks like a magazine spread and almost certainly does not appreciate it. On their Instagram, we’ve noticed two kitties. One is orange.


Boots at Hey Neighbor Café, 2 Burrows St (Portola).

A white-pawed cafe cat who was once pictured on the shop’s own website wearing his crown sideways, as a king does. We’ve seen mentions of shop dogs at Hey Neighbor nowadays. This Instagram post from 2022 says Boots had been traumatized.

Not pictured, but also from the 2022 map:

  • The Sun Sun Trading cat at 1226 Stockton St (Chinatown). A cat among the ginseng, dried seafood, and Chinese remedies of a Chinatown trading shop. No name on record.
  • Ruby at Amity Market, 3350 Taraval St (Parkside). White and button-nosed, way out where the avenues run quiet and the fog wins most arguments. A later addition to Arvin’s map.

In memoriam

KitKat at Randa’s Market, 3131 16th St (Mission).

The most famous of all of them, and the reason this map reads a little differently in 2026 than it did in 2022. KitKat was a tabby that Randa’s took in as a stray to keep the rodents down, and over six years he became the opposite of pest control: the reason people came in. Customers brought him toys, blankets, food. He was a “particularly friendly” star on Arvin’s map.

In October 2025, KitKat was killed by a Waymo outside the store. The neighborhood built a memorial at the door. For a couple of weeks he became the face of every feeling this city has been holding about robotaxis and tech and who gets a say in the streets, and then he became what he’d always been, which was a cat somebody loved. Randa’s Instagram bio still reads “Remember KitKat.” We do.

Advertisement

More sightings worth chasing

The Reddit thread turned up more cats than we could pin to a name and a verified address. Treat these as leads, not promises: the corner store at Central and Hayes, where someone once met a cat named Coco; Dad & Son Market at Fillmore and Lombard, said to keep two; a Chinese dry-goods store at Broadway and Stockton with three young cats; Unimart at 8th and Howard, where a mother and two kittens hang around; Larkin Corner Market, whose cat is shy about office hours; Key Food at Fillmore and Oak, which has both a cat and a dog named Major; and a maybe-cat in a corner store at 22nd and Guerrero. And one that isn’t a store at all: Lamont, who holds court at Pop’s, the 1937 dive bar at 2800 24th Street. Not a bodega cat, but a beloved one.


Saul Sugarman is editor-in-chief and owner of The Bold Italic. He is proud stepmother to a senior kitty, Xena, who is warrior princess of San Francisco’s Forest Knolls neighborhood.

The Bold Italic is a not-for-profit media organization, and we publish first-person perspectives about San Francisco and the Bay Area. We operate under a fiscal sponsorship of a 501(c)(3).

You can become a paid subscriber. Or donate. Or learn more about us.





Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

Nine runs? NINE runs! White Sox down Giants with one huge inning

Published

on

Nine runs? NINE runs! White Sox down Giants with one huge inning


SAN FRANCISCO – The top of the fourth inning started innocuously enough for the White Sox during their series opener against the Giants on Friday night at Oracle Park.
Sam Antonacci and Munetaka Murakami were hit by Trevor McDonald pitches and Colson Montgomery ended an 0-for-14 funk with a 3-foot



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

20 women sue SF sheriff after alleged mass strip search ‘for training’

Published

on

20 women sue SF sheriff after alleged mass strip search ‘for training’


Numerous women who were detained in the San Francisco County Jail have accused the department of violating their rights after being subjected to a mass strip search that prosecutors said were used “for training” purposes.

Nearly 20 women have accused the San Francisco sheriff’s office of forcing them to strip naked in the county jail on May 22, 2025, and times before and after that date, while male deputies watched and cracked jokes.

The federal class action lawsuit was filed Friday in the United States District Court for Northern District of California. The suit was filed against the city and county of San Francisco, the SF County Sheriff’s Department, SF County Sheriff and several members of the department, per the complaint obtained by The Post.

Women who were detained in the SF County Jail have accused the department of violating their rights after being subjected to a mass strip search. NBC Bay Area

The women alleged that while they were detained in the county jail, they were subjected to strip searches in front of male deputies who allegedly taunted and filmed them. Prosecutors claimed that this was not by accident and “it was deliberate,” per the complaint.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs include women who were strip-searched before May 22, women who were strip-searched during the mass operation on May 22, and women who were subjected to “suspicionless post-movement strip searches in the months that followed,” the complaint read.

The women claimed they were not only forced to strip naked in front of other women but that this also allegedly occurred while deputies wore body-worn cameras and recorded the searches.

The federal class action lawsuit was filed Friday in the United States District Court for Northern District of California. Th prisonerswithchildren.org

“Multiple plaintiffs heard Sergeant Ibarra, the supervising officer, explicitly instruct Deputy Dockery not to deactivate her body-worn camera during the searches,” per the complaint.

“When Dockery asked whether she should turn her camera off, Ibarra said no. Ibarra later told detainees the footage might be ‘used for training purposes.’”

The complaint goes on to allege that Ibarra “told women the footage was similar to what they ‘see on YouTube’ and was ‘just like ‘Cops’” the TV show.

Advertisement

The San Francisco Sheriff’s Office (SFSO) states that strip searches must be conducted outside the view of anyone not involved and that no male staff are present when women are searched.

The suit also claimed that when various women either complained or filed grievances about the strip searches they were allegedly retaliated against. 

“After plaintiffs LaSonya Wells and Alexcis Herrera organized other women to file tort claims, both were placed in segregation within a week,” the complaint read.

The suit was filed by attorney’s: Elizabeth Bertolino, Molly Ryan, Anthony Label, and Michael Christian. NBC Bay Area

“Sergeant Ibarra directly threatened continued strip searches in November 2025 unless women ceased what he called ‘disrespecting deputies.’”

The suit was filed by attorney’s: Elizabeth Bertolino, Molly Ryan, Anthony Label, and Michael Christian.

Advertisement

Speaking to Mission Local in November, one of the women allegedly subjected to the strip searches talked about the trauma she still feels from it.


Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!
California Post App: Download here!
Home delivery: Sign up here!
Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!


“I’m still having nightmares about it,” one of the women told the outlet.

In November, the SFSO issued a statement that “appropriate personnel action was taken” following the numerous allegations.

“The conduct described is deeply concerning and does not reflect the policies, procedures, or professional standards we require of our staff,” the department told KTVU. 

Advertisement
In November, the SFSO issued a statement that “appropriate personnel action was taken” following the numerous allegations. NBC Bay Area

“We want to acknowledge the women who came forward. Every complaint raised within our facilities is taken seriously, and we remain committed to ensuring that all individuals in our care are treated with dignity, respect, and in full accordance with our policies and procedures.”

The women are seeking “compensatory damages for all constitutional and statutory violations” from things such as alleged emotional distress, trauma, physical injuries, loss of work assignments, etc, per the complaint.

The Post reached out to the San Francisco County Sheriff’s Office for further comment.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Headlines, May 22 – Streetsblog San Francisco

Published

on

Headlines, May 22 – Streetsblog San Francisco


Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you’ll need to reclaim your account by clicking “Forgot your password?” on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending