Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Breeze Airways now offers direct flights from Richmond to San Francisco

Published

on

Breeze Airways now offers direct flights from Richmond to San Francisco


RICHMOND, Va. (WRIC) — In celebration of its one-year anniversary in Richmond, Breeze Airways has introduced 4 new highly-anticipated direct flights. Breeze will now fly direct out of Richmond to San Francisco, Hartford, Jacksonville and Windfall, totaling 9 flights out of the river metropolis, together with present flights to Charleston, Las Vegas, New Orleans, Tampa, and West Palm Seashore.

Breeze Airways CEO, David Neelman, mentioned the corporate needs to concentrate on way of life.

“We create these areas the place folks can reside in Charleston. They will fly throughout the day and are available again at night time. So it’s only a higher life,” Neelman mentioned. “We’re specializing in way of life.”

Neelman additionally beforehand co-founded Morris Air, WestJet, JetBlue and Azul Linhas Aereas.

Advertisement

“You don’t add new cities to a metropolis if it’s not going properly, so we’re actually happy with how issues are going right here in Richmond,” Neelman mentioned.

Breeze Airways CEO, David Neelman

The Vice President of Airline Advertising and marketing at Airbus North America, Matthew Saks, mentioned the continuous flights will make the most of the most recent member of the Airbus plane household, the Airbus A220, which makes use of a 3:2 configuration, and is extra fuel-efficient. The aircraft may even have fewer seats than what visitors are used to usually seeing on bigger planes. The A220 could have 126 seats, in comparison with the everyday bigger aircraft which seats 200 or extra.

“It additionally ensures that the passengers have probably the most snug expertise doable,” Saks mentioned. “So if you get onto the plane, you’ll discover that the plane has larger home windows, it’s lighter, it’s airier, and guaranteeing that the passenger, from their perspective, could have a extremely snug journey and revel in their time on the plane.”

Neelman mentioned the nonstop flights will hub to hub, which means the airline – and its clients – shall be saving cash with out connections.

“We simply picked cities from Richmond which have lots of people touring, after which we stimulate it with the decrease fare, and, you recognize, we all the time say, ‘We get you there for twice as sooner, however half the value’,” Neeman mentioned.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

After Missing Housing Goals, SF Has Permit Process Slashed Under New State Law | KQED

Published

on

After Missing Housing Goals, SF Has Permit Process Slashed Under New State Law | KQED


Under SB 423, which passed last year, cities that miss their state goals on planning for new housing must provide an expedited path for approving permits for new developments that meet existing planning standards.

San Francisco will be the first city where the law is triggered after Wiener included language making it the only city with an annual review of its housing permitting goals. Other cities are reviewed every four years.

On Friday, the California Department of Housing and Community Development ruled that San Francisco was falling short of its goal to plan for building 82,000 new units of housing by 2031. Last year, the city authorized just over 3,000 units, according to the San Francisco Planning Department.

Rich Hillis, director of the Planning Department, called the streamlined process instituted by SB 423 “a new era.”

Advertisement

“You could come in today online and apply for a housing project that will be approved by the end of this summer,” Hillis said at a press conference Monday. “And that is truly a game changer, where that would have normally taken a year, two years — or, as Mayor Breed pointed out, sometimes 10 years or more if CEQA is involved and appeals are involved.”

Critics say the penalties instituted by SB 423 were always part of a plan to do away with local control in favor of market-rate developers.

Lori Brooke, co-founder of anti-upzoning group Neighborhoods United SF, called the state’s goal of 82,000 new units for San Francisco “unattainable” and said the city was unfairly singled out by SB 423, which she said “forces the city to haphazardly make changes to zoning and planning that will be felt for the next 100 years.”

“San Francisco is being punished for actions beyond its control — cities don’t build housing; developers do,” Brooke said in a statement.

KQED’s Sara Hossaini contributed to this report.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco PD tests device that can detect fentanyl in saliva

Published

on

San Francisco PD tests device that can detect fentanyl in saliva


By Joanna Putman
Police1

SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco Police Department will soon deploy a drug testing device that tests for fentanyl and other drugs in saliva, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The Dräger DrugTest 5000 is intended to assist in public intoxication arrests, according to the report. The move comes as a part of a yearlong effort to combat the city’s open-air drug markets.

The Dräger device, which tests saliva samples for several different, is already in use for DUI investigations, according to the report. Ryan Kao, director of the SFPD’s Crime Strategies Division, led discussions with Dräger, persuading the company to develop a prototype specifically for detecting fentanyl.

Advertisement

San Francisco police, already contracted with Dräger for other testing purposes, will be the first to field-test the prototype, according to the report. The device operates with a handheld unit and an analyzer, which processes saliva samples to detect eight types of drugs: fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, methadone, benzodiazepines like Xanax and ketamine. Officers must receive consent before administering the test, similar to procedures in DUI cases.

Kao acknowledged that the new system could lead to more arrests but emphasized its role in providing objective evidence for officers, which can be difficult to obtain in public intoxication arrests.

“In an age where we have so much more scrutiny on our officers, this allows them to say, ‘You know what? I’m not just making it up. I have something that’s scientifically backed,’” Kao said.

Advertisement

“[The] shift from making an arrest to preserving life is commendable…” Sheriff Chad Chronister said. ” I [am] proud of our team for taking her into custody safely”

Advertisement

Video: Fleeing driver fires at Texas officers during pursuit

Cedar Hill Police pursued the suspect down a freeway; the man opened the driver’s side door and fired at least one shot at the officers while continuing to flee

Advertisement

Video shows NY officer fatally shooting 13-year-old on ground. Police say he pointed a replica gun

Utica PD officers stopped two teens because they matched descriptions of robbery suspects; one attempted to flee before producing a replica gun and pointing it at officers

Advertisement

July 4 Sales.png

Save on duty gear from the Officer Store, Flying Cross, Southern Police Equipment, Hero’s Pride and Vertx, as well as our recommended Amazon deals

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Franciscans sound off on study labeling city 'worst-run' in the US for second consecutive year

Published

on

San Franciscans sound off on study labeling city 'worst-run' in the US for second consecutive year


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

San Franciscans had mixed reactions while sounding off on a recent study that dubbed their city the “worst run” in the United States for the second year in a row.

Advertisement

The ranking comes courtesy of WalletHub, a personal finance company that measured the “effectiveness of local leadership” by comparing the quality of city services matched against the city’s total budget to determine its operating efficiency. Their “Best & Worst-Run Cities in America” report casts an analytical eye on 148 sizeable U.S. cities, scrutinizing their performance across several critical service categories and 36 key metrics, while also considering their per-capita spending.

“The best-run cities in America use their budgets most effectively to provide high-quality financial security, education, health, safety and transportation to their residents. Many of the top cities also have a very low amount of outstanding government debt per capita, which can prevent financial troubles in the future,” WalletHub analyst Cassandra Happe explained in a report detailing the study earlier this month.

Despite coming in at 24 in quality of services, analysts placed San Francisco last in its total budget per-capita rank, along with having the highest amount of long-term debt outstanding. The city ranked 148th overall.

SAN FRANCISCO DUBBED WORST CITY IN THE UNITED STATES, ACCORDING TO NEW REPORT

San Francisco, California’s Golden Gate Bridge. (iStock)

Advertisement

“I’m not surprised at all,” Tom Wong, a lifelong San Francisco resident who owns a private security firm in the area, told Fox News Digital of the ranking last Monday. “What we have in San Francisco is not a problem of governance. We have a problem with criminals in governance.”

Wong, a Republican, has voiced his dissent with local officials multiple times, including on the Fox News Channel and the FOX Business Network. When asked what he believes caused many of the city’s issues he identified, he restated that dissent.

“The progressive movement is not about making things better. It’s about how much they could grift before it bellies up,” he said. “They’re pushing the limits of how much people will tolerate beforehand so, in order to fix what we have in the city, we need to change just about everything… The city’s broken. That’s because every level of governance is corrupt.”

A second respondent, who asked to remain anonymous, also agreed with WalletHub’s findings.

“As a New Yorker that has been here in San Francisco for well over a decade, I would say, yeah, it’s pretty poorly run. I wouldn’t argue with the findings,” she told Fox News Digital during an interview last Wednesday.

Advertisement

“The budget is $49 billion, and so I think a lot of people and the residents of the city wonder where that money’s going. We know that it’s going to inflated salaries or whatever, but why aren’t they paying teachers and cops? Teachers sometimes have to pay out of their own pocket for supplies for their classrooms, and we’re understaffed with cops. We can’t attract talent because cops aren’t respected here.”

The respondent identified herself as a “left-leaning progressive” who has become more moderate over time. When asked for her thoughts on city leadership, she pointed out a great divide between progressive Democrats and moderates.

“The city supervisors are split. They prevent Mayor Breed from doing her job. We have a lot of city supervisors that are just really toxic, and they are just bottlenecks for Breed,” she said, particularly naming Supervisors Connie Chan, Hillary Ronen, Dean Preston and Shamann Walton.

“They literally oppose law and order,” she added.

SAN FRANCISCO BECOMES ONE OF THE FIRST MAJOR US CITIES TO DELCARE ‘SANCTUARY’ STATUS FOR TRANSGENDER PEOPLE

Advertisement
Democratic San Francisco Mayor London Breed

San Francisco Mayor London Breed listens at a press conference at City Hall on Feb. 16, 2022, in San Francisco, California. Breed criticized WalletHub’s report, calling it “misleading and inaccurate.” (Gabrielle Lurie/The San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Ben Wang, owner of San Francisco clothing store Dare Fashion, offered a different take on the study. While speaking to Fox News Digital last Thursday, he emphasized San Francisco’s unbreakable spirit and its longstanding reputation as a progressive haven, where people could go if they felt they didn’t belong anywhere else.

“I totally disagree that San Francisco is the ‘worst-run’ city,” he said.

“I mean, I don’t know because I don’t live in another city,” he continued. “But it might be a little bit unfair because most of the bigger cities on there [the study] have lower ratings… and that makes a lot of sense because problems get more complicated when you have a bigger city and more diverse neighborhoods, and it doesn’t work all over the city. Whereas smaller cities tend to be a bit more homogenous.” 

Wang additionally disagreed with the study’s general premise and methodology. 

“Philosophically, I don’t agree with these types of rating systems because you’re trying to take something that’s very complicated and put it into a numbered list,” he said.

Advertisement

“As a former scientist, I can understand doing some sort of what’s called a multivariate analysis. You’re putting a lot of variables into something, and you’re trying to get it into one metric, but I didn’t see anything that took into account the size of the city, the population of the city or the population density, as a factor in their multivariate analysis. Without those factors, New York City is really low on their list. So is Los Angeles, so is San Francisco, because I feel like maybe a factor was being left out, which is actually very important.” 

Wang feels that pinning the blame on city officials is largely unfair, given the complex nature of commonly-cited problems like drug use and homelessness. He emphasized the need to “dig around for the roots of the problem” instead of blaming those problems on the people who are trying to fix them, even if their efforts sometimes might not yield positive results.

“Where did this problem start? A lot of the homelessness comes from habitual heroin users, and where did they start? I think Big Pharma started that problem with the opioid crisis, pumping out cheap pills, and telling people they weren’t going to get addicted, and they did.”

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICIALS PUSH FOR DRUG-FREE HOUSING IN REVERSAL OF ‘DRUG PERMISSIVE’ POLICIES: REPORT

San Francisco skyline

Ina Coolbrith Park, San Francisco, California, USA. (iStock)

Despite the respondents each having their own take on the study, they shared a few common themes. For one, they had all witnessed crime to some extent.  

Advertisement

Tom Wong, for instance, told FOX Business’ Ashley Webster last year that his private security firm had been rattled by thieves – both the physical business location and vehicle break-ins as well.

“Safety-wise, it’s not good,” he said of the crime conditions in San Francisco last week. “The reason being is that a lot of the crime is being underreported because there are not enough detectives, so the police are not responding to a lot of calls. The business owners, the homeowners are so fed up that they don’t even report the crime.”

Law enforcement, he elaborated, tends to go after more violent crimes under the assumption that insurance will help cover expenses incurred from burglaries.

“After dark, it’s a Third World country,” he added.

Despite his fashion shop being robbed twice in the last three years – with the most recent incident costing the business a whopping $300K that forced him to set up a GoFundMe page to help alleviate the cost – Ben Wang remains determined not to give up on San Francisco.

Advertisement

“I think it’s a big problem,” he said when asked about crime. Linking back to his cause-and-effect example of Big Pharma instigating drug usage and homelessness, he added that income inequality exacerbated by the COVID pandemic made poorer residents more desperate and therefore more likely to commit crimes.

“I love that San Francisco is a very progressive place, and that the whole idea of this place is that we’re going to try new things. The environmental movement started here, all these cool things, Dotcom and the Silicon Valley… it encourages people to try new things, which is fantastic. One of the things that we tried was not prosecuting, shoplifting and small crimes and also going easier on drug crimes and users and all that stuff, and it didn’t work out well,” he added.

The anonymous respondent shared an experience from her own neighborhood, when a nearby abandoned home was burglarized earlier this year.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The cops are called at 2:30 in the morning on a Monday morning, and you have a bunch of SFPD respond to this call. You could see that the gate was broken. You could see that there was a light on. You could see that there were burglars in the house. The cops even had nest cam footage showing the casing and them coming back with crowbars and flashlights. You had all the evidence,” she said. 

Advertisement

“My husband dealt with the cops and the neighbors. I went back to bed. When I woke up at 8:30 in the morning, their getaway car was still parked outside. The cops left the burglars inside the house because they stated that there wasn’t a homeowner to give them permission to enter the house.”

Meanwhile, Mayor London Breed called WalletHub’s ranking “misleading and inaccurate” because she said the study compared San Francisco’s city and county budget with other cities, which only have city budgets, according to FOX 2, an affiliate based in San Francisco,

The report highlighted her previous remarks from her State of the City Address, where she said, “I’m tired of the people who talk about San Francisco as if our troubles are inevitable and our successes a fluke. Our successes are not a fluke, and they’re not fleeting,” adding, “They’re the product of years of hard work, collaboration, investment, creativity, and perseverance. They’re the output of thousands of people, in government and out, who believe in service not cynicism.” 

All three respondents have their own unique bond with the city – and each raved about it in their own way.

“It is the most beautiful place,” Wong said, adding later, “There’s plenty of good food here.”

Advertisement

The second respondent had some similar opinions to share. “There’s a lot of creative, smart people that live here. We have excellent culture and food. The weather is amazing. We’re close in proximity to Big Sur and Napa. And, if you feel like you need services – not that I do – but it’s nice to know that those services are available to people.”

“You just can’t kill the spirit [of the city],” Wang said.  “That’s what San Francisco has been from the times of the Gold Rush. Chinese people came here early… this was always a place that there was opportunity… Even if it’s taking us a little longer, and we should be backpedaling from some misguided policy or things that we tried that didn’t work, I just I find it difficult to believe that you’re going to really kill the spirit of the city.”

Fox News’ Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending