Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

RV campers forced off San Francisco’s Winston Drive search for new home

Published

on

RV campers forced off San Francisco’s Winston Drive search for new home


Amid San Francisco’s controversial homeless encampment sweeps, city officials are struggling to find places to put all the unhoused people with only about 4,000 shelter beds available to accommodate twice that number of people.

And that does not include people living in their cars or RVs.

Evidence of the RV community on Winston Drive in San Francisco – necessities, simple joys, vices and everything in between – is still visible on the stretch of road near the Stonestown Galleria.

But as of August 1st, the community itself was gone.

Advertisement

At the beginning of August, the city started enforcing the 4-hour parking limit on Winston Drive. That came after two months of rallies and protests by the families that lived there.

The move was a long-time coming, not out of the blue. But it meant the people who lived in RV’s along the road, many of them being families from Central America, had no choice but to leave and find somewhere else to go.

Many of the people relocated to Zoo Road, just about a mile or so away from Winston Drive.

That included Juan Carlos Madrid and his family.

“Everyone who is here, we are the same people who were living on Winston,” he said in Spanish.

Advertisement

Prior to the pandemic, living in an RV wasn’t his reality. He came to America from Honduras 23 years ago. He lived in Daly City, had an apartment and a steady construction job. His life was normal. But that changed with COVID, and his family ended up on Winston Drive.

“We were there for almost five years, until they moved us out,” he said.

Madrid says this is not a long-term solution, but it works for now.

“Here, we live one day at a time,” he said.

Tuesday was not an easy day for the people who have relocated to Zoo Road. SFMTA officers were there doing outreach and parking enforcement.

Advertisement

A spokesperson tells CBS News Bay Area they encourage those experiencing homelessness to take advantage of the SFMTA discount and citation waiver programs if they’ve been impacted by parking limits.

For Eusevia Rosales, it was difficult to watch this unfold just days after she and her family also left Winston Drive.

“I don’t know how to tell you,” she said in Spanish. “I don’t know where we can go.”

She and her family came to the USA from El Salvador about a year ago, hoping for a better life away from gang violence, where she could work and help support her family. She had a job, but says an injury has since prevented her from working. At one point her family had an apartment, but it became too expensive. 

Like Madrid, they ended up on Winston Drive. The little money she has goes towards taking care of her family, she says.

Advertisement

“I’m thinking about a lot of things. But we have to keep going,” she said.

She says she’d like some kind of direction and is pleading for city officials to come up with a solution for families like hers, such as a safe parking zone.

“I’m so stressed out,” she said. “Without knowing where we could go, knowing that we have the kids, and nobody understands the situation that you’re living through.”

The mayor’s office provided CBS News Bay Area with the following statement:

“The city will continue to do outreach and offer support, housing and shelter, while enforcing parking laws in areas where people live in their RVs. Many of the people now on Zoo Road were previously on Winston, where city outreach teams have done extensive outreach with offers of alternatives to parking on the street. The mayor’s office will continue to work with city departments, including SFMTA and HSH on these efforts.”

Advertisement

The City’s Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH) has hosted five services fairs with the people who lived on Winston Drive, including one as recently as June 27. HSH reports engaging with 27 households in an outreach fair, and says 23 successfully moved out of their vehicles and into housing.

But Yessica Hernandez with the non-profit Coalition on Homelessness, says many of the people who are in the RVs ultimately don’t qualify for some services. Getting them into stable housing situations isn’t simple.

“Not a lot of people qualify for housing. The other families who qualified for something was only for the deposit and the first month’s worth of rent,” she said. “They need to find a site where people can park safely.”

Her organization released a statement on Wednesday going into more detail, that reads in part:

“For over three years, the Coalition on Homelessness and our dedicated allies have worked tirelessly to support these communities. We have engaged with city officials, advocated for better housing solutions, and provided as much assistance as resources allow. However, the need far exceeds the available resources, leaving our most vulnerable residents in a precarious situation.  About half the families were able to get subsidized housing over a year ago, but none of the remaining families qualified, not scoring high enough on the city’s coordinated entry assessment tool. Several vacant lots have been identified for safe parking, but action to turn those lots into safe parking has not been taken by San Francisco city officials.”

Advertisement

Hernandez says moving the families around is not a solution; a designated parking lot alone, isn’t either. But she believes a safe parking zone will help bridge the gap as they work towards long-term solutions.

“The best solution is to have a safe parking site, if no housing solutions are available right now,” she said. “We know there are a lot of empty lots around the city. We just need a yes from one of them. We just need a safe parking site where they can park in the meantime, while they find other solutions that are more permanent.”

Madrid says a designated parking place where they can live for now, without worrying if they’ll be forced out, would really help provide a sense of stability.

“We are not a community that makes problems. Just because of the fact that we’re here doesn’t mean that we’re bad people. We’re not bad people,” he said.

On the contrary, he added, saying the majority of people who live in this RV community are families just looking for a better life.

Advertisement

“My dream, is to have a good life with my kids,” he said. “I don’t ask for anything. Only to have a normal life, have an apartment, to have food and clothes for my kids – that’s the American dream.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco Giants Farm System Ranking Takes Hit at Midseason

Published

on

San Francisco Giants Farm System Ranking Takes Hit at Midseason


The San Francisco Giants dropped a few spots in ESPN’s newest farm system rankings, which were based on the MLB Draft, the trade deadline and system graduates.

The Giants’ drop, to some degree, is based on a good thing — quality players graduated from their system.

Those graduates, based on Major League service time, including outfielder Tyler Fitzgerald, pitcher Kyle Harrison and pitcher Keaton Winn. Fitzgerald is having a huge second half of the season, while Harrison is a mainstay in the rotation. Winn is on the 60-day injured list.

Based on those graduations and other factors, the Giants dropped from No. 15 in the preseason to No. 20. That’s based on the system’s surplus value. In the preseason that value was $207 million and it is now $172 million.

Advertisement

So what is surplus value? FanGraphs calculated it based on several factors.

First, the site used historical data to determine what each prospect would do in the Majors if called up. Then, the system used that projection to determine what each player would make during their six controllable years as MLB players. Then, the site added up that value to reach the surplus value for each organization.

The departures of Fitzgerald, Harrison and Winn certainly had an impact. But another pitcher — Hayden Birdsong — is back with the Giants and if he pitches out the season he may graduate from the rankings, too.

San Francisco blunted the loss of some of that surplus value with some of the trades it made at the deadline. For instance, the Giants turned veteran pitcher Alex Cobb into left-handed pitching prospect Jacob Bresnahan, who immediately became the Giants’ No. 23 prospect per Baseball America.

Another new Top 30 prospect for San Francisco is third baseman Sabin Ceballos, who is No. 25. He came to the Giants as part of the deal that sent outfielder Jorge Soler and pitcher Luke Jackson to the Atlanta Braves.

Advertisement

The rise of other prospects in the system could help boost future value, too. Last year’s first-round pick, first baseman Bryce Eldredge, played in the MLB Futures Game last month at All-Star weekend. He is considered the Giants’ No. 1 prospect. He’s already been promoted once this season and he could earn another promotion to Double-A this season.

ESPN also took note of two draft picks that the Giants approached differently when it came to signing them. San Francisco went under-slot with first-round pick James Tibbs III and called him one of the draft’s “riskiest” picks, while going over slot for Dakota Jordan, a player ESPN wrote had “the best tools in the draft.”



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

'Great migration' continues as more Americans flee New York, San Francisco

Published

on

'Great migration' continues as more Americans flee New York, San Francisco


The exodus from major cities in states run by Democrats continues.

A growing number of Americans are migrating from predominantly blue cities like San Francisco and New York, according to a Bank of America analyst note that is based on aggregated and anonymous internal customer data.

Advertisement

In the three-month period from April to June, there were “large population declines” in many Northeastern and Western cities, continuing a long-term trend that began during the pandemic. 

New York and Boston saw the largest net population outflows in the Northeast, while San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, Oregon, saw the largest drops in the West. 

WALL STREET’S FEAR GAUGE SPIKES TO HIGHEST LEVEL SINCE 2020 AS GLOBAL TURMOIL DEEPENS

New York and California have some of the highest tax burdens in the country. San Francisco has also been plagued by a spike in property-related crime, according to the California Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Statistics Center.

A truck is parked in front of a U-Haul facility on Aug. 31, 2020, in New York City. (John Lamparski/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Among the top 23 major metropolitan areas in the country, Columbus, Ohio, saw the biggest influx of people during the second quarter of 2024. That was followed by Austin, Texas; Las Vegas; San Antonio, Texas; and Jacksonville, Florida.

Texas, Florida and Nevada do not have a state income tax.

RECESSION FEARS, MARKET SELL-OFF RAISE ODDS OF A BIGGER FED RATE CUT

Still, the findings from Bank of America also show that fewer households are moving between cities, likely due to the increased “hidden” costs of homeownership. Homeowners’ insurance and property taxes are among the “hidden” costs that have spiked in recent years, particularly in the Sun Belt. 

Gen Z and lower-income households were more likely to relocate in the second quarter, likely due to financial necessity rather than choice, the report said. 

Advertisement
Austin, Texas downtown

A view of downtown Austin, Texas. (iStock / iStock)

“In our view, the current level of inter-city moves is being held back by the ‘hidden’ costs of homeownership, alongside more overt costs such as higher mortgage rates,” the report said. “At the same time, Gen Z and those on lower incomes, particularly renters, are continuing to move.”

Affordability and cost-of-living are most likely the top reasons behind younger Americans and lower-income households moving. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

“It’s also important to note that it’s easier for younger and lower-income households to change addresses because a greater proportion of these consumers are renters rather than homeowners,” the report said. The homeownership rate is just 35% for Americans ages 25 to 30, compared to a 66% rate across all ages.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

SFMTA delays vote on banning right turns at red lights anywhere in SF

Published

on

SFMTA delays vote on banning right turns at red lights anywhere in SF


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — San Francisco transit leaders are tabling a vote that could change just about any road in the city.

The SFMTA Board of Directors will wait to decide whether to ban right turns at red lights anywhere in San Francisco.

SFMTA talked until late Tuesday about plans to implement new restrictions at hundreds of intersections across Downtown neighborhoods.

SF transportation agency wants to expand ‘No Turn On Red’ restrictions in city

Advertisement

The signs will go up in an area that has seen the most accidents involving pedestrians.

One big sticking point – whether to make this a citywide ban.

There have been plenty of close calls on San Francisco city streets involving cars and pedestrians.

“I literally treat cars like they don’t see me because that’s for my own safety,” said Carl Compton of San Francisco.

SFMTA will soon ban drivers from making right turns during red lights at 200 intersections across Downtown neighborhoods including South of Market, Union Square, Chinatown, North Beach and the Financial District.

Advertisement

San Francisco’s traffic engineer approved all these locations for “no turn on red” signs.

“No turn on red” signs went up in the Tenderloin in 2021.

The SFMTA says that helped cut down on the number of people being hit by cars.

MORE: Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of it?

The city has already given the green light for Downtown and SoMa to move forward with the new restrictions.

Advertisement

Now the SFMTA is expected to expand the policy to more neighborhoods.

The expansion is part of San Francisco Mayor London Breed’s plans to curb traffic deaths and serious injuries on city streets.

Advocates for pedestrians say the policy prevents drivers from driving into crosswalks.

Jodie Medeiros is with Walk San Francisco.

“Pedestrian number one capsulitis in all of our traffic violence. More than 50% of our annual fatalities are people crossing, walking in the crosswalk,” said Medeiros.

Advertisement

People who walk and bike in the city are mixed about the new policy.

MORE: To catch a speeder: 33 new speed cameras to be installed in SF

“It doesn’t work. I’m sorry. It doesn’t work,” said Carl Compton of San Francisco. “To put up a policy to make up for bad drivers seems like bad policy.”

“I think it’s a good idea. I think it’s more like an educational thing. People need to know it’s for their own good,” said Alvin Wong of San Francisco.

Many critics question how the new policy will be enforced given the number of.

Advertisement

“It is something we will be asked to be sure that it is enforced. And again, start with education before penalty,” said Medeiros.

We asked SFPD, the mayor’s office, and SFMTA if the city has the capacity to enforce this policy but haven’t gotten a response.

Traffic safety experts believe this “no turn on red policy” will keep people who walk or bike safe.

To be clear, this is not a citywide ban, as some advocates have hoped for. Seattle, Boston, and Washington, D.C. are also considering similar “no turn on red” policies.

Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending